Wlodimir Ledochowski,born October 7, 1866;
26th Superior General of the Jesuit Order
February 11, 1915 - December 13, 1942
Romes' Learning Against Learning:media magnates
Henry and Clare Luce
(co-creator of TIME magazine)
members of the SMOM
The Vatican American Holocaust – Why Your Silence is Their Consent
Frank O’Collins Calls for Truth While Pope Joe Calls for New World Economic Order
Jul 7, 2009
http://www.arcticbeacon.com/greg/?p=1222
A recent New York Times article is preparing Americans to accept Pope Joe as the “King of Kings and the Lord of Lords”.
Why else would they feature an article with Joseph Ratzinger, telling the world to unite under a global economy and criticizing “a growing divide between rich and poor.”
Ratzinger, however, fails to tell people his geo-political killing machine, nicknamed The Holy See, has caused the great divide.
This story that appeared yesterday in the NY Times is just another example of more double talk coming from Rome.
Fortunately, while the Pope Joe , the dirty dog that he is, was foaming at the mouth with lie after lie, researcher Frank O’Collins was penning an article of truth, exposing those lies.
O’Collins directs our attention to the upcoming Vatican-led American Holocaust and how the destruction of a strong nationalistic dollar is paving the way, like it did in Nazi Germany, for the destruction of America.
First read what O’Collins has to say and then compare it to Nazi Joe’s words.
O’Collins wrote:
What is really going on with the Global Recession? Who is really behind it? And why the Vatican Luciferian soul collectors are preparing to reap another harvest
Watch your TV news bulletin, read the paper or listen to the radio and you will never hear about Zürich and the role of Vatican controlled bankers in bringing about the worst Global Recession in 80 years, nor the tens of thousands of tons of gold—trillions of dollars worth—hidden in vaults beneath this ancient city.
Nor will any self righteous mainstream media commentator tell you that the same people who deliberately wrecked the US economy—The Federal Reserve—is a private group of Trusts ultimately owned by groups such as the Rothschilds (the 19th C family founder Mayer Amschel Rothschild himself originally named “Roth” a senior Vatican banker from Zürich who split and joined the Jesuit cause for a “New World Order”). The “Fed” being granted even more power in June 2009 in spite of destroying the lives of countless millions of ordinary Americans.
Of course, mainstream media has a ready excuse for continuing to treat the American public like “mushrooms”—the perilous state of the Truth Movement—in an even worse state than the enlightenment movement across Europe and Germany in the 1930’s who warned the world against the Vatican plans for World War II through their ultra Catholic Dictators such as Franco (Spain), Mussolini (Italy), Hitler(Germany), Pavelic (Croatia), Antonescu (Romania), Peron (Argentina) and Fr Stalin S.J. (Soviet Union)
Today, the “Truth Movement” is hopelessly distracted by such Psyop Jesuit disinfo agents as Alex Jones who keeps publicizing key Jesuit symbols, harping on about 9/11 and blaming nefarious and nameless groups such as “Jewish bankers”, while refusing point blank to ever speak of the real agenda of the Vatican and his Jesuit handlers.
On the other side, English psyop Jesuit disinfo agent David Icke covers the “alien X-files” demographic of countless millions of impressionable young internet savvy youth who know the New World Order exists, but were brought up on deliberate disinfo about “secret alien bases” and the world ruled by “reptilian shape shifters”.
With such success in destroying the Truth Movement from the “inside”, it is no wonder that the unholy plans of the Roman Cult controlling the Vatican are proceeding at an accelerated pace—towards the ultimate satanic goal of sacrificing by fire tens of millions of Americans within the next four years—perfectly legally, because millions of Americans have “unwittingly” given their consent through their deliberate ignorance and silence.
You have been warned
What is the most common theme about “selling your soul to the Devil” as portrayed in Jesuit/Vatican funded Hollywood movies? That’s right, it involves a contract and your willing consent. In fact, Jesuit/Vatican funded Hollywood movies make it very clear that the forces of Satan cannot damn your soul to perpetual torture unless they gain your legal consent. This image has been repeated in countless movies, with unwavering consistency (1) you have entered into an agreement with Satan and (2) you have consented to your soul being damned.
“It is only Hollywood make believe”, you might say—but you are wrong. “I haven’t consented to sell my soul to Satan”, you might also protest—wrong again—you have already consented to the forces of Lucifer to condemning you through your willing participation in his system of greed, money, material possession and silence against evil.
Over months and years, many in the truth movement have clearly shown that the very banking system we rely upon is a creation of the Jesuits and the Roman Cult. Similarly, in recent months we have clearly demonstrated that such characters as William Shakespeare were nothing more than a fraud and “trojan horse” designed to introduce a language of control and consent.
The whole birth certificate system of the United States is perversely now geared to “sell the souls” of Americans to the Vatican Jesuit banks at birth, in order to keep the country solvent. Similarly, most court documents show you “SS” on the particulars—the claim that it means “to wit; namely” a 20th Century fraud in the 1st legal dictionaries. SS has always means Sedes Sacrorum—the Holy See, the Roman Cult and the Vatican for 700 years. The Same “SS” that came around to the houses of ordinary Germans in the 1930’s and 1940’s and took away consenting victims to be sacrificed in ovens by the millions.
You haven’t just consented to being legally burnt to Moloch—the ancient name of Lucifer whom the rotten Roman Cult worship—you have consented daily since your birth and your parents consent through signing the Birth certificate satanic contract.
Moreover, any American who has an internet connection can simply go to a search engine and type in “Evil Vatican” or “Vatican Holocaust” and see more than enough proof for themselves on what is happening in preparation as we speak. Still, like the millions of Germans and Europeans in the 1930’s, Americans are convinced that such evil does not exist in reality and could not possible happen to them.
Why?
The rotten Roman Cult that controls the Vatican and over a billion good Catholics as willing hostages is the most successful criminal gang in history—maintaining power for almost 1,000 years—as was predicted in such scripture as the Book of Revelation.
They have maintained power through a vast array of devices, the most successful being law, finance and terror. Yet as dedicated Satanists, they have also maintained power by recognizing the power of tricking the living into consenting to be condemned to eternal servitude—the power that comes with millions of trapped souls believing they are damned to serve the will of the Roman Cult.
Most credible western historians know that the satanic Popes of the Roman Cult were the originators of the very Black Magic and Witchcraft texts in the middle ages used to damn tens of thousands of innocent women to horrendous torture and death.
And anyone who has spend a few seconds reading any kind of world history knows that the Vatican is also responsible for the satanic sacrifice of countless millions more through the crusades and public burnings right up to the over 18 million sacrificed in purpose built ovens in Poland and Russia during World War II in camps that form a 300 mile wide satanic pentagram—with the key “ley lines” of evil focused towards the Vatican itself!
This evil spiritual power has been a key focus and feature of the behaviour of the Roman Cult and its agents for hundreds of years—with the need for fresh condemned souls every few decades. Even the dead go numb from pain after a while. And the reason they keep sacrificing people to their satanic gods under the cloak of being “Christian” is because they continue to get away with it—look at WWII, when Pope Pius XII died in October 1958. Not even the coffin and embalming could hide the evil stench of the most evil man in history filling St Peters Square—with hundreds of pilgrims vomiting from the odor—and the Vatican still wants to make him a saint!
Just because cowardly mainstream newsreaders and editors don’t specifically warn you that the FEMA camps can easily be converted into super efficient human sacrifice camps, does not mean you have not been warned, or been let off your contract to be sacrificed.
If you are Catholic, then you have a good chance of not being sacrificed—mainly because the Vatican normally does not sacrifice their own “sheople” unless they actively work against them. But if you are a Christian “heretic” in the eyes of the Roman Cult, then you are marked for burning.
What can you do?
Firstly, you can demonstrate that you actively deny consent to the Roman Cult and forces of Satan by spreading the truth to as many people as you can. Secondly, you can start to live a life with less emphasis on the materialism of Satan that has so addicted America and forced the destruction of family values and family life. Thirdly, you can consider such alternatives as the United America Free Society (see http://united-america.org) in which you lawfully join a free society without having to uproot your life or family.
Don’t blame God. Free will means many Americans have willingly chosen to be fed into the next incarnation of the ovens, to be sacrificed to Ba’al Moloch—their souls damned to the property of the Vatican.
Finally, you can pray. Pray that your friends, neighbours and family will wake up from the spell of the Vatican led New World Order and their willing accomplices. Time is running out. Even if one is saved from the ovens, it is a win for God.
What the Papa from Rome said:
By RACHEL DONADIO
Published in NY Times: July 7, 2009
VATICAN CITY — Pope Benedict XVI on Tuesday called for a radical rethinking of the global economy, criticizing a growing divide between rich and poor and urging the establishment of a “world political authority” to oversee the economy and work for the “common good.”
He criticized the current economic system, “where the pernicious effects of sin are evident,” and urged financiers in particular to “rediscover the genuinely ethical foundation of their activity.”
He also called for “greater social responsibility” on the part of business. “Once profit becomes the exclusive goal, if it is produced by improper means and without the common good as its ultimate end, it risks destroying wealth and creating poverty,” Benedict wrote in his new encyclical, which the Vatican released on Tuesday.
More than two years in the making, “Caritas et Veritate,” or “Charity in Truth,” is Benedict’s third encyclical since he became pope in 2005. Filled with terms like “globalization,” “market economy,” “outsourcing,” “labor unions” and “alternative energy,” it is not surprising that the Italian media reported that the Vatican was having difficulty translating the 144-page document into Latin.
Reportedly delayed to take into consideration the financial crisis, it was released by the Vatican on the eve of the Group of Eight industrialized nations summit meeting, which opens in Italy on Wednesday, and before Benedict is expected to receive President Obama at the Vatican on Friday.
“It’s not an encyclical done for the crisis,” Cardinal Renato Martino, the president of the Vatican’s Council for Justice and Peace, said at a news conference on Tuesday. Still, he added, “if the encyclical had come out before the crisis, you would have said it was prophetic.”
In the encyclical, Benedict wrote that “financiers must rediscover the genuinely ethical foundation of their activity, so as not to abuse the sophisticated instruments which can serve to betray the interests of savers.”
In many ways, the document is a somewhat puzzling cross between an anti-globalization tract and a government white paper, another indication that the Vatican does not comfortably fit into traditional political categories of right and left.
“There are paragraphs that sound like Ayn Rand, next to paragraphs that sound like ‘The Grapes of Wrath.’ That’s quite intentional,” Vincent J. Miller, a theologian at the University of Dayton, a Catholic institution in Ohio, said in a telephone interview.
“He’ll wax poetically about the virtuous capitalist, but then he’ll give you this very clear analysis of the ways in which global capital and the shareholder system cause managers to focus on short term good at the expense of the community, of workers, of the environment.”
Indeed, sometimes Benedict sounds like an old-school European socialist, lamenting the decline of the social welfare state and praising the “importance” of labor unions to protect workers. Without stable work, he notes, people lose hope and tend not to get married and have children.
But he also wrote that “The so-called outsourcing of production can weaken the company’s sense of responsibility towards the stakeholders — namely the workers, the suppliers, the consumers, the natural environment and broader society — in favor of the shareholders.”
And he argued that it is “erroneous to hold that the market economy has an inbuilt need for a quota of poverty and underdevelopment in order to function at its best.”
Benedict also called for a reform of the United Nations so that there can be a unified “global political body” that allows the less powerful of the earth to have a voice, and called on rich nations to help less fortunate ones.
“In the search for solutions to the current economic crisis, development aid for poor countries must be considered a valid means of creating wealth for all,” he wrote.
John Sniegocki, a professor of Christian ethics at Xavier University in Cincinnati, said that one of the most controversial elements of the encyclical, at least for some Americans, will be Benedict’s call for international institutions to play a role in regulating the economy.
“One of the things he’s saying is that the global economy is escaping the power of individual states to regulate it,” Mr. Miller said. He said the encyclical also contained elements “very critical” of how the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank “have required cuts in social spending in the third world.”
Michael Novak, a philosopher and theologian at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, a conservative research organization, said he thought that the encyclical was stronger on principles than policy suggestions. He said he was particularly uncomfortable with the idea of a strong international institution to regulate the global economy.
“I like limited government. I would much prefer to have many limited governments than one overriding authority,” said Mr. Novak, in a telephone interview from Rome.
Arguably the most environmentally-conscious pope in history, Benedict wrote that, “One of the greatest challenges facing the economy is to achieve the most efficient use — not abuse — of natural resources, based on a realization that the notion of ‘efficiency’ is not value-free.”
In line with what he calls “respecting the intrinsic value of creation,” he also decried stem cell research, abortion and euthanasia.











![[]](http://www.crossroad.to/images/2003/eye-pyramid-sm.jpg)













May 22nd, 2009 at 11:02 am
The Vatican is the enemy, and some sick follower of theirs keeps erasing this message..
By erasing the message they are admitting guilt leading to the day were we all take out the apostate [RCC], take their properties and redistribute to the victims of Rome:
http://continuingcounterreform.....times.html
It is very well understood, however, that Monaco is entirely under the control of Ledochowski, that proud, imperious, and able Pole who made Bismarck such worlds of trouble in the old Kulterkampf day and who has been able to impose his will very often upon even the present Pope. This powerful man was in a German prison when Pius IX created him a Cardinal in 1875. Next year he was released and banished, and he has since lived in Rome, devoting his great wealth and talents to building up a militant Ultramontagne party about him. His wrath at the treatment he received at the hands of Bismarck has colored all his political views. He has hated both Germany and Italy and has looked unceasingly forward to the time when French bayonets should restore the temporal power of the Vatican in the old Roman States.
If we assume that this spirited and resolute prelate will shortly be ruling the Church through its nominal head, it becomes a most anxious question how he will accept the existing political conditions of Europe which have so radically changed since 1875. The new rulers of the Germans have been at pains to show their desire to abolish the last traces of the Kulterkampf. When the pending Prussian Education bill is passed, the German Catholics will be actually stronger than they were before the May laws. During the last half year these dispatches have frequently reflected the new interest which William and his immediate entourage are displaying in the Polish question. Of course a good deal of this has arisen naturally from the contemplation of the necessity of sooner or later fighting Russia: but even more it represents the effort to allure Ledochowski into friendship with Germany by an appeal to his national sentiment. How far this has succeeded will be, as has been said, a most anxious question.
In any event under this new regime there would be an abrupt cessation of pastorals on Socialistic and labor problems and of poems about St. Thomas Aquinas. We should instead see the Vatican boldly embark upon the troubled waters of European diplomacy, seeking alliances and taking desperate risks upon the fortune in the next war.
“Should Old Pope Leo Die: the political tendencies of his successor. The Cardinal who would probably win the prize – his Polish supporter – affairs in France and Germany – Spurgeon’s return – Lord Lorne’s appointment”, The New York Times, January 23, 1892
http://query.nytimes.com/mem/a.....ref=slogin
Reply