Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Against the Jesuitical Racism of Eric Jon Phelps

BROTHER MAXI ATTACKING YOUR POSITION ON RACISM

I DECIDED LONG TIME AGO TO BE SILENT ABOUT THIS TOPIC, ONLY GOD AND I KNOWS WHY. BUT I CAN NOT DO IT ANYMORE BECAUSE NOW I BAPTIZED MYSELF IN THE NAME OF CHRIST ONLY.

ERIC, AND IT HURTS MYSELF TO SAY THIS: YOUR POSITION REGARDING RACISM, (IS NOT NAZI, AND) IS NOT BIBLICAL.

TAMAR, RAHAB, AND BOAZ, ANCESTORS OF MY LORD, JESUS CHRIST, WERE HAMITES! EVEN YAHWEH MY FATHER USED THE PROPHET NATHAN TO REBUKE THE KING DAVID FOR KILLING THE HUSBAND OF BETHSEBA, URIAH THE HITTITE, WHO WAS A HAMITE!

SO, THE BIBLE NOT ONLY DO NOT CONDEMNS INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE BUT DEFENDS IT THE BIBLE IS ONLY RACIST IN SPIRIT AND NOT IN FLESH. BECAUSE THE REFORMERS WERE WHITES FOR ALMOST THE SAME REASON THAT THE JEW WERE THE FIRSTS CHRISTIANS.

THIS LETTER ALSO WORKS AS A DOCUMENT WHICH WILL DEMONSTRATE IF OUR BELOVED FRIEND AND TEACHER OF THE CLASS OF THE JESUIT HISTORY, IS OR IS NOT A TRUE CHRISTIAN, BECAUSE IS UNDENIABLE THAT RAHAB, TAMAR AND BOAZ WERE OF THE "RACE" OF HAM.

IF ERIC JON PHELPS AND ANY OTHER, CONTINUE TO PUT HIMSELF IN THE "ANTI-MULTICULTURALISM" SIDE OF THE RACIAL WAR'S HEGELIAN DIALECTIC EQUATION (MULTICULTURALISM ANTI-MULTICULTURALISM=RACIAL WAR FOR DESTABILIZATION OF THE WEST), THEN I, AS A TRUE CHRISTIAN, HAVE NO OTHER OPTION THAT TO SEE A PRO-JESUITICAL SPIRIT IN THAT BEHAVIOR. [emphasis ADDED]

CHRIST, THE TRUTH, IS THE ANSWER!

IN YAHWEH MY FATHER, THROUGH JESUS MY LORD.

BROTHER MAXI.


---

A State prohibition upon Jewish-Aryan marriages is Jesuit and Nazi; asides from that, I agree with this statement of Brother Maxi, and add the above emphasis.

FACEBOOK Note page- Against the Jesuitical Racism of Eric John Phelps
https://www.facebook.com/notes/douglas-willinger/against-the-jesuitical-racism-of-eric-jon-phelps/209352609123455




20 comments:

Amish said...

I agree. This is very odd behavior from Phelps.
The KKK were a Templar masonic post Civil War society to scare the newly freed black away from anything Christian. The Wizard Knights would often burn crosses.
Phelps was accused of being some kind of Jesuit from the very beginning for his Christian Zionist support of the Israel state deception.

Douglas A. Willinger said...

I agree, aprticularly if your refering to the *exclusionary* nature of Masonic Zionism, as I support the right of return for Jews and those considered non Jews to immigrate to Israel, Judea and Samaria, and purchase land and homes from willing sellers.

Reincarnated Prussia will have the return of many Germans; but that must not mean any forcing out of Poles, Balts, Russians.

As I see it, the reincarnated multi-ethnic Prussia is a must to set Israeli Zionism right- with right of return for those now unfortunately undre the Roman promoted identity of "Palestine".

Note that Palestine is a Roman colonial name, whereas Israel, Judea, Samaria, Prussia, Pomerania, and Silesia are indigeoneous names (perhaps english or latin translations).

Further note that the colonial and later landed Germans adopted the name of Prussia rather then caling it say New Palatinate.

Douglas A. Willinger said...

I agree, aprticularly if your refering to the *exclusionary* nature of Masonic Zionism, as I support the right of return for Jews and those considered non Jews to immigrate to Israel, Judea and Samaria, and purchase land and homes from willing sellers.

Reincarnated Prussia will have the return of many Germans; but that must not mean any forcing out of Poles, Balts, Russians.

As I see it, the reincarnated multi-ethnic Prussia is a must to set Israeli Zionism right- with right of return for those now unfortunately undre the Roman promoted identity of "Palestine".

Note that Palestine is a Roman colonial name, whereas Israel, Judea, Samaria, Prussia, Pomerania, and Silesia are indigenous names (perhaps English or Latin translations).

Further note that the colonial and later landed Germans adopted the name of Prussia rather then calling it say New Palatinate.

Douglas A. Willinger said...

Posted: Aug 19 2011, 05:04 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 3,808
Member No.: 1
Joined: 17-March 11




Mister Eric Jon Phelps,

Hello,

How can you call me "dear" when you condemn me?

First, ¿what have anything to do the doctrine of the Trinity with the Concept of Racism? Although, we both know that is a typical and old discussion between the so called "christians", and that the second is a consecuence of first... You deny the biblical doctrine of the One True God. One (1) True God, Yahweh, My Father (1≠3<=>2+2≠5). I do not deny the Deity (with a capital letter "D", not a minuscle letter "d") of the risen Lord Jesus Christ. Becouse Christ is named as a Mighty God, but only Yahweh is the Almighty God. (Isaiah 9:6) Both are Alpha and Omega becouse both were involved in the Creation. "But to us [there is but] ONE God, the Father, OF whom [are] all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, BY whom [are] all things, and we by him. (1 Corinthians 8:6). Therefore YOU are not a saved men becouse you deny Christ, and deny God, becouse you idolatrously worship Three Gods instead of just One God, Yahweh The Father, becouse: " this is life eternal, that they might know thee the ONLY TRUE GOD, AND Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent." (John 17:3) ¿You call me a sinner? When it's you who preach another gospel based when you preach the apostate babilonical baptism based not in the name of Jesus as the Apostles did, but in the name of a Mysterious Trinity. And becouse you are who deny this most biblical baptism into the name of Jesus for the remission of sins, therefore you are the sinner and not me. Therefore it's you who are spiritual son of your spiritual father the Devil, the Adversary, the Liar, and not me. Therefore, you are not a true christian, Mister Eric Jon Phelps! You know much about the Jesuit Order and Calvinism, but you know nothing about the Bible and the True Christianism. I declare myself, rigth now, first and to all, a True Christian, and a Servetist (who was not a Jesuit as you said, and who was a True Reformer, and who was slowly burned alive for 30 minutes by Calvin), only in an illustrative and metaphorical way. Your list of scriptures that supposedly support the doctrine of Trinity, and others lists and heresies of others unsaved mens regarding this issue is now, completely answered by me and i will send to you this information hoping to you to repent. (Just wait until i translate all that information into english becouse you can not understand the sophisticated and rich spanish lenguage). And as i said, I DO NOT DENY THE DEITY OF CHRIST (and why you say "deity"? thus you recognize there is only One True God?), it's you who denies it, becouse you say that Yahweh is Jesus, therefore you merge two Gods and persons into one God and person, and this is idolatry. And you know what happens to the idolaters.

Douglas A. Willinger said...

Secondly, your position on seeking to preserve your "white race" is NOT biblical. Becouse as i prove WITH THE BIBLE, God condemns the Racism. God did separated the humans, and with the Great Commision united again all humans and "races" in Christ. Becouse the Bible, the word of God, clearly says: "Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in my name. Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you." (Matthew 28:19,20 [without the Comma Johanneum Jesuitical Interpolation!]) It is God who will preserve the nations and "races" not you. You have lied to me and others when you said that Noah put a curse over the Hamites, becouse, as i have investigated and proved the Canaanites never ruled above the Shemites, but the Hamites indeed ruled above Shemites and Jephethians and even over Israelites! The curse of Noah was only related to the Canaanites and was accomplished when Israel ruled above the Canaanites. Therefore repent and apologize for say that lie, and for spreading the hate USING THE BIBLE TO DO IT! Again, i say this to you becouse i love you, not becouse i hate you, becouse if i would hate you i would not say nothing to you, like some do. Repent, repent, repent! There is no biblical and scientific basis for divide the humans into "races" as proved by the science today. Such science that you and others will fanatically call "jesuitical science" with no prove whatsoever only becouse does not fit with your fleshly point of view. If Jesus himself said in Matthew 19:6, regarding marriage: "What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder", the more we must not separate humans which God hath joined together, becouse if the Bible says that about "One Flesh" the more we the True Christians must be united becouse we are "ONE BLOOD" (Acts 17:16). We find another proof in John 17:11 that Jesus my Lord, called us to be "one" like the Father and Christ are one. (Yet another proof that Jesus is not Yahweh and that the christians must be united).

Douglas A. Willinger said...

Lastly, notice what the Holy Scripture say about we, the True Christians, in 1 Peter 2:9: "But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light". Now, the greek word translated as "generation" is "génos" (gr. γένος) which LITERALLY means "RACE". Don't you preach an always literal Bible? Then you contradict youserlf and therefore say that the Bible contradicts itself! Repent! Repent today... The Communist Socialist Doctrine of the Multiculturalism is a great sin like the Fascist Nacional Socialist Doctrine of the Anti-Multiculturalism is also a great sin. Becouse God condemns both doctrines, becouse both deny Christ. If they were True Christians then it would does not matter what culture thay would have. You, better that anyone else knows that the Jesuit Order used and use both doctrines, the Doctrine of the Racism first, and the Doctrine of the Anti-Racism today. But the Bible only preach a Spiritual Racism (Deuteronomy 7:3-4; 1 Corinthians 7:39; 2 Corinthians 6:14) and as you see, this is the only "Interracial Marriage" which is based on Spirit, not in flesh! This two damned doctrines of "Multiculturalism" and "Anti-Multiculturalism" are just the Thesis and Antithesis of this Hegelian Dialectic which will led to the Racial War for the Desestabilization of the West! Therefore is a great sin that you put yourself into one side of this satanical equation! If the Great Whore recognize that "Multiculturalism is a great mistake" (don't you think is strange?) is becouse they want to create, incite and excite the "Anti-Multiculturalism" against the "Multiculturalism". Becouse you and they say this, therefore both you and them recognize what i have denounced. Finishing, was not "white" but christians whom give us the Freedoms and Sciences that we enjoy today. How can you talk about Freedom when you worship John Calvin who condemned the Freedom of Conscience when he killed Servet? The Calvinists persecuted (in a minor way) the true christians like the Great Whore did. Therefore to day that was "whites" persons who give us the Bible and therefore Freedom, and not saying that was christians who did it, then you converts the work of the Holy Spirit of God in a fleshly issue, and therefore preachs doctrines of mens instead of the correct doctrine of God. Don't you know that one of the firsts christians involved in the evangelization of Europe was Simeon that was called Niger, a black men? (Acts 13:1-4) Therefore is an issue of spiritual races and not of human races which is involved in the creation of the Modern Era. If you say the opposite, then you deny God.

Douglas A. Willinger said...

Thirdly, all of whom i describe as "Hamites" was Hamites! Amen! Uriah indeed was a Hamite, becouse he was an Hittite, and the Hittites descent from Heth, and Heth was the second son of Canaan which was a son of Ham! (Genesis 10:15,6) This is also recognized by the most respetables Bible Scholars like Barne, Clarke, Gill, Jamieson-Fauset, Mendenhall, Humble, Speiser, Bryce, Jones, etc, etc. Even the name "Hittites" literally means "The Childrens of Heth"! Now, the Bible says that the Hittites was Hamites, but, just becouse some scholars say that what the Bible say is a lie and that this "Hittites" of the Bible do not lived in Israel but lived in Turkey, then you obey mens more than the Bible? This a great heresy and blasfemy against the Holy Scriptures and the word of God. I must tell you that the question of whether the Biblical Hittites of the first half of the first millennium BC are identical to the earlier Anatolian Hittites is still disputed in academic Biblical and ancient Near Eastern studies. The fact that Bathseba took a foreign husband is proof that God do not condemns Material Racism Intermarriage, but Spiritual Racism Intermarriage. The exception is the rule! You talk about the Abrahamic Covenant. ¿Don't you know that Tamar was the mother of two sons of Judah, the twins Perez and Zerah? Don't you know that she is mentioned even in the Genealogy of Jesus? Therefore you do not understand and deny the Bible. I can not believe it! You say that Boaz was not a descendant of ham, when he was the son of Rachab when she married Salmon of the tribe of Judah! This is mentioned in the Genealogy of Jesus! And Rahab was indeed a Hamite of dark skin. Tamar was also a black hamite woman. And all of these exceptions are not the rule? Your rule is material racial separation, but the rule of God is spiritual racial separation. Do not contradict the Bible! Remember that does not matter what Sarah wanted, becouse God himself chosed an egyptian woman, Hagar, to be the concubine of Abraham and she was the mother of Ishmael! Indeed Sara was "hateful". Don't you remember when Sara laughed at God? So, that "racial" family is an invention of yourself and others which born from the fleshly traditions of mens, but not from the Bible. As you recognized we can find much others black hamites womans as wives of important mens chosed by God like, Zipporah the Kushite the wife of Moses, Tamar the hamite wife of Judah, and Asenath the hamite egyptian wife of Josheph, which was the mother of the patriarchs of the Israelite tribes Manasseh and Ephraim! Therefore, THE ESCEPTION IS THE RULE! And if you deny it then you deny ALL THE BIBLE!

Douglas A. Willinger said...

The greatest threat are not nations, "races" or institutions mister Eric Jon Phelps, but the christians... the christians... the true christians... God use the nations, but love and use even more his childrens the christians, of whom you don't know nothing.

Thanks to Yahweh my Father for the great racially mixed peoples of South America! We will never be free only if we don't know The Truth, not if some white men don't come to help us! I will do more to the freedom of thw world that you becouse i care much more that you about The Truth. "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32) The only way in what i can support you is in this figth against the Jesuit Order. But in doctrinal and biblical points i do not know you. Brazil is a great nation of which you do not know nothing.

You, Eric, are facilitating that jesuitical destruction by backing the Black Pope’s “antimulticulturalism.” It is you that is exhibiting a pro-Jesuitical spirit in your doctrine. Becouse, again, i am not a "Multiculturalist" but a "Culturalist" and not a "Racist" but a Rampant "Spiritual Racist". And i discriminate you.

And, although the greek word for "God" does not appear in the earliest manuscripts of 1 Thimothy 3:16, indeed Jesus the Christ, the Anointed, it is the only answer (not a groups of mens) and it is A God manifested in the flesh, but not THE God Yahweh the Father. The hebrew word "Eyheh" אהיה of Exodus 3:14 do not means "I AM", go to a hebrew dictionary and discover that means "I WILL BE". Go back two versicles and read in Exodus 3:12, when the SAME WORD "Eyheh" is used and discover that it says "I WILL BE with you...". Therefore you know knothing about the Bible.

As i said: i do not deny the Deity of Christ, (i deny that Yahweh is Jesus). And as i said, you don't know Christ, and Christ do not know you.

I will pray to the Father through Christ in order that they change your heart to make you repent and then i could receive you with Christ as my brother.

This discussion will be closed only when you devote your life to Christ.

In Yahweh my Father, through His Son Jesus the Christ.

(Not your) Brother Maximiliano Aguaisol from Argentina.

Douglas A. Willinger said...

From: eric@vaticanassassins.org
To: dmaxi_gsl@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: Brother Maxi Attacking Your Position On Racism.
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 09:21:34 -0400


Dear Maxi,



First, you deny the biblical doctrine of the One Triune God. You deny the deity of the risen Lord Jesus Christ. Therefore, you are not a saved man, you are yet in your sins (Ephesians 2), your spiritual father is the devil (John 8). I have written to you before on this topic, given you a list of scriptures for your consideration as to the deity of Christ, and you never answered me.



Secondly, my position on seeking to preserve my White race is most biblical. God created the White race through Japheth. He did so to SEPARATE man by race, the three racial classes being from Shem, Ham and Japheth. To then seek to preserve the White race which God created is a good deed and most biblical. To mix the White race with other races is not good, not biblical. Further, to mix White nations with other races, and nations of other races, is not biblical: this I seek to resist. “Multiculturalism” is s great sin before God, a destructive force used by the Jesuit Order against its historical foe, White Protestants and Baptists composing once White Protestant and Baptist nations. Even apostate White Protestant/Roman Catholic Germany has now admitted that “multiculturalism” is a failure.



Thirdly, as to all those whom you describe as “Hamites,” here are a few comments. Uriah was not a Hamite, he was a Hittite, the Hittites being a mixed race having descended from Shem and are now the Turks---a White, olive-skinned people in general. Nonetheless, the exception is not the rule. Simply because Bathsheba took a foreign husband, this does not mean God desired his racial Hebrew/Jewish/Israelites to mix with foreign races/nations. If this was done as a matter of policy, then the racial Abrahamic Covenant would be rendered of none effect. Boaz was not a Hamite; he was a racial Jew of the tribe of Judah, seven generations removed from Judah and Tamar! Ruth was from Moab, a nation descended from Lot and his daughter, both Shemites and related to Abraham. Hence, Ruth was not a Black Hamite. Rahab was the harlot of Jericho, a city of Canaanites descended from Ham. Hence, she may be considered to be of the Black race, but again, this exception is not the rule. Tamar was a darker-skinned Gentile of the Canaanites who was the daughter-in-law of Judah. So we see that there are exceptions to the rule, but the rule is racial separation unto nationhood, a nation to be of a specific race. Remember that Sarah did not want a Canaanite to be a daughter of her son Isaac. Was Sarah a hateful “racist?” No, rather she sought to keep with her racial family. Other Hebrew/Jewish/Israelites took foreign wives of darker skin, like Judah and Moses, but God worked it for good in the creation of the twelve tribes of Israel. Joseph was given a White Egyptian wife by pharaoh hence the lighter-skinned tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh, yet God also worked that for good. The above reasons is why we see skin color variation among the Jews.

Douglas A. Willinger said...

As I have said, the general rule is racial separation since God created the races through the three sons of Noah to the end of separating mankind. For if we are not separated by race, language and nation, we will unite against God as did the one race of Man before the Great Flood. Historically, it was the White Roman Catholics of Spain and Portugal and Italy that, in general, did not hesitate to race mix with the Blacks and Shemites of South America. The White English and German Protestants of North America, generally, did not race mix with the Blacks and Shemites of North America. Racial separation was the law in Protestant/Baptist North America and hence the US became the greatest threat to the Black Pope’s quest for the destruction of the White Protestant Reformation. Part of that plot was to destroy the White race, hence the slave trade was put upon the colonies by the Jesuit-controlled British Monarchs, the Blacks intended to be used to kill the White Protestants as per the very words of Jefferson in a provision of the Declaration of Independence, but stricken from that document before its signing.

Now just look at the fruit of race-mixed South America. Those peoples are completely at the mercy of the Black Pope’s International White Power Structure. They will never be free---unless some White Protestant nation helps them out of their slavery. (That is why you, Maxi, should support me.) And how can that ever transpire unless there is, in fact, a White Protestant nation somewhere in the world, I would add, governed by true White Protestant and Baptist nationalists and not the pope of Rome! Just look a Cuba! It is a race-mixed, immoral, crime-ridden, Roman Catholic nation under the dictatorship of a White Roman Catholic Freemason, Fidel Castro and his brother! Just look at Jesuitical Brazil---it is 50/50 White and Black, Roman Catholic and enslaved to White King Juan Carlos, one of the kingpins of Rome’s White Power Structure. And now look at the once White Protestant and Baptist America AFTER the Jesuit Order’s wicked, socialist-communist Civil Rights Movement, a movement never intended to benefit the Blacks as Malcolm X rightly stated. In the last 60 years the Whites and the Blacks have demoralized at a astounding rate of speed, primarily because the AV1611 Bible was taken out of the public/common schools. But forced amalgamation has played nearly an equal part in further demoralizing the Whites and Blacks either by racial agitation or by racial miscegenation and the hybridization of the nation into an Alien Nation. Whites have essentially been “Africanized,” as intended by Thaddeus Stevens and other Radical Red Republicans with their “Reconstruction” back in the 19th century.

Douglas A. Willinger said...

So I will always hold to the biblical truth of supporting nationalism and nationhood. For nations are composed of a common race, common language and common culture enjoying a common national boundary. Hence, I will always be on the “anti-multiculturalism” side of the war against the Jesuit Order’s Counter Reformation. For no Jesuit that I know of calls for true, Biblical nationalism as described above. They are all---to the man---for “multiculturalism,” which means “bring the Blacks, Asians and Hispanic and Arab Shemites into the once White Protestant nations to result in confusion, division and ultimate destruction of the White Northern European Protestant Reformation with its attending political liberties. This is not a Jesuitical dialectic of “multiculturalism v. anti-multiculturalism,” rather, it is a war between the doctrine of Satan versus the doctrine of God. Multiculturalism is destroying the post-Reformation West and its once Great White Race. You, Maxi, are facilitating that destruction by backing the Black Pope’s “multiculturalism.” It is you that is exhibiting a pro-Jesuitical spirit in your doctrine.



Indeed, Christ is the answer, the one and only Jesus Christ who is “God Manifest in the Flesh” (I Timothy 3:16), he being the Word of God who is “God” (John 1:1), the “I AM” of Exodus 3:14 as Christ described himself in John 8:58. This is the Christ you need Maxi. It is time to repent of your sins including the heresy of denying the deity of Jesus Christ. It is time to believe the true gospel of Christ as per I Corinthians 15:1-4. Then and only then will Christ be your savior. Until this time, I cannot and will not call you “Brother.”



I consider our discussion closed as I have devoted now two hours to this post.



Lord bless,



Brother Eric

Douglas A. Willinger said...

From: maxi aguaisol [mailto:dmaxi_gsl@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 3:27 PM
To: eric@vaticanassassins.org; dougwill2001@yahoo.com; chamish@netvision.net.il; boris@borisgroenemeyer.de; sac_bb@hotmail.com; semperbry2@yahoo.com; carlhew@clearsurfusa.com; 2co411@gmail.com; fanne_24@hotmail.com; gregbeacon@gmail.com; gregoryuspbr@gmail.com; jpiedraquirs@gmail.com; nowcomex@yahoo.com; lennybloom@gmail.com; mactruther@gmail.com; bundesligagun7@sbcglobal.net; rivera.nick@gmail.com; nuryriveramci@yahoo.com; oacorrales@gmail.com; petethottam@gmail.com; teflonwalrus@comcast.net; stopalienabduction@gmail.com; tentenelaire@gmail.com; voxrick@yahoo.com; waltpatclifford@gmail.com
Subject: Brother Maxi Attacking Your Position On Racism.



BROTHER MAXI ATTACKING YOUR POSITION ON RACISM

I DECIDED LONG TIME AGO TO BE SILENT ABOUT THIS TOPIC, ONLY GOD AND I KNOWS WHY. BUT I CAN NOT DO IT ANYMORE BECOUSE NOW I BAPTIZED MYSELF IN THE NAME OF CHRIST ONLY.

ERIC, AND IT HURTS MYSELF TO SAY THIS: YOUR POSITION REGARDING RACISM, (IS NOT NAZI, AND) IS NOT BIBLICAL.

TAMAR, RAHAB, AND BOAZ, ANCESTORS OF MY LORD, JESUS CHRIST, WERE HAMITES! EVEN YAHWEH MY FATHER USED THE PROPHET NATHAN TO REBUKE THE KING DAVID FOR KILLING THE HUSBAND OF BETHSEBA, URIAH THE HITTITE, WHO WAS A HAMITE!

SO, THE BIBLE NOT ONLY DO NOT CONDEMNS INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE BUT DEFENDS IT THE BIBLE IS ONLY RACIST IN SPIRIT AND NOT IN FLESH. BECOUSE THE REFORMERS WERE WHITES FOR ALMOST THE SAME REASON THAT THE JEW WERE THE FIRSTS CHRISTIANS.

THIS LETTER ALSO WORKS AS A DOCUMENT WHICH WILL DEMONSTRATE IF OUR BELOVED FRIEND AND TEACHER OF THE CLASS OF THE JESUIT HISTORY, IS OR IS NOT A TRUE CHRISTIAN, BECOUSE IS UNDENIABLE THAT RAHAB, TAMAR AND BOAZ WERE OF THE "RACE" OF HAM.

IF ERIC JON PHELPS AND ANY OTHER, CONTINUE TO PUT HIMSELF IN THE "ANTIMULTICULTURALISM" SIDE OF THE RACIAL WAR'S HEGELIAN DIALECTIC EQUATION (MULTICULTURALISM ANTIMULTICULTURALISM=RACIAL WAR FOR DESESTABILIZATION OF THE WEST), THEN I, AS A TRUE CHRISTIAN, HAVE NO OTHER OPTION THAT TO SEE A PRO-JESUITICAL SPIRIT IN THAT BEHAVIOUR.

CHRIST, THE TRUTH, IS THE ANSWER!

IN YAHWEH MY FATHER, THROUGH JESUS MY LORD.

BROTHER MAXI.

From: eric@vaticanassassins.org
To: dougwill2001@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: Doug Willinger Attacking Your Position On FB
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 14:11:26 -0400

Dear Douglas,



I just reworded my post on ProBaptiCal as why the prohibition of intermarriage in the Church and future Nation of ProBaptiCal.



Brother Eric



From: Douglas Willinger [mailto:dougwill2001@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 1:39 PM
To: Eric Jon Phelps
Subject: Re: Doug Willinger Attacking Your Position On FB



Done (posted on Facebook), with a brief reply.



Douglas Willinger

Continuing Counter Reformation

Douglas A. Willinger said...

From: Eric Jon Phelps
To: 'Douglas Willinger'
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 1:16 PM
Subject: RE: Doug Willinger Attacking Your Position On FB

Dear Douglas,



The blood is mixed, but at a small percent. I am not for a detailed blood-purity policy; rather I am for a White German calling himself German and living in a White Germany. The same holds true for the White Russians, White French, White English, White Scottish as well as the Asian Chinese, the Asian Japanese, the Asian Koreans, as well as the Black Ethiopians, the Black Congolese, as well as the Hispanic Mexicans, Hispanic Cubans, etc. If Rome is to have her NWO, there must be forced race, language and nation-mixing thereby destroying all national distinctions of the peoples God has created. As I have said many times, God has created the races and nations and languages so as to keep mankind separated lest we unite as we did at Babel---unite against God. This is most biblical and is covered in most of my work.



As to those who are already race-mixed, we must pick up and continue based upon what we look like. Any White, Black, Asian, or Hispanic would identify me as being White; so I am White even though I have a little Pawnee Indian in me. This is not a bad slope, rather a biblical one that will be vindicated over time. Further, this will be the law for ProBaptiCal, and if you do not agree with it, then you can stay in any other country. Surely you would not attack my country and destroy it over this historic trait restored after 70 years of forced-amalgamation would you? Our nation would truly be diverse from all the other race-mixed nations, as you do believe in diversity?

Douglas A. Willinger said...

Now as to the maxim of no intermarriage between White Gentles and Jews living in ProBaptiCal, this is not a Nazi doctrine as you have posted. It is a Biblical doctrine as per the separation of the races. Further, the Hebrew/Jewish/Israelite race has 13 tribes---13 royal bloodlines---to preserve if the racial promise given to Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and his 12 sons is to be fulfilled. Ezekiel 48 can never be fulfilled if the 13 tribes have been either bred out or killed out of existence. In ProBaptiCal these tribes will be protected by forbidding White Gentiles to marry the Hebrew/Jewish/Israelites. This will further bring the nation the blessing of God as per Genesis 12:1-3.



I regularly refer the American Indians as the Savage American Indians during the early days of the White Protestant colonies and White Calvinist Republic of the US (1789-1868). But the threat to every major city now are the Majority Savage Blacks (75-80% of American Blacks) as opposed to the Minority Civil Blacks (20-25% of American Blacks---who fear the Majority Savage Blacks). I do not see the burning down of American cities by any other people than the Majority Savage Blacks, do you? Have you see Detroit lately, as well as Baltimore? The Blacks have destroyed the center of nearly every American city here on the East Coast including your Washington, DC. And why should I be silent about it? Why should you attack me when I truthfully point out this exclusive population as the font of the inner city destruction. The Mexican Roman Catholic Alien Invaders are also becoming a huge criminal element---as designed by Rome, but the Blacks, financed by Welfare and composed of a population that is 70% illegitimate with no fathers to train the children, are by far the worst offenders against our high commercial and productive culture. So I will continue to attack them specifically as a people until they are rivaled by another group. Then I will attack both---equally!



Lastly, ignorance does not make a person rob, rape, vandalize and murder. It is an act of the will of these Majority Savage Black who are continually fighting and fornicating---their two paramount occupations---while living high on Welfare and enjoying thousands of dollars of government monies as payment for the bastard babies they breed. (Bastard is a most biblical word!) The government encourages this wickedness as the answer to this immoral riot is intended to be Jesuit White fascism who in fact deserve the death penalty for their bloody crimes. Galatians 6:7 will not go unheeded! Education is not the answer; for many uneducated men and women live decent and moral lives. The answer is right behavior that is engendered by the reading of the Word of God and government punishment of evil.



Please post this on your facebook.



Lord bless,



Brother Eric

Douglas A. Willinger said...

From: Douglas Willinger [mailto:dougwill2001@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 11:37 AM
To: Eric Jon Phelps; 'Nick'
Subject: Re: Doug Willinger Attacking Your Position On FB



Eric-



The blood is already mixed.



Go to my facebook page and see my photo albums Dad's People and Mom's people.



The Jesuitical racism you embrace would oppose Prussia, with Prussians being largely German with admixtures of Slavic and Baltic (and even Asiatic- think of the Mogul invasion of the 1200s) peoples as a start.



You need to question whoever has set you upon this intellectually bad slope.



Also, how often do you use the term for savages who are not Black?



It would be far better to write about majority ignorant people- owing to the Jesuitical dumbing down that affects ALL ethnicities.



Douglas Willinger

Continuing Counter Reformation

Douglas A. Willinger said...

From: Eric Jon Phelps
To: 'Nick'
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 9:50 AM
Subject: RE: Doug Willinger Attacking Your Position On FB

Dear Brother Nick,



Agreed and thanks for the further info about “Animal Planet.”



I will be adding a further sentence to my post as to forbidding interracial marriage between Jews and White Gentiles as I think that Doug really does not understand my position---that it is not Nazi, but Biblical. The royal bloodlines of the 13 tribes of Israel must not be amalgamated with Gentile blood that the racial land promise given to Abraham extending to the 13 tribes may be fulfilled as per Ezekiel 48.



Lord bless,



Brother Eric



From: Nick [mailto:bundesligagun7@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 9:07 PM
To: Eric Jon Phelps
Subject: RE: Doug Willinger Attacking Your Position On FB


Brother Eric,
I think it's pretty ridiculous that now after all this time he finally has an issue with your position on Race. He's known you for a couple years I presume. He can't stand the fact that you are against Gentiles and Hebrews intermarrying because I think Doug is Hebrew. He must be a typical Hebrew male that likes White Gentile women. That's why he labels it as Jesuit Nazi law, concerning the policy of Pro-Baptical. Also saying that the term "Majority Savage Black" is relevant because of where you grew up. Has he lived amongst the anti-White Savages in urban areas? Even the Blacks call the Bay Area the "Animal Planet" because it's savage crime saying "Niggas be Animals" in their lazy ebonic English. I don't know, I just think this it's odd because you've preached the same principles for years, and now finally Doug has an issue. Strange.



Brother Nick
--- On Mon, 8/15/11, Eric Jon Phelps wrote:


From: Eric Jon Phelps
Subject: RE: Doug Willinger Attacking Your Position On FB
Date: Monday, August 15, 2011, 11:49 PM

Yep, he ought to reference my new article on my website.



Brother Eric

Douglas A. Willinger said...

The preceding 13 comment posts are from a google cache of The UnHived Mind made shortly before Sheri Kane's Jesuitical Censorship

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Li0ZvFU1TXAJ:z15.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND_III/index.php%3Fshowtopic%3D2551+eric+jon+phelps+jesuitical+racism&cd=11&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a

avles said...

Interesting material by me found about the topic "Jesuitical racism":

Thursday, July 19, 2012

Leopold II of Belgium and the [Jesuitical] Congo Free State

http://avlesbeluskesexposed.blogspot.it/2012/07/leopold-ii-of-belgium-and-jesuitic.html

Bor Ogoro said...

You are an idiot for having this quarrel with Eric.

Obviously you have been brainwashed by Roman indoctrination.

The idea of multiculturalism comes from the idea of stripping people of an identity

Douglas Andrew Willinger said...

Multiculturalism may be used in such a fashion, but hardly necessarily. Generally it is used inconsistently to place the Catholic demographics at an advantage, for instance dial 1 for English, 2 for Spanish in the USA, but no such option in areas to the south.

What EJP preaches regarding race is simply a means of attempting to discredit the anti-Jesuit/Vatican movement.