The New York Times On the Papacy and Cardinal Mieczyslaw Ledochowski

Excerpt from

“Should Old Pope Leo Die: the political tendencies of his successor. The Cardinal who would probably win the prize – his Polish supporter – affairs in France and Germany – Spurgeon’s return – Lord Lorne’s appointment"

January 23, 1892

http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?_r=1&res=9B07E3DA1738E233A25757C2A9679C94639ED7CF&oref=slogin

The Papacy since 1870 has been in a position where practically everything turns upon the personality of the Pontiff and his choice of advisers. There can be no more mediocre Popes under whose nominal guidance matters can go on in commonplace routine. Every successor of Peter now must make a big mark in the history of the Church for good or bad. If he is not very strong, he will be found lamentably weak. There is no longer any middle course.

Leo has been one of the strong kind. His fourteen years of reign have been devoted to building a new sort of Papacy beside rather than upon the ruins of the old structure. Considering the great difficulties and obstacles in the way of his task, proceeding even more from within than without, the result is exceptionally successful. Perhaps the outcome of his labors is best described by saying that he has shown those who thought the Papacy need no longer be taken into account in the world’s affairs because Rome has been wrestled from it that they were profoundly mistaken. The Vatican to-day wields far greater influence in Europe than it has done before since the French Revolution.

But it is a peculiarly personal influence. The next Pope will inherit only the opportunities of securing it for himself, and failing to improve these will be vastly easier than success.

It seems to be taken for granted that Cardinal Raphael Monaco la Valetta [b. February 23, 1827- d. July 14, 1896] will secure the succession. He is the doyen of the Sacred College and Secretary of the Inquisition- an amiable, unambitious priest of sixty-five, who has the very slenderest notions of or interest in the general European situation. He is extremely simple in his tastes, is not in the least stirred by all the great outside social and political problems with which Leo has striven to grapple as a sacerdotal Tory. By temperament he always belonged to the conservative wing of the college. He will assume the tiara, if elected, as its representative and opposed to the small liberal group headed by Cardinal Parocchi. If he stood by himself there would be no risk in predicting that this would be a reign under which the Papacy would lose more prestige than Leo gained for it.

It is very well understood, however, that Monaco is entirely under the control of Ledochowski, that proud, imperious, and able Pole who made Bismarck such worlds of trouble in the old Kulterkampf day and who has been able to impose his will very often upon even the present Pope. This powerful man was in a German prison when Pius IX created him a Cardinal in 1875. Next year he was released and banished, and he has since lived in Rome, devoting his great wealth and talents to building up a militant Ultramontagne party about him. His wrath at the treatment he received at the hands of Bismarck has colored all his political views. He has hated both Germany and Italy and has looked unceasingly forward to the time when French bayonets should restore the temporal power of the Vatican in the old Roman States.

If we assume that this spirited and resolute prelate will shortly be ruling the Church through its nominal head, it becomes a most anxious question how he will accept the existing political conditions of Europe which have so radically changed since 1875. The new rulers of the Germans have been at pains to show their desire to abolish the last traces of the Kulterkampf. When the pending Prussian Education bill is passed, the German Catholics will be actually stronger than they were before the May laws. During the last half year these dispatches have frequently reflected the new interest which William and his immediate entourage are displaying in the Polish question. Of course a good deal of this has arisen naturally from the contemplation of the necessity of sooner or later fighting Russia: but even more it represents the effort to allure Ledochowski into friendship with Germany by an appeal to his national sentiment. How far this has succeeded will be, as has been said, a most anxious question.

In any event under this new regime there would be an abrupt cessation of pastorals on Socialistic and labor problems and of poems about St. Thomas Aquinas. We should instead see the Vatican boldly embark upon the troubled waters of European diplomacy, seeking alliances and taking desperate risks upon the fortune in the next war.

A prophetic understatement.


Wlodimir (Vladimir) Ledochowski According to Tupper Saussy

Napoleon on the Jesuits

“The Jesuits are a MILITARY organization, not a religious order. Their chief is a general of an army, not the mere father abbot of a monastery. And the aim of this organization is power – power in its most despotic exercise – absolute power, universal power, power to control the world by the volition of a single man [i.e., the Black Pope, the Superior General of the Jesuits].

Jesuitism is the most absolute of despotisms [sic] – and at the same time the greatest and most enormous of abuses…”

Napoleon I (i.e., Napoleon Bonaparte; 1769-1821; emperor of the French)

The New York Times on the Papacy and Cardinal Mieczyslaw Ledochowski

General Lafayette on the Jesuits

General Lafayette, in 1799 wrote:

"It is my opinion that if the liberties of this country" the United States of America "are destroyed, it will be by the subtlety of the Roman Catholic Jesuit Priests, for they are the most crafty, dangerous enemies to civil and religious liberty. They have instigated most of the wars of Europe".

Marquis Lafayette (1757-1834; French statesman and general. He served in the American Continental Army under the command of General George Washington during the American Revolutionary War.)

Napoleon on the Jesuits

John Adams on the Jesuits

The 2nd President of the U.S.A.

I do not like the reappearance of the Jesuits.... Shall we not have regular swarms of them here, in as many disguises as only a king of the gipsies can assume, dressed as printers, publishers, writers and schoolmasters?

If ever there was a body of men who merited damnation on earth and in Hell, it is this society of Loyola's. Nevertheless, we are compelled by our system of religious toleration to offer them an asylum.

-- John Adams, letter to Thomas Jefferson, May 5, 1816

General Lafayette on the Jesuits

Samuel Morse on the Jesuits

“Let us examine the operations of this Austrian Society [the St. Leopold Foundation], for it is hard at work all around us, yes, here in this country [i.e., the USA]… With its headquarters in Vienna [Austria], under the immediate direction and inspection of [Austrian Prince] Metternich, …it makes itself already felt through the [American] Republic. Its emissaries are here. And who are these emissaries? They are Jesuits. This [Roman Catholic] society of men, after exerting their tyranny for upwards of two hundred years, at length became so formidable to the world, threatening the entire subversion to all social order, that even the Pope [i.e., Clement XIV], whose devoted subjects they [i.e., the Jesuits] are, and must be, by the vow of their society, was compelled to dissolve them [in 1773]. They had not been suppressed, however, for fifty years, before the waning influence of Popery and Despotism required their useful labors to resist the light of Democratic liberty, and the Pope (Pius VII) simultaneously with the formation of the Holy Alliance [in Europe], revived the order of the Jesuits in all their power. ((Ed. Comment: Pope Pius VII restored the Jesuit Order in 1814 in exchange for his release from prison, where he had spent five years under Jesuit “persuasion”.)

And do Americans need to be told what Jesuits are? If any are ignorant, let them inform themselves of their history without delay; no time is to be lost; their workings are before you in every day’s events; they are a secret society, a sort of Masonic order with super added features of revolting odiousness, and a thousand times more dangerous. They are not merely priests, or priests of one religious creed; they are merchants, and lawyers, and editors, and men of any profession, having no outward badge (in this country [i.e., the USA]) by which to be recognized; they are about in all your society. They can assume any character, that of angels of light, or ministers of darkness, to accomplish their one great end, the service upon which they are sent, whatever that service may be.

They [i.e., the Jesuits] are educated men, prepared, and sworn to start at any moment, and in any direction, and for any service, commanded by the general of their order [i.e., the Jesuit Superior General, the “Black Pope”], bound to no family, community, or country, by the ordinary ties which bind men; and sold for life to the cause of the Roman Pontiff.”

How appropriate coming from the inventor of the device - the telegraph - that would herald the age of electric based communications that evolved into telephones and the internet.

Samuel F.B. Morse's `FOREIGN CONSPIRACY'
John Adams on the Jesuits

Abraham Lincoln on the Jesuits

The 16th President of the U.S.A.

“This war would never have been possible without the sinister influence of the Jesuits. We owe it to Popery that we now see our land reddened with the blood of her noblest sons. Though there were great differences of opinion between the South and North, on the question of slavery, neither Jeff Davis nor any one of the leading men of the Confederacy would have dared to attack the North, had they not relied on the promise of the Jesuits, that, under the mask of Democracy, the money and the arms of the Roman Catholics, even the arms of France, were at their disposal if they would attack us.”

I pity the priests, the bishops and monks of Rome in the United States, when the people realize that they are, in great part, responsible for the tears and the blood shed in this war. I conceal what I know, on that subject, from the knowledge of the nation; for if the people knew the whole truth, this war would turn into a religious war, and it would at once, take a tenfold more savage and bloody character. It would become merciless as all religious wars are. It would become a war of extermination on both sides. The Protestants of both the North and the South would surely unite to exterminate the priests and the Jesuits, if they could hear what Professor Morse has said to me of the plots made in the very city of Rome to destroy this Republic, and if they could learn how the priests, the nuns, and the monks, which daily land on our shores, under the pretext of preaching their religion, instructing the people in their schools, taking care of the sick in the hospitals, are nothing else but the emissaries of the Pope, of Napoleon, and the other despots of Europe, to undermine our institutions, alienate the hearts of our people from our constitution, and our laws, destroy our schools, and prepare a reign of anarchy here as they have done in Ireland, in Mexico, in Spain, and wherever there are any people who want to be free."

President Abraham Lincoln- with more quotes
Samuel Morse on the Jesuits

Mieczysław Ledóchowski: NY Times Editorial June 24, 1874

It appears that the American Pilgrims have presented to the Pope an address sent from this country to that eminent ecclesiastical martyr, Archbishop Ledochowski, of Posen. Pius IX took occasion to say in reply that “the United States is the only country where he is really Pope in the eyes of the government.”

That, it must be added, depends entirely on circumstances. If the Sovereign Pontiff means that in this country his pretensions to infallibility and to the headship of the Christians world meet wit he same impartial toleration as would the alleged spiritual; sovereignty of the grand Lama of Tibet, or of Mumbo-Jumbo, he in unquestionably right: but if he means that he cold repeat, without interference, in the United States, any such experiment as that which was attempted in Posen, he would be clearly wrong. For example, the Pope conferred on Count Ledochowski, during the sitting for the Vatican Council, the title of Primate of Poland.

That there was a direct political attack upon the three great powers who hold slices of that dismembered kingdom, because the revival of an exploded spiritual dignity restored also the claim associated with it, of being regarded as regent of the kingdom during the vacancy of the throne. In fact, a German ecclesiastical almanac for 1872 includes Archbishop Ledochowski in the list of reigning sovereigns as representative of the King of Poland.

We may stigmatize the partition of Poland as an infamous piece of royal brigandage, and yet refuse to recognize the right of any ecclesiastical authority to keep alive, by this and similar means, hopeless and ruinous sedition among the subjects of any European power. The attempt was all the more imprudent, since the priestly agents by whom it was promoted were sustained by the pay of the State against which they were conspiring. Suppose “pontifical documents” had been used to fan the flame of disaffection in the South, the Government of this country would have been compelled to take very much the same position in regard to them as the Governments of Prussia, Austria, and other States have recently done. [paragraph splits and emphasis added]

http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9502EEDC1139EF34BC4C51DFB066838F669FDE

What about:

the Vatican role in the assassination of U.S. President Abraham Lincoln?
the Vatican role in engineering World War 1 and 2, plausibly to resurrect and then to "cleanse" Poland?


Should not the New York Times have shown a continuing interest in the origins of the holocausts of WW2?

Jesuit Con-Spiration

From Boris:

Dear Friends, Another Organization we should investigate!

Public Con-Spiracy for the Poor (CS)

http://www.con-spiration.de/

Symbols (in their words)

http://www.con-spiration.de/annex/religions.html

Moon

MUSLIMS

Aim: to gain heaven
Way or means to reach the aim: submission to God; to pray five times a day, to fast in the month Ramadan, to give alms, pilgrimage to Mecca at least once in life, to defend on certain occasions / conditions Islam also by military means (Dschihad)

Heart

UNBELIEVERS - ATHEISTS (MARXISTS)
PEOPLE OF GOOD WILL

Aim: communism, classless society, welfare for everybody;
Way or means to reach the aim: to follow the teachings of Marx, Engels, Lehnin; class warfare,
Formula(s) or watchwords: liberty, fraternity, equality; the party is always right; the socialsm wins,

YinYang

HINDUS
VISHNUISM, SHAIVISM, BRAHMANISM

Aim: to gain illumination, and to reach eventually salvation by one's own efforts
Way or means to reach the aim: meditation, asceticism and yoga, veneration of gurus and gods (there're more than 3000)

Sun

BUDDHISTS

Aim: to gain Buddhaship, to escape samsare (weel of reincarnation), to enter nirvana or brahman.
Way or means to reach the aim: ascetiscism, meditation, invocation of the name of Buddha (Amida), abhisheka, mantra, mandala...
Formulas: unknown to me
Symbol: Lotus

Star

JEWS

Aim: to gain heaven
Way or means to reach the aim: to fulfil the commandments,
Symbol: David's star

Cross

CHRISTIANS

Aim: to enter heaven by recognizing and serving Christ in the poor
Way or means to reach the aim: ora et labora (Latin - pray and labour); to fulfil the most important demand: To love God with all your heart... ; sacraments...
Formula: My Lord and my God..., and: Kyrie eleison - Lord have mercy...
Symbol: the cross
Colour: golden - nimbus of the saints

Especially the symbols background we should have a look at, again.

The are all connected to the sun in the center

Look at what their link section is flooded with

http://www.con-spiration.de/english/linkse.html

Active since 2001

In their Words

"As religious heads keep up the inter-religious dialogue or the joint prayer for the public [e.g. the Prayer Meetings in Assisi, where Pope John Paul II and leaders of other religions said their prayers for justice and peace], and scholars discuss at international scientific meetings inter-religious questions we may assume that this is done also as inivation for everybody to join as well the discussion as the common prayer. Maybe it will be realized some day by experts in WWW matters who establish a body of members of different religions and world views. There will be needed above all their agreement on a common symbol and on the use of the proceeds from its selling (for the poor)."

http://www.con-spiration.de/#cs

"The modern way of life is to a large extent shaped by the American way of life which needs urgently and persistently a counterposition because it is a great temptation. Big business and globalization prophets want to lure people into this mentality: To become consumers, competitors, careerists.
There is happiness and bliss in people who are really poor, poor in spirit and mind. God's blessing rests on them (Cf. Mt 5,3). They have the ability to live in union and peace with themselves and with others - as is shown by their lives. To strive after that kind of poverty, pays off."

http://www.con-spiration.de/#morepref

Jesuits involved

Ernst Förster SJ

CS Webmaster

As always in the fashion of Jesuits guiding information flow

http://www.con-spiration.de/ef.html

They are based in the city of Cologne, Germany

Elisabeth-Breuer-Str. 63
D-51065 Köln
Fon (0049)0221/28581-0
Fax (0049)0221/28581-459
foerstersj@t-online.de

Christoph Albrecht SJ

"The Friends of Notre-Dame de la Route"

Christoph Albrecht is representative of "The Friends of Notre-Dame de la Route"

http://www.ndroute.ch/freunde/vorstand.html

"Notre-Dame de la Route"

A Jesuit hideout in Switzerland

http://www.ndroute.ch/de/kurse/uebersicht.php

Linking their own connections

http://www.ndroute.ch/de/links/links.php

No Alliance with Structural Violence!
Necessary Church Developments in the Age of Globalization

http://www.con-spiration.de/texte/english/glob-e.html

Comment on the Reprimand
of the Salvadorian Liberation Theologian Jon Sobrino SJ

http://www.con-spiration.de/texte/english/2007/albrecht-e.html

Tel. 026 409 75 03

christoph.albrecht@jesuiten.org

http://ds1.dreifels.ch/jesuiten/page.asp?DH=66

Is he the same person going to head the CJD - Christian Youth village?

http://www.cjd.de/public/333/news/index.php?news_id=2691&news_date=2

Eberhard von Gemmingen SJ

Chief Editor for German Radio Vatican
He knows Ratzinger from his Radio Vatican days dating back to 1982.

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eberhard_von_Gemmingen

Cross of Merit, First class (Officer's cross)

He recieved the Bundesverdienstkreuz (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundesverdienstkreuz)

"The Order of Merit of the Federal Republic of Germany" was instituted by Theodor Heuss 1951

http://www.bundespraesident.de/The-role-of-the-Federal-Presid/Work-in-Germany-,11180/The-Order-of-Merit-of-the-Fede.htm

Look further down this post for Info on Theodor Heuss

IMH (International Media Help)

He is an acknowledged member of the IMH opening channels for his propaganda.

http://www.imh-deutschland.de/page/index.php?rubrik=0005

Radio Vatican

Editorial to the German-language Program 2003

http://www.con-spiration.de/texte/english/gemmingen-e.html

Johannes Müller SJ

http://www.hfph.mwn.de/lehrkoerper/igpmit/mueller

Published studies like:
"Die vielen Gesichter der Globalisierung. Perspektiven einer menschengerechten Weltordnung"

"The many faces of Globalism. Perspectives of a people friendly world order"

http://www.hfph.mwn.de/lehrkoerper/igpmit/mueller

"Institut für Gesellschaftspolitik" a Jesuit institution

Hochschule für Philosopie

Forty Years Populorum Progressio
A Milestone on the Way to World-wide Social Teachings

http://www.con-spiration.de/texte/english/2007/mueller-e.html

Pierre de Charentenay SJ

http://www.revue-etudes.com/etudes/qui_sommes_nous.php

Is there any Future for Europe?
Fifty years after the Roman Treaties

http://www.con-spiration.de/texte/english/2007/charentenay-e.html

Chefredakteur
Jan Kerkhofs SJ wird Chefredakteur von Europe Infos und Leiter des Katholischen Sekretariates für Europäische Fragen (OCIPE). Der Nachfolger von Pierre de Charentenay SJ ist Flame, emeritierter Theologie- und Soziologieprofessor an der Katholischen Universität Löwen, Gründer der Foundation for the Study of European Values (Stiftung für die Analyse europäischer Werte) und Autor von 35 Büchern sowie zahlreicher Artikel.

http://www.comece.org/comece.taf?_function=ei_new&sub_id=11&id=31&language=de

Jesuit Publication

http://www.stimmen-der-zeit.de/

Albert Keller SJ

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Keller

Intellectual Discussion or Tolerance?

http://www.con-spiration.de/texte/english/2007/keller-e.html

The rebel in "der Kanzel"

http://www.kreudenstein-online.de/Briefe/interview_albert_keller.htm

They know how to draw masses - so they will be able to do that with the new one world religion.

Bernhard Grom SJ

http://www.kath-kirche-kaernten.at/pages/bericht.asp?id=4025

Prof. Dr. Bernhard Grom (München)
Geb. 1936. Seit 1955 Jesuit. Studium der Philosophie (Pullach) und der Theologie (Lyon). Aufbaustudium in Religionspädagogik und Religionspsychologie (Brüssel). Promotion (Rom). Seit 1972 Prof. für Religionspsychologie und –pädagogik an der Hochschule für Philosophie, München. Ständiger Gastdozent an der Theol. Fak. Luzern.

http://www.akademische-wochen.org/fruehjahr2004.htm

Bernhard Grom SJ, geb. 1936; Professor für Religionspädagogik und Religionspsychologie an der Hochschule für Philosophie in München. Redaktionsmitglied der Zeitschrift »Stimmen der Zeit« und Seelsorger in einer Münchner Pfarrei. Zahlreiche Veröffentlichungen.

http://www.gruenewaldverlag.de/autor_info.php?autor_id=90

http://www.gruenewaldverlag.de/autorenlist_result.php?autor_id=90

Bernhard Grom: Gott und Gewalt in religionspsychologischer Sicht

Der Vorwurf, dass Religion Gewalt fördert, wird seit langem immer wieder stereotyp vorgetragen. Und tatsächlich spielt(e) Religion als eine Quelle von Gewalt in politischen und ethnischen Konflikten oder im aktuellen fundamentalistischen Islamismus eine wichtige Rolle. Und dennoch: Ist dieser Vorwurf in dieser pauschalen Form überhaupt haltbar? Trifft nicht eher das Gegenteil zu, dass Religion friedensstiftend und aggressionsmindernd wirkt? Wir haben den renommierten Religionspsychologen Bernhard Grom SJ gebeten, die Beziehung von Religion, Gottesbild und Gewalt aus psychologischer Sicht zu untersuchen. Sein Beitrag liefert eine deutliche Antwort, die allzu schnellen Schuldzuweisungen an die Adresse der Religion einen Riegel vorschiebt.

http://www.kth-linz.ac.at/ThPQ/artikel/2005/quartal2/grom.htm

Christian Zen?

http://www.con-spiration.de/texte/english/2007/grom-e.html

Telefon: +49 89 23 86 - 2300

http://webinfo.campus.lmu.de/view_person.cfm?ps=39441

Die Neuausgabe des bekannten Standardwerks von Bernhard Grom erklärt die Vielfalt, in der sich religiöses Erleben, Denken und Verhalten ausprägen kann. Dieses Handbuch gibt einen umfassenden Überblick über die Psychologie der Religion – übersichtlich, allgemein verständlich und auf dem aktuellen Stand der Wissenschaft.

http://www.koesel.de/Detail.asp?isbn=346636765

He is the "go to" in the field of religious psychology!

Their collection of Helpful Texts

Get a glimpse at what we are heading for

2005

Stefan Silber - Theology of Liberation in the Dialogue between Religions
Hans Kessler - Trialogue between Jews, Christians, and Muslims
Victor Conzemius - Johannes Paul II a Global Player of Justice
Arnold Angenendt - Violent Monotheism - Human Polytheism?
Ludwig Ebersberger - Structure and Dynamic of the Cosmos
Konrad Hilpert - The Acknowledgment of Religious Freedom
Christoph Albrecht SJ - No Alliance with Structural Violence!
Alfred Metzger - The Ideology of the Militant Muslims
Ernst Förster - Three Sharing Or Dividing One God
Joachim Valentin - Final Fight - Hell - Paradise
Eberhard von Gemmingen SJ - Radio Vatican
Thomas Gertler - How do I look at the world?
Franz Kamphaus - Culture of Non-Violence
Peter Hünseler - Dialogue at a snail's pace
Joachim Valentin - Rationality in Islam?
Iwan Sokolowsky - Islam And Peace

2006

Peter Heine - No Raprochment in View - Differences between Shiites & Sunnis
Chr. W. Troll - 'To believe each other capable of questioning oneself critically'
Ursula Schneider - Peace Initiatives and Peace Potentials in Israel/Palestine
Gerd Stricker - Still no Thaw (Orthodox and Catholic Christians in Russia)
Karl-Heinz Pohl - Spiritual Traditions For Which Today's Chinese Stand
Andreas Renz, Hansjörg Schmid, Jutta Sperber - In the Name of God
George Evers - Conflict Intensification Instead of Communication?
Anton Rauscher - John Paul II and the World-wide Social Question
Michael Amaladoss - Serving the Interreligious Dialogue in India
Christian W. Troll - Progressive Thinking in Contemporary Islam
Georg Evers - Religious Coexistence Endangered in Indonesia
Katharina Hofer - Does a Militant Christianity Develop in Africa?
Christian M. Rutishauser - From Religion Pluralism to Dialogue
Anton Rauscher - The Christian Roots of Human Dignity
Thomas Gertler - Spiritual Exercises and World Mission
Magnus Striet - Benedikt XVI, Modern Times, and Faith
Anna Strobel - Unique Legal Status - Muslims in Austria
Marianne Heimbach-Steins - Human Rights for Women
Andreas Heuser - God, Nation and Education (Ghana)
Johannes Müller - Protection for Religious Symbols?
Gerd Neuhaus - Christian And Pluralistic At Once?
Gisbert Greshake - Each Child Understands That
Heinz Werner Wessler - India's Unity in Diversity
Michael Sievernich - Multi-Culturalism at the End
Clauß Peter Sajak - Dictatorship of Relativism?
Hans Joachim Höhn - Renaissance of Religion
Sabine Demel - From Culture- to Faith Mission
Annette Meuthrath - Asian Women's Theology
Johannes Röser - Religion as Maker of Moral?
Heiner Bielefeldt - Threatened Human Right
Theodor Hanf - Time-tested Co-operation
Johannes Röser - How Universal is God?
Daniel Bogner - A Clear Improvement
Anton Rauscher - The Scarf Conflict
Hans Maier - Church in Democracy
Stefan Silber - Complex and Alive
Magnus Striet - Liberty and Faith
Peter Heine - Not Only Alms
Stefan Ort - Good Religion
Ulrich Ruh - Fears

2007

Christoph Albrecht SJ - Comment on the Reprimand of the Liberation Theologian Jon Sobrino SJ
Johannes Müller SJ / Johannes Wallacher - Forty Years Populorum Progressio
Marco Moerschbacher - When Black Priests Bring Themselves to Notice
Tahsin Görgün - Humans as Creatures And Deputies of the Creator
Stephan Leimgruber - New Perspectives of Interreligious Learning
Raif Georges Khoury - Christians in Lebanon and the Arab Culture
Christoph Krauß & Gerhard Kruip - Caught up in Self-blockades
Hamideh Mohagheghi - Only Obedient Wife and Good Mother?
Luis Gutheinz - A View into the Workshop of Chinese Theology
Hans Maier - 'There Is Missing a Common European Feeling'
Dieter Senghaas - How to Reorient the Intercultural Dialogue
Christian Ruch - Buddhism in the German-speaking Countries
Petra Kolonko - Peking Olympiad in 2008 and Human Rights
Christian W. Troll - Muhammad - Prophet also for Christians?
Pierre de Charentenay SJ - Is there any future for Europe?
Reinhold Esterbauer -Christian reason as soul of Europe?
Andreas Heuser - To a Large Extent Unknown Neighbours
Michael Reder - Reform of World Trade and of the WTO
Alois Koch - Johann Adam Schall von Bell (1592-1666)
Albert Keller SJ - Intellectual Discussion or Tolerance?
Andreas Fincke - A Chimera of Freedom of Religion
Christian Frevel - Socialists and left-wing Christians
Jürgen Springer - 'We all always pray for the Pope'
Ali Dere - How Much Islam Does Pluralism Stand?
Dieter Senghaas - Is There Any Future For Peace?
Walter Cardinal Kasper - Changes of Ecumenism
Georg Evers - Politically and Religiously Strained
Wolfgang Schonecke - No Simple Programmes
Martin Maier - Fifth General Assembly of CELAM
Magnus Striet - Not For All But For Many Only?
Michael Sievernich - Fauxpas in Aparecida?
Walter Cardinal Kasper - Faith and Reason
Daniel Bogner - Interpreters or Lobbyists?
Gerhard Kruip - Another world is possible
Harry Harum Behr - An Ordinary Subject?
Ernst Ulz - Our Message Are The People
Alexander Foitzik - Option for the Poor
Karl H. Neufeld - Second Africa Synod
Veit Strassner - The Nerves Lie Bare
Jürgen Springer - The Chinese Letter
Ulrich Ruh - Continuity and Flexibility
Bernhard Grom SJ - Christian Zen?
Jürgen Springer - Frayed Puzzle
Ernst Ulz - A Powerful Revolution
Georg Evers - “River and cross”
George Evers - Hopeful Signal
Karl Osner - Meeting the Poor
Martin Maier - Inculturation

Things still to have alook at:

Theodor Heuss

was writing Friedrich Naumanns biography

http://www.sozialarchiv.ch/bestaende/mattmueller2.html

Naumann

Connection to Goerdeler - first choice of the Kreisauer Circle!!

http://www.20-juli-44.de/pdf/1954_heuss.pdf

Plotting of Hitlers Death

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E05E3DF1138F933A25752C1A960958260

Heuss verbindung

It's like the Kreisauer Circle in WWII - they now have a worldwide powerstructure that comes to fall if crime charges will keep hitting the Vatican. This is part of their planing for contingency in new structures and what better than a new, single, universal religion, because the old cloaked system now has done its deeds for much over 2000 years.

WbR,

Boris

Wlodimir (Vladimir) Ledochowski: Father of Germany's CDU political party

From Boris:

"I can only highlight that the Kreisauer Circle was very oecumenic, Count von Moltke explicitly names the oecumenic component and that the Jesuit General Ledochowsky in a conspirative fashion was called "our General" by the members of the Kreisauer Circle."

Source: http://diskussion.cdu.de/forum/thema4/ileP...s.ovr/ileeCrUgl

From The Un-Hived Mind:

Dear friends,

The plot thickens even more - Is Ledochowskis work still having influence on German politics today?

As I don't have much time right now please excuse that this is just my unfinished theory.

For that reason I'd like the input of all of you to establish if this is worth further persuing.

I might be running in the wrong direction - but if it holds true we are unwillingly on our way crushing Germanys most highlighted resistance movement during WWII.

How did I get this lead? Ok - now this gets odd!

It is about the CDU (Christlich Demokratische Union/Christian Democratic Union) - one of Germany's most influential political parties to this day.

In the official CDU forum someone posted about the inception of the CDU party and it's Jesuit connection.

They are telling us that Ledochowski when he died in 1942 already had a "network" for a new political direction in place. This was headed by his Provincial Augustin Rösch SJ with the help of Count J. von Moltke, the Kreisauer Circle and Pius XII.

In the last weeks of the war out of this emerged structures later to be the CDU.

"I can only highlight that the Kreisauer Circle was very oecumenic, Count von Moltke explicitly names the oecumenic component and that the Jesuit General Ledochowsky in a conspirative fashion was called "our General" by the members of the Kreisauer Circle."

Source: http://diskussion.cdu.de/forum/thema4/ileP...s.ovr/ileeCrUgl

I would have granted them the right to be an opposition with having only been infiltrated at the top by Rösch and maybe 1-2 more people.

But by saying "our General", having a Provincial in the midst and most of them being catholic or even SMOM/SJ they have to know of the influence the church has had in that game. By not telling they are the WWII version of Alex Jones - firing peoples emotions and resistance up while still holding back on truth.

Now who were all those praised fighters of nazi doctrine and how do they fit in our picture of Jesuit/Catholics steering WWII?

Kreisau Circle

"But the circle's main focus was to plan and propose a peacetime government for Germany; they do not ever appear to have made any plans to overthrow the Nazi state."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kreisau_Circle

"[T]hey wrote a plan for a constitution that included subjects like economy, foreign policy, justice, religious, culture, education and even the trails against the nazi war criminals."

http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Academy/1148/july6.html

Wasn't this Pope Pius XI encyclical?

"He issued the encyclical Quas Primas establishing the feast of Christ the King, and took as his papal motto "Christ's peace in Christ's kingdom." This indicates the central idea of his pontificate: that the Catholic religion must permeate all areas of human living: the home, the city, politics, economics, art etc. Rather than allowing religious belief to be reduced to a merely private matter, or withdrawing the Church from involvement in the outer world, Pius XI thought Catholics must work to create a truly Catholic society: Christ must be King over every aspect of life."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Pius_XI

This is a contingency plan and would explain the Jesuit involvement/interest in all of this.

Fake resistances like today - people will think someone allready acts on it so I don't have to.

A little bit about members of the Kreisauer Circle:


Augustin Rösch, SJ

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustin_R%C3%B6sch
http://www.bautz.de/bbkl/r/roesch_a.shtml

Rösch was questioned 1017 times during the nazi reign.

Either there is something to question him for or not. And if you suspect something you don't let him go 1017 times.

I mean over which timespan? 10 years? That would still be every 3rd or 4th day!
Sounds more like a cover to get him to give the new intel - or brief him…

Do you really think if he was a real rebel the Superior General would have let him stay Provincial?

Also why do they grab Delp and hang him if they had that much intel on Rösch?
Following the Jesuit oath Delp was the one of their own who was dispensable.

Alfred Delp



http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Delp

Eric Jon Phelps on page 620 in Vatican Assassins III quotes Hoensbroech and shortly the Jesuit Alfred Delp is mentioned - I had a closer look at him and think Delp was just a patsy to justify what they already had in store - because Delp, like Augustin Bea (who also was admired for what he did to this day) was directly commissioned by Ledochowskis Provincial Augustin Rösch SJ!
This was not only to have a "fake" resistance but it actually seams the Nobility and the Provincial worked hand in hand to create the successor political party for the Superior General.


Helmut James Count von Moltke


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmuth_James_Graf_von_Moltke

Look at who runs in his family:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmuth_Karl_...hard_von_Moltke
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmuth_von_Moltke_the_Younger


Peter Yorck von Wartenburg



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Yorck_von_Wartenburg

Wartenburg was born and lived in a castle that was in Templar/Order of Malta hand
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ole%C5%9Bnica_Ma%C5%82a


Adenauer



"a devout Catholic who had received the Magistral Grand Cross personally from SMOM Grand Master Prince Chigi"

http://www.mega.nu:8080/ampp/naziism.html
Germans first chancellor Konrad Adenauer (SMOM) in 1906 had joined von Papens (SMOM) and Leibers (SJ) Center Party.

His political opponent of the SPD, Carlo Schmid later said: "[He] was the first man of the state to be created, while it still wasn't in existence."

[Udo Kempf, Hans-Georg Merz: Kanzler und Minister 1949–1998. Westdeutscher Verlag, Wiesbaden 2001, S. 82]

Hoensbroech, Fourteen Years a Jesuit., Volume II, page 165, second paragraph:

"Ever since the establishment of the Centre Party in Germany it has always been closely connected with the Jesuit Order. Theologians of the German Province were often consulted by parliamentary members of the Center. The leader of the Centre, Leiber, was a frequent guest in the German Jesuit Colleges on the Dutch frontier (Exaeten, Wynandsrade, Blyenbeck)."

All this would also imply that possibly Scientology Tom Cruse playing Stauffenberg (connected to the Kreisau Circle) is Jesuit propaganda to lead the American people into violent revolution against Bush to further their plan the same way! As seen today at least in the media the pope denies a meeting to Rice. (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7002988.stm)

Remember: The von Stauffenberg family is one of the oldest and most distinguished aristocratic Roman Catholic families of southern Germany and had a strong Bamberg connection. Look up Erics VAIII to see the importance of the city of Bamberg.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claus_Schenk_von_Stauffenberg

So after the end of the deliberate war not just the people who were in (or got to) power in Germany were roman catholics (SMOM or SJ) they also as we allready know created the new industrial infrastructure, central banking, secret services and now we see they are responsible for the "new" political party system.

Now remember that our Bush and Brown friendly German chancellor Angela Merkel is of the CDU party.

While having a look at this one can come to the conclusion that Germany, as it is since 1945, is an artificial creation for Vatican deeds.

Looking forward to your feedback.

WbR,
Boris

About Germany's CDU - Christian Democratic Union, from Wikipedia:

History

The party's roots go back to the Centre Party, founded in 1870 to promote the interests of German Catholics. The party played an important role and participated in most national governments from the last years of the German Empire and during the Weimar Republic, but was dissolved in 1933.

CDU was founded after the war with many members of the former Centre Party, but with the goal to include not only Catholics, but also Protestants, in a common confessional and conservative party. Its first leader and West Germany’s first chancellor was Konrad Adenauer. The CDU was the dominant party with Konrad Adenauer as its leader from 1949 to 1963. Then in 1963, Ludwig Erhard of the CDU succeeded Adenauer, preceding a recession in 1966. This caused the CDU to wane in power and consequently form a coalition with the SPD. Kurt Georg Kiesinger (CDU) then took power as chancellor of West Germany.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian-Democratic_Union_of_Germany

And about its predecessor, the Centre Party, from Wikipedia:

The German Centre Party (Deutsche Zentrumspartei or merely Zentrum), often called the Catholic Centre Party, was a Catholic political party in Germany during the Kaiserreich and the Weimar Republic. The party dissolved itself on July 6, 1933, shortly before the conclusion of a Concordat between the Holy See and Germany. After World War II, the party was refounded, but could not rise again to its former importance, as most of its members joined the new Christian Democratic Union (CDU).

The Soest programme and the founding of the "Centre Party"

Growing anti-Catholic sentiment and policies, including plans for dissolving all monasteries in Prussia, made it clear that 'group' reorganization was urgently needed in order to protect Catholic minority rights, enshrined in the 1850 constitution, and to bring them over to the emerging nation state.

In June 1870 Peter Reichersberger called on Catholics to unite and, in October, priests, representatives of Catholic federations and Catholic gentry met at Soest and drew up an election programme. The main points were:

• Preservation of the Church's autonomy and rights, as accepted by the constitution. Defense against any attack on the independence of Church bodies, on the development of religious life and on the practice of Christian charity.
• Effectual implementation of parity for recognized denominations.
• Rejection of any attempt to de-christianize marriage.
• Preservation or founding of denominational schools.

There were also more general demands such as for a more federal, decentralized state, a limitation of state expenditure, a just distribution of taxes, the financial strengthening of the middle classes and the legal "removal of such evil states, that threaten the worker with moral or bodily ruin".

With such a manifesto, the number of Catholic representatives in the Prussian Diet rose considerably and in December 1870 they formed a new "Centre" faction, also called the "Constitution Party" to emphasize its adherence to constitutional liberties.

Three months later, early in 1871, the Catholic representatives to the new national parliament, the Reichstag, also formed a "Centre" faction. The party not only defended the Church's liberties, but also supported representative government and minority rights in general, in particular those of German Poles, Alsatians and Hannoverians. The Centre's main leader was the Hannoverian advocate Ludwig Windthorst and other major figures included Karl Friedrich von Savigny, Hermann von Mallinckrodt, Burghard Freiherr von Schorlemer-Alst, the brothers August and Peter Reichensperger, and Georg Count Hertling.

Also in other German states Catholic parties were formed, cooperating with the Prussian Centre Party in the Reichstag:

• in Bavaria, the "Bavarian Patriotic Party", with a particularistic-conservative bent, since 1887 called the "Bavarian Centre".
• in Baden, the "Catholic People's Party", since 1881 formally linked to the national "Centre Party" and since 1888 adopting the name "Centre Party".

Kulturkampf

In the age of nationalism, Protestant Germans, whether Conservative (like Otto von Bismarck) or Liberal, accused the Centre of Ultramontanism or having a greater loyality towards the Pope than to their own nation. After the First Vatican Council, Bismarck launched the Kulturkampf, or "cultural struggle" against the Catholic Church, but this neither crippled the Church permanently nor did it hurt the Centre party, which gained greater support from the Catholic population. Following Bismarck's 1878 turn from free trade to protectionism and from the National Liberal party to the Conservative parties, he also abandoned the unsuccessful Kulturkampf. Some laws however, for example Civil marriage, the Pulpit paragraph, and the anti-Jesuit laws remained in force.

The Centre party remained a party of opposition to Bismarck, but after his resignation in 1890, it frequently supported the following administrations' policies in the Reichstag, particularly in the field of social security.

The party became known for its pragmatism - the party was willing to support a wide variety of policies so long as the interests of German Catholics and of the Catholic Church itself were advanced. The party was also notable for the mixture of class interests it represented, ranging from Catholic trade unions to aristocrats.

"Out of the tower!"

The Kulturkampf had reinforced the Catholic character of the Centre Party, but even during it Ludwig Windthorst had defended the party against Bismarck's accusation of being a "denominational party" in describing the Centre as "a political party with a comprehensive political programme and open to anyone, who accepts it." However, only a few Protestants took up this offer and the Centre remained -by the composition of its members, politicians and voters, a Catholic party.

Loyal to the Pope in church matters, the Centre party steered a course independent of the Holy See on secular matters. This became apparent in the "septennat dispute" of 1886. Since the Centre Party rejected Bismarck's military budget, the Chancellor negotiated with the Holy See and promised to abolish some Kulturkampf laws and to support the Pope in the Roman question, if the Vatican persuaded the Centre Party to accept his bill. Despite this agreement, the Centre Party rejected the Budget and Bismarck called new elections. He also published the letters with the Vatican, intending to drive a wedge between Catholic voters loyal to the Pope and the Centre Party with the slogan: "The Pope against the Centre!" Windhorst managed to avert this by reaffirming the Party's autonomy, which the Pope had accepted, and by interpreting the published letters as expression of papal confidence in the party.

As was said on TV in decades past, stay tuned to this channel.