tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5168353211979506184.post9197067170502568467..comments2023-11-02T07:33:16.948-04:00Comments on Continuing Counter Reformation: Troy Maxi Conversation About EJP Controlled OppositionDouglas Andrew Willingerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06412711658495398785noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5168353211979506184.post-42283710087403660862011-10-16T12:06:14.406-04:002011-10-16T12:06:14.406-04:00Looks like King James did accept the Templar found...Looks like King James did accept the Templar founded Order of the Garter at some early stage of his life. However, sometimes these knighted kings converted to Christian. This was certainly the case with King James and at least a few others in Prussia.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/kjreve20.htm" rel="nofollow"><b>King James, Meditation on Revelation</b></a><br /><br />“The Pope is Antichrist, and Popery the loosing of Satan, from whom proceedeth false doctrine and cruelty to subvert the kingdom of Christ: Now whether the Pope beareth these marks or not, let any indifferent man judge; I think surely it expounds itself: Doeth he not usurp Christ his office, calling himself universal Bishop and head of the Church? Playeth he not the part of Apollyon, and Abbadon the king of the Locusts and destroyer, or son of perdition, in chopping and changing of souls betwixt heaven, hell, and his fantastic or imagined purgatory at his pleasure? Blasphemeth he not, in denying us to be saved by the imputation of Christ his righteousness? Moreover, hath he not sent forth and abused the world with innumerable orders of locust and shavelings? Hath he not so fully ruled over the world these many hundredth years, as to the fire went he, whosoever he was, that durst deny any part of his usurped supremacy?”....“But I am sure none will condemn me for an heretic, save such as make the Pope their God...” (King James I, A Meditation on Revelation; Premonition).<br /><br /><b>"locust and shavelings"</b><br /><br />Locust, an apparent reference to Rev 9 possibly denoting Islam; and shavelings refers to priests.<br /><br />Whether King James was Knighted or even a Christian has no bearing on the accuracy of the KJB translation, and to imply KJ was "Jesuit controlled" as they attempted assassination of the entire govt thru Guy Fawks is dogmatic.<br /><br />It was Queen Elizabeth I and King James who founded the Protestant British Colonies in the New World. These were Protestant founded and governed. Only after King James was Maryland founded for the Catholics, then the masonic American Revolution and subsequent founding of their Capital in Maryland, Washington.ColKlinkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08630751805833671271noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5168353211979506184.post-67557685416980457292011-10-12T23:58:30.521-04:002011-10-12T23:58:30.521-04:00There is zero proof KJ was knighted of any sort. T...There is zero proof KJ was knighted of any sort. There is ample proof he refused or was never offered the vestments of the Order of the Garter, along with Queen Elizabeth I, which is why the Jesuits tried to assassinate both of them. People often attack KJ to support their new version Bibles used to support some false doctrine. The 1611 KJV is an old english and that includes the Apocrypha so the newer editions would be preferred. Perhaps visit Bible Protector on Youtube as to which KJB is the better edition.ColKlinkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08630751805833671271noreply@blogger.com