Thursday, November 13, 2008

Explaining People Like FDR, Clinton, Bushes, etc

Found at Endr Times:

http://endrtimes.blogspot.com/2007/09/skull-and-bones-codeword-barbelon.html

SKULL AND BONES: CODEWORD BARBELON

SKULL AND BONES:


I thought you would all be interested in this snippet (an Excerpt) from a chapter of the book Codeword Barbêlôn. Footnotes are at the end of the email. Please observe the copyright notice, which must be placed on any website or in any email in which the excerp is posted/sent out: This is a book you must read. See Excerpt below:


Copyright Notice: © P.D. Stuart, and Lux-Verbi Books. All rights reserved. Enfield, Middlesex, EN1 3ZJ, UK Tel/Fax: +44 800 1692911

—————— Chapter XXXII ——————

SKULL AND BONES:

"IT'S PART OF WHO I AM'-

THE HIGHEST MORAL AUTHORITY

DURING HIS PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN of 2000, George W. Bush gave a 90-minute talk (on July 31) with the managing editor of the Illuminati controlled TIME magazine (so says Jesuit Professor Carroll Quigley: see later chapter titled “The Rhodes Gang”). At one point in the interview, Walter Isaacson asked Mr. Bush whether it troubled him at all that he had been initiated into the secret Society of Skull and Bones, to which Bush responded exuberantly, “No qualms at all. I was honored.”[1]

The problem with that response is that the secrets of this Order mark its members as infidels and debauchees, with skeletons in their closets.

The reason the ‘literary society’ of Skull and Bones is of particular concern is that its members are required to take an oath (see later) that completely absolves them from—takes precedence over—allegiance to any nation or king or government or constitution, including the negating of any subsequent oath which they may be required to take, that conflicts with the interests of the Order. To whom then do they swear their ultimate allegiance? We must go back to the origin of the Order to see the roots that sustain these branches.

Now, there has been a certain amount of deliberate falsehoods put out by some who belong to the Order called Skull and Bones. I now offer a very different, and we hope more correct view. As we shall see, Skull and Bones is merely a chapter of the German Illuminati, founded by the Jesuit, Adam Weishaupt.

THE HISTORY OF SKULL AND BONES

The masterminds behind the formation of Skull and Bones were William Huntington Russell and Alphonso Taft. Russell, while on a student tour of Germany, met Adam Weishaupt and was initiated by him into the Illuminati. In 1832, Russell took his newfound wisdom (or ‘illumination’) back to America. A year later, in 1832, a group of Yale undergraduates, led by Alphonso Taft and Russell, formed a society called, “The Skull and Bones,” modelled after the old Phi Beta Kappa Society of 1776 and set up as Chapter 322 of the German Illuminati.[2] Today Skull and Bones’ corporate name is The Russell Trust Association, which financies Skull and Bones, and also supervises the Order’s adherence to the tradition.

Alphonso Taft would later become both President and Chief Justice of the United States—one of four Justices known as the “Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse.” Indeed, “Skull and Bones leads the list in influence, age, and society standing,”[3] among American secret society.

Why have I alleged that Skull and Bones is a Chapter of the German Illuminati formed by Adam Weishaupt? What evidence is there to support this? There is a world-wide secret society called the Brotherhood of Death Society, whose symbol is also the skull with two crossed bones. At this point we want to draw a comparison between Skull and Bones and the Order known as the Thule Society, which many commentators have said is the German chapter of the Brotherhood of Death Society. It is known that Adolf Hitler joined this society in 1919, under the leadership of Dietrich Eckhart. As Eckhart revealed on his deathbed, “Follow Hitler; he will dance, but it is I who have called the tune. I have initiated him into the Secret Doctrine, opened his centers in vision, and given him the means to communicate with the powers.” [4] Skull and Bones’ symbol is also a skull with two crossed bones, but with the mysterious number ‘322’ underneath. It is claimed that certain documents exist which state that Skull and Bones is Chapter 322 of a corps of a German University, and that this German Secret Society (the Thule Society) was the basis for the founding of Skull and Bones at Yale University in 1832. In 1876 the headquarters of Shull and Bones was broken into and a document was found inside with the these words: “From the German Chapter. Presented by Patriarch D.C. Gilman of D. 50.”[5] [Emphasis supplied].

There are indeed some very striking similarities. Like the Thule Society, members of the Order of Skull and Bones are initiated into the society by what is called “sexual magic ritual.” “The [ritualistic] death of the initiate will be as frightful as the use of human skeletons and ritual psychology can make it.... ”[6] The Thule Society performed sexual rituals in their practices, likewise, Skull and Bones also incorporates sexual activities into their initiations (for which see later). Additionally, The Thule Society, were “concerned with raising their consciousness by means of rituals to awareness of evil and nonhuman intelligences in the universe; and with achieving means of communication with these intelligences.”[7] Likewise, the initiates of Skull and Bones believe that they are “born again,” a term that in the Bones vocabulary means “enlightenment,” not the usually meaning given to it in the Christian Gospels.

Significantly, in the book Proofs of a Conspiracy (previously cited) Prof. Robison described the initiation ceremony into the “Regent Degree” of the Illuminati; and according to author Kris Millegan, in his book Fleshing Out Skull and Bones, “It [the Illuminati’s initiation ceremony] bears a striking resemblance to the… ritual for entry into Skull and Bones at Yale.”[8]

The oath taken by the Illuminati requires the initiated to disregard all bonds of allegiance whether to father, mother, brothers, sisters, relations, friends or to the king, magistrates, and any other authority to which loyalty, obedience, or service may have been sworn. The particular passage reads: “faithfulness and everlasting obedience to all superiors and regulations of the Order…. you are free from the so-called oath to country and laws: swear to reveal to the new chief… what you may have seen or done, intercepted, read or heard, learned or surmised, and also seek for and spy out what your eyes cannot discern. Honour and respect the Aqua Tofana (a slow poison) as a sure, prompt, and necessary means of purging the globe by death of those who seek to vilify the truth [their ideology] and seize it from our hands... in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.”

“YOU MUST BE BORN AGAIN”: INITIATION BY DON QUIXOTE

Let us look more closely at Skull and Bones and its grotesque Illuminati initiation ritual. On April 23, 2001, ABC News reported on a Hidden Video Capture[9] of the Skull and Bones initiation ritual. From this video we know that the initiation takes place on the campus of Yale University in a building called “The Tomb.” Ron Rosenbaum, columnist for the New York Observer, hid out on the ledge of a nearby building and videotaped the nocturnal initiation ceremony in the Tomb’s courtyard. He says that in the room “The death’s-head logo stamps everything from crockery to painted borders on the wall.”[10] There were three people officiating—one dressed like the pope, another like Hiram Abif (the Masonic Messiah) and a third like a Don Quixote [D].[11]

Why the Skull and Bones ritual would have as officiants Bonesmen dressed like the pope, Hiram Abif, and Don Quixote? Let’s look at this a bit closer. However, we need not strain for an answer: the pope represents the supremacy of Catholicism; in Hiram Abif we have the well known representative of Freemasonry. But who is this character Don Quixote?

The Jesuit Carroll Quigley once said, “Look at the real situations which lie beneath the conceptual and verbal symbols.” So let’s take his advice. Quixote was satirically characterized as the epically famous “madman” of Azpeitia. If we start with Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, the author of Don Quixote, we discover that not only was he a “strict Roman Catholic” it is believed that he also attended a Jesuit school in 1566: “Cervantes is likely [to have] enrolled in a Jesuit high school (colegio).”[12] Next we find that Cervantes’ book Don Quixote expressly refers to the pope as “His Holiness the Pope…” and “his holiness Pope Pius V of happy memory.” (pp. 138, 331).

Interestingly, Pope Gregory XII used almost identical words to Cervantes in his letter, dated December 12, 1580, inciting Catholics to murder Queen Elizabeth I: “… that guilty woman (Elizabeth) of England…. is the cause of so much injury to the Catholic faith…. whosoever sends her out of the world with the pious intention of doing God service… especially having regard to the sentence pronounced against her by Pius V of holy memory….”

So who was this character represented by the original “Don Quixote” of whom Cervantes wrote so affectionately? “It was Ignatius Loyola,” says English commentator John Bowle.[13] Was Bowle right? The theory that Loyola (the first Jesuit General) is the man represented in the figure of Don Quixote, as first mooted by Bowle, hangs on a passage in the book Don Quixote[14] where the angry Biscayan, the enemy of Don Quixote, is made a native of Azpeitia—the name of the obscure Spanish village where Loyola was born. [15] It is interesting to note that Quixote the “madman” of Azpeitia had wild visions of fighting with a dragon. Likewise, Ignatius Loyola claimed to have fought with Satan, who is referred to in the Bible as the winged “serpent” and “the dragon” (Revelation 12:3,9,17).

Further, in the story Don Quixote is said to have “composed a rosary” in honour of the Virgin Mary, who is typecast as the girl whom he loves “untouched by any man” who “still possesses… virginity.” (pp. xx, 802). A clear reference to the Virgin Mary—the idol of Loyola and the Jesuits. Even their mother church is named Mary.

In another book Our Lord Don Quixote (1905), Catholic professor Miguel de Unamuno draws parallels between Don Quixote and the life of the founder of the Jesuit Order, Ignatius of Loyola, their “Lord”. And the Jesuit-trained Voltaire wrote, the only difference between Loyola and the Quixote, is that “Don Quixote had a horse and an esquire, but Ignatius was not provided with either.”[16]

Another link to the Jesuits is the use of the skull and crossbones emblem. Earlier we saw that when a Jesuit of the lower rank is to be elevated to a position of command, he is conducted into a Chapel of the Order, where he swears an oath under “a banner of yellow and white [the colours of the pope], and... a black banner with a dagger and red cross above a skull and crossbones.” Bonesmen likewise take an oath of inviolate secrecy while standing before a skull and cross-bones. So, here we see that the Skull and Bones initiation ritual, like that of the Jesuits uses the occult icon of the skull and crossbones.

It is also curious that the emblem of the skull and crossbones is also the symbol of the Chancellor for the Knights of Columbus. Interestingly, at the initiation of Mason the initiate is placed in a coffin and then lifted up; and when he opens his eyes he is confronted with a human skull and crossed bones? Are these similarities between the initiation of Skull and Bones, the Jesuits and Freemasons just another coincidence?

Albert C Stevens (the respected historian) also makes this interesting connection between the Masonic Kappa Sigma society, [discussed at Continuing Counter Reformation here] founded in 1867 at the University of Virginia, and Skull and Bones. On page 355, Stevens states, “The badge [of Kappa Sigma] is an inverted crescent of gold, attached to and below which, by four of its points, is a five-pointed star [the pentagram] with the letters Kappa Sigma in its center…. At the top, on the crescent, a skull and bones are engraved; at the left, the crossed keys [a symbol of the pope’s power], and at the right, crossed swords.”[17] Is this all mere coincidence?

Returning to Quixote. Note, too, that “the hero [Don Quixote] is not one whom the author [Cervantes] desired to revile or to malign,” rather, says Charles Francis Horne, “Never was a satire like this, which leaves us full of love and sympathy for the object [Quixote, i.e. Loyola].”[18] Thus, in the initiation ceremony of Skull and Bones, the pope, the Masonic Hiram Abif, and the Jesuit icon, Don Quixote, are all figures of admiration and emulation. Not surprisingly, then, many of the leading politicians in America, Bush, Clinton, Kerry, Rice, etc., bend and fawn before the Roman pontiff.

It is also quite interesting to note that Pope Benedict XVI (when he was Cardinal Ratzinger) also praised the character Don Quixote. In his book Principles of Catholic Theology the Pope referred to the madman Don Quixote as “a crusader for truth even if the defense of it should cost him his life.”[19] Did not Loyola, that “ingenious gentleman” and crusader, teach the members of his Order to defend the Catholic faith at all hazards, even at the cost of their lives? Is that what Pope Benedict XVI is suggesting to his flock? Is this one the Principles of Catholic Theology?

To continue with the initiation. The Skull and Bones initiate is made to “face a skeleton, and at its feet are a crown and a sword.”[20] During this ritual the Bonesmen shriek out, “Eulogia! Eulogia! Eulogia!” as the initiate is escorted into the inner temple (Room 322), where he is made to sign his name to an oath of utmost secrecy. He is then made to stand before a picture of Judas Iscariot, whose name is shouted aloud three times.

The initiate is next led to the most important part of the ritual, and pushed to his knees before a human skull filled with blood, which skull is resting at the foot of a human skeleton called “Madame Pompadour.” The other Bonesmen cry: “Drink it! Drink it! Drink it!” This mockery of the Christian sacrament is known as the “Black Mass.” When he is done drinking, the initiate is whipped in the face with the tail of the person dressed as the Don Quiote (the classic literary character symbolic of Ignatius Loyola). He is next taken quickly before the Bonesman dressed like the Pope. The initiate must bend and “kiss the Pope’s slippered toe.”[21] This very fact—kissing the slippered toe of the pope—shows that their first allegiance is to the pope! Just as the ‘faithful’ Catholic kisses the toe of the bronze statue of St. Peter, inside the Basilica at Rome, so too, the Bonesman must kiss the pope’s slippered toe at his ritual initiation into the Order.

But that is not all. The candidate is then shoved to his knees in front of Don Quixote. As the shrieking Bonesmen fall silent Don Quixote taps the supplicant on his shoulder with a sword and says, “By order of our Order, I dub you a knight of Eulogia.” This is significant! Not only does the initiate kiss the pope’s toe, more importantly, the initiate is welcomed into the Order by the figure symbolizing the Jesuit General, Don Quixote: “I dub you a knight of Eulogia.” This lurid “melodrama” culminates in a ritual of mock sacrifice of a naked female.


THE RELIGION OF SKULL AND BONES: IS BUSH CHRISTIAN?

The sitting President, George W. Bush, is worryingly ‘religious.’ The President claims that he is on a “divinely” appointed mission! We shall see a little later.

The Bonesmen use the Greek word: eulogia (“blessing”) and are referred to as Knights of Eulogia, because, according to the lore of Skull and Bones, a Roman goddess called Eulogia, after ascending to heaven in 322 BC, came back to earth in 1832 to found their society. Students of history will know that the Greek general, Alexander the Great died in 322 B.C. and was buried in Memphis, Egypt, and that his body was dug up and reburied in the Gnostic capital of Alexandria. As it turns out, the home of Skull and Bones, on the campus of Yale, is a windowless structure built to look like a mausoleum (a tomb) in a Greco-Egyptian style.

Is Bush a Christian? Judge for yourself. At one stage in the ritual initiation of Skull and Bones the initiates must “lay naked in coffins and tell their deepest and darkest sexual secrets as part of their initiation.” (Esquire, September, 1976, p. 85). Satanic high priest Anton LaVey explains the significance of this in his book The Satanic Rituals: Companion to the Satanic Bible: “The ceremony of rebirth takes place in a large coffin... This is similar to the coffin symbolism that...is found in most lodge rituals.”[22] Curiously enough, during the 1988 Presidential Campaign, a TV reporter asked Vice-President George H. W. Bush Sr. (father of President George W. Bush) whether he was a Christian. Bush Sr. initially stammered, but then said, “if you mean born again, then, yes, I am a Christian.” Now, was that a misleading statement on the part of George Bush Sr.? Is he a Christian or just “born again” Bonesman?

Just to set the record straight, so that Christians don’t get confused about Bush’s “born again” lark: Skull and Bones believe that on the night of initiation, the initiate “dies to the world and [is] born again into the Order.… ”[23] When an initiate enters the coffin during his initiation, he is considered to have “died to self and to this world,” and born again into the Order. He is not born again in Christ.

Here is part of a 2000 interview (original transcript) given by the son, President George W. Bush Jr.:

“TIME: But you [George W. Jnr.] sure shared a lot of the same upbringing: Andover, Yale, even Skull and Bones. Did you have any qualms, say, about joining an elite secret club like Bones?

Bush: No qualms at all. I was honored. I was fairly nonchalant. I didn’t view it as a great heritage thing. I didn’t take it all that seriously.

TIME: Demystify it a bit for those who might think it’s a cross between a Masonic Lodge and the Trilateral Commission. Did your father show up for your initiation, like your grandfather showed up for his?

Bush: Without revealing all the great secrets? I got a few of my old club mates who could demystify it right off the bat. My dad didn’t tap me. Someone a year ahead of me tapped me. There was an entry celebration. I can’t remember whether my dad showed up or not…. ”

Note that President Bush did not deny that Skull and Bones was a Masonic Lodge, rather he confirmed that he could not reveal “all the great secrets.” In fact that same 2000 interview, Bush said of his family’s historical involvement in Skull and Bones it is “my heritage; its part of who I am.” Indeed it is: his father, George H.W. Bush Sr. is also a “born again” member. Bush once said, to understand people you have to look at their family.

So, what exactly is Bush’s mission? “I’m here for a reason,” Bush told his chief political aide Karl Rove after the September 11 attacks.[24] Close friends of the President speak of his views in similar terms: “I think, in his frame, this is what God has asked him to do,” said one close friend.[25] One senior administration official said, “[Bush] really believes he was placed here to do this as part of a divine plan.”[26] The question is: what divine plan is he referring to, God’s or someone else’s? We can guess the answer from a statement that Bush made t wo years into his presidency: “The best way to honour Pope John Paul II… is to take his teaching seriously… and PUT HIS WORDS AND TEACHINGS INTO ACTION HERE IN AMERICA.”[27] Perhaps this explains what President Bush meant when three years later in 2004 he told the Knights of Columbus that he was their “friend in… administration,” and that together they would work “to change America”! Is President Bush a Catholic, you ask? Really, dear reader, you are far too inquisitive!

On March 23, 2001, a day after promising to put the pope’s teachings in to action in America, Bush was speaking at The Catholic University of America, and he reminded his audience that the former president of the Soviet Union had called the pope “the highest moral authority on earth.”[28] Why did Bush feel the need to remind his audience of this? Does Bush also regard the pope as “the highest moral authority on earth?

Perhaps Bush and the Russian President were referring to a papal statement made on July 18, 1870 by Pope Pius IX: “We declare it to be an article of faith that the Roman Pope possesses infallibility in any doctrine relating to faith and morals. If anyone shall oppose this our decision, which God forbid, let him be accursed.”

Intelligent reader, whenever you hear a man express such views, as freely as Bush does, you can be sure that he is either a Jesuit, a tool of the Jesuits or that he has been “poisoned by their maxims.” Take your pick, the conclusions are not far different. Bonesmen do not kiss the pope’s ring at their initiation ceremony for no reason!

The Belfast Telegraph, April 14, 2007 reported: “US President George W Bush will meet with Pope Benedict XVI at the Vatican in June…. ” This meeting took place on June 25, 2007. Both men exchanged gifts. Why would the President of the United States of America go to Rome to kiss the ring of a mitred king of the Vatican? Bush had a “closed-door discussion” with Pope Benedict! As one of my acquaintances asked, “What did Bush and Benedict say to one another during those 35 minutes of privacy following the journalists’ departure from the Pope’s [private] library?” Equally fascinating is the significance of Benedict’s ‘message-packed’ gift to the U.S. commander-in-chief: a rare first edition of the autobiography of John Carroll of Baltimore. John Carroll was the first Catholic Archbishop of the United States and founder of the first Jesuit university in America—Georgetown University!

How profound of D. S. Phelan (a priest) to say, “The pope is the ruler of the world. All the emperors, all the kings, all the princes, all the presidents of the world are as these altar boys of mine.”[29] Why do you doubt this? Have we not seen photographic, video and Television images of three U.S. presidents kneeling in homage before the bier of Pope John Paul II.

Robert Higgs comments of the power of the pope: “Observing the many government leaders gathered at the Vatican for the funeral of Pope John Paul II, we might well have suspected that the world’s politico-military chieftains need what the Pope has more than the Pope needs what they have.”[30]

Above is the pictute of Bush Snr., along with his son President George W. Bush, his daughter-in-law, Laura, former President Bill Clinton, and Condi Rice, kneeling with hands clasped before the bier of Pope John Paul II.

This brings us back nicely to the question of why Bush said in his autobiography: “[in] My senior year (at Yale) I joined Skull and Bones, a secret society, so secret, I can’t say anything more.”[31] Why not? Is that not a fair question to ask, intelligent reader? Bill Cooper says it is because: “Members of the Order take an oath that absolves them from any allegiance to any nation or king or government or constitution, and that includes the negating of any subsequent oath, which they may be required to take. They swear allegiance only to the Order and its goal of a New World Order... according to the oath Bush took when he was initiated into Skull and Bones, his oath of office as President of the United States means nothing.”[32]

George W. Bush would have us believe that Skull and Bones is merely a footnote in his past: that he has had nothing to do with the Order after graduating from Yale. However, in 1971, “needing a job, Bush called a Bonesman, Robert H. Gow. Gow, who later told The Washington Post that his Houston-based agricultural company had not been looking for anyone at the time, hired Bush as a management trainee.” [33] “In 1977, when Bush formed Arbusto Energy, his first company, he applied to Skull and Bones for financial aid. With assistance from his uncle Jonathan Bush [a Bonesman], he lined up $565,000… One of them contributed $93,000—the venture capitalist William H. Draper III [also a Bonesman],” and “Twelve Bonesmen… gave a total of $35,500 to Bush’s 1998 gubernatorial campaign. At least forty-six Bonesmen… have given approximately $1,000 apiece to his presidential campaign—the maximum allowed by law.”[34]

If you are scratching your head wondering to whom members of Skull and Bones take their secret oath of allegiance, the answer is: the ‘unknown superiors’—the pope, Masonic heads of the Order, all of whom answer to Quixote. And since, as we have seen, Skull and Bones honours the pope and Jesuit General (in the figure of Don Quixote), then is it too much of a stretch to conclude that the allegiance of Skull and Bones is to the Pope? This also begs the question, how can the American people place their trust in a President who holds secrecy and concealment so dear? How can they be sure that Bush hasn’t taken an oath to the superiors of his Order which conflicts with his duties as President? Said President John F. Kennedy: “The very word ‘secrecy’ is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers, which are cited to justify it. No President should fear public scrutiny of his program.”[35] Kennedy was assassinated!

So, in case you are still wondering why Bush “can’t say anything more” about Skull and Bones, perhaps it’s because he fears sharing the fate of President Kennedy. Or maybe it’s because as Plato said: “To assist in keeping up the deception, we will form secret societies and clubs… and so by fair means or by foul we shall gain our ends and carry on our dishonest proceedings with impunity.”[36]

Well said were the words of President Ulysses S. Grant: “…all secret, oath-bound, political parties are dangerous to any nation, no matter how pure or how patriotic the motives and principles which first bring them together.”[37] For as Arkon writes, members of these secret societies seek to “gain financial and social power, and to place them at the disposal of the group,”[38] Indeed, as we have seen and shall yet see again, we have cause to fear the Jesuits and their acolytes (Bonesmen, Rhodes Scholars, Phi Beta Kappa, etc., etc.) whose sole aim is to place men in high office—as advisers to presidents, congressmen, senators, Whitehouse aides, and Supreme Court Judges—to further their secret oath-bound purposes.


TO ORDER:

Codeword Barbêlôn—666—Danger in the Vatican
Sub-title - The Sons of Loyola and their Plans for World Domination...
Author: Stuart, P.D.
ISBN-10: 0954359666
ISBN-13: 978-0954359669

http://www.luxverbi.org.uk/arch/book_Codeword Barbêlôn_0-954359666.htm

OR ON AMAZON.CA: http://www.amazon.ca/Codeword-Barbelon-Vatican-P-D-Stuart/dp/0954359666/ref=sr_1_1/701-4608711-3700315?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1188247770&sr=1-1


Footnotes:

[1] Interview by Walter Isaacson, “George W. Bush: ‘My Heritage Is Part Of Who I Am.’” Time Magazine, August 7th 2000 (Time Volume 156, No. 6) ; also reported on cnn.com (Times/CNN, August 1, 2000):

www.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/08/01/bush.7_31.a.tm/

[2] Both former President George Bush Snr. and President George W. Bush Jnr. are active members. See also, Anthony Sutton’s, America’s Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull and Bones (Billings: Montana, Liberty House Press, 1983).

[3] Arthur Preuss, A Dictionary of Secret and Other Societies (B. Herder Book Co., 1924), p. 161.

[4] Trevor Ravenscroft, The Spear Of Destiny: The Occult Power Behind the Spear Which Pierced the Side of Christ (New York: Putnam, 1973), p. 91; See too, Bill Cooper, Behold A Pale Horse, op. cit., p. 81; and Antony Sutton, America’s Secret Establishment, op. cit., p.7.

[5] Antony C. Sutton, America’s Secret Establishment, op. cit., p. 212.

[6] Ron Rosenbaum, “The Last Secrets of Skull and Bones,” September 1977 issue, Esquire Magazine, p. 89.

[7] Ravenscroft, op. cit., p. 161.

[8] Kris Millegan, Fleshing Out Skull and Bones, op. cit., p. 17.

[9] Ron Rosenbaum, Video footage captured on April 14, 2001, New York Observer.

[10] Alexandra Robbins, Secrets of the Tomb: Skull and Bones (New York: Little, Brown and Company Limited, 2002), p. 87. Robbins, a 1998 graduate of Yale University, is on the staff of The New Yorker’s Washington bureau.

[11] Ron Rosenbaum, “The Last Secrets of Skull and Bones,” Esquire Magazine, Sept. 1976 issue, pp. 85, 86, 89.

[12] Anthony Joseph Cascardi, The Cambridge Companion to Cervantes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), p. xi.

[13] Charles Francis et. al., The Great Events by Famous Historians, (The National Alumni, 1905), pp. 238-340.

[14] Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra (1547–1616), Don Quixote, or El Ingenioso Hidalgo don Quijote de la Mancha—“The ingenious gentleman Don Quixote of la Mancha” (Madrid: Francisco Robles, and Juan de la Cuesta, 1605), pt. 1, 1605; pt. 2, 1615, p. 325-329; See too, Encyclopaedia Britannica (15th edn. 1986), Vol. 15, p. 753; Harold Bloom, Genius (New York: Warner Books 2002), p. 15. It is said that after the Bible, Don Quixote is the world’s most translated book.

[15] Henry Edward, Miguel de Cervantes, His Life & Works (London: Adam and Charles Black, 1895), p. 139. Ignatius was born at Azpeitia in the Basque province of Guipuezcoa, and was given the name Don Iñigo de Oñez y Loyola.

[16] John Morley, The Works of Voltaire, (1901), already cited, heading “Ignatius Loyola.”

[17] Albert C. Stevens, The Cyclopedia of Fraternities, op. cit., pp. 355-356.

[18] Charles Francis, The Great Events by Famous Historians, op. cit., pp. 238-340.

[19] Cardinal Ratzinger (Pope Benedict XVI), Principles of Catholic Theology (San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press 1987 [1982]), p. 392, quoting in part from Miguel de Cervantes’ Don Quixote La Mancha.

[20] Kris Millegan, Fleshing Out Skull and Bones op. cit., p. 17.

[21] Ibid., p.120.

[22] Anton S. LaVey, The Satanic Rituals: Companion to the Satanic Bible (New York: Avon Books/HarperCollins, 1972, 1976), pp. 2, 57.

[23] Antony Sutton, Esquire Magazine, Sept. 1977 issue, p. 89. Sutton was a research fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, and economics professor at California State University, Los Angeles. He was educated at the universities of London, Gottingen and California.

[24] Bob Woodward, Bush at War (NY: Simon & Schuster, 2002), p. 205.

[25] Quoted in Frank Bruni’s, “For President, A Mission and a Role in History,” New York Times, September 22, 2001, p. A1.

[26] Quoted Michael Hirsh, “America’s Mission,” Newsw

...

Also to Order Prof Veiths Lectures please go to this link:

http://www.luxverbi.org.uk/arch/Total_Onslaught_DVD_Set.htm

http://www.luxverbi.org.uk/


Source: http://arcticbeacon.com/books/Skull_and_Bones_Chapter_32.html
Posted by at 2 comments:
Labels: , , ,

Romish-Masonic FDR: "...the freedom of the Pope and of Vatican City is assured by the armies of the United Nations"

From The New York Times, June 6, 1944

Roosevelt Speaks

Says Rome's Fall Marks 'One Up and Two to Go' Among Axis Capitals

Warns Way Is Hard

Asks World to Give the Italians a Chance for Recovery


(excerpt)

Shrines Should Live, He Says

President Roosevelt saw considerable significance in the fact that Rome should be the first Axis capital to fall. He remarked its shrines, "visible symbols of the faith and determination of the early saints and martyrs that Christianity should live and become universal," and added that "it will be a source of deep satisfaction that the freedom of the Pope and of Vatican City is assured by the armies of the United Nations."

There is significence too, he added, in the fact that Rome was liberated by a composite force of soldiers from many nations.

Reviewing the military picture, the President pointed out that "it would be unwise to inflate in our own minds the military importance of the capture of Rome." He cautioned his auditors that while the Germans have retreated "thousands of miles" accross Africa and back through Italy, "they have suffered heavy losses, but not great enough yet to cause collapse."

"Therefore," he added, "the victory still lies some distance ahead. That distance will be covered in due time- have no fear of that. But it will be tough and it will be costly."

Pope Gives Thanks Rome Was Spared

Voices Appreciation to Both Belligerents in Message to Throng at St. Peter's


VATICAN CITY June 5- Pope Pius XIII appeared on the balcony of St Peters at 6 PM today to thank God that Rome had been spared from the ravages of war while before im in the densely packed square of St Peters the new broad Via Della Conciliazione tens of thousands of Romans cheered themselves hoarse.

It was the third time today that the Pontiff had shown himself to cheering crowds, as he had appeared twice at a window of his office this morning. But this was a solemn, sacred occasion and no one knowing anything about Pius XI can doubt the fervor of his thankfulness that Rome had been saved.

The Pontiff seemed strong and well and his voice carried far though ot was difficult to hear every word he said because of he crowd.

"We must give thanks to God for the favors we have reeived" said the Pope. Rome has been spared. This day will go down in the annals of Rome."

He went on to say he hoped that Italians would be worthy of the grace shown them and put aside hatred and all personal vendettas. He then thanked both belligerents - the Allies and Germany - for having left Rome intact.

After a prayer of thankfulness to the Blessed Virgin and Saints Peter and Paul, guardians, the Pontiff gave his blessing, "urb et orbis," as the immense crowd knelt before him.

[The AP estimated the crowd was between 250 and 500K].

The world has changed for Rome but the Vatican goes on imperturably as it has through so many other conquests in centuries gone by. It is neutral in fact and spirit. The Pope and all high officials went about their daily routines today as in the past. Except for the tanks and the amoured cars running in font of St Peter's one could never know what happened today.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Wlodimir Ledochowski's Masonic Fool FDR

Making East Europe Safe for Stalinism
and Ledochowski's westward shift of Poland
and displacement/erasure of Prussia

Dear Douglas,

the following might be of interest for you:
In the spring of 1943, Admiral Wilhelm Canaris, head of the German Secret Service, met with George Earle, the American Naval Attache in Istanbul, Turkey. Admiral Canaris came to discuss the surrender of the German armed forces. He reported that he had joined with other German leaders in an assassination plot to remove Hitler from power. After this was accomplished, they would take over the German government, and surrender to the Allies, with only one condition:

There must be no Soviet advance into Central Europe.

Mr. Earle sent President Roosevelt a note informing him of Canaris'
proposal.

He received no reply.

Earle tried again, and this time he received what has been termed a "brush-off" from President Roosevelt.

So Earle flew to Washington. Roosevelt told him that his concerns were overly anxious, that Germany would soon surrender after the planned attack commenced through Western Europe.

Earle was very disappointed, and returned to Istanbul. He advised Canaris of what he had learned, and he returned to Germany, where he and the other plotters against Hitler's life were found out and either hung or shot for their efforts to shorten the war and prevent the expansion of the Russians into Eastern Europe.4

If Roosevelt had accepted Canaris' offer: "... the war might have ended in 1943. Countless lives would in all probability have been saved, and, of greatest importance, the Allies wouldn't have supplanted one dangerous ideology with another. The Soviet hordes would have been stopped at the Polish border. The entire map of Europe would have been different."5

Earle returned to the United States. He wrote "I decided to make known some of my views and observations about the so-called allies, the Soviets, so as to wake up the American people about what was really going on. I contacted the President about it, but he reacted strongly and specifically forbade me to make my views known to the public. Then upon my requesting active duty in the Navy, I was ordered to Samoa, in the far-distant South pacific"6

In fact, Earle was warned by Roosevelt's daughter in a letter to him "... that if he carried out his outlined program of publicly criticizing and commenting on some of the Soviet moves, he could be adjudged guilty of treason."7

It is indeed unfortunate that the Roosevelts took this position on the "Soviet moves," the movement of Russian troops into the Eastern European countries as the war was ending, as evidenced by President Roosevelt's inaction in the Canaris case, and the letter of his daughter in the Earle case, because the citizens in these countries did not want the Russians to occupy their nations. This fact was made brutally apparent as millions of these patriots actually joined with the German armed forces in an attempt to keep the Russians from advancing into their respective countries.

So Roosevelt could have truly assisted these patriots in keeping their countries free of Communism by assisting the Canaris group, and Earle could have been of immense assistance in bringing these matters to the attention of the American people.

But it was not to be, and the Eastern European countries were occupied by the Russian Communists much to the chagrin of millions of patriots. Roosevelt continued his support of the Russian government as the war ended by guaranteeing their occupation of these nations by the agreements made at the wartime conferences with the major leaders of the Allied governments.

Ralph Epperson, The Unseen Hand, p.286-287
So it looks like there were two attempts to negotiate a surrender?

On the following pages more betrayals are decribed, like the unnecessary concessions made to Stalin by Roosevelt and Churchill at Yalta, and the betrayal of (orthodox) Russian soldiers (among them General Vlasov and his soldiers) and civilians in a forced repatriation during „Operation Keelhaul” approved by Roosevelt and Eisenhower.

I read somewhere that Admiral Canaris and General Rommel, both high-ranking victims of the Nazi regime, were both Protestants.

Best regards,
Oliver



Wlodimir Ledochowski's Masonic Tool FDR
Posted by at 4 comments:
Labels: , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Wlodimir Ledochowski's Masonic Tool FDR

http://www.hnn.us/blogs/comments/27592.html

Keith Halderman

Consequences of Hate

In his post below David Beito quotes Franklin Roosevelt as saying "We have got to be tough with Germany and I mean the German people not just the Nazis. We either have to castrate the German people or you have to treat them in such a manner so they can't go on reproducing." This quotation has elicited two comments of defense from Craig J. Bolton. In the first he recalls “only two recorded incidents of opposition by the German people” and he ends the second one with the adage; “Ideas have consequences. Bad ideas have bad consequences.” I agree with this line and the notion expressed in the above Roosevelt comment was a bad idea with bad consequences for both Germans and Americans.

I am now in the process of reading The New Dealers’ War: FDR and the War Within World War II by Thomas J. Fleming. This book is doing something I would have thought impossible, it is lowering my opinion of FDR even further.

While Craig Bolton may or may not be correct about there being only two overt incidents of opposition to the Nazis there certainly was a great deal of high level covert support for internal regime change including a very famous assassination attempt in East Prussia. According to Fleming Admiral Wilheim Canaris head of the German Military intelligence organization, the Abwehr, met secretly in Spain, during the summer of 1943, with the heads of American and British intelligence. They hammered out a peace plan which included a cease fire and the elimination of Hitler. Roosevelt rejected this offer refusing to negotiate with “these East German Junkers” and all other overtures from Germans yearning for the Nazis’ downfall.

In fact, when Roosevelt unexpectedly announced, against the opposition of Churchill and his own military commanders, that unconditional surrender was the only acceptable end to the war, he created a great obstacle for those Germans who wished Hitler gone and the carnage over. The policy proved to be a big unifier of the Hitler’s people. We can never know if some Allied encouragement and a different set of demands might have been enough for the success of Admiral Canaris and like minded Germans in their goal of ending the war sooner. However it is not unreasonable to say that FDR’s hatred and determination to punish may very well have cost tens of thousands of Americans their lives.


Posted on Monday, July 3, 2006 at 2:19 AM

Post a Comment

What rules govern discussion boards?

If you have not already, you must Sign Up before you can post.








FDR's attitude would be strategically critical for the Oder Neisse line, the destruction of Prussia and the expulsion of its peoples.












Wlodimir Ledochowski WW2 MasterMind

Wlodimir Ledochowski's War Culpability Admission
Wlodimir Ledochowski's Goal Predicted by Maximilian Kolbe?
Wlodimir Ledochowski's Plausible Counter Reformation Strategy
Wlodimir Ledochowski's Holocausts
Wlodimir Ledochowski's Goals Via Goals

Wlodimir Ledochowski's Mission, Motivation, Geopolitical Chessboard
Wlodimir Ledochowski's Plausible Childhood Vow to Destroy Prussia
Wlodimir Ledochowski's Plausible Childhood Inspiration

Wlodimir Ledochowski's Spooky Obscurity

Wlodimir Ledochowski According to Tupper Saussy

Vatican Bank Claims: Prussia Trust?

Maximilian Kolbe on WW2: "God is Cleansing Poland"



The All-Seeing Eye, The President, The Secretary and The Guru
Posted by at 3 comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, November 10, 2008

FEAR of Kulturkampf Revenge

A google search of the term "Kulturkampf or Kulterkampf Revenge" revealed the following citation from an East Prussian BB url that I did not recognize; however clicking in it reveals only a blank window.

Clearly, the intell spooks are working for those spooked by their own fear- confirming that the Roman Catholic Church via 26th Jesuit Order Superior General Wlodimir Ledochowski, is indeed guilty of engineering WW2- particularly in setting up Germany to LOOSE for the sake of a sick Roman Catholic plan to 'cleanse' Poland and destroy Prussia.

Ostpreußenforum: Wlodimir Ledochowski's Revenge for the ...

Explore the topics "Wlodimir Ledochowski" and "Kulterkampf Revenge" in " Continuing Counter Reformation" ...
f27.parsimony.net/forum67420/messages/2603.htm - 3k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this

Wlodimir Ledochowski: BVD (League of Expelles) To Target?
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

Ratzinger to Continue Push Pacelli Canonization

Perhaps goaded by fear of the expose of
Wlodimir Ledochowski's Kulterkampf Revenge?

The Young Ratzinger

From Wispers in the Loggia

http://whispersintheloggia.blogspot.com/2008/11/pius-proceeds.html

Vice-Pope: "Pius Proceeds"

Laying to rest the past week's misreports of a "freeze" on the cause for beatification of Pope Pius XII, the Holy See's second-in-command has indicated that the next major step in the wartime pontiff's controversial progression toward the altars remains in the offing.

Opening a Vatican exhibit yesterday to mark the 50th anniversary of Pius' death, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone SDB said that the late Pope's cause "continues forward like all other causes."

"We can expect the decree on his heroic virtue, and then the miracle [for beatification]," Bertone added. "It will be seen."

The comments were first reported by the Italian bishops' daily newspaper, Avvenire.

Green-lighted by the Congregation for the Causes of Saints, the document marking the successful close of the customary investigation into Pius' Christian character is currently pending before Pope Benedict.

Bertone's predecessor as Secretary of State prior to his 1939 election to the papacy, Pius' legacy has long remained under fire from much of the Jewish community, who believe that the late pontiff failed to do enough in the face of the Holocaust. Recently requested to put the brakes on the cause by a global group of Jewish leaders meeting with him, Benedict's reply that he was "seriously considering the matter" had been interpreted in some reports as an indicator that he was given to halting the process.

Tomorrow, Bertone is slated to deliver a major address on Pius' relations with Judaism at the Pontifical Gregorian University as part of a seminar on the late pontiff.

-30-
posted by Rocco Palmo at 21:40
Posted by at 1 comment:

Wlodimir (Vladimir) Ledochowski's Plausible Inspiration

His Uncle
Mieczyslaw Ledochowski



http://books.google.com/books?id=pO_gCtlJRWwC&pg=RA1-PA359&lpg=RA1-PA359&dq=Ledochowski's+Wars&source=bl&ots=0u_QQaPP8N&sig=OSTnNzEXStuGYqrKZ67NvhfPSDE&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=10&ct=result#PRA1-PA359,M1
LEDOCHOWSKI, HIECISLAUS JOHANN, COUNT (1822-1902), Polish cardinal, was born on the 2gth of October 1822 in Gorki (Russian Poland), and received his early education at the gymnasium and seminary of Warsaw.

After finishing his studies at the Jesuit Accademia dei Nobili Ecclesiastic! in Rome, which strongly influenced his religious development and his attitude towards church affairs, he was ordained in 1845.

From 1856 to 1858 he represented the Roman See in Columbia, but on the outbreak of the Columbian revolution had to return to Rome. In 1861 Pope Pius IX. made him his nuncio at Brussels, and in 1865 he was made archbishop of Gnesen-Posen. His preconization followed on the 8th of January 1866.

This date marks the beginning of the second period in Ledochowski's life; for during the Prussian and German KulturkampJ he was one of the most declared enemies of the state. It was only during the earliest years of his appointment as archbishop that he entertained a different view, invoking, for instance, an intervention of Prussia in favour of the Roman Church, when it was oppressed by the house of Savoy.

On the I2th of December 1870 he presented an effective memorandum on the subject at the headquarters at Versailles. In 1872 the archbishop protested against the demand of the government that religious teaching should be given only in the German language, and in 1873 he addressed a circular letter on this subject to the clergy of his diocese. The government thereupon demanded a statement from the teachers of religion as to whether they intended to obey it or the archbishop, and on their declaring for the archbishop, dismissed them. The count himself was called upon at the end of 1873 to lay aside his office. On his refusing to do so, he was arrested between 3 and 4 o'clock in the morning on the 3rd of February 1874 by Standi, the director of police, and taken to the military prison of Ostrowo. The pope made him a cardinal on the i }th of March, but it was not till the 3rd of February 1876 that he was released from prison.

Having been expelled from the eastern provinces of Prussia, he betook himself to Cracow, where his presence was made the pretext for anti-Prussian demonstrations. Upon this he was also expelled from Austria, and went to Rome, whence, in spite of his removal from office, which was decreed on the isth of April 1874, he continued to direct the affairs of his diocese, for which he was on several occasions from 1877 to 1879 condemned in absentia by the Prussian government for " usurpation of episcopal rights."

It was not till 1885 that Ledochowski resolved to resign his archbishopric, in which he was succeeded by Dinder at the end of the year. Ledochowski's return in 1884 was forbidden by the Prussian government (although the Kulturkampf had now abated), on account of his having stirred up anew the Polish nationalist agitation. He passed the closing years of his life in Rome. In 1892 he became prefect of the Congregation of the Propaganda [the Inquisition], and he died in Rome on the 22nd of July 1902.


Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , ,

Phelps on Wlodimir (Vladimir) Ledochowski's KULTURKAMPF REVENGE

Dear Doug,

Agreed.

Your German investigation of what the Order did to Germany is extremely
important.

Brother Eric
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)