Continuing Counter Reformation: Pomerania

Showing posts with label Pomerania. Show all posts

Thursday, September 8, 2011

Terrible & PREMEDITATED

excerpted from: http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2009/07/wlodimir-ledochowski-kulturkampf_17.html

A revenge more terrible then commonly acknowledged.

The idea of setting up Germany to start and loose a brutal war with severe consequences eastward undeniably dovetails with the Jesuit Order's major goal of recapturing lands previously lost to “heretics” such as Lutherans, notably the post WW2 partition of East Prussia, historically the 1^st Lutheran state in 1525.

De Zayes book focuses exclusively upon the expulsion of the ethnic Germans as a terrible revenge for the crimes of the 3^rd Reich; it overlooks the broader picture of a continuing counter reformation directed by a man born into a prestigious Polish ‘Noble’ family – so-known for their devotion to the Vatican – who was only about 8 years old when his uncle Mieczyslaw was imprisoned by Otto Von Bismarck, leader of the predominantly Protestant state of Prussia that would prominently defy the Vatican with its KULTURKAMPF.

Wlodimir (Vladimir) Ledochowski's Goal Predicted by Maximillian Kolbe in 1938?

Wlodimir (Vladimir) Ledochowski: War Culpability Admission – Oder Neisse Line/Destruction of Prussia the ‘aim’ of the counter reformation

Rome's planned theft of the predominately Protestant areas of East Prussia, Pomerania, Silesia, etc to the north, came as the cap stone of an agenda of bloody religious war for the gain of the Roman Catholic Church Empire: a 20^th century continuation of the counter reformation.

Crafted by the Jesuit Superior General, who was only 8 years old when Protestant Prussia imprisoned his Cardinal Uncle Mieczyslaw Ledochowski, as a most plausible childhood revenge vow.

Wlodimir Ledochowski 1872

about when Bismarck’s Prussia expelled the Jesuit Order

from united Germany

Baltimore newspaper April 17, 1915

“When the new Black Pope was yet a lad he witnessed the persecution and imprisonment of his uncle, the late Cardinal Ledochowski , who had estates in German Poland, and whom Bismarck regarded with mingled fear and hatred of the persecuted Poles in Germany”

Cardinal Mieczyslaw Ledochowski

b. October 29, 1822 – d. July 22, 1902

1871-1918 German 2^nd Reich, with Polish majority Posen/Poznan

Cardinal Miecczyslaw Ledochowski was a key figure in the Prussian-Vatican conflict.

From The Washington Post, January 15, 1913

The Washington Post on Cardinal Mieczyslaw Ledochowski

“He spent two full years in prison before being liberated and sentence to exile, and he then proceeded to Rome where he lived as the honored guest, first of Pius IX and then of Leo XIII, exercising a potent influence at the Vatican. So much so, indeed, that before Bismarck would consent to a cessation of the so-called Culterkampf, he insisted that Cardinal Count Ledochowski should leave Rome and cease to be a member of the Pope’s immediate entourage.”

Miesczyslaw Ledochowski was a Vatican official representing a nexus of power higher then the Pope, who, vengeful for Prussia's Kulturkampf, was desirous of future war.

This is what the NY Times published in 1892: The New York Times On the Papacy and Cardinal Mieczyslaw Ledochowski

It is very well understood, however, that Monaco is entirely under the control of Ledochowski, that proud, imperious, and able Pole who made Bismarck such worlds of trouble in the old Kulterkampf day and who has been able to impose his will very often upon even the present Pope. This powerful man was in a German prison when Pius IX created him a Cardinal in 1875. Next year he was released and banished, and he has since lived in Rome, devoting his great wealth and talents to building up a militant Ultramontagne party about him. His wrath at the treatment he received at the hands of Bismarck has colored all his political views. He has hated both Germany and Italy and has looked unceasingly forward to the time when French bayonets should restore the temporal power of the Vatican in the old Roman States.

If we assume that this spirited and resolute prelate will shortly be ruling the Church through its nominal head, it becomes a most anxious question how he will accept the existing political conditions of Europe which have so radically changed since 1875. The new rulers of the Germans have been at pains to show their desire to abolish the last traces of the Kulterkampf. When the pending Prussian Education bill is passed, the German Catholics will be actually stronger than they were before the May laws. During the last half year these dispatches have frequently reflected the new interest which William and his immediate entourage are displaying in the Polish question. Of course a good deal of this has arisen naturally from the contemplation of the necessity of sooner or later fighting Russia: but even more it represents the effort to allure Ledochowski into friendship with Germany by an appeal to his national sentiment. How far this has successor will be, as has been said, a most anxious question.

In any event under this new regime there would be an abrupt cessation of pastorals on Socialistic and labor problems and of poems about St. Thomas Aquinas. We should instead see the Vatican boldly embark upon the troubled waters of European diplomacy, seeking alliances and taking desperate risks upon the fortune in the next war.

So, apparently, was the Pope (with his doctrine of 'papal infallibility"):

On January 18th, 1874 -- thus on the anniversary of the founding of the German Reich -- he declared at an assembly of international pilgrims that Bismarck was the serpent in the paradise of mankind. This serpent seduced Germans into wishing to be more than god himself. Such an overextension of the human self would be followed by a humiliation such as no people had ever before tasted!

Only the Eternal one knew whether or not the grain of sand on the mountains of eternal retribution had already been released.

This retribution was growing to avalanche proportions and it would rush in a few years at the clay feet of this Reich and transform it into ruins. This Reich, which, like the tower of Babel, had been erected in defiance of god, would pass away to the glory of god.

Pope Pius IX (May 13, 1792 – February 7, 1878),

born Giovanni Maria Mastai-Ferretti,
Pope, elected June 16, 1846, served 31+ years until his death in 1878.

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Wlodimir Ledochowski's Masonic Tool FDR

http://www.hnn.us/blogs/comments/27592.html
Keith Halderman
Consequences of Hate
In his post below David Beito quotes Franklin Roosevelt as saying "We have got to be tough with Germany and I mean the German people not just the Nazis. We either have to castrate the German people or you have to treat them in such a manner so they can't go on reproducing." This quotation has elicited two comments of defense from Craig J. Bolton. In the first he recalls “only two recorded incidents of opposition by the German people” and he ends the second one with the adage; “Ideas have consequences. Bad ideas have bad consequences.” I agree with this line and the notion expressed in the above Roosevelt comment was a bad idea with bad consequences for both Germans and Americans.
I am now in the process of reading The New Dealers’ War: FDR and the War Within World War II by Thomas J. Fleming. This book is doing something I would have thought impossible, it is lowering my opinion of FDR even further.
While Craig Bolton may or may not be correct about there being only two overt incidents of opposition to the Nazis there certainly was a great deal of high level covert support for internal regime change including a very famous assassination attempt in East Prussia. According to Fleming Admiral Wilheim Canaris head of the German Military intelligence organization, the Abwehr, met secretly in Spain, during the summer of 1943, with the heads of American and British intelligence. They hammered out a peace plan which included a cease fire and the elimination of Hitler. Roosevelt rejected this offer refusing to negotiate with “these East German Junkers” and all other overtures from Germans yearning for the Nazis’ downfall.
In fact, when Roosevelt unexpectedly announced, against the opposition of Churchill and his own military commanders, that unconditional surrender was the only acceptable end to the war, he created a great obstacle for those Germans who wished Hitler gone and the carnage over. The policy proved to be a big unifier of the Hitler’s people. We can never know if some Allied encouragement and a different set of demands might have been enough for the success of Admiral Canaris and like minded Germans in their goal of ending the war sooner. However it is not unreasonable to say that FDR’s hatred and determination to punish may very well have cost tens of thousands of Americans their lives.

Posted on Monday, July 3, 2006 at 2:19 AM
AND German AND British AND.... by Sudha Shenoy (July 3, 2006 at 4:38 AM)
Re: AND German AND British AND.... by Jonathan Dresner (July 3, 2006 at 4:49 AM)
Re: AND German AND British AND.... by Robert Higgs (July 3, 2006 at 12:47 PM)
Re: AND German AND British AND.... by Keith Halderman (July 3, 2006 at 12:20 PM)
Re: AND German AND British AND.... by Jonathan Dresner (July 4, 2006 at 5:03 PM)
Re: AND German AND British AND.... by Robert Higgs (July 4, 2006 at 7:42 PM)
Welllll [Part 2] by Craig J. Bolton (July 3, 2006 at 5:44 PM)
Re: Welllll [Part 2] by Keith Halderman (July 3, 2006 at 7:28 PM)
Re: Welllll [Part 2] by Craig J. Bolton (July 4, 2006 at 6:37 PM)
Re: Welllll [Part 2] by Keith Halderman (July 5, 2006 at 10:33 AM)
Conditional surrender by Robert Higgs (July 4, 2006 at 7:50 PM)
Re: Conditional surrender by Keith Halderman (July 5, 2006 at 10:08 AM)
Re: Conditional surrender by Craig J. Bolton (July 5, 2006 at 1:21 PM)
Re: Conditional surrender by Robert Higgs (July 5, 2006 at 2:58 PM)
What about Italy? by Paul Noonan (July 5, 2006 at 4:52 PM)

Post a Comment

What rules govern discussion boards?

If you have not already, you must Sign Up before you can post.
User Name:
Password:
Remember Me
Subject:
Comment:

FDR's attitude would be strategically critical for the Oder Neisse line, the destruction of Prussia and the expulsion of its peoples.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Wlodimir (Vladimir) Ledochowski: BDV To Target?

From the Bund Der Vertriebenen (League of German Expellees)

http://www.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bund-der-vertriebenen.de%2F&langpair=de%7Cen&hl=en&ie=UTF8

08.10.2008

Military History Research Office sees origins of expulsion long predating WW2

To the increased reclamation of the expulsion of the Germans by today's historians says the President of the Confederation of displaced persons, Erika Steinbach MP:

In the final band of professionals nationally and internationally acclaimed series "The German Reich and the Second World War" Militärgeschichtlichen Research Office of the history of displacement and their classification in the historical context condition. The causes and course of displacement in all its complexity and illuminates the historical context. The displacement is not only a direct consequence of the Second World War, but also in connection with the events in Europe before the Second World War must be seen.

It is good that German history relevant institutions, such as the Military History Research Office, leaders in their editions the expulsion of the Germans at the end of the Second World War. This largest ethnic cleansing in Central European history now requires just a technically competent historical assessment.

The now persistently high interest of science and media at issue can be an even deeper and more neutral handling this part of German history expected.

Finally there should be a fair assessment of the stakeholders and respect for all victims of war and violence.

If the Bund Der Vertriebenen leadership fails to spotlight Ledochowski, or participates in any cover up, its membership MUST bring about a new leadership.