Thursday, April 16, 2015

Jesuit Tool Michael Scheuer of Georgetown U

Michael Scheuer- A suspiciously anti Israeli agi-prop Jesuit trained Georgetown University professor who previously called for another 911.

Disproportionately condemns Israel for running U.S. foreign policy, while saying nothing about the influence of Rome-Jesuit Order.

Trained by the Jesuits , and at Georgetown University as a lecturer acting the "former" CIA man Michael Scheuer has served as the CIA's anti-Israeli and other propaganda mouthpiece of the American mainstream media for a decade. Scheuer message has always been that the US is fighting Israel's wars, but in reality, the Jesuits controlled by the US government to play in the Middle East conflict to both sides. As I have repeatedly stressed, the aim is to make Jerusalem artificially maintained in the conflict, under the pretext of UN-administered global power center, where Christianity, Judaism and Islam combined into one new world religion of the Vatican reign of the holy places.

You remember also, that the CIA was from the beginning of the Vatican tool to conquer America.
Think of how strong these secret societies [the Knights of Malta, Opus Dei], members of the dedication of the "international defenders of the Church." It is hardly a secret that one of the Catholic elite of the greatest advances in "the defense of the Church" in America was a CIA creation. The CIA's actions are far from limited to international inquiries. It serves as a means through which the American secret society members can secretly "assist" the Holy Mother the Church, whose defenders they work ...
[William J.] Donovan did more for the Church and exploitation than any other American, and he was awarded it the highest honors the Catholic [St. Sylvester's Grand Cross], as any American has received.
-Stephen D. Mumford, American Democracy and the Vatican, 1984

Dr. Scheuer recently concluded a 22-year career with the CIA in which he served in both the Directorate of Intelligence (DI) and the Directorate of Operations (DO). During his tenure at the CIA, Dr. Scheuer held various positions including Senior Adviser for the Usama Bin Laden Department, Chief of the Southwest/Southeast Asia Counternarcotics Operation, and Chief of the Sunni Militant Unit. Dr. Scheuer is the author of Imperial Hubris. Why the West is Losing the War on Terrorism and Through Our Enemies' Eyes: Osama Bin Laden, Radical Islam, and the Future of the United States, as well as numerous journal articles.
"Counternarcotics" = illigitimate tobacco-alcohol market protectionism- human rights violator.

Also see:

I wrote a piece about him in Continuing Counter Reformation in 2009.

To my eye he appears to be of partial Jewish ethnic extraction.  If so, he is what would be called as 'self hating' Jewish person and a traitor, for he is too anti Israel to be credible, going way beyond anything that could be called legitimate criticism of Israel.

Friday, April 10, 2015

Guy Fawkes Masked 'Anonymous Tips Its Papist Hand Against Israel & 'Zionism'

Not a syllable of constructive criticism of Israel, aka against exclusionary Labor Zionism nor any other entity in the Middle East particularly Hamas- Palestine which is vehemently pro drug inquisition

Has Anonymous ever criticized the Papacy?

Cyber activist group Anonymous has released an internet video which threatens Israel with an “electronic Holocaust” on April 7, in a massive cyber attack planned to fall just over a week before Holocaust Remembrance Day on April 16, known in Israel as Yom HaShoah.

The video shows a masked figure in a suit and tie delivering a prepared statement, warning that the group will eradicate Israel from cyberspace “for... crimes in the Palestinian territories”.
“We will erase you from cyberspace in our electronic Holocaust,” says the video’s masked figure.

"As we did many times, we will take down your servers, government websites, Israeli military websites, and Israeli institutions."
 “A message to the youth of Palestine, you are a symbol of freedom, resistance and hope: we are with you and will continue to defend you,” the electronic voiceover adds. “Our message to the foolish Benjamin Netanyahu and all leaders in the Zionist entities, we will continue to electronically attack until the people of Palestine are free.”

Delivered in English and with Arabic subtitles, the video shows Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu sitting with members of his cabinet and military leaders, coupled with images from the Gaza conflict, including ones showing the air strikes on the enclave during the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) Operation Protective Edge last summer and Gazans running with injured children.

Previous targets of the hacker group’s operations have been websites of the Israeli prime minister’s office, the IDF, the Bank of Israel and the Embassy of Israel to the United States.

Benjamin T. Decker, senior intelligence analyst at Tel Aviv-based geopolitical risk consultancy The Levantine Group, says that the hacker collective makes the threat every year and, thus, Israel has acclimatised to the cyber threat, with less damage done with every year.

“For the most part, this is posturing. This is actually the fourth year that Anonymous has carried out this Op Israel attack and called on their supporters to erase Israel from the internet,” he says.
“As the years have progressed we have seen that, despite their increasing sophistication in hacking techniques, we have seen less damage against Israeli cyber infrastructures, largely due to Israel’s pioneering of most cyber warfare tactics, both offensive and defensive.”
Last year, during the Gaza conflict, the ‘hacktivist’ group pledged that the #OpSaveGaza campaign against Israel would “expose their terrorist activity to the world”, referring to Israel as ‘Israhell’. 

Anonymous sounds like the same pro Papist nonsense that I exposed here.

Any group purporting to be pro people and pro Gaza should be anti Hamas.

There really ought to be a mass protest of people burning these ridiculous Guy Fawkes masks.

Wednesday, April 1, 2015

Interview With Petro The Roman

Reveals why so many Popes after 2008 with the resignations of Kolvenbach, Benedict 16 and now Adolpho Nichols... along with Francis S.J.'s prediction that his Papacy shall be short lived...

Pope Francis S.J. is Petro the Roman

Interviewer-  Pope Francis, after 24 months of becoming Pope you have conducted quite a successful PR campaign.  You have had a few photo ops of you washing some people's feet.  You have had a few media spot stories about a handful of Catholic Church officials getting less expensive apartments,  You have shown tolerance by spotlighting homosexuality, quoted as "who am I to judge", as somehow the main human rights issue.  Yet all the while you call for ramping up the pharmaceutic inquisition repression which is what fills the courts and prisons and destroys peoples' lives for non-crimes that you would lie by calling crimes.  And you would deny God's gift of Medical Cannabis, so your Vatican run pharmaceutical corporations can continue to bilk the public upon such quackery as chemotherapy.  You are really some piece of work.

Could you please explain the circumstances behind you becoming Pope?

Pope Francis-  I was selected to be Pope Petro the Roman in early 2013 in order to attempt to place a new face upon the Roman Catholic Church.  A face that people would not look beyond, as a PR project, for I am the PR Pope.

That was quite a scary time, starting with April 2012 when Farnese King Juan Carlos of Spain broke his hip, ultimately getting us to sped up the process.   Catholics in Action came across some interesting telecommunications chatter that really perked their interest.

Remember the day that we selected to announce Benedict's retirement- February 11.  That was the anniversary of Wlodimir Ledochowski becoming the Jesuit General in 1915: the figure who indisputably painted the Roman Catholic Church into a corner that it could not escape if his influence were to ever become widely known- as we could no longer claim that the counter reformation was something that ended in say 1648.

Wlodimir Ledochowski

And mere hours later, the Vatican dome is struck by lightening- twice.

But there is more, as these are unprecedented times for the church.

Do you remember 2008?   That was when the Jesuit General Peter Kolvenbach resigned, which is unusual as the usual custom for such a figure is to die in office, as it is with the Pope.  And Kolvenbach was replaced or rather supplemented with his successor Adolpho Nichols.

Since 2008, Two Black Popes.

And Since 2013, Two Living ex-Popes, one Black and one White:

Interviewer- Yes.

Pope Francis- Now, flash forward to 2013, when Benedict the 16th does the same.

And two living White Popes
Four Popes In Total

So thus, with me as Pope, we now have a grand total of 4 living Popes.  2 Jesuit 'Black' Popes.  And 2 'White' Popes- all living at the same time.  Unprecedented in the history of the Church.  Four living Popes!

Interviewer- OK.  When has that ever happened before?  Popes usually die in office.  We don't have "emeritus" Popes. What could have happened to bring that about?

Pope Francis- Since 2007 the release of damning information about the Church released upon the internet, through that infernal invention of "the Blog".  And from source or sources that we have long had suspicions about.  Its something that we have feared for quite some time, of someone stirring up things with the sort of writings that would never be published in the controlled press, as we have had various people working for us in the past of dubious loyalties: those with a sense of irony and talents to show us the threat that we would ultimately face.

So by 2008 came the decision to begin the process with Kolvenbach's retirement and supplementation with his successor Nichols.

And then as one can gather from Farnese King Juan Carlos breaking his hip, some stuff spilled upon the intranet telecommunications grid that really let the cat out of the bag, in early April 2012.  As came up upon the 1st anniversary of that, enough of us in the Vatican began getting scared.   So we initiated stage two of the process, with Benedict's resignation and replacement or rather supplement- me.  Recall that we announced Benedict's impending resignation on February 11, 2013 - hours before the double lightening strikes upon St Peters later that evening.  And we announced that Benedict's replacement would come by mid April.  Yet we got the whole process sped up with my selection announced a month earlier , in mid March.  THAT is unprecedented in Roman Catholic Church history.

So for a few months things seemed to settle down.  The public was buying our PR Pope campaign hook line and sinker.  And readership of that blog Continuing Counter Reformation plummeted some 40-50%, showing the masses that they could now relax as the Vatican now had some supposedly 'reformist' Pope.

But then some sh*t began stirring up.  Something involving what scared the crap out of Juan Carlos back in April 2012 that made him regret his bullying of Washington, D.C officials to approve his 'I am King of the World' stadium imposing the Farnese family narrow street vision upon the vista emanating southwards from the Capitol building known publicly as that of the U.S. but by us as that of the Roman Catholic Church of North America.  Something involving a sharp rise in fear in latter October, early November 2013 incredibly marked by the sudden upturn of the FURY of that hurricane in the Philippines which had been simply predicted as a regular storm suddenly and massively flaring up into the biggest storm yet in recorded history.

Interviewer-  You mean Hurricane Haiyan.

Pope Francis- Oh yes, HERicane Hailyan.

Mother Nature Blew Her Lid!

And we have that painting in the ceiling of the U.S. Capitol with That Girl holding a sword.

And then, things got even more weird.

Vladimir Putin begins to fervently contact me.  It appears that he had some strange dreams, waking up in the middle of the night bathed in cold sweat, with a recollection now of his previous life as another 'Vladimir'.  One who had been upon a religious mission with "deranged visions of a divine Polish mission, ... [for a] ... Roman Catholic crusade against schismatics in eastern and southeastern Europe."  Of course there are many Polish people that would have absolutely nothing to do with that, even amongst Roman Catholics as many were insufficiently Roman, hence the need for the 20th century continuing inquisition to murder then via the Romish forces of the 3rd Reich.  But there's always a subset of Romish types in any national group, as there were within Polish peoples, namely that who Putin was beginning to recollect his previous life as: Wlodimir Ledochowski himself!

Interviewer-  Previous life?  I thought that the Roman Catholic Church did not recognize re-incarnation.

Pope Francis- Please. There's a difference between what we tell the public and what we acknowledge ourselves.  We are masters at deceiving the public.  We suppressed the doctrine of reincarnation going back to the Council of Nicaea.  We took books out of the bible.  And we infiltrated everything, getting Christians and Protestants to blatantly misread the Bible, such as Hebrews 27 which states "And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment" - never-mind that a man or person is the sum of a body and a spirit.  Yes, a man-person dies once.  He/she is not resurrected in body with spirit as was Jesus.  Rather the spirit goes on to a next life.  The ancient Jews knew that. the modern day Jews like the modern day Christians are babylonian influenced more than they dare imagine.

Just look at Vladimir Putin and Wlodimir Ledochowski.  Both born October 7.  Putin born in 1952, exactly 14 years before the 100th anniversary of Ledochowski's 1866 birth.  Look into their eyes.  And recall what former U.S. Defense Secretary William Gates wrote about Putin- looking into the eyes of a stone cold killer.

Putin takes this as being a part of some great prophecy, of serving our lord then and now for advancing our church.

Interviewer- Our church?

Pope Francis-  The great schism is really a charade.  Both Rome and Moscow are its twin pillars.

The great wars that we orchestrated were all about suppressing dissent from the Church.  Do you thin that the reversal of Roman Catholic demographics in Eastern Poland starting right after the supposed end of the counter reformation in 1648 were about the 'righteous' Eastern Orthodox Church 'liberating' the 'ukrainian' borderlands from the Polish 'overlords?   We sold out united Poland.  Poland had some loyal to Rome leaders.  But ultimately, Poland was way too tolerant of religious heretics.    While France brown-nosed Rome with its St. Bartholomew Day's Massacre, those infernal Polish szlachta explicitly rejected that.  They thumbed their nose at us, with that Warsaw Confederation of 1573. Then they rejected our plan for Poland to merge with Russia.  And they even objected to our 1596 creation, the Unite Church.  Though we had some loyal leaders, the infernal Szlacta showed us that the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth ultimately could not serve as a sufficiently effective tool to expand Romish power eastwards.  So first we subverted it.

We engineered the Khmelnytsky rebellion.

We crafted the 'urkainian' borderlands people identity - after all 'ukrainiain' means borderlands in Russian -- as an evolution of the Kieven Rus identity so as to suppress the people there's original identity as the Eastern Poles.

And more then a century later we outright sacrificed it, via our Jesuit tools established in Russia and Prussia to partition it off the map.

And then when Poland emerged towards the end of that Great War (WW1) under the leadership of that too independent for our liking Joseph Pilsudski, and his alliance with East Polan leader Symon Petliura, we subverted that every which way we could.

We had reliably Papal loyal regiments from the Poznan area subvert the Pilsudski-Petlura drive to Kiev.

And we backed our puppet, the aptly named 'Roman' Dmowski and his reliably loyal Papist National Democrats, who subverted Pilsudski every which way they could.

We did it all to placate Moscow, which we shall ultimately take in its entirety.

What do you think that double headed eagle is really all about?

So, Putin is all excited about continuing his mission, and insists upon meeting with Pope Francis.

He already had an inkling of what was going on.  For instance back in 2008 he offers to split Ukraine with Poland.  But they refuse to take the bait.

And so it would appear, others.  There were some in the Vatican that liked the idea of a revived Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth.  Not of course one independent of Rome, but rather a puppet creation, for the sake of a Romish agenda of a Unite Church combining Roman and Muscovite tendencies.  And then there was this massive growth in groups on Facebook in latter 2013 promoting some form or another of such, including that of a group sponsored by the Polish government calling for Byelorussia to re-join Poland.  As if something happened in late summer 2013 spurring all of this.

So Putin gets more energized.

He wants to know what Rome wants him to do.

So in November 2013, Putin visits the Vatican and has a 35 minute private conversation with me.

He was particularly concerned with the sudden emergence of the 'maiden' political movement in Ukraine with its massive protests against the Russian clientèle regime in Kiev.  He is likewise intrigued by the juxtaposition of stories about German Chancellor Angela Merkel - who was by then speaking out publicly in favor of the protests in Kiev -- being spied upon by the U.S. NSA tapping her cell phone, along with those of various powerful families with Spain.  He said that he felt like he was being set up.

I assure him not to worry, that we have a plan.

And that, in the event of a regime change in Kiev, that he should have Russia seize the Crimea, and perhaps portions of eastern Ukraine.  But I warn him that going so far to seize the entire southern portion of the country to link up with that Russian outpost of the Trans Dniester Republic might provoke too much of a response as that would cut of Ukraine from the Black Sea.   Russia has its well established since the days of the Czar Sevastopol navel station in western Crimea, with that peninsula perhaps the most Russian loyal part of Ukraine, which only received it as a gift from a drunken Khrushchev in 1954.  So, seizing Crimea would be relatively safe, and would provide a goal of at least taking the western shore of the Azov Sea.

The following February, regime change comes to Kiev- Ukraine is now officially pro West.  And Putin's Russia seizes the Crimea peninsula, stamping its attachment to Russia with a referendum, and starts a war or reconquest localized in the easternmost provinces of Ukraine.

Meanwhile, we in Rome begin doing what we have to do in order to continue the process.

Interviewer- What was that?

Pope Francis- We have the current Jesuit General  Adolpho Nichols announce in May 2014 that he shall resign effective in 2016, with the Jesuit Convocation #36 where they choose Nichol's successor.

Meanwhile, the previous Jesuit General Peter Kolvenbach remains alive.

So that shall make a total of Three living Black Popes, and two living White Popes, equaling Five in total.
The Two Current Popes - Nichols and Francis

Interviewer-  So what's the relevance of that?

Pope Francis- Well it involves the process.

Interviewer- What process?

Pope Francis- What we have to do for victory.

Interviewer- For victory of what?

Pope Francis- For the victory of the Church of course. And for our lord.

Interviewer- Well, what is this process?

Pope Francis- Well, the process specifically is the ritual.  You do understand that our church consists of many elaborate rituals including the taking of he holy eucharist: all of which are rituals of ancient magic passed down from millennium ago straight from Babylonian Church customs.

Interviewer- Babylonian church customs

Pope Francis-  Yes, have you not noticed for instance our weird head garb?  It dates from well before 330 AD, before Roman Catholicism adapted the veneer of Christianity.  All of this ties into the uncertainty of whether I shall either resign from the papacy or die in office.

Interviewer- You are considering resigning?

Pope Francis- Oh yes. Because the ritual will require either 5 or 6 of us Popes.  Therefore that is why I myself do not believe that I will be Pope after 2016 or 2017.  Either I shall resign or die in office.

Interviewer- Why the uncertainty?  Either you will resign or die in office but why don't you yet now which?

Pope Francis-  Well I have to travel to the US.  I will be speaking before the U.S. Congress.  And I will be visiting your city of Philadelphia, city of brotherly love for world family day.  I have some things that I have to do there.  We shall see how things go this year and then I shall know if the number is Five or Six?

Interviewer- Five or Six, for what?

Pope Francis- Well it is because of the ritual that we shall soon undertake- namely that we are not yet sure if it requires five or six living Popes.

Peter Kovenbach; Adolpho Nichols; Nichol's successor; Benedict 16; and myself.  That equals 5.

Plus 1 - my successor - equals 6.  And right now we are at Four, until the 2016 Jesuit Convocation #36 selects Nichol's successor, bringing us to Five.

The open question being shall the ritual require 5 or 6 living Popes.

Interviewer- What ritual?

The ultimate satanic black mass, which comes in two versions.  One with Five.  The other with Six.

Interviewer- Satanic?!

Yeah, satanic.  Have not you figured it out yet?  The Roman Catholic Church IS satanic.  Our rituals are satanic black magic, particularly the so called 'taking of the holy communion' where we eat Jesus.  Think about it- why are we so bent upon the crucifix displaying a dead jesus- sort of like 'worshiping' a dead deer displayed upon the hood of one's automobile.

Interviewer- what is this ritual?

Pope Francis- Well it involves this.  We gather together, the 5 or 6 of use.  We assemble in the outline of either a pentagram or a hexagram.  And I would rather end the description there as it's too disgusting to repeat in mixed company.  Suffice to say it's rather vulgar and disgusting, and as you may guess involves perverted forms of sex.  Why do you think that we talk about homosexuality so much?   Why do we have such an emphasis in the name of compassion, even though its the drug war rather than sodomy statutes that clog the courts and fill the prisons.  We are so full of sh*t with our pretense over human rights as a massive distraction from the massive economic exploitation of the general public.  But it is what we have to do to placate our lord Lucifer.

Interviewer- Lucifer?

Pope Francis- Lucifer!

Who has appeared in so much of our art, and who made his mark in politics, and happens to be bi-sexual.

Come on now, we all know that Jesus as not a blond.

After all, why do you think that we do so much in Latin?

Monday, March 30, 2015

Pope Francis S.J. Feels "an ‘event’ ... wipes him out, not a natural end"

Once more the 78-year-old Francis seems to be racing against the clock, and many in Rome are speculating that his decision to declare such a momentous event so soon in his papacy, barely two years after his election, is to be sure he gets one in before time runs out, as if he is holding a sort of last hurrah or a farewell ceremony. And there are sad, almost sinister undertones.

“This pope seems to be in a hurry to get as much done as he can, as if he’s got a deadline,” Marco Politi, a Vatican expert, said at a small roundtable discussion on Francis and the length of his papacy last week. “He keeps talking about how his time is short, but it’s not because he’s sick. He has told his friends that he feels it will be an ‘event’ that wipes him out, not a natural end.”

In an interview with the Mexican network Televisa this month on the occasion of his second anniversary as pope, the pontiff repeated the idea that his days are numbered. He said he had a feeling that his reign at the helm of the Roman Catholic Church wouldn’t last too long, echoing previous comments in which he said he had a “vague sensation” that his time was short. “I have the feeling that my pontificate will be brief—four or five years,” he said. “I don’t know, even two or three.”

Saturday, March 28, 2015

September 2015- Pope Francis SJ To Visit Washington, D.C., New York City and Philadelphia,_2015/1132562

(Vatican Radio)  The White House issued a statement on Thursday announcing United States President Barack Obama and his wife Michelle will host Pope Francis on September 23, 2015.

The meeting will take place in the White House, and the statement said President Obama and Pope Francis would discuss several issues of mutual interest, including “caring for the marginalized and the poor; advancing economic opportunity for all; serving as good stewards of the environment; protecting religious minorities and promoting religious freedom around the world; and welcoming and integrating immigrants and refugees into our communities.”

The statement said President Obama “looks forward to continuing this conversation with the Holy Father during his first visit to the United States as pope.”

Pope Francis and President Obama met for the first time at the Vatican on March 27, 2014.
It has already been announced Pope Francis will address a joint session of the United States Congress on September 24.

After visiting Washington, Pope Francis’ trip to the United States will take him to New York City, where he will address the United Nations General Assembly on September 25, before he heads to Philadelphia for the World Meeting of Families from September 26-27.

Wednesday, March 25, 2015

Inclusionary vs Exclusionary Nationalism - POLAND

Quite applicable to Israel, which alas more follows the Dmowski rather than the Pilsudski model

Inclusionary Nationalism - Jozef Pilsudski

Jozef Pilsudski - one of world history's greatest political leaders!

Piłsudski's regime began a period of national stabilization and of improvement in the situation of ethnic minorities, which formed about a third of the Second Republic's population.[51][126][127][128] Piłsudski replaced the National Democrats' "ethnic-assimilation" with a "state-assimilation" policy: citizens were judged not by their ethnicity but by their loyalty to the state.[129][130] Widely recognized for his opposition to the National Democrats antisemitic policies,[131][132][133][134][135][136] he extended his policy of "state-assimilation" to Polish Jews.[129][130][137][138] The years 1926–35, and Piłsudski himself, were favorably viewed by many Polish Jews whose situation improved especially under Piłsudski-appointed Prime Minister Kazimierz Bartel.[139][140] Many Jews saw Piłsudski as their only hope for restraining antisemitic currents in Poland and for maintaining public order; he was seen as a guarantor of stability and a friend of the Jewish people, who voted for him and actively participated in his political bloc.[141] Piłsudski's death in 1935 brought a deterioration in the quality of life of Poland's Jews.[136]

Henryk Jozewski

The Volhynia Experiment was a cultural and political program by the interwar Polish government in the province of Volhynia whose purpose was the create a Ukrainian identity that was also loyal to the Polish state. It was hoped that this program would furthermore lead to pro-Polish sympathies in Soviet Ukraine and serve as a possible aide in Polish plans concerning the Soviet Union.[1] The Volhynian Experiment was opposed by both Ukrainian nationalists from neighboring Galicia and by pro-Soviet communists.


In 1928 Henryk Józewski, the former deputy minister for internal affairs in the Ukrainian government of Symon Petliura, was nominated the voivode, or governor, of Volhynia, to carry out the program of cultural and religious autonomy for Ukrainians in that region. Józewski, a Pole from Kiev (where, unlike in Galicia, Poles and Ukrainians had a history of cooperating with one another),[2] was a Ukrainophile who felt that the Polish and Ukrainian nations were deeply connected and that Ukraine might one day become a "Second fatherland" for Poles. [3] Like many Poles from Kiev, he was bilingual in the Ukrainian and Polish languages. [4]

Józewski brought Ukrainian followers of Symon Petliura, including former officers in Petliura's army, to his capital of Lutsk in order to help in his Volhynian administration. He hung portraits of Petliura alongside those of Pilsudski in public places, [3] founded the Institute for the Study of Nationality Affairs and educational society for the Orthodox (which expanded to 870 chapters in Volhynia), subsidized Ukrainian reading societies (by 1937, it had 5,000 chapters), and sponsored Ukrainian Theater. The use of Ukrainian language, instead of Russian, during church sermons was encouraged.

A loyal Ukrainian political party, the Volhynian Ukrainian Alliance, was created.[5] This party was the only Ukrainian political party allowed to freely function in Volhynia.[3] Its programme called for democracy, a separation of church and state, and equality for all citizens. Although many of its supporters, former officers of Symon Petliura, had committed anti-Jewish pogroms in Volhynia during the period the Revolution, under Jozewski's influence antisemitism was not tolerated.[3]
Two groups competed with Jozewski and his pro-Polish Ukrainian allies for the allegiance of the Volhynian Ukrainians: the Communist Party of Western Ukraine and the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), based in Galicia. The Communists referred to the Volhynian Experiment as a "Petliurite Occupation", and set up a front party, the Peasant Worker Alliance. The Peasant Worker Alliance, whose affiliation with the Communist party was unknown by most of its supporters, grew to be the most popular party in Volhynia, until it was banned by Jozewski in 1932. Soviet-based partisans fought Jozewski's police in the marshes of northern Volhynia. [3]

While the Communists were coming to Volhynia from the East, Ukrainian nationalists entered from the South. The OUN saw Volhynia as fertile ground for the expansion of its Ukrainian nationalist ideal. By 1935 it was reported that 800 OUN members were operating in Volhynia; they had penetrated many of the Ukrainian institutions that Jozewski had created. According to Jozewski's rivals in the Polish military, the pro-Polish Petliurite Ukrainians in Volhynia failed to match the OUN in terms of organization and numbers.[3]

During the period of his governance, Józewski was the object of two assassination attempts: by Soviet agents in 1932 and by Ukrainian nationalists in 1934.[6]


After his sponsor Pilsudski's death in 1935, Józewski's Ukrainian programme was cancelled. The anti-Ukrainian Polish elements in the Polish military took control over policies in Volhynia. Józewski was criticized for allowing Ukrainians to buy land from Poles, Orthodox churches were demolished or converted to Catholic use during the "revindication" campaign, and by 1938 Józewski himself lost his post.[1][7] Under his successor, all state support for Ukrainian institutions was eliminated, and it was recommended that Polish officials cease using the words "Ukraine" or "Ukrainian." [8] The Polish army Generals believed that filling all state offices in Volhynia with ethnic Poles would ensure fast mobilization and prevent sabotage in case of a Soviet attack on Poland.[9] Ukrainians were systematically denied the opportunity to obtain government jobs.[10] Although the majority of the local population was Ukrainian, virtually all government official positions were assigned to Poles. Land reform designed to favour the Poles[11] brought further alienation of the Ukrainian population..[12]

Military colonists were settled in Volhynia to defend the border against Soviet intervention.[9] Despite the ethnic Ukrainian lands being overpopulated and Ukrainian farmers being in need of land, the Polish government's land reforms gave land from large Polish estates not to local villagers but to Polish colonists.[10] This number was estimated at 300,000 in both Galicia and Volhynia by Ukrainian sources and less than 100,000 by Polish sources (see osadnik) [13]

Plans were made for a new round of colonization of Volhynia by Polish military veterans and Polish civilians and hundreds of new Roman Catholic churches were planned for the new colonists and for converts from Orthodoxy.[8]


The ultimate result of Polish policies in Volhynia was that a sense of Ukrainian patriotism was created; however this patriotism was not tied to the Polish state.[1] As a result of the anti-Ukrainian Polish policies that followed the Polish government's cancellation of the Volhynian Experiment, both Ukrainian nationalists and Communists found fertile ground for their ideas among the Volhynian Ukrainian population.[8] Eventually, the Polish population of the area would be destroyed in the Massacres of Poles in Volhynia.

The Volhynia Experiment makes perfect sense, especially considering that before the 'Ukrainians' were known as 'Kieven Rus' they were the East Polans:

Exclusionary Nationalism - Roman Dmowski

Roman Dmowski

Forever a political opponent of Piłsudski, Dmowski favored what he called a "national state," a state in which the citizens would speak Polish and be of the Roman Catholic faith.[54] If Piłsudski's vision of Poland was based on the historical multiethnic state that had existed under the Jagiellonian dynasty, which he hoped to recreate with a multinational federation (Międzymorze federation),[55] Dmowski's vision was the earlier Polish kingdom ruled by the Piast dynasty, ethnically and religiously homogeneous.[54] Piłsudski believed in a wide definition of Polish citizenship in which peoples of different languages, cultures and faiths were to be united by a common loyalty to the reborn Polish state.[56][57] Dmowski regarded Piłsudski's views as dangerous nonsense, and felt that the presence of large number of ethnic minorities would undermine the security of Polish state. At the Paris Peace Conference, he argued strenuously against the Minority Rights Treaty forced on Poland by the Allies....

... For Dmowski, what the Poles needed was a "healthy national egoism" that would not be guided by what Dmowski regarded as the unrealistic political principles of Christianity.[10] In the same book, Dmowski blamed the fall of the old Commonwealth on its tradition of tolerance.[10] While at first critical of Christianity, Dmowski viewed some sects of Christianity as beneficial to certain nations, through not necessarily Poland. Later in 1927 he revised this earlier view and renounced his criticism of Catholicism, seeing it as an essential part of the Polish identity. Dmowski saw all minorities as weakening agents within the nation that needed to be purged.[10][74]

 In the prewar years, the history of Poland was contested terrain as different ideological forces pulled Polish nationalists in opposite directions, represented by Dmowski and Piłsudski.[75] Throughout his career, Dmowski deeply disliked Piłsudski and much of what he stood for.[72] Dmowski came from an impoverished urban background and had little fondness for Poland's traditional elitist social structure.[71][72] Instead, Dmowski favored a modernizing program and felt Poles should stop looking back nostalgically at the old Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, which Dmowski held in deep contempt and should instead embrace the "modern world".[72] In particular, Dmowski despised the old Commonwealth for its multi-national structure and religious tolerance.[72] He saw the ethnic minorities in Poland as a direct threat to the cultural identity, integrity and ethnic cohesion of Poland, directly in competition with the Polish petit bourgeoisie with which he identified.[73] Dmowski argued that good citizens should only have one allegiance to the nation, and there is no middle ground.[76] In his ideal Poland there would be no ethnic minorities, they would either be polonized or forced to emigrate.[77] The success of his nationalistic ideas, also adopted and propagated by nationalists in other countries (such as Lithuania and Ukraine) contributed to the disappearance of the tolerant, multicultural Polish-Lithuanian identity.[76]

Tuesday, March 24, 2015

Georgetown University Calls Wlodimir Ledochowski "One of the best superior generals in Jesuit history"

Wlodimir Ledochowski, S.J., was a Catholic priest and the 26th superior general of the Society of Jesus. The son of a count with a background in law and politics, Fr. Ledochowski entered the Jesuit order in 1889 and was ordained a priest five years later. He was significantly involved with the administration of the Jesuits in today's Poland, Germany, and Austria before being elected superior general in 1915. Ledochowski's time as superior general was marked with the significant changes of World War I, the Great Depression, and World War II; he called together two general congregations, negotiated a concordat with the Italian government over the Society, and invested in infrastructure and reforms that helped bring new momentum to the Jesuits. Following his death in 1942, he was widely considered to have been one of the best superior generals in Jesuit history.

Thursday, March 19, 2015

1911 Protestants Fell In Line With Rome On Pharmacratic Inquisition

The very same publication "The Herald of Gospel Liberty"
that got it right on Cardinal Gibbon's opposition to public schools in the U.S.,
sadly bought Rome's impending Pharmacratic Inquisition, opposing even Coffee and Tea
with its disregard of the Bible's suggestions to use the herbs of the earth as meat.

It might be interesting to inquire, Why Cardinal Gibbons thinks the public school system of the United States is an evil.  As I see it, it is because the public schools teach children to think, independent of the priests of the Roman Catholic church. The plan of that church is to have the children taught under the immediate supervision of the church, and as the public school system does not consult the Roman Catholic Church as to what shall be taught, or as to who shall do the teaching, the Roman Catholic prelate forthwith pronounces the public school one of the five great evils of the land. ... The Catholic invasion of Protestant rights has already gone quite too far for the best interests of our common country.
Alas, "The Herald of Gospel Liberty"would adopt the very thinking behind the Vatican's criminal and socially destructive drug war, breaking with the Gospel and the concept of Liberty, including even opposing the use of Coffee and Tea, both which are God given herbs of the earth.

Herald of Gospel Liberty - General Convention of   the Christian Church
Herald of Gospel Liberty Volume 103, Issue 27-52 
August 17, 1911

The Department of State has recently issued an announcement of the second International Brewers' Congress to be held in Chicago, October 12 to 22d next. Copies of this letter have been sent to the Diplomatic and Consular Officers of the United States in foreign countries asking their co-operation. Among other statements in this letter are the following: "It is the purpose of this Congress to discuss agricultural, scientific, technical and sociological questions connected with the brewing and allied industries. The Secretary of Agriculture of the United States, the Hon. James Wilson, has accepted an invitation to act as honorary president of this Congress, and the United States Department of Agriculture will he represented at the International Barley and Hop Exhibition by a suitable exhibit." This is signed, "Your obedient servant, P. C. Knox." This suggests a question which may be submitted to the people for discussion. How far should the machinery of a government be used in advertising and promoting a business which courts and statesmen have declared is the chief source of poverty, misery and crime.
Governor O'Neal of Alabama has recently called attention to an evil which demands the consideration of all parents and citizens. He says: "I very strongly urge prohibitive legislation against all so-called 'soft drinks' which contain cocaine, caffeine. acetanilide, phenacetin, or other added injurious chemicals or habit-forming drugs. At the present time many parents who refuse to let their children drink coffee or tea in the home because of the caffeine they contain, will suffer them to be doped with caffeine at the soda fountain, without the knowledge that these drinks contain this injurious substance. In the language of an eminent chemist: "The country is full of caffeine drunkards [DW note- sic] who are wholly ignorant of the nature of the disease from which they suffer, or its cause."
From many parts of the South come reports showing the increasing use of cocaine by the negroes. This is especially the case with negroes employed in the large lumber camps in that section where there is local option. It is found that as saloons are closed many of the negroes turn to the use of cocaine with results that are most serious. The closing of the saloons is good so far as it is good, but not sufficient. We must prohibit the sale of habit-forming drugs such as cocaine; but more than this the temperance people must do something to break up the monotony of life and give men some new interests. We must conquer by supplanting. Reform thus far has been largely negative. The time is come when it must be more directly positive.
At a recent meeting of the Northern Baptist Convention in Philadelphia the Social Service Commission called attention to the fact that the temperance forces are divided to the serious detriment of the cause. A resolution was adopted by the Convention requesting every religious body and temperance organization in the land to select representatives who shall hold a general council and endeavor to form a working and positive program of action and to mobilize the forces of righteousness in the campaign against the over-shadowing evil of the saloon. The situation is critical and demands immediate action. This council of war must be fully representative. The Social Service Commission was asked by the convention to take such action as seems wise in securing such representatives from the various organizations and churches.
In a recent special message to Congress President Taft called attention to the fact that by a recent decision of the Supreme Court the Food and Drug Act was seriously impaired. Without fear of punishment under the law unscrupulous persons knowing the medicines have no curative or remedial value [DW note- baseless statement to reject God given herbs for the sake of establishing a monopoly of medicine of an FDA approved schedule of synthetic patentable pharmaceuticles] for the diseases for which they Indicate them, may ship in interstate commerce medicines consisting of substance [DW note- that are un-patentable and thus can’t be secured by APhA members as source of profit] possessing any slight physiological action and labeled as cures for diseases, which in the present state of science are recognized as incurable. "This," says the President, "is an evil which menaces the life of the people and strikes at the life of the nation." He therefore urges Congress to amend the law in such a way as to prevent the misbranding of foods and medicines. To remedy this. Senator McCumber introduced a bill (Senate 2849) which was referred to the Committee on Manufactures. This provides that an article shall be deemed misbranded in case of drugs, "// it is an imitation of that offered for sale under the name of another article." "If the contents of the package fail to bear a statement on the label of the quality or proportion of any alcohol, morphine, opium, cocaine or any derivative or preparation of any such substance." "If there is written or printed on the, package or container thereof any false or fraudulent misrepresentations concerning its curative qualities, effects, or physiological action." The druggists of the country who handle the various nostrums, no doubt urged on by nostrum makers, are flooding the members of the committee with letters. It is important that the people who believe in pure food and drugs should communicate at once with Senators from their state urging immediate action on this important measure. Senate 2849.
Such represents the same sort of satanic perversion of government as seen today with various 'Baptists', including the full delegation of what constitutes acceptable medicine as whatever is approved by the US FDA.