Romish-Masonic FDR: "...the freedom of the Pope and of Vatican City is assured by the armies of the United Nations"

From The New York Times, June 6, 1944

Roosevelt Speaks

Says Rome's Fall Marks 'One Up and Two to Go' Among Axis Capitals

Warns Way Is Hard

Asks World to Give the Italians a Chance for Recovery


(excerpt)

Shrines Should Live, He Says

President Roosevelt saw considerable significance in the fact that Rome should be the first Axis capital to fall. He remarked its shrines, "visible symbols of the faith and determination of the early saints and martyrs that Christianity should live and become universal," and added that "it will be a source of deep satisfaction that the freedom of the Pope and of Vatican City is assured by the armies of the United Nations."

There is significence too, he added, in the fact that Rome was liberated by a composite force of soldiers from many nations.

Reviewing the military picture, the President pointed out that "it would be unwise to inflate in our own minds the military importance of the capture of Rome." He cautioned his auditors that while the Germans have retreated "thousands of miles" accross Africa and back through Italy, "they have suffered heavy losses, but not great enough yet to cause collapse."

"Therefore," he added, "the victory still lies some distance ahead. That distance will be covered in due time- have no fear of that. But it will be tough and it will be costly."

Pope Gives Thanks Rome Was Spared

Voices Appreciation to Both Belligerents in Message to Throng at St. Peter's


VATICAN CITY June 5- Pope Pius XIII appeared on the balcony of St Peters at 6 PM today to thank God that Rome had been spared from the ravages of war while before im in the densely packed square of St Peters the new broad Via Della Conciliazione tens of thousands of Romans cheered themselves hoarse.

It was the third time today that the Pontiff had shown himself to cheering crowds, as he had appeared twice at a window of his office this morning. But this was a solemn, sacred occasion and no one knowing anything about Pius XI can doubt the fervor of his thankfulness that Rome had been saved.

The Pontiff seemed strong and well and his voice carried far though ot was difficult to hear every word he said because of he crowd.

"We must give thanks to God for the favors we have reeived" said the Pope. Rome has been spared. This day will go down in the annals of Rome."

He went on to say he hoped that Italians would be worthy of the grace shown them and put aside hatred and all personal vendettas. He then thanked both belligerents - the Allies and Germany - for having left Rome intact.

After a prayer of thankfulness to the Blessed Virgin and Saints Peter and Paul, guardians, the Pontiff gave his blessing, "urb et orbis," as the immense crowd knelt before him.

[The AP estimated the crowd was between 250 and 500K].

The world has changed for Rome but the Vatican goes on imperturably as it has through so many other conquests in centuries gone by. It is neutral in fact and spirit. The Pope and all high officials went about their daily routines today as in the past. Except for the tanks and the amoured cars running in font of St Peter's one could never know what happened today.

Wlodimir Ledochowski's Masonic Fool FDR

Making East Europe Safe for Stalinism
and Ledochowski's westward shift of Poland
and displacement/erasure of Prussia

Dear Douglas,

the following might be of interest for you:

In the spring of 1943, Admiral Wilhelm Canaris, head of the German Secret Service, met with George Earle, the American Naval Attache in Istanbul, Turkey. Admiral Canaris came to discuss the surrender of the German armed forces. He reported that he had joined with other German leaders in an assassination plot to remove Hitler from power. After this was accomplished, they would take over the German government, and surrender to the Allies, with only one condition:

There must be no Soviet advance into Central Europe.

Mr. Earle sent President Roosevelt a note informing him of Canaris'
proposal.

He received no reply.

Earle tried again, and this time he received what has been termed a "brush-off" from President Roosevelt.

So Earle flew to Washington. Roosevelt told him that his concerns were overly anxious, that Germany would soon surrender after the planned attack commenced through Western Europe.

Earle was very disappointed, and returned to Istanbul. He advised Canaris of what he had learned, and he returned to Germany, where he and the other plotters against Hitler's life were found out and either hung or shot for their efforts to shorten the war and prevent the expansion of the Russians into Eastern Europe.4

If Roosevelt had accepted Canaris' offer: "... the war might have ended in 1943. Countless lives would in all probability have been saved, and, of greatest importance, the Allies wouldn't have supplanted one dangerous ideology with another. The Soviet hordes would have been stopped at the Polish border. The entire map of Europe would have been different."5

Earle returned to the United States. He wrote "I decided to make known some of my views and observations about the so-called allies, the Soviets, so as to wake up the American people about what was really going on. I contacted the President about it, but he reacted strongly and specifically forbade me to make my views known to the public. Then upon my requesting active duty in the Navy, I was ordered to Samoa, in the far-distant South pacific"6

In fact, Earle was warned by Roosevelt's daughter in a letter to him "... that if he carried out his outlined program of publicly criticizing and commenting on some of the Soviet moves, he could be adjudged guilty of treason."7

It is indeed unfortunate that the Roosevelts took this position on the "Soviet moves," the movement of Russian troops into the Eastern European countries as the war was ending, as evidenced by President Roosevelt's inaction in the Canaris case, and the letter of his daughter in the Earle case, because the citizens in these countries did not want the Russians to occupy their nations. This fact was made brutally apparent as millions of these patriots actually joined with the German armed forces in an attempt to keep the Russians from advancing into their respective countries.

So Roosevelt could have truly assisted these patriots in keeping their countries free of Communism by assisting the Canaris group, and Earle could have been of immense assistance in bringing these matters to the attention of the American people.

But it was not to be, and the Eastern European countries were occupied by the Russian Communists much to the chagrin of millions of patriots. Roosevelt continued his support of the Russian government as the war ended by guaranteeing their occupation of these nations by the agreements made at the wartime conferences with the major leaders of the Allied governments.

Ralph Epperson, The Unseen Hand, p.286-287

So it looks like there were two attempts to negotiate a surrender?

On the following pages more betrayals are decribed, like the unnecessary concessions made to Stalin by Roosevelt and Churchill at Yalta, and the betrayal of (orthodox) Russian soldiers (among them General Vlasov and his soldiers) and civilians in a forced repatriation during „Operation Keelhaul” approved by Roosevelt and Eisenhower.

I read somewhere that Admiral Canaris and General Rommel, both high-ranking victims of the Nazi regime, were both Protestants.

Best regards,
Oliver

Wlodimir Ledochowski's Masonic Tool FDR

Wlodimir Ledochowski's Masonic Tool FDR

http://www.hnn.us/blogs/comments/27592.html

Keith Halderman

Consequences of Hate

In his post below David Beito quotes Franklin Roosevelt as saying "We have got to be tough with Germany and I mean the German people not just the Nazis. We either have to castrate the German people or you have to treat them in such a manner so they can't go on reproducing." This quotation has elicited two comments of defense from Craig J. Bolton. In the first he recalls “only two recorded incidents of opposition by the German people” and he ends the second one with the adage; “Ideas have consequences. Bad ideas have bad consequences.” I agree with this line and the notion expressed in the above Roosevelt comment was a bad idea with bad consequences for both Germans and Americans.

I am now in the process of reading The New Dealers’ War: FDR and the War Within World War II by Thomas J. Fleming. This book is doing something I would have thought impossible, it is lowering my opinion of FDR even further.

While Craig Bolton may or may not be correct about there being only two overt incidents of opposition to the Nazis there certainly was a great deal of high level covert support for internal regime change including a very famous assassination attempt in East Prussia. According to Fleming Admiral Wilheim Canaris head of the German Military intelligence organization, the Abwehr, met secretly in Spain, during the summer of 1943, with the heads of American and British intelligence. They hammered out a peace plan which included a cease fire and the elimination of Hitler. Roosevelt rejected this offer refusing to negotiate with “these East German Junkers” and all other overtures from Germans yearning for the Nazis’ downfall.

In fact, when Roosevelt unexpectedly announced, against the opposition of Churchill and his own military commanders, that unconditional surrender was the only acceptable end to the war, he created a great obstacle for those Germans who wished Hitler gone and the carnage over. The policy proved to be a big unifier of the Hitler’s people. We can never know if some Allied encouragement and a different set of demands might have been enough for the success of Admiral Canaris and like minded Germans in their goal of ending the war sooner. However it is not unreasonable to say that FDR’s hatred and determination to punish may very well have cost tens of thousands of Americans their lives.

Posted on Monday, July 3, 2006 at 2:19 AM

• AND German AND British AND.... by Sudha Shenoy (July 3, 2006 at 4:38 AM)
• Re: AND German AND British AND.... by Jonathan Dresner (July 3, 2006 at 4:49 AM)
  • Re: AND German AND British AND.... by Robert Higgs (July 3, 2006 at 12:47 PM)
• Re: AND German AND British AND.... by Keith Halderman (July 3, 2006 at 12:20 PM)
  • Re: AND German AND British AND.... by Jonathan Dresner (July 4, 2006 at 5:03 PM)
    • Re: AND German AND British AND.... by Robert Higgs (July 4, 2006 at 7:42 PM)

• Welllll [Part 2] by Craig J. Bolton (July 3, 2006 at 5:44 PM)
• Re: Welllll [Part 2] by Keith Halderman (July 3, 2006 at 7:28 PM)
  • Re: Welllll [Part 2] by Craig J. Bolton (July 4, 2006 at 6:37 PM)
    • Re: Welllll [Part 2] by Keith Halderman (July 5, 2006 at 10:33 AM)

• Conditional surrender by Robert Higgs (July 4, 2006 at 7:50 PM)
• Re: Conditional surrender by Keith Halderman (July 5, 2006 at 10:08 AM)
  • Re: Conditional surrender by Craig J. Bolton (July 5, 2006 at 1:21 PM)
    • Re: Conditional surrender by Robert Higgs (July 5, 2006 at 2:58 PM)

• What about Italy? by Paul Noonan (July 5, 2006 at 4:52 PM)

Post a Comment

What rules govern discussion boards?

If you have not already, you must Sign Up before you can post.

User Name:
Password:
Remember Me
Subject:
Comment:

FDR's attitude would be strategically critical for the Oder Neisse line, the destruction of Prussia and the expulsion of its peoples.












Wlodimir Ledochowski WW2 MasterMind

Wlodimir Ledochowski's War Culpability Admission
Wlodimir Ledochowski's Goal Predicted by Maximilian Kolbe?
Wlodimir Ledochowski's Plausible Counter Reformation Strategy
Wlodimir Ledochowski's Holocausts
Wlodimir Ledochowski's Goals Via Goals

Wlodimir Ledochowski's Mission, Motivation, Geopolitical Chessboard
Wlodimir Ledochowski's Plausible Childhood Vow to Destroy Prussia
Wlodimir Ledochowski's Plausible Childhood Inspiration

Wlodimir Ledochowski's Spooky Obscurity

Wlodimir Ledochowski According to Tupper Saussy

Vatican Bank Claims: Prussia Trust?

Maximilian Kolbe on WW2: "God is Cleansing Poland"



The All-Seeing Eye, The President, The Secretary and The Guru