Monday, July 26, 2010

God Must Dislike Mieczyslaw & Wlodimir Ledochowski’s Bloody Revenge for Bismarck’s Kulturkampf

as reflected by Poland's 2008 and 2010 electoral results


“God is cleansing Poland,”
he said.
“After this her [spiritual] light will shine on the world" - Maximilian Kolbe



From the blog “Strange Maps” of election results in Poland in 2008 and 2010

http://bigthink.com/ideas/21401

“Your map showing the electoral divide in Ukraine (#343) is quite interesting, and put me in mind of a similar one that I saw last year, that prompted me do a bit of map research,” writes David G.D. Hecht. “If you look at the Wikipedia article on the Polish legislative elections of 2007, there is a map there similar to the Ukrainian one. I looked at this map and thought, hmmm…where have I seen this divide before? Looks very familiar. This isn’t just some urban/rural, professional/worker, white-wine-and-brie/beer-and-sausages thing!”

Mr Hecht did some overlay work, and came up with this remarkable fit: “The divide between the (more free-market) PO and the (more populist) PiS almost exactly follows the old border between Imperial Germany and Imperial Russia, as it ran through Poland! How about that for a long-lasting cultural heritage?!?” How about: amazing, bordering on the unbelievable?

The Ukraine map isn’t the first example on this blog of electoral cartography showing older cultural divides. Map #330 demonstrates a correlation in the Southern US states between areas of intense cotton production in 1860 and counties voting for Obama in 2008. And map #108 shows the regional divides at issue in France during the 2007 presidential election. I am reminded of German artist Heinrich Böll (b. 1917 in Cologne), who once said that he could still sense the cultural difference between both banks of the Rhine, once the border between the Roman Empire and the barbarian hordes across the river.

The erasure of older borders doesn’t mean they totally disappear — the new map is a palimpsest, even if it sometimes has to be held up to the UV light of an election for those old, overwritten boundaries to reappear. But it is quite strange for an old border like the one between the Kaiser‘s Germany and the Czar‘s Russia to reappear on a Polish election map as recent as 2007. Poland has moved around the map of Europe quite a bit, most recently in 1945. Poland basically moved west, losing its eastern part to the Soviets and gaining the eastern part of Nazi Germany.

The losses and gains of territory were accompanied by huge movements of people, in numbers probably not seen since the Völkerwanderung at the collapse of the Roman Empire. Expropriated Germans moved west, as did Poles, who took their place. In the context of that momentous re-organising of the region’s ethnic composition, the palimpsest of the Imperial border, cutting Poland in half, seems improbable. And yet there it is, in an almost perfect fit. As I am not an expert in Polish politics, the history of Polish resettlement in the country’s new territories, or the putative phenomenon of cultural-historical anamnesis, I welcome all tentative explanations for this phenomenon.

Many thanks to Mr Hecht for producing and sending in this overlay map.



Meiczyslaw Ledochowski: of the devoutly Roman Catholic ‘Noble’ Ledochowski family, born October 29, 1822, who in December 1865 became Archbishop of Poznań and Gniezno and Primate of Poland (both cities then a part of the Prussian Province of Posen), and a figure famous for his conflict with Bismarck’s Prussia stance against the Roman Catholic Church’s political power following Pope – declaration of papal infallibility, and who was famously jailed by Bismarck’s government for nearly 24 months.


Accordingly, M Ledochowski became an increasingly potent influence at the Vatican:
“He spent two full years in prison before being liberated and sentence to exile, and he then proceeded to Rome where he lived as the honored guest, first of Pius IX and then of Leo XIII, exercising a potent influence at the Vatican. So much so, indeed, that before Bismarck would consent to a cessation of the so-called Culterkampf, he insisted that Cardinal Count Ledochowski should leave Rome and cease to be a member of the Pope’s immediate entourage.”
According to The New York Times, January 23, 1892, M Ledochowski was vengeful:
http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2007/10/new-york-times-on-papacy-and-cardinal.html

http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?_r=1&res=9B07E3DA1738E233A25757C2A9679C94639ED7CF&oref=slogin


Ledochowski, that proud, imperious, and able Pole who made Bismarck such worlds of trouble in the old Kulturkampf day and who has been able to impose his will very often upon even the present Pope. This powerful man was in a German prison when Pius IX created him a Cardinal in 1875. Next year he was released and banished, and he has since lived in Rome, devoting his great wealth and talents to building up a militant Ultramontagne party about him. His wrath at the treatment he received at the hands of Bismarck has colored all his political views. He has hated both Germany and Italy and has looked unceasingly forward to the time when French bayonets should restore the temporal power of the Vatican in the old Roman States.

If we assume that this spirited and resolute prelate will shortly be ruling the Church through its nominal head, it becomes a most anxious question how he will accept the existing political conditions of Europe which have so radically changed since 1875. The new rulers of the Germans have been at pains to show their desire to abolish the last traces of the Kulturkampf. When the pending Prussian Education bill is passed, the German Catholics will be actually stronger than they were before the May laws. During the last half year these dispatches have frequently reflected the new interest which William and his immediate entourage are displaying in the Polish question. Of course a good deal of this has arisen naturally from the contemplation of the necessity of sooner or later fighting Russia: but even more it represents the effort to allure Ledochowski into friendship with Germany by an appeal to his national sentiment. How far this has successor will be, as has been said, a most anxious question.

In any event under this new regime there would be an abrupt cessation of pastorals on Socialistic and labor problems and of poems about St. Thomas Aquinas. We should instead see the Vatican boldly embark upon the troubled waters of European diplomacy, seeking alliances and taking desperate risks upon the fortune in the next war.
It was this vengeful and increasingly powerful Vatican official who became an increasingly important figure in the upbringing of his nieces and nephews following the death of his brother Antonil Ledochowski from small pox that he contacted from visiting his eldest daughter Marie Theresa in 1885. And it was the time that Maria Theresa, the second daughter Ursula, and the third sibling (and the first son) Wlodimir devoted their lives to the Roman Catholic Church.








Wlodimir, who eventually became the Jesuit Superior General, reportedly had a devotion dating back to his childhood regarding his uncle Mieczyslaw’s imprisonment by Bismarck’s Prussian led new 2nd Reich established in 1871:

From a Baltimore newspaper April 17, 1915
“When the new Black Pope was yet a lad he witnessed the persecution and imprisonment of his uncle, the late Cardinal Ledochowski , who had estates in German Poland, and whom Bismarck regarded with mingled fear and hatred of the persecuted Poles in Germany”



The idea of Germany’s ultimately being set up for defeat was in line with the Pope (with his doctrine of 'papal infallibility"):
On January 18th, 1874 -- thus on the anniversary of the founding of the German Reich -- he declared at an assembly of international pilgrims that Bismarck was the serpent in the paradise of mankind. This serpent seduced Germans into wishing to be more than god himself. Such an over extension of the human self would be followed by a humiliation such as no people had ever before tasted!

Only the Eternal one knew whether or not the grain of sand on the mountains of eternal retribution had already been released.

This retribution was growing to avalanche proportions and it would rush in a few years at the clay feet of this Reich and transform it into ruins. This Reich, which, like the tower of Babel, had been erected in defiance of god, would pass away to the glory of god.
Such Papal sentiment, resentful and vengeful, given the subsequent history, apparently flowed to Mieczyslaw’s nephew Wlodimir Ledochowki:

From Tupper Saussy:
http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2007/06/wlodimir-vladimir-ledochowski-according.html
Wlodimir Ledochowski was a Polish aristocrat who by 1906 had demonstrated such exceptional skills in international diplomacy that Jesuit Superior General Franz Xavier Wernz (under whose tutelage Pacelli had done his prost graduate research in canon law) appointed him Consultor General for Germany, Austria-Hungary, Russia, Bosnia, Serbia, Croatia, and Poland, as well as Belgium and the Netherlands.

“Consultor General” is the equivalent of a cabinet post. It empowered Ledochowski to lace the future of his nations with alliances that lay buried like so many land-mines. This is not an unusual feat for a Jesuit strategist. Indeed, the Society of Jesus (which is the pope’s private CIA and veritable Mother of Spies) is renowned for “Orthelloizing” nations- setting them up for mutual destruction, as when Othello’s trusted but treacherous advisor Iago gloats to the audience, “Now whether he kills Cassio or Cassio him, or each do kill the other, every way makes my gain.”

(It’s foolish, in my opinion, not to suspect a covert military strategist of anything he has the authority, means, and requirement to do. To ignore him is to be conquered by his strategy, which is usually to foster ignorance of his most decisive operations.

Triggering World War

Most historians agree that the first World War was triggered by the Serbian Concordat of June 1914. Eugenio Pacelli was the Concordat's acknowledged author, but Vladimir Ledochowski had authority, means, and requirement to ghost it.

The Serbian Concordat promised (a) Vatican support of Serbia's liberation from Roman Catholic Austria-Hungary, while (b) pitting Roman Catholic evangelism against the Serbian state religion, Eastern Orthodoxy, a faith that denies the supremacy of the Roman papacy.

Such a policy was sure to provoke belligerency between Austria-Hungary and Serbia, just as Jesuit military strategy created enmity between America and Great Britain to incite a Revolution that resulted in the world's first republic governable by Roman Catholic laypersons. The underlying purpose of the Serbian Concordat, like the Declaration of Independence, was to restructure the world according to the requirements of Rome. What those requirements were we shall learn presently.

Four days after Eugenio Pacelli signed the Concordat, a Serbian terrorist assassinated the heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne. Within weeks, nations with no more reason to make war than the alliances they had signed began outfitting their respective soldiery for what looked like Armageddon.

The Purpose of World War I

Immediately upon assuming his Generalate, Vladimir Ledochowski fled Rome (Austria, after all, was now at war with Italy) and set up office with two assistants in his mother's castle at Zizers, Switzerland. In 1917, Ledochowski invited Mathias Erzberger, a deputy from the German Catholic Center party, to Zizers for a secret meeting.

Erzberger later reported to friends that the General had persuaded him to support a strategy of destroying the unified Reich under the Protestant Kaiser Wilhelm II in order to bring the Catholic nations of central and eastern Europe together in a pan-German federation under a charismatic dictator charged with subduing the communist menace from the east. Dr. Hans Carossa, documenting the deputy's fact patterns after Zizers, observed that “Every political maneuver that Erzberger has engaged in since his discussion with the Jesuit General has only served to advance this Jesuit political strategy.” (Manfred Barthel, The Jesuits, William Morrow, p. 254-5)


Means A: The Lusitania

As much as Ledochowski needed to mobilize America against Germany, America was disinterested in European events. In fact, President Woodrow Wilson repeatedly declared that Europe's calamities were of absolutely no concern to Americans. But soon after Ledochowski ensconced in Zizers (locals pronounce it "Caesar's"), things started going his way. A German submarine sank the RMS Lusitania off the coast of Ireland with 128 Americans aboard. This act, wrote Jim Marrs in his study of clandestine governments (Rule By Secrecy, HarperCollins, 2000), “set off a firestorm of anti-German feeling throughout the United States, fanned by the Rockefeller-[J.P.] Morgan dominated press.” Marrs added that “Morgan was the Rothschilds' American representative—some say partner.” The house of Rothschild is bound by fiduciary duty to facilitate the Jesuit General's needs. According to Encyclopedia Judaica, the Rothschilds are “Guardians of the Vatican Treasury.” The Rothschild press used the Lusitania to foment hatred among Americans toward “the hideous Hun.” But a stunt even more dramatic was needed to secure a declaration of war.


Means B: The Zimmerman Telegram

War resulted from the famous Zimmerman Telegram, which the Rothschild press sensationally published in America on March 1, 1917. In the telegram, supposedly decoded by British interceptors, German foreign minister Arthur Zimmermann proposed to the German ambassador in Mexico a German-Mexican alliance against the United States in which Germany would support the Mexican recapture of territory in Texas, Arizona and New Mexico.

A German official talking secretly of invading Texas, Arizona, and New Mexico brought the war suddenly home

Normally, when the alleged proponent of such an explosive notion—true or not—is asked for verification, he follows good diplomatic form and categorically denies responsibility. Not Arthur Zimmermann. At a Berlin news conference on March 3rd, a reporter for the Hearst papers—which columnist George Seldes terms "the most pro-Catholic press in America”—caught Zimmermann's attention and stated: “Of course Your Excellency will deny this story.” Zimmermann replied, “I cannot deny it. It is true.”

Is this a script, or what?

Zimmermann's inexplicable admission (and shamefully unprofessional, unless done in obedience to the General or the Rothschilds) gave President Wilson no alternative but to ask Congress for precisely what Vladimir Ledochowski desired: a declaration that a state of war existed with Germany

Congress complied on April 6, the Guardians of the Vatican Treasury cranked out the credit (through the Rothschilds' brand new Federal Reserve), and over the next year and a half, more than 364,000 American lives were sacrificed (out of 4,355,000 mobilized) to Ledochowski's objective of destroying the Reich and replacing its Protestant Kaiser with a charismatic dictator.

Came Armistice Day, November 11, 1918, the Reich was devastated . The Kaiser had fled for the safety of Holland.

Power-drunk from overthrowing czarist Russia, Bolshevik mobs flying red flags overran Bavaria. All Munich's diplomatic legations returned to their home countries. The Vatican nunciature alone remained.

On June 28, 1919, the Allies presented the Treaty of Versailles for Germany to sign. The Diktat, as Germans called it (“dictated peace”), only perfected their devastation—forcing them to accept sole responsibility for the war, ripping great chunks of territory away from the Reich, and reducing German naval and military power to practically nil.

The moment had arrived for the introduction of Vladimir Ledochowski's “charismatic dictator."

He entered history at 15 Brienner Strasse late one blustery night during the winter following the Diktat...

Mission Accomplished

Sister Pascalina recalled the moment for her biographers, Paul Murphy and Rene Arlington (La Popessa, Viking, 1983).

The nunciature was asleep. Pascalina heard knocking at the door. She answered to find a young Austrian soldier standing there, a corporal and a Catholic, bearing a letter of introduction from a leading Bavarian politician citing him for acts of bravery during the war.

Pascalina issued the young man into the sitting room and awoke Archbishop Pacelli. Their meeting went fast. The soldier vowed to check the spread of atheistic communism in Munich and elsewhere.

Pascalina heard Pacelli say, “Munich has been good to me, so has Germany. I pray Almighty God that this land remain a holy land, in the hands of Our Lord, and free of communism.”

She then saw Pacelli give the soldier “a large cache of Church money to aid the rising revolutionary and his small, struggling band of anticommunists.”

“Go, quell the devil's works,” the archbishop told him. “Help spread the love of Almighty God.”

Sister Pascalina never forgot the young soldier's face or his name—Adolf Hitler.


Wlodimir Ledochowski, 26th Jesuit Superior General,
Polish paternal lineage, maternal Swiss-Austrian lineage
b. in Austria on October 6, 1866
became 'Black Pope' February 11, 1915

Franz Xavier Wernz, 25th Jesuit Superior General,
German
b. December 4, 1842 - d. August 19, 1914


Giuseppe Melchiorre Sarto (Pope Pius X),
Italian, part Polish,
b.June 2, 1835 - d. August 20, 1914

The circumstances of Wlodimir Ledochowski’s ascent to the Black Papacy -- namely the statistically unlikely day apart sudden deaths of his predecessor, 25th Jesuit Order Superior General Franz Wernz, and Pope Pius X in August 1914, just weeks after WWI’s outbreak -- suggests a power struggle by an entity with a deeper counter reformation agenda, perhaps too extreme for some within the Vatican to support, and hence cloaked.

That war would end with, amongst other things, the re-emergence of the Polish state after being wiped off the map in 1795. Perhaps Wlodimir Ledochowski enticed Wernz and Pius X with the idea of what became WW1 with Germany defeating Russia and hence liberating the part of Poland under Russian rule, with the secreted idea of Germany then being defeated in order to give Posen (Poznan) back to Poland.

Yet other goals, consistent with the idea of extending Rome’s power, though perhaps too extreme for others to support, would require a second such war. Hence say Ledochowski would plan WW1 with such people, he would not rely upon their support for such a second such agenda stage, and hence have to have both killed to pursue his goals as the 26th Jesuit Order Superior General via his 20th century continuation of the counter reformation. As such, Wlodimir Ledochowski continued with steering nations during WWI.

From Frank O’Collins
http://one-evil.org/people/people_20c_Ledochowski.htm
Few have probably heard of this Jesuit Superior General. But this man, more than any other can claim something so evil, few can match it- in being the brains behind the starting of not one, but two world wars- WWI and WWII. History books in large part deliberately misdirect us to the actual starting events and following up battles of war, the heroes, the villains and who eventually wins.
But as many readers know, war is much more than simply killing people- it is also about making money- financing war and building weapons as it is about power- who loses control and infrastructure – who changes the influence of cultures and other religions. World War I was as much about the War of Princes vs the Jesuits, then its timing and results make sense. Prior to World War I, the European monarchies were back on the ascendancy. But these same royal families were the ones who destroyed the Jesuits in the 18th Century. The Jesuits had never forgotten, nor had the Papacy against the intrusion into Papal affairs of a more confident ruling class.
It was Ledochowski who played an instrumental part in helping arrange the chess board so that by the end of World War I, many of the Catholic and Protestant Monarchies were destroyed. But his most elaborate evil was to be seen in the meticulous events leading up to World War II. In finding a close ally in Pope Pius XII, the Papacy and Jesuits for the first time in three hundred years become once again as one- planning the total destruction of the remaining power of Protestantism in Europe- the last war of Reformation.

A slice of Europe Illustration: Religious Situation in Central Europe
about a century after the start of Martin Luther’s Reformation
(Calvinists RED; Lutherans PINK; Roman Catholics BLUE)

It was Ledochowski’s Roman Catholic religious war, as I initially posted in June, 2007:
Target certain groups of people, such as people who are educated, Jewish, Orthodox or Protestant, particularly Lutherans from eastern Germany.

Set up a chain of events culminating in bloody wars targeting all of these groups, with 10s if not 100s of millions of deaths. In other words, figure out an evil gigantic game of pinball if you will.

Set this into motion by setting up evil governments, government entities and government leaders, particularly the 3rd Reich, the SS and Adolph Hitler, and the USSR and the KGB and Joseph Stalin.

Make sure that key events, along with all of the major players, are manipulated for the desired outcome, including perhaps even your fellow Jesuits, who may not necessarily know your objective[s].

In this case of geo political religious chessboard, that meant a Germany starting a brutal war against civilians, which it would lose.
Indeed, note the timing of Wlodimir Ledochowski’s death, on Decmeber 13, 1912- a mere 24 days after the war turned at Stalingrad with the start of the USSR counteroffensive on November 19, 1942, with reports of him having gastro-intestinal difficulties.



WW2: the Vatican’s continuing counter reformation war to ‘Cleanse’ Europe

Against Jewish Peoples


Against liberals, 'modernists', such as those in Poland

Against Baltic Protestants


Against Prussia- Oder Neisse Line goal ‘prophesied’ by Maximillian Kolbe before WW2


Wlodimir (Vladimir) Ledochowski: War Culpability Admission

Steering War as Counter Reformation Agenda




Ante Pavelic

b. July 14, 1889 – d. December 28, 1959
“Poglavnik” (Headman) of Clerical-Fascist Ustasha Croatia

“we shall convert one third, we shall kill one third and one third will leave willingly or unwillingly”

Pavelic with Franciscan Monks

Maximillan Kolbe- Franciscan
Born- died 1941 immediately prior to Ustashe taking control of Croatia



From “A Man For Others: Maximilian Kolbe Saint of Auschwitz In the Words of Those Who Knew Him” by Patricia Treece, published by Harper & Row Publishers, 1982 hardcover 1st edition, at page 73.

http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2007/08/father-saint-maximilian-kolbes-our-war_06.html
Though written in 1934 for his spiritual soldiers of the far flung Militia, an article entitled “Our War” sums up the message that consumed so much of Kolbe’s energy between 1936 and 1939. In it he says:

Don’t set out to do your own works for God, however great these might be, but give yourself humbly into his hands to do his works.

Accept all that happens as his will, including the sufferings he permits (not causes) you to undergo at the hands of evil men, knowing that even these will mysteriously enrich you.

As embers of the spiritual army fighting under the generalship of Mary, give yourself to God through service to her. To be one in will with Mary of the great fiat, the only human being whose will has never deviated by her choice from God’s, is to be perfectly united to the will of God. And it is this alignment of your will with his that is the pressing business of your life.

Offering yourself totally to God, let him transform you into a knight of love who, with others, will conquer the whole world, not in the sense of capturing it, but of freeing it.

He ends this article by saying that when each Militia member is “set aflame with the fire of divine love (I repeat we are not talking here of sweet tears and feelings, but if the will) … melted (and) fused to God … we will melt the whole world and each individual in it with love.”

And at p 107:
http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2007/08/from-man-for-others-maximilian-kolbe.html
Brother Arnold may be right in thinking that Father Maximilian, in talking about his mystical experience in Japan, was buoying his own spirits. Equally possible is that he was trying to prepare Brother Arnold for those moments – and beyond them – when the distraught young secretary would try to follow his spiritual father into the Gestapo’s car.

Brother Cyprian said Father Maximilian’s “seraphic and ardent” love of God was visible in his conversation and in the conferences he gave the Brothers. Certainly it was this love that permitted him to look at Poland’s tragedy as others could not. In March 1938, before most people thought of a war, he had said to the Brothers:

During the first centuries, the Church was persecuted. The blood of martyrs watered the seeds of Christianity. Later, when the persecutions ceased, one of the Fathers of the Church deplored the lukewarm ness of Christians. He rejoiced when persecutions returned. In the same way, we must rejoice in what will happen, for in the midst of trials our zeal will become more ardent. Besides, are we not in the hands of the Blessed Virgin? Is it not our most ardently desired ideal to give our lives for her? We live only once. We die only once. Therefore, let it be according to her good pleasure. [!!!]

Once war came, he did not change his tune:

“God is cleansing Poland,” he said. “After this her [spiritual] light will shine on the world.”

According to Richard Whitehall's page 95 cite of the book

"Rex Germanorum, Populos Sclavorum: An Inquiry into the Origin & Early History of the Serbs/Slavs of Sarmatia, Germania, & Illyria" by Ivo Vukcevich
"In World War II, it should be noted, Moslem leaders placed the blame the crusading war and genocide against the Serbs and the chaos in Bosnia squarely on the shoulders of the Austro-Polish 'Black Pope,' Wladimir Ledochowski, Superior General of the Jesuits, who, perhaps inspired by deranged visions of a divine Polish mission, appears to have supported Roman Catholic crusade against schismatics in eastern and southeastern Europe."

richard_whitehall@hotmail.com

http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2007/06/wlodimir-vladimir-ledochowski-final.html
Let IT be KNOWN! That @ Adolf Eichmann's trial in Israel in 1961, Eichmann clearly stated that both he and Reinhard Heydrich were answerable to the PopeS (White Pope-Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli and the Black Popes-Jesuit General Wvladimir Ledochowski S.J. a Polish Jesuit) for the "Final Solution decree of the Vatican Third Reich of Europe using Four Roman Catholic Dictators Hitler,Pavelic,Mussolini and Franco!

On December 7th 1941 (Pearl Harbor)the Nazi Catholic Stormtrooper SS began GAS VAN OPERATIONS in Lodz and Chelmno regions of Poland, Jews were herded into Catholic Church in Chelmno until the next morning the hundreds of GAS VANS arrived escorting the Jews from the Roman Church directly into the GAS VANS once the measured drive to the remote forests the Jews were dead via carbon monoxide!! (source: "Shoah" documentary, Claude Lanzmann)

cordially, Michael Todd Lehman
Indeed, with the entities he created, such as the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service, Ledochowski created an endowing legacy.
http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2007/12/wlodimir-vladimir-ledochowski-era-no.html

There seemed, indeed, during those years of Ledochowski, Pope Pius XI, and Pius XII, no real limit to what both Jesuitism and overall Roman Catholicism could achieve. Even – especially, we should say – in the afterglow of Ledochowski’s long reign and into the Generalate of his successor, Belgian Jean-Baptise Janssens, the magic power of momentum seemed to continue.

P 221 The Jesuits: The Society of Jesus and the Betrayal of the Roman Catholic Church

Dr. Nicholas Murray Butler, who met Father Ledochowski in 1930, wrote later that "everyone in Rome I was told that Father Ledochowski would rank as one of the two or three greatest heads of the Jesuit Order," an estimate which would group him with such men as Ignatius Loyola, [April 19, 1541 to July 31, 1556] the first [Jesuit] general, Francisco Borgia, [July 2, 1565 to October 1, 1572] the third, and [Claudius] Aquaviva, [Feb 19, 1581 to Jan 31, 1615] the fifth.

And according to Malachi Martin:

http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2007/09/wlodimr-vladimir-ledochowski-last-of.html

It was during the twenty-seven year Generalate of Father Wlodzimierz Ledochowski (1915-1942) that the traditional character of the Society received the firmest stamp and clearest definition since the Generalate of Claudio Acquaviva in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. One might even say that Ledochowski insisted on fidelity to the structure of Jesuit obedience, was an almost merciless disciplinarian, and maintained a stream of instructions flowing out to the whole Society about every detail of Jesuit life and Ignatian ideals. He know exactly what Jesuits should be according to the Society’s Constitutions and traditions; and under strong hands of two quite authoritarian Popes, Pius XI and Pius XII, he reestablished the close ties that had once linked papacy and Jesuit Generalate. Ledochowski, in fact, gave renewed meaning to that old Roman nickname of the Jesuit Father General, “the Black Pope. Just as Pius XII can be described as the last of the great Roman Popes, so Ledochowski can be called the last of the great Roman Generals of the Jesuits.

p 221 Malachi Martin, The Jesuits: The Society of Jesus and the Betrayal of the Roman Catholic Church


That he remains such an obscure figure, ignored usually even by the Jesuits is consistent with the unpleasantness of the reality.



Wlodimir Ledochowski Un-Mentioned by Historian of Polish History Norman Davis

Historians Pretend that Religious Wars in Europe ended in 1648


Wlodimir Ledochowski Ignored by the Jesuits

More about Wlodimir Ledochowski- Kulturkampf Revenge


Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Bell CA's Masonic Featherbedding?

Should not fiscal responsibility demand public knowledge of government official's fraternal order memberships?

Or shall we just continually get screwed by the ancient regime?
California Official's $800,000 Salary in City of 38,000 Triggers Protests

By Christopher Palmeri - Jul 20, 2010

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-07-20/california-official-s-800-000-salary-in-city-of-38-000-triggers-protests.html

Hundreds of residents of one of the poorest municipalities in Los Angeles County shouted in protest last night as tensions rose over a report that the city’s manager earns an annual salary of almost $800,000.

An overflow crowd packed a City Council meeting in Bell, a mostly Hispanic city of 38,000 about 10 miles (16 kilometers) southeast of Los Angeles, to call for the resignation of Mayor Oscar Hernandez and other city officials. Residents left standing outside the chamber banged on the doors and shouted “fuera,” or “get out” in Spanish.

It was the first council meeting since the Los Angeles Times reported July 15 that Chief Administrative Officer Robert Rizzo earns $787,637 -- with annual 12 percent raises -- and that Bell pays its police chief $457,000, more than Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck makes in a city of 3.8 million people. Bell council members earn almost $100,000 for part-time work.

City Attorney Edward Lee said the council members couldn’t discuss salaries in public without advance notice. The council then adjourned for a private session. About an hour later, the council members returned, and Hernandez read a statement saying the city would prepare a report on the salaries and seek public comment at the next council meeting, scheduled for Aug. 16.

Residents shouted in protest. Lee said he would have the room cleared if people continued to speak out of line. Police Chief Randy Adams said the fire department wanted to end the meeting because the crowd outside was blocking the door.

Easing Tensions

Then, in what appeared to be an effort to ease tensions, Hernandez announced that the meeting to discuss salaries would be held instead on July 26.

After the meeting, Bell resident Ali Saleh read a statement from a newly formed group called the Bell Association to Stop the Abuse. He called for an independent audit of city salaries and contracts.

On July 1 Bell took control of many of the city functions of neighboring Maywood, a city whose council members voted to contract out almost all services. Saleh also asked that Bell stop that process until the city’s salary investigations were resolved.

Bell has sold two general obligation bond issues totaling $50 million in the past six years, according to prospectuses for the bonds and information in the city’s annual financial statement for 2009. In that time, its debt has risen to $1,972 per capita in 2009 from $599 in 2004, according to its annual financial statement.

Inquiry Under Way

The city’s personal income was $24,800 per capita in 2008, according to its financial statement. That compares with an average of $32,819 nationwide, according to 2010 figures from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis.

Bell’s general fund revenue declined 4.6 percent to $14.1 million for the fiscal year that ended June 30, 2009, according to the city’s financial statement. The city’s expenses rose 2.3 percent to $15.9 million in same period.

The Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office has begun an inquiry into Bell council member pay, according to Dave Demerjian, head of the office’s Public Integrity Division. He said Bell council members were receiving $8,083 a month, mostly by serving on city-related commissions.

“We’re reviewing the council member salaries to see if they conform to state law,” Demerjian said in a telephone interview.

California law limits the salaries of council members to several hundred dollars a month, depending on the size of the city, according to Hector De La Torre, a state assemblyman from nearby South Gate, who sponsored legislation in 2005 that limits how much council members can get paid from other city-related assignments to $150 a month.

‘Obscene Pay’

De La Torre said that after his bill was passed, Bell’s City Council voted to operate under its own charter, rather than adhere to state laws on how cities should be run.

“It seems obscene to me,” De La Torre said in a telephone interview. “People making $30,000 a year are paying taxes so that their council members can make $80,000.”

Adams, Bell’s police chief, said in an interview after the council meeting that he had retired as chief of police in the much larger city of Glendale, California, when Bell officials approached him.

“I told them they would have to pay me what I was making in retirement and the $165,000 I would make as chief of police,” Adams said.

Adams said he had been brought in to end corruption in Bell’s police department.

“Some of the former members of this force are in the federal penitentiary,” he said.

‘Streets Are Cleaner’

Hernandez, the mayor, defended the salaries in an interview with the Los Angeles Times.

“Our streets are cleaner, we have lovely parks, better lighting throughout the area, our community is better,” Hernandez said, according to the newspaper. “These things just don’t happen, they happen because he had a vision and made it happen.”

Carmen Avalos, the city clerk in South Gate, said she attended the Bell council meeting to help educate people about the political process.

“This is what we are trying to avoid,” she said in an interview at the meeting. “The lack of fiduciary responsibility, the lack of transparency.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Christopher Palmeri in Los Angeles at cpalmeri1@bloomberg.net.

Constantine's Masonic Crown?

Constantine I (emperor) (right) gives imperial power to Pope Sylvester I

Monday, July 19, 2010

We Americans, for the most part, are extremely "history-challenged"

From Key Breakthrough

Nov 3, 2009
Secret societies operate through intelligence agencies

http://keybreakthrough.blogspot.com/2009/11/secret-societies-operate-through.html

02/28'07 Vyzygoth interviews Darryl Eberhart on Beyond The Grassy Knoll

Darryl) And then just the last couple of years, I all of the sudden decided to discover that there was a real superpower behind the scenes, orchestrating things in the religious world, in the financial world, in the geopolitical world, and of course, that's what I have recently termed the "Vatican-Papacy-Jesuits-Knights of Malta cabal". And I believe they are the real real powers behind most of the powerful governments in the world, clearly with the Roman Catholic religion over a billion adherents and with super financial stockholdings etc. through their fabulously rich Knights of Malta. So by far, they are the biggest people out there. […]

Keith V-Goth) What I find people having a hard time with is the fact that this could be so perversive. And they still have a hard time believing it because of the PR that comes out of the Vatican etc. [...] The government, you know, they are not our friends. At the behest of the listener, I put up on my homepage links to three New York Times stories that tell you, the FBI was involved, you could say, and also pulled off the 1993 World Trade Tower Bombings, okay? There is three stories out there, straight from the New York Times, and they implicate themselves, they convict themselves. […] This is only the beginning of it, it's not all the FBI's fault. But the fact is, we have a problem: Our government is not our advocate, it's our adversary. […]

Darryl) The way to control governments is to bribe people, to give them money, to give them power and sexual favors. And I think, a lot of Congressmen in the past and probably to this very day, the new ones they come in, they get them in compromising position. Basically, secret societies operate through intelligence agencies. I think, we hung up on this idea of 'oh, all the CIA couldn't be bad, or all the FBI couldn't be bad, or all the national security agencies couldn't be bad – no one can pull of a conspiracy without a whole lot of people knowing.' Well, can I give him a little bit of my background? And I'll tell him why they can do that.

Keith) Absolutely.

Darryl) I spent 26 years in the intelligence community. I had a Top Secret Special Intelligence Clearance that entire time. I was at the top of my profession as a technician – eleven and a half of that was in the old U.S. Air Force Security Service. I learned Russian and Arabic languages. I was a linguist, a traffic analyst, and a reporter in the Air Force. And then I spent eight and a half years in what would be the army's equivalent to that: the old army security agency – military intelligence. And then I worked six years for the National Security Agency, after I retired from the military. And the reason that they're able to pull so many things off is, that within those intelligence communities, where you have people with top secret clearances, everything is on a need-to-know basis, and it's very compartmentalized, so that you could be in one room and the room down the hall you can't get in despite all your Top Secret Special Intelligence Clearances, because it's on a strict need-to-know basis. But the key thing is that most of the people in the CIA, the FBI, the NSA are good, red-blooded, patriotic Americans who are working hard to do their job, especially during the Cold War that they were fighting against Communism and America's enemies. And they are at the bottom, they have no idea – just like a secret society: they are at the bottom, they are popping information up, and the people at the top feed off that information, correlate it, provide it to whom they will, keep what information from whom they don't want it to get to, and that's the way they are able to control things. The Kennedy Assassination is a beautiful picture of that because you have Knights of Malta all over the intelligence community.

The FBI Assistant Director Cartha DeLoach for the FBI was the liaison to the Warren Commission. Then the CIA liaison to the Warren Commission was another Roman Catholic military order Knight of Malta James Jesus Angleton. So any information going back and forth between the Warren Commission, which is an interesting commission, had some of Kennedy's enemies on it like Allen Dulles () also a lot of top-level Freemasons were at the heads of these organizations. So again, you don't have to have all of your people in these organizations, all you have to do is have them at key choke points, key leadership positions, like Angleton was the head of the CIA's counter-intelligence – probably just as powerful as the head of the CIA – for like decades. He also set the Vatican desk, he set the Israel desk, but the key thing was: he was the liaison to the Warren Commission. So that any information going back and forth between them were handled by a couple of Roman Catholic military order Knights of Malta and, of course, you had Roman Catholic Knights of Malta involved in other areas [...] they're all over the map in the intelligence community.

Keith) Would it be fair to say that, when you do have sort of black bag operatives in the intelligence communities, that they are necessarily there because of their membership in a secret society?

Darryl) I think, if they get into any of a top position, they are either in the secret society or they're being controlled by the secret societies, whether it's through, like I said, sexual gifts, whether they give them monetary gifts ... If somebody that's either in, with them, or totally controlled by them, you're not going to be in a powerful position – I don't think – and last very long. John Kennedy is the perfect example. If you start to bug the system, they're going to either try to buy you off, give you something special, or bribe you if they know of sexual indiscretions etc., and if none of that works very quickly ... if you very powerful, very high up, that you might reveal secrets or break up like Kennedy was going to do break up the CIA into a thousand pieces, especially take the black ops from them and transfer it over to the Pentagon, then they're going to kill you. And most likely they will kill you. [...] I think, John Kennedy, and Bobby, and a few others were really trying to run stuff out of the White House, and when they started to go against some of their advisers, when he started to print money outside of the Federal Reserve, when he decided to shut down he war in Vietnam, there were just to many powerful interests in the background that decided, 'hey, he is double-crossed, thus he has got to go.'
Keith) Do you wonder if the old man hadn't taken a very debilitating stroke at the end of '61, if he would allowed those to – perhaps what I would say – 'go rogue'?
Darryl) That who had that debilitating stroke?

Keith) Joseph Kennedy

Darryl) Oh! I heard from some folks that when they said, 'your boy's got to go,' that he just nodded his head. There has been several books written about his ties with Sam Giancana and others. Joseph Kennedy – he was the mob.

Keith) Of course the fiction work which I don't think it's fiction, obviously, and the name excapes me – I think it's also the individual who wrote The Manchurian Candidate () which heavily, heavily innervates that the father knew, it was the price of doing business.
Darryl) Exactly.

Another example of good patriotic Americans, you have like Navy Seals or Special Forces that are sometimes ... especially Special Forces – I don't know if you ever had Lt. Colonel Daniel Marvin on?

Keith) No.

Darryl) He was asked to kill Lt. Commander William Bruce Pitzer [...] and he was trying to get that information out to the public, thus he had a Top Secret Clearance as Navy Lieutenant Commander, and so Marvin, Colonel ... he was then a Captain of Special Forces was asked to take him out at the Bethesda Naval Hospital. He refused because he said, you know, 'Special Forces are only used to assassinate people overseas, and you guys use the CIA here, in the U.S. I'm not gonna do it.' Well, they asked another captain and I think, he might have been the one Special Forces' Captain that killed him. But the point I'm trying to get here is that they were saying that Pitzer, Lieutenant Commander William Bruce Pitzer at the Bethesda Naval Hospital, was gonna tell secrets to the Soviets, so, you know, 'you need to kill this guy!' And that's how they get good patriotic people like Special Forces () to assassinate one who's actually a guy trying to bring important information to the American people or to reveal evil that's going on within government. And they ask a guy that's been highly-trained in assassination technics () sniper etc., 'hey, you need to kill this guy because he's selling secrets.' So, you can see, how it works. They can get a good patriotic American to kill another good patriotic American by lying to him. And that's very sad, but that's going on.

Keith) Whenever people talk about ... You know, I'm not saying people. I mean, when Wilcox, yourself, Phelps, Tom Richards, when we have discussed, or/and they had written about the Vatican and the Jesuits, everybody says, 'oh wow, they can't be into everything.' But they certainly are, I mean, their diguise is a one that nobody thinks they are capable of it, because there are supposedly ecclesiastically into, that they could have such an expansive and efficient organization. But I also want to mention one other thing: (And we had a gentleman on here () by name of Greg, who has a website that kind is devoted to occult history: http://rochester92.vox.com, and Greg if you're listening, you can be insulted by this as well.) I'm gonna to have another guest on, who are really starting to bother me with his tone. And if he's listening today, he probably won't come on, because I'm directing it to him. And that is, he writes me an email saying he will come on the show – he said, 'but my own views are very different from those who focus on the Illuminati, Freemasons and such distractions and trivia.' Well, I would love to send him back a very measured email. Because this is the kind of "locked head" that is out there, that makes so many of these things happen. This also includes people not believing that the Vatican, the Jesuits, and – as you said before – the Knights of Malta can be involved in this stuff. But now, having set that all up, there is a hierarchy! And when you mention this along with the temporal coadjutors, you're looking at a framework, so that when you mention this, it involves all this but it makes others think perhaps that we've gone loony. Your take.

Darryl) Yeah, the reason for that is, and it's very sad, and to some American I can say this: We Americans, for the most part, are extremely "history-challenged". Not only do we know very little about real church history, not only do we know very little about european history, world history, but we know very little about true American history. I ran into Europeans, Keith, when I was over in Germany and other places, that knew far more about American history than a lot of Americans do. And I talked to you earlier about this: we need to be doing more reading. You mentioned about the Jesuits – most people they can't just believe that the Jesuits are that powerful. Let me just give you a couple of quotes here. You know, a lot of people try to blame it on the Jews, to blame it on Freemasons, and it's just like I said, the last couple of years, every stone I started turning over, I started finding Jesuits, Knights of Malta, which is controlled and co-located with the Jesuit Order, involved in almost any key assassination of heads of state, important ones and throughout history, involved in fomenting wars like WW I and WW II. So here is that great quote. It's by a Canadian historian, J.E.C. Shepherd, and if the Jesuits aren't so powerful and so bad, then why would a quote like this be made.

Between 1555 and 1931, the Society of Jesus was expelled from at least 83 countries, city states and cities, for engaging in political intrigue and subversive plots against the welfare of the State, according to the records of a Jesuit priest of repute [i.e., Thomas J. Campbell]. [...] Practically every instance of expulsion was for political intrigue, political infiltration, political subversion, and inciting to political insurrection.

So, and most of the people that threw them out, Keith, were Roman Catholic monarches! They were thrown out of places like Spain and Portugal, like two and three times each, France, they were thrown out most of the Central American countries, they were thrown out of Russia several times. Of course, almost any time that that occurred, they came back with a vengeance. They were responsible for assassinating not only President Abraham Lincoln, which is something that's totally disappeared from American history text books and from encyclopedias, but they killed Czar Alexander I and Czar Alexander II of Russia, they killed King Henry III and King Henry IV of France – one of them tried to give religious liberty to all of the French people. They've got such a track record of murder, not to mention religious genocide like happened in Croatia in the 1940s.

There is another great quote – () some people, you know, try to say, the Masons are running everything – this is by another historian, it's an American historian named James Parton. Very short quote, he says:

If you trace up Masonry, through all its Orders, till you come to the grand tip-top head Mason of the World, you will discover that the dread individual and the Chief of the Society of Jesus [i.e., the Superior General of the Jesuit Order] are one and the same person.

So clearly, these guys are big power players. If we go back and study european history, we'll find out for centuries ... and of course the Jesuits are kind of – as far as the Roman Catholic Church goes – a relatively new order: they have only been around 400 and plus years. But for those 400 years, almost every single King, Queen, the mistresses of the King, the top generals in those countries – all had Jesuits for their father confessors. Their children ... of any royalty, or anybody that was important went to Jesuit colleges. In universities they were at the forefront of setting all those up. So, when you become the father confessor to the King, or the Queen, or to his mistresses, and all of the sudden you want the King to launch – let's say – a religious genocide against the Waldenses or somebody, you just go in and say, 'hey King, we want you to kill all these people, even in your own country,' and if he starts to hesitate, 'well, how about we tell the Queen about your ten mistresses?' That's why I wrote an article about the confessional. It's the greatest intelligence gathering system that the world has ever seen.

Posted by Tosco Weber at 11:32 PM

Thursday, July 8, 2010

Letter About Turkey

From Eric Jon Phelps

Dear Brother Kirk,

I am sick at the moment but feel it is necessary that I respond.As you know, the Turks are nice to westerners on the outside; inside they are secretive and suspicious---and with good reason. Turkey was created out of the parceled-up Ottoman Empire at the Treaty of Versailles. They regard it as theft of the greatest magnitude, as would I.

What they do not know as that the last Sultan (who was also a freemason) and Knight of Malta King George V worked together to bring about the Ottoman Empire's loss of WWI. Both worked together during the Armenian and Assyrian massacres of Orthodox Christians---Rome using Islam to kill "heretics and liberals." Remember at about the same time (1917), the Turks fired not one shot when General Allenby entered Jerusalem. Leaflets were dropped and the Turks, well---they just faded away because someone gave that order! Thus, the Jesuits used their apostate White Protestant British Empire to end their Sunni-Islamic Ottoman Empire. They needed Jerusalem to be inhabited by Jews in order to build the Third Hebrew Temple. And according the Pierre van Paassen's Days of Our Years, this was Haj Amin al Husseini's greatest fear while it was that thug who was appointed Grand Mufti by one of the Pope's court Jews, England's acting Lord High Commissioner for Palestine, Herbert Samuel.

Now, Turkey is to never be admitted into the European Union---never! One of the first indications of this was Turkey's attack on Cyprus in 1974, stealing nearly one half of the island. The Turkish northern half is trashed, while the Southern Greek Orthodox half is quite prosperous and beautiful. This was done at the height of the Cold War. Why? Suppossedly, Greece and Turkey were allies against the superhuman Soviet Threat! The fact is Cyprus belongs to the Turks and was torn away from Turkey at Versailles. Turkey wants it back---and is going to have all of the island as this present 12th crusade against Islam unfolds. I maintain, all of Cyprus is a consolation prize for not being admitted into the pope's EU. That EU is to be Islamic free. The reason Rome has brought the Muslims into Europe is to unite the Whites against a common enemy once driven to desperation. Berlin is called "Little Istanbul" and the Germans are fuming about it!

Well, if Turkey has no future with the condemned US and the the coming superpower of the EU, then were shall she go? Into the arms of Mother Russia, and this is exactly what the Prophet Ezekiel declares (Ezekiel 38). Togarmah is Turkey. Therefore, we can begin to observe a gradual move away from the EU (especially with the Gulen movement) and towards Moscow. This alliance will be solidified when the US is blamed for blowing Mecca, Medina and the Jerusalem Mosques---in fact to be blown by the Saudis serving the Jesuit Papacy via Freemasonry and the king being a member of the Order of the Golden Fleece which is a noble Roman Catholic Order.

After this present crusade, the US, Canada and Mexico (NAU) will be partitioned by the victors (Sino-Soviet-Muslim alliance); the Pope's EU will be complete and referred to as Shengen; the Far East will be united by Japan and China (including Austraila); and Africa will be united by a Black king subject to the Pope. But what most Bible readers are missing is the identification of the kingdom of the beast (Rev. 16:10) with its capital city being rebuilt Babylon (Rev. 18). Thus, the high Jesuits running the Jesuit Papacy have decided to demolish the three mosques sacred to Islam as per above. In exchange for the willing sacrifice, the high Islamic Freemasonic leaders will be given a fabulous new kingdom, the beginning of which is Dubai. The construction projects throughout Baghdad by American contractors is unbelievable---unless you understand this grand design.

I trust this is helpful.

Lord Bless,

Brother Eric



To: eric@vaticanassassins.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 3:57 PM
Subject: Turkey

Hi Eric, I have listened to much of your information and understand what you have emparted on your listeners and how this relates to those 'running the show'. My wife's family is are Turkish (I am western) and they are very educated and very nice, respectful people. They are I guess 1 level 'below' the aristocracy and decision makers of Turkey. This means I have 'some' level of contact on a social level with captains of industry, CEO's, ex-Ministers, politicians, Governers, Mayors, so I meet those who are themselves close to current Cabinet Ministers etc, even close enough to get on the phone to the P.M. Without mentioning names... Many or even most of these gentlemen are clearly high level Grand Orient/Muslim brotherhood members, given one can clearly observe handshakes etc.

They are very nice gentlemen and I respect them very much on an individual basis. They are secular and not in agreement with the AK Parti in power, but appreciate that political stability is "good for business".

As a bible believer who understands the 'end game' so often written about, prophecised about, and drummed into even blue lodge family in the West (rebuilt Solomons Temple with risen Horis, anti-messiah etc) I would like your opinion on where you see Turkey headed in the near/medium term and why. I understand who the defacto rulers of Turkey are, who runs things out of Cairo, and who runs that (and so on up the pyramid with all roads leading to...) so no need to window dress any response. I also have listened to Mr Riviera and agree in theory with what he was told by his boss, so you will not shock or offend on that issue. This is personal for me, as I respect the Turkish people and I care about the direction (east, south east, gulen movement, bagdad caliphate?) the current administration is taking the country. Timelines, names, any specifics would be invaluable to me. I am also well respected by these gentlemen, who are 'near' the inner circle (including the dynastic families of Turkey) so I'm only 1-2 degrees removed from the movers and shakers (so to speak). So any accurate, fact based information you provide/confirm can easily be provided in a discrete and trustworthy manner to these individuals. You would be surprised how well received I am in certain circles. I understand this email is no doubt flagged somehow in alphabet agencies, with possible future ramifications for me which I understand are real and serious, but God doesn't give a spirit of fear, so I must not also and I pray this message reaches you safe and that the power of the holy spirit surrounds us both and protects us.

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

Obama Administration Opposes Internet Freedom of Speech

'Change' need not be for the better.

Obama Information Czar Calls For Banning Free Speech

Sunstein: Taxation and censorship of dissenting opinions “will have a place” under thought police program advocated in 2008 white paper

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, January 14, 2010

The controversy surrounding White House information czar and Harvard Professor Cass Sunstein’s blueprint for the government to infiltrate political activist groups has deepened, with the revelation that in the same 2008 dossier he also called for the government to tax or even ban outright political opinions of which it disapproved.

Sunstein was appointed by President Obama to head up the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, an agency within the Executive Office of the President.

On page 14 of Sunstein’s January 2008 white paper entitled “Conspiracy Theories,” the man who is now Obama’s head of information technology in the White House proposed that each of the following measures “will have a place under imaginable conditions” according to the strategy detailed in the essay.


1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing.

2) Government might
impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such
theories.
That’s right, Obama’s information czar wants to tax or ban outright, as in make illegal, political opinions that the government doesn’t approve of. To where would this be extended? A tax or a shut down order on newspapers that print stories critical of our illustrious leaders?

And what does Sunstein define as “conspiracy theories” that should potentially be taxed or outlawed by the government? Opinions held by the majority of Americans, no less.

The notion that Lee Harvey Oswald did not act alone in killing JFK, a view shared by the vast majority of Americans in every major poll over the last ten years, is an example of a “conspiracy theory” that the federal government should consider censoring, according to Sunstein.

A 1998 CBS poll found that just 10 per cent of Americans believed that Oswald acted alone, so apparently the other 90 per cent of Americans could be committing some form of thought crime by thinking otherwise under Sunstein’s definition.

Sunstein also cites the belief that “global warming is a deliberate fraud” as another marginal conspiracy theory to be countered by government action. In reality, the majority of Americans now believe that the man-made explanation of global warming is not true, and that global warming is natural, according to the latest polls.

But Sunstein saves his most ludicrous example until last. On page 5 he characterizes as “false and dangerous” the idea that exposure to sunlight is healthy, despite the fact that top medical experts agree prolonged exposure to sunlight reduces the risk of developing certain cancers.
To claim that encouraging people to get out in the sun is to peddle a dangerous conspiracy theory is like saying that promoting the breathing of fresh air is also a thought crime. One can only presume that Sunstein is deliberately framing the debate by going to such absurd extremes so as to make any belief whatsoever into a conspiracy theory unless it’s specifically approved by the kind of government thought police system he is pushing for.

Despite highlighting the fact that repressive societies go hand in hand with an increase in “conspiracy theories,” Sunstein’s ’solution’ to stamp out such thought crimes is to ban free speech, fulfilling the precise characteristic of the “repressive society” he warns against elsewhere in the paper.

“We could imagine circumstances in which a conspiracy theory became so pervasive, and so dangerous, that censorship would be thinkable,” he writes on page 20. Remember that Sunstein is not just talking about censoring Holocaust denial or anything that’s even debatable in the context of free speech, he’s talking about widely accepted beliefs shared by the majority of Americans but ones viewed as distasteful by the government, which would seek to either marginalize by means of taxation or outright censor such views.

No surprise therefore that Sunstein has called for re-writing the First Amendment as well as advocating Internet censorship and even proposing that Americans should celebrate tax day and be thankful that the state takes a huge chunk of their income.

The government has made it clear that growing suspicion towards authority is a direct threat to their political agenda and indeed Sunstein admits this on page 3 of his paper.

That is why they are now engaging in full on information warfare in an effort to undermine, disrupt and eventually outlaw organized peaceful resistance to their growing tyranny.

Friday, July 2, 2010

Pope B16's Hindu Gesture of Shiva?

POPE BENEDICT XVI'S OCCULT MULTI-FINGERED GESTURE WITH BOTH HANDS JOINED EVOKES HINDU ALL-SEEING EYE OF SHIVA (THE "SUPREME BEING" OF THE HINDUS)

Letter from Troy:

Photo of Benedict XVI Ratzinger (above left) brought to my attention by Doug Willinger of http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/


"The Eye of Shiva" illustration (above right; source unknown, please contact me if known to the reader) was brought to my attention previously by Marco Ponce of http://marcoponce.com/ & is posted at his photo collection at: http://picasaweb.google.com/marcoponce/SymbolsEyeOfSaturnSatan#5421282767178932210


BENEDICT XVI RATZINGER'S HAND GESTURE ALSO EVOKES THIS HINDU DEITY THAT IS EITHER SHIVA OR VISHNU.


At the site that I found the photo below, the photos is labelled "Sudarsana" (also spelled in English "Sudarshana") which is apparently a weapon of a type known as a "chakra") that Shiva gave to Vishnu, according to Hindu mythology.


Internet researcher of the occult Jon X Revelator in his interesting Saturnalian study (attached here as a PDF) incorrectly labels the photo below as being a deity called Sudarsana. This is false, but presumably he found the photo below merely labelled with that word & no other info at the link that I give below. On another photo JXR labels Shiva as being a "goddess". This is false. Known to the Hindus as "Lord" Shiva, he is in fact male & is considered the supreme being in their scheme of things.


JXR interprets both solar haloes & ourobouroses (depictions of a snake in a circular formation swallowing its own tail) behind the heads of different eastern deities as representing Saturn & thus identifies them all as being one & the same. It is unclear to me whether or not in the Hindu pantheon this is considered to be so in the case of Shiva & Saturn.


In a quote that I post below it shows that "Lord" Shiva is the lord of Saturn. So the quote that JXR uses using those very words "Lord Shiva is the lord of Saturn"does not show that Shiva is Saturn. Nor does this quote that JXR apparently misreads, in which Kenneth Grant clearly implies that Shiva is Shaitan or Set (Satan) & states that Saturn is the servant of Shaitan/Sat:


"Saturn: The planetary representative of Shaitan or Set" - Aleister Crowley and the hidden god by Kenneth Grant, p. 225


However two other quotes - one from an apparently Hindu source & another by Theosophical Society founder Blavatsky - that JXR uses contend (confusingly) that they are the one & the same (rather than Saturn being a servant of Shiva):


"Lord Shiva, the ruler of the planets, is Saturn in one of his manifestations." - The Thousand Names of Shiva by Sterling Publishers Pvt., Limited,, Vijaya Kumar, p. 123


"Kiyun, or the god Kivan, worshipped by the Hebrews in the wilderness, is Shiva, the Hindu Saturn."
- Occultism of the Secret Doctrine by H.P. Blavatsky, p. 235


- TS (Much more info & a number of images posted below, please check it out!)
http://realityresearch.wordpress.com/
reality research resource
exposing the roman world order – the papal roman empire's covert global power structure & mystery babylon new world order agenda


SHIVA & SATURN:
http://web.archive.org/web/20080225212045/http://www.shreevedic.com/saturn.asp


Saturn tops the list of Surya’s nine sons in fierceness. The dark complexioned Yamuna is Saturn’s sister and Yama, the controller of death is his younger brother. Saturn’s harshness is also caused by his strange family.


According to ancient myths Surya, the Sun God, allocated a separate ‘loka’ to each of his progeny on attaining maturity.


But Saturn, who was by nature evil and greedy, was not satisfied with reigning over only one Loka. He made a plan to invade all the other Lokas.


Surya was extremely pained by this maldesign of Saturn. But his sane counsel had no effect on Saturn’s evil intention. Eventually Surya appealed to Lord Shiva. Ever ready to deliver his devotee from fear Lord Shiva appeared and warned the impudent Saturn. When Saturn ignored him a battle ensued between the two. Saturn vanquished all the Ganas of Lord Shiva along with Nandy and Veerbhadra with his amazing valour. On seeing the destruction of his army Shiva was outraged and he opened his third eye. Saturn also targeted him with his eye’s deadly vision. The whole of Saturn ‘Loka’ was engulfed in an unparalleled light born of the two might sights. An enraged Shiva then struck Saturn with his trident. Saturn could not withstand its blow and fell unconscious. Seeing his son in this state, Surya was overcome with grief. He prayed Shiva to spare Shani’s life. Easy to please Shiva eliminated all the troubles of Saturn. After this Saturn accepted Shiva’s omnipotence and sought forgiveness from him. Impressed by the fighting skill of valiant Saturn Lord Shiva admitted him in his service and appointed him the executor of punishment.


See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiva for more details on Shiva.


Note: Many very interesting photos related to the hexagram at the link below:
http://www.gosai.com/krishna-talk/84-star-david-satkona.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudarshana_Chakra
"Shiva gives Vishnu the chakra"


EXCERPTED FOOTNOTES SHOWING THAT THE THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY'S ALICE BAILEY CONSIDERED THE ALL-SEEING EYE TO BE THE EYE OF SHIVA FROM:
The All-Seeing Eye, The President, The Secretary and The Guru
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/All_Seeing_Eye.htm


“...the phrase so often employed, `the All-Seeing Eye.' This refers to the planetary Logos to see all parts, aspects and phases (in time and space) of his planetary vehicle,...”
- Alice Bailey, Discipleship in the New Age II - Teachings on the New Age - Part IV


Bailey's "planetary Logos" is a satanic trinity, the scheme is as follows,
Shamballa: Ruler - Sanat (Satan) Kumara
Hierarchy: Ruler - The [Anti] Christ
Humanity: Ruler - Lucifer
“One of the four Lipka Lords, Who stand nearest to our planetary Logos, is called 'The Living Serpent,' and His emblem is a serpent of blue with one eye, the form of a ruby, in its head. Students who care to carry this symbology a little further can connect this idea with the 'eye of Shiva' which sees and knows all...”
- Alice Bailey & Djwhal Khul - A Treatise of Cosmic Fire
“The eye of Shiva – the All-Seeing Eye, the eye which directs the will and purposes of Deity.”
- Alice Bailey & Djwhal Khul - Esoteric Astrology - III - Triangles of Energy - Constellations
The Occult Meaning of the All-Seeing Eye
Lieutenant C. A. L. Totten, to Secretary of Treasury Charles J. Folger, on February 10, 1882:
“The All-Seeing Eye is one of the oldest hieroglyphics of the Deity. The triangle also is a cabalistic symbol of the most remote antiquity...


The descent of the mystic eye and triangle in the form of a capstone to this mysterious monument [the Great Pyramid of Gizeh] of all times and nations, is to us as a people most pregnant with significance. The motto, Novus Ordo Seclorum, is a quotation from the 4th Ecologue and was borrowed in turn by Virgil from the mystic Sylbylline records.


The entire quotation is as follows: ‘Novus Ordo Seclorum altered from Magnus Soeclorum Ordo, a mighty order of the ages born anew. Both the prophetic Virgin and Saturnian kingdoms now return. Now a new progeny is let down from the heavens. Favor, chaste Lucina, the boy soon to be born in whom the iron age shall come to an end, and the golden one shall arise again in the whole earth.’”
Chapter 14: Great Cycle, Global Grid And Multidimensional Physics: The Historical Perspective


Papal Hierarchical Structure

from Troy:

PAPAL ROMAN EMPIRE: ORDER OF PRECEDENCE & INFLUENCE OF THE KEY KNIGHTHOOD ORDERS (BOTH OVERT & COVERT) - EXPANDED & REVISED [V.1]

Reality Research Resource

http://realityresearch.wordpress.com

PAPAL ROMAN EMPIRE HEADS:

* The Jesuit Order (founded in 1534 by Ignatius of Loyola)
Superior-General ("Black Pope"): Adolfo Nicolás

* Pope ("White Pope"; "Papal Caesar"; "Pontifex Maximus"; Supreme Pontiff of the [so-called] Universal Church; Bishop of Rome): Joseph "Benedict XVI" Ratzinger


SUGGESTED ORDER OF PRECEDENCE & INFLUENCE OF THE KEY KNIGHTHOOD ORDERS (BOTH OVERT & COVERT) WITHIN THE PAPAL ROMAN EMPIRE:

1: The Order of the Golden Fleece (Spanish branch) (f. 1430 by Duke Phillip III of Burgundy, Spanish/Austrian split: 1712). "Sovereign": "Prince of the Papal Roman Empire" Juan Carlos I, King of Spain [Head of the House of Bourbon; also Grand Master of eight other orders; "Stranger" Knight of the Order of the Garter; Knight of the Hispano-Neapolitan Order of St Januarius; Knight Grand Cross of the Hispano-Neapolitan Constantinian Order; Knight of the Collar of the Order of the Holy Sepulchre; Knight of the Order of the Most Holy Annunciation).

2: The Order of the Garter (f. 1344 by Edward III, King of England). "Sovereign": "Princess of the Papal Roman Empire" Elizabeth II, Queen of the United Kingdom [also "Sovereign" of the Orders of St John, the Thistle, Bath, Saints Michael & George, Royal Victorian Order, etc...; Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the Netherlands Lion; Knight with Chain of the Royal Order of the Seraphim (Sweden)]; Chancellor: Lord Carrington (Peter Carington, 6th Baron Carrington) [also Knight Companion of the Order of the Garter; Knight Grand Cross of the Orders of Saints Michael & George).

NOTE: Key knights & dames within both the Order of the Golden Fleece (Spanish branch - the far more elite of the two branches) & the Order of the Golden Fleece are: Juan Carlos I, Elizabeth II (English OSJ head), Beatrix, Queen of the Netherlands (Dutch OSJ head) & Carl XVI Gustav, King of Sweden (Swedish OSJ head).

3: The Order of the Holy Sepulchre (and its associated Order of Merit for non-Catholics) (f. 1103 by Godfrey of Bouillon, first Latin King of Jerusalem, who was also the first head of this Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre). Grand Master: "Papal Prince" John Cardinal Foley [also Commander Grand Cross of the Order of the Polar Star (Sweden)].

4: The Order of St Januarius (Both branches) (f. 1738 by Charles, King of Naples & Sicily [Charles VII, King of Naples/Charles V, King of Sicily] later became Charles III, King of Spain; Hispano-Neapolitan/Franco-Neapolitan split 1960).

* Hispano-Neapolitan Grand Master: Don Infante Carlos, Duke of Calabria [also Grand Master of the Hispano-Neapolitan Constantinian Order; Knight of the Order of the Golden Fleece (Spanish branch); Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the Holy Sepulchre].

* Franco-Neapolitan Grand Master: Prince Carlo, the Duke of Castro [also Grand Master of the Franco-Neapolitan Constantinian Order & of the Royal Order of Francis I; Bailiff Grand Cross of Honour & Devotion of the Order of Malta; Knight Grand Cross of Saints Maurice & Lazarus].

NOTE: The Dukes of Calabria & Castro are the disputing Heads of the House of Bourbon-Two Sicilies.

5: The Constantinian Order (Both branches) (f. 16th Century by the "Angeli Comneni" Grand Masters, confirmed in a series of Papal briefs & a Bull of Pope Clement VIII (Ippolito Aldobrandini); transferred to Francesco Farnese 1698).

* Hispano-Neapolitan Grand Master: Don Infante Carlos, Duke of Calabria [also Grand Master of the Hispano-Neapolitan Order of St Januarius; Knight of the Order of the Golden Fleece (Spanish branch); Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the Holy Sepulchre].

* Franco-Neapolitan Grand Master: Prince Carlo, the Duke of Castro [also Grand Master of the Franco-Neapolitan Order of St Januarius & of the Royal Order of Francis I; Bailiff Grand Cross of Honour & Devotion of the Order of Malta; Knight Grand Cross of Saints Maurice & Lazarus].


6: The Order of Malta (and its associated Order of Merit for non-Catholics) (f. c. 1099 as the Hospitaller Order by Gerard Thom). Grand Master: "Papal Prince" Matthew Cardinal Festing [also Knight Grand Cross of Justice of the Franco-Neapolitan Constantinian Order; Officer of the Order of the British Empire].


7: Alliance of the Orders of St John of Jersualem

* English branch: (f. 1831; London-based) "Sovereign" Head: Elizabeth II, Queen of the United Kingdom [Head of the House of Saxe-Coburg & Gotha a.k.a. Windsor; "Sovereign" of the Orders of the Garter, Thistle, Bath, Saints Michael & George, Royal Victorian Order, etc...; Dame of the Order of the Golden Fleece (Spanish branch)]; Grand Prior, Prince Richard, the Duke of Gloucester [also House of Saxe-Coburg & Gotha a.k.a. Windsor; Knight of the Garter; Knight Grand Cross of the Royal Victorian Order; Royal Order of the Polar Star (Sweden)].

* Dutch branch (Johanniter Orde): (became independent of the German branch in 1946, after World War II; Hague-based) Honorary Commander: Beatrix, Queen of the Netherlands [Head of the House of Orange-Nassau; "Sovereign" of both the Order of the Netherlands Lion & the Order of the House of Orange; Dame of the Order of the Golden Fleece (Spanish branch); "Stranger" Dame of the Order of the Garter].

* Swedish branch (Johanniterorden): (became independent of the German branch in 1946, after World War II; Stockholm-based) High Protector: Carl XVI Gustav, King of Sweden [Head of the House of Bernadotte; Lord & Master (Grand Master) of the Royal Orders of the Seraphim & Polar Star [also Knight of the former & Commander Grand Cross of the latter); Knight of the Order of the Golden Fleece (Spanish branch); "Stranger" Knight of the Order of the Garter; Knight Grand Cross of both the Order of the Netherlands Lion & the Order of the House of Orange].

* German branch (Johanniterorden [Bailiwick of Brandenburg - also includes Swiss, French, Hungarian & Finnish Commanderies]): (f. 1160; Berlin-based) Master: Oskar, Prince of Prussia [House of Hohenzollern - although not the Head of that House, which is Georg Friedrich, Prince of Prussia].


8: The Order of the Golden Fleece (Austrian branch) (f. 1430 by Duke Phillip III of Burgundy, Spanish/Austrian split: 1712). Grand Master: Karl Habsburg-Lothringen, Archduke & Prince (Austria), Prince (Hungary) [Head of the House of Habsburg-Lorraine].


9: Order of Saints Maurice & Lazarus (f. 1572 by Emmanuel Philibert, Duke of Savoy).
Grand Master: Vittorio Emanuele, Prince of Naples, Duke of Savoy [also Grand Master of the more elite Order of the Most Holy Annunciation (Juan Carlos I of Spain is the other most notable known member) & of the Royal House of Savoy's Order of Merit; Bailiff Grand Cross of Justice of Franco-Neapolitan Constantinian Order; Bailiff Grand Cross of Order of Malta].


10: The Teutonic Order (f. c. 1190 by Duke Friedrich of Hohenstaufen).
Grand Master/General Abbot: Bruno Platter.

- TS

Reality Research Resource
http://realityresearch.wordpress.com



NOTES ON THE SUGGESTED ORDER OF PRECEDENCE IN THE ABOVE LIST:

I use several criteria for my ongoing assessment of which order takes precedence: any official info, the leadership & membership, how senior a position one knighthood order's GM is as a member of other orders in relation to other knighthood GM's, historical info & how that might tie into the current scene, the list goes on, but these are all good criteria. Also worth noting the differences between the two branches of the Golden Fleece & Constantinians (& the latter's more elite St Januarius Order). Number of key shared members especially Royal members (esp. notable in the Fleece, Garter & Hispano-Neapolitan CO) & the global networking potential (absolutely vast in the case of the Franco-Neapolitan Constantinian Order.

It seems that none of these Papal-loyal Orders, including the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre have claimed precedence over the Golden Fleece:

http://www.chivalricorders.org/vatican/holysep.htm

Numerous historic privileges have been claimed for knights of the Holy Sepulcher; the right to the title of Count Palatine (in any case abrogated by the nineteenth century reforms of the Roman nobility), precedence before the members of all other Orders except that of the Golden Fleece, the right to legitimize bastards, change baptismal names, grant arms, create notaries and hold religious benefices while married (similar extravagant privileges were granted at various times to the members of the Constantinian Order and several other Orders but all have been effectively abrogated and are unrecognized today). Such privileges were certainly never recognized as being the prerogatives of the knights appointed by the two French institutions, and there is little evidence that any European ruler recognized these privileges even for those dubbed at the Tomb of Our Lord.

Guy Sainty confirms in one of his online studies on the Equestrians that both Juan Carlos (Grand Master of the Spanish Order of the Golden Fleece) & his cousin Infante Carlos, Duke of Calabria (Grand Master of the Hispano-Neaplitan Constantinian Order & its more elite sister order, the Order of St Januarius are both Knights of the Holy Sepulchre. Juan Carlos has the highest grade of the Equestrians: Knight of the Collar. They are of course knights of each others orders.

http://www.chivalricorders.org/vatican/holysep.htm

Today the two Spanish Lieutenancies alone in the Order have maintained a "noble" character, requiring proof of paternal nobility for all its members. King Juan Carlos of Spain has been awarded the Collar of the Order, as was his late father, the Count of Barcelona, and both the Prince of the Asturias and the next senior male of the Royal House of Spain, the Infant Carlos of Bourbon-Sicily, Duke of Calabria have received the Grand Cross.

I contend that only the high Jesuits (including UK Provincial Michael Holman), the Pope & King Juan Carlos I are above Elizabeth II - the Cardinals are her equal. Note that these Papal Princes include Festing - but the ruling European & British Royal heads are also Princes & Princesses of the Papal Roman Empire (which I refuse to honour as "Holy" & encourage others to do likewise).

As the Garter & the Fleece are essentially Templar offshoots (or derivatives at least) & the most powerful of the Templar derived bodies is the Jesuit Order, her loyalty his to the Jesuit Superior-General & any Pope that he directs. She will of course pay respect to the Roman Cardinals & the likes of the Archbishop of Westminster as representatives of the Pope & these women-haters no doubt do not feel inclined to acknowledge her as an equal, but I see her as answering to the Jesuits. How many bosses can one have anyway? Makes for a very messy chain of command.

Note that Juan Carlos I, King of Spain is the current Latin King of Jerusalem & we read the claim here that the first King of Jerusalem founded & was the Head of the Order of the Holy Sepulchre:

http://www.governo.it/Presidenza/cerimoniale/onorificenze_araldica/documentazione/n_ordini_cavallereschi_santa_sede_eng.pdf

The Equestrian Order of The Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem 1) The Origins

The origins of this Order began with the liberation of the land of The Holy Sepulchre from Muslim domination by Godfrey of Bouillon, Chief Commander of the Militia of the first Crusade. In doing so, Godfrey of Bouillon founded the Order of the Holy Sepulchre.

In 1103, as reported by the writers of the Crusade, Balduino I, the first King of Jerusalem and as Head of The Equestrian Order of The Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem, he had the power to nominate new Knights. This power was for himself and his successors.

Interesting notes on the seldom discussed Order of St Januarius:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_Saint_Januarius

Its statutes and foundation both date to 3 July 1738 and the first promotions to the Order were announced three days later. These statutes limited membership of the Order to sixty Roman Catholic noblemen, although non-Catholics have been admitted by successive Grand Masters in exceptional cases and the total complement of the Order has exceeded sixty on several occasions. As an Order of the collar and the highest Order of the Kingdom, it was intended to equal in rank that of the Golden Fleece, awarded by Charles' father in Spain, and that of the Holy Spirit, given by his cousin in France. Indeed, it was frequent practice for the princes of each branch of the House to receive all three Orders. As they had discussed in their correspondence, King Charles reserved for his father the right to appoint up to six knights, emphasising the unity of the House of Bourbon. ...

The order continues to be awarded today by the two claimaints for the headship of the royal House of Bourbon-Two Sicilies, Infante Don Carlos, Duke of Calabria and Prince Carlo, Duke of Castro. Since 1960, the order has been awarded sparingly and total membership has not exceeded eighty, most of the knights being members of royal houses, senior officers of the Constantinian Order or Italian Grandees. The Infante Don Carlos, Duke of Calabria, and his late father both followed the example of the nineteenth century sovereigns of the Two Sicilies in awarding the order not only to the heads of other royal houses (or reigning sovereigns), but also to their closest advisers, several of whom also hold high office in the Constantinian Order.

Neither Constantinian Order Grand Master (the Duke of Calabria & the Duke of Castro, both disputing heads of Bourbon Two Sicilies; also the Grand Masters of the two Orders of St Januarius) are nominally Papal Princes - at least nowhere that I've read, but who knows? They could be, as it is a religious-military lay order like the SMOM (these being the only two).

The Franco-Neapolitan CO has the most Vatican archbishops & cardinals (62 in 2008) as nominal members at least. Hispano-Neapolitan CO Knight (as well as being a Knight of many others, incl SMOM, OSJ, etc) Guy Sainty states that many of these have just receieved the documents & that's that.

Here's my analysis of the RC archbishops, cardinals & SMOM members, based on the lists at the F-N CO site(s). Bear in mind that I posted this in October 2008 so certain details will have changed (Egan's & Murphy-O'Connor's CV's for example):

http://realityresearch.wordpress.com/2008/10/05/franco-neapolitan-constantinian-order-royal-order-of-francis-i-members/


SELECTED PROMINENT S.M.O.M. MEMBERS:
http://www.constantinian.com/dynastic-constantinian.html#maltaorder

“Since 1878, every Prince and Grand Master of the Order of Malta has been a senior member of the Constantinian Order … Many senior officers of the Order of Malta across the world are members of the Constantinian Order and some hold official positions within the Grand Magistry of the Constantinian Order”.

* Matthew Festing (F-N CO Knight Grand Cross of Justice; First invested as a Knight of Justice in 1991; 79th Grand Master of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta [Knights of Malta]).

* Fredrik Crichton-Stuart (F-N CO Knight Commander of Justice; SMOM’s Grand Prior of England).

* Princess Michael of Kent (Dame Grand Cross of Justice, F-N CO British and Irish Delegation; SMOM Dame; wife of Prince Michael of Kent, the Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Mark Master Masons).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SELECTED PROMINENT ROMAN CATHOLIC CARDINALS:
http://www.constantinian.com/dynastic-constantinian.html#apostolic

“Currently over 60 [62 to be precise - as of June 2008] cardinals and archbishops are members of the Constantinian Order and who play a very active role in the spiritual development of the Order. His Holiness The Pope is also represented in the Order through the appointment of a personal Ecclesiastical Counsellor.”

* Albert Cardinal Vanhoye (French Jesuit Cardinal; the F-N CO’s Grand Prior).

* Edward Cardinal Egan (Archbishop of New York [2000-present]; elevated to theCollege of Cardinals [Jan. 2001]; received SMOM’s Bailiff Grand Cross of Honour & Devotion immediately after; SMOM’s US Association’s Principal Chaplain; originally a SMOM Conventual Chaplain ad honorem from 1989; Association of the Order of the Holy Sepulchre’s Grand Prior; Knight of the Grand Cross (Motu Proprio) of the House of Savoy’s Order of Saints Maurice and Lazarus).

* Cormac Cardinal Murphy-O’Connor (Archbishop of Westminster; F-N CO‘s UK & Irish Delegation’s Prior).

* Desmond Cardinal Connell (Archbishop Emeritus of Dublin & Primate of Ireland; former philosophy lecturer).

* + 9 other Roman Catholic Church Cardinal Archbishops; 1 other Cardinal Archbishop Emeritus; 17 other Cardinals & 31 Diocesan & Titular Archbishops.

Monday, June 28, 2010

No German Suicide Bombers over Danzig, East Prussia, etc.

Nor any mention about the infamous 1995 'Operation Storm' forced expulsion of some 300,000 Serbs from their ancestral homes in Krijina from this article from the publication founded by SMOM William F. Buckley

From the National Review
http://article.nationalreview.com/436085/helen-thomas-turkey-and-the-liberation-of-israel/victor-davis-hanson

excerpt:

Anti-Semitism as displayed by both [Hearst reporter, Helen] Thomas and Turkey’s leaders is not predicated on criticizing Israel, much less disagreeing with its foreign policy. Instead, it hinges upon focusing singularly on Israeli behavior, and applying a standard to it that is never extended to any other nation.

There are plenty of disputes over borders and land in the world. But to Helen Thomas or the Turkish government, Kashmir or the Russian-Chinese border matters little — although the chances of escalation to nuclear confrontation are far greater there than on the West Bank. Has Thomas ever popped off, “Why don’t those Chinese just get the hell out of Tibet?” or “Why don’t those Indians just get out of Kashmir?”

The Palestinian “refugees” — a majority of whom are the children, grandchildren, or great-grandchildren of people actually displaced in 1948 — compose a small part of the world’s refugee population. There are millions of refugees in Rwanda, the Congo, and Darfur. Well over a half-million Jews were ethnically cleansed from the major Arab capitals between 1947 and 1973, each wave of expulsion cresting after a particular Mideast war. Again, few care to demonstrate for the plight of any of these people. Prime Minister Erdogan has not led any global effort to relocate the starving millions in Darfur, despite his loud concern for “refugees” in Gaza. The United States gives far more millions of dollars in aid to the Palestinians than does their Muslim protector in Turkey, who saves cash in winning Palestinian support by practicing anti-Semitism on the cheap. Nor have I heard of any German suicide bomber blowing himself up over lost ancestral land in Danzig or East Prussia, although that land was lost about the same time as some Palestinians left Israel. Few worry that in 1949 tens of thousands of Japanese were forcibly expelled by the Soviet Union from Sakhalin Island.

The world likewise cares little for the concept of “occupation” in the abstract; it is only the concrete example of Palestine that earns its opprobrium. We can be assured that President Obama will not bring up Ossetia with President Putin. He will not raise the question of Tibet with the Chinese or occupied Cyprus with Prime Minister Erdogan. Will Helen Thomas ever ask, “How can Turkey be allowed to keep Nicosia a divided city?” Will she worry whether Greeks are allowed to buy property in the Turkish sector of that capital?

There is no European outcry over the slaughter of South Koreans in a torpedo attack by a North Korean vessel. I don’t recall President Sarkozy weighing in on that particular moral issue. The United Nations is angrier at Israel for enforcing a blockade against its terrorist neighbor than it is at Somalia for allowing pirates to kill and rob right off its coast. There was not much of a global outcry when Iran hijacked a British naval vessel; few in Turkey demonstrated when the French blew up a Greenpeace protest vessel.

“Disproportionate” is a term used to condemn Israeli retaliation. It does not apply to other, far more violent reprisals, such as the Russian leveling of Grozny, or the Turkish killing of Kurds, or occasional Hindu mass rioting and murdering of Muslims in India. Does Prime Minister Erdogan wish to allow “peace activists” to interview Kurds detained in his prisons, or to adjudicate the status of Kurds, Armenians, or Christian religious figures who live in Turkey? Can we imagine a peace flotilla of Swedish and British leftists sailing to Cyprus to “liberate” Greek land or investigate the “disappearance” of thousands of Greeks in 1974? And if they did, what would happen to them? About the same as would happen if they blocked a road to interdict a Turkish armored column rolling into Kurdistan.

Nor do human-rights violations mean much any more. Iran executes more of its own citizens each year than Israel has killed Palestinians in the course of war in any given year. Syria murders whomever it pleases in Lebanon without worry that any international body will ever condemn its action. I have heard a great deal about the “massacre” or “slaughter” at Jenin, where 52 Palestinians and 23 Israelis died. Indeed, the 2002 propaganda film Jenin, Jenin was a big hit on college campuses. But I have never seen a documentary Hama, Hama commemorating the real 1982 slaughter of somewhere between 10,000 and 40,000 civilians by the criminal Assad regime in Syria, with which we now so eagerly wish to restore ties. I find a 1,000-to-1 fatality rule generally applies: Each person killed by the Israel Defense Forces warrants about as much international attention as 1,000 people killed by Africans, Russians, Indians, Chinese, or Arabs.

I used to think that oil, Arab demography, fear of Islamic terrorism, and blowback from its close association with the United States explained the global double standard that is applied to Israel.

But after the hysteria over the Gaza flotilla, the outbursts of various members of the Turkish government, and Ms. Thomas’s candid revelations, I think the mad-dog hatred of Israel is more or less because it is a Jewish state. Period.

Let me explain. Intellectuals used to loudly condemn anti-Semitism because it was largely associated with those deemed to be less sophisticated people, often right-wing, who on either racial, nationalistic, or religious grounds regarded Jews as undesirable. Hating Jews was a sign of boorish chauvinism, or of the conspiratorial mind that exuded envy and jealousy of the more successful.

But in the last two decades especially, the Left has made anti-Semitism respectable in intellectual circles. The fascistic nature of various Palestinian liberation groups was forgotten, as the “occupied” Palestinians grafted their cause onto that of American blacks, Mexican-Americans, and Asian-Americans. Slurring post-Holocaust Jews was still infra dig, but damning the nation-state of Israel as imperialistic and oppressive was considered principled. No one ever cared to ask: Why Israel and not other, far more egregious examples? In other words, one could now focus inordinately on the Jews by emphasizing that one’s criticism was predicated on cosmic issues of human rights and justice. And by defaming Israel the nation, one could vent one’s dislike of Jews without being stuck with the traditional boorish label of anti-Semite.

So an anti-Semitic bigot like Helen Thomas could navigate perfectly well among the top echelons of Washington society spouting off her hatred of Israel, since her animus was supposedly against Israeli policies rather than those who made them. Only an inadvertent remark finally caught up with her to reveal that what she felt was not anger growing out of a territorial dispute, but furor about the nature of an entire people who should be deported to the sites of the Holocaust.

Finally, as I say, all this may have a strangely liberating effect on Israel. We know now that whatever it does, the world, or at least its prominent political and media figures, is going to damn it. Its longtime patron, the United States, now sees not much difference between Israel’s democratic achievement and the autocracies around it, which we are now either subsidizing or courting. As a result, the global censors have lost leverage with Israel, since they have proven to be such laughable adjudicators of right and wrong when Israel is involved.

Israelis should assume by now that whether they act tentatively or strongly, the negative reaction will be the same. Therefore why not project the image of a strong, unapologetic country to a world that has completely lost its moral bearings, and is more likely to respect Israel’s strength than its past concern for meeting an impossible global standard?

How odd that the more the activists, political leaders, and media figures issue moral strictures against Israel, the more they prove abjectly amoral. And the more they seek to pressure Israel, the more they are liberating it to do what it feels it must.

— NRO contributor Victor Davis Hanson is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, the editor of Makers of Ancient Strategy: From the Persian Wars to the Fall of Rome, and the author of The Father of Us All: War and History, Ancient and Modern.

Sunday, June 27, 2010

Canberra 'Back and to the Left'

blatantly masonic architecture hidden in plain sight
Also see- http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2010/11/freemasonry-lets-america-down.html
---
Letter from Troy Space

MASONIC/ILLUMINIST PYRAMID BUILDINGS & RELATED OCCULT ARCHITECTURE:

Check the design of the street layout near the Australian government HQ in Canberra - does it look like the Illuminati "pyramid without a capstone" symbolism from the US "Great Seal" reverse that also feature son the US $1 bill? For those with eyes to see it does indeed:





$1 U.S. bill, back side to the left

Having a closer look at the Australian Parliament Building on "Capital Hill", do we see any occult design at work?:

Indeed it appears to be an abstracted occultic Baphomet/Goat of Mendez, with horns & lower wing edges discernable, as well as the telltale tri-pronged centre horn & flame given a geometric abstracted representation in the architectural layout. There is even a subtle refelection in the Parliament Building grounds of the lower portions of the snakes forming an elliptical shape with the wand in the middle from that same Baphomet drawing of Eliphas Levi.

And why the apparently functionless Pyramid frame on top of the Australian Parliament building?:



Or the glass Pyramid beneath it?


I had come across similar shots of Canberra before, but not the ones of the glass pyramid that is underneath the big metal (presumably steel) framed pyramid above the government buildings.