Northern Germany Ask Pope B16 About This!

Prolonging the War For the Oder-Neisse Line Destruction of Prussia

Managed for the Counter Reformation




It is the end of 1942.

The U.S.S.R. military forces have turned the war's tide, with the start of their counter-offensive November 19, 1942, driving out the Third Reich invasion forces that entered the U.S.S.R. since June, 1941- tremendously brutalizing the local populations and landscape. Such was in contrast to the 1915-1918 occupation by the Second Reich, causing many Jewish peoples to disbelieve the stories of Third Reich atrocities and hence staying to be slaughtered.





Jesuit Superior General Wlodimir Ledochowski is dead, reportedly due to gastrointestinal complications, December 13, 1942- circumstances suggestive of him being poisoned by those displeased upon figuring out that he had set up Deutschland not for victory, but rather defeat.

Wlodimir Ledochowski had been the Jesuit Superior General since February 11, 1915, succeeding a German, Franz Wernz, who died the same night with Pope Pius X- circumstances suggestive of a pair of political assassinations of those who had agreed to an agenda of war, though not to that portion of the agenda they had been told about- with their being a hidden agenda they may not have supported: a timeline suggestive of something started with their approval, in a need of being steered for the sake of a further secreted agenda.

Were the statistically unlikely – one day apart -- deaths of Ledochowski's predecessor Franz Wern (August 19), and Pope Pius X (August 20) marks of an intra Vatican coup representing similar but different agendas?

Franz Wern, 25^th Jesuit Superior General,

German

died August 19, 1914

Giuseppe Melchiorre Sarto (Pope Pius X),

Italian, part Polish,

died August 20, 1914

Wlodimir Ledochowski, 26^th Jesuit Superior General,

Polish father, Swiss mother

February 11, 1915

died December 13, 1942

Giacomo della Chiesa (Pope Benedict XV)

September 3, 1914 - January 22, 1922

Franz Wernz born died August 19, 1914.

Pope Pius X dies early morning August 20, 1914.

War broke out July 28, 1914- exactly one month its spark: the assassination of the Habsburg Archduke and his monastically (*without right of heir ship for their offspring, as she was deemed insufficiently noble) married wife Sophie in the city of Sarajevo, on June 28, 1914 by Serbian terrorists, during a royal visit to this province annexed by Austria Hungary in 1878. Serbia had opposed Austria Hungary’s annexation of Bosnia-Herzgovina, ethnically Serbo-Croatian, with three main religious faiths: Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and Muslim, and effectively on the fault line between Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Europe, occurring in the wake of the 1054 Great Schism, where Western and Eastern Catholicism split.

30 Years and 10 months later, the NSDAP 3rd Reich has been conquered, with the populations of the predominantly Protestant Lutheran areas of eastern Germany now re-defined as western Polish 're-covered territories' - referring to such lands as Silesia being part of the original Poland founded in 966, becoming Germanised sufficiently by the 1330s to be lost to Piast Poland, though afterwards being essentially German with many of part Polish ancestry, even if they did not realize it - under the end of WW2 agreements to shift Poland's borders west: an action with significant retreat regarding Protestant and Roman Catholic European demographics.

Wlodimir (Vladimir) Ledochowski's Goal Predicted by Maximillian Kolbe in 1938?

Wlodimir (Vladimir) Ledochowski: War Culpability Admission – Oder Neisse Line/Destruction of Prussia the ‘aim’ of the counter reformation

In a later paper Hlond wrote triumphantly: "The religious changes that have occurred in this region have no historical examples. In less than two years, the Protestant religion of the land east of the Oder was forced out. In the barren areas on the Baltic Sea, the first flowers begin to sprout buds Catholic life. The Roman faith ... is advanced into the heart of Europe ... The Germanic Protestantism receives a significant blow. "
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=de&twu=1&u=http://www.ostdeutsches-forum.net/Zeitgeschichte/mit-Lug-und-Trug.htm

The sequence of events needed to bring about this drastic western shift of Poland required both the design of the war to maximize destruction and thus a desire for revenge, and prolonging the war sufficiently to bring the military forces of the USSR deep into Central Europe: an agenda requiring control over the war's opposing sides- guided by strategicians working for hidden agendas.

http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2007/07/wlodimir-vladimir-ledochowski-world-war.html

The one who doubts that World War II was “managed” by an unseen hand, must deal with the following facts that have baffled historians for years. The blunders or failures by those in power, always benefiting the purpose of the Vatican's Jesuits, are not by accident. A friend and graduate from Princeton has written the following for you, dear truth-seeker.

“In books on Europe during World War II you can find many maps. But the one that would tell you the most about what happened, and in my judgment why it happened, exists in no book I have seen. That is a religious map of Europe before and after World Wars I & II. Now in viewing such a map, for all you hear about the holocaust of millions of Jews, you would immediately see a greater religious consequence of the wars: The complete suppression of the Orthodox peoples under the Inquisition of the Atheistic ideology of Communism along with that bulwark of Lutheran Protestantism — Prussia and East Germany.

Many decisions against peace and victory were made on both sides. The religious results indicated in such a map were predetermined, evidenced by the course of the war. ....

Churchill talked about “the soft underbelly” of Europe but instead directed the Allies up what amounts to “a porcupine ridge” in Italy. A rapid invasion could have been made through Montenegro and Serbia, which, being the only active guerilla war in Europe, was already holding down fifteen to twenty German Divisions, and was without the general uprising, which would have occurred immediately upon an Allied assault. This, however, would have brought the war to a close in early 1944, and would have put Eastern Europe in the hands of the West, neither of which was intended. Instead, Italy was invaded in about the hardest and most ignorant way. If victory had been the object, the Generals would have gone for the capital, Rome, landing amphibiously on any number of close shore points and driving straight to the city, taking the enemies’ natural base and mopping him up from there. Circling Sicily to take its capital, then letting the German army escape by boat unimpeded to the main peninsula [as Meade allowed Lee to escape from Gettysburg unimpeded] was only the beginning of the follies – ‘the blunders’ – tragic to so many allied soldiers and their families (including Shriner Freemason Bob Dole). For much of the next year, the Allies fought against stiff resistance up the spine of the mountains, an excuse being made that they lacked boats to make the strategically obvious landing near Rome. But that such was just an excuse is made plain by the way in which the one major amphibious landing in Italy at Anzio was conducted. They landed, and waited on the beach for forty-eight hours for the Germans, caught by surprise, to arrive. Reconnaissance jeeps went out, reaching the outskirts of Rome and the invasion force could have followed; but instead, the force stayed put so they could have several months of World War I style trench warfare which resulted in the deliberate sacrifice of all but six of Darby’s seven hundred U.S. Rangers, betrayed by their High Command.

The policies of Roosevelt and Churchill [Churchill, like Hitler, also advocated the 19th Century Jesuit doctrine of an “International Jewish Conspiracy”] – who throughout the war maintained an active personal correspondence with Mussolini (the man who restored the Temporal Power to the Jesuits’ “infallible” Pope) – were carried out to perfection, and the taking of Rome with its Vatican, the second capital of the Axis, was delayed until June 5, 1944, one day before ‘D-Day’. So rather than the Roman Catholic hierarchy being embarrassed for its support of the Axis, its shame was quickly driven off the front pages by the Normandy Invasion, the Allies having ‘failed’ to timely capture Rome.

July 1944 to April 1945

The Division of Europe, placing Lutheran Protestant Prussia and East Germany under the Inquisition of Atheistic Communism.

At least three major ‘blunders’ had to take place to keep the American-English Allies from taking Berlin and Eastern Germany. First, there was the failure to destroy the critical core of the German army in the West by the basic maneuver of an encircling action, the closing of ‘the Falaise Pocket’ in France allowing two hundred thousand Germans to escape while ensuring the blood-bath called ‘The Battle of the Bulge’. Secondly, there was the complete intelligence ‘breakdown’ on the side of the Allies that ‘failed’ to recognize that the beefed up and returned German Army was about to attempt the breakthrough known as ‘the Battle of the Bulge’. Thirdly, there was the prevention of General Patton’s Army from blitzkrieging into Berlin and East Germany (where the German people were ready to welcome Americans and surrender to them, as this was the hope of the German Army in the East, fighting fiercely against Stalin’s Red Army.) This deliberate forbidding of Patton to take Berlin (which would have resulted in surrender) combined with the all-out suicide assault by the Soviet Armies to take the Nazi capital (raping, pillaging and plundering all along the way), resulted in the slaughter of 600,000 more Russian soldiers than a sensibly conducted campaign would have killed, according to recent estimates by Russian intelligence sources.” {} 61[Emphasis added]

All these “failures” and “blunders,” causing all this heartbreak and unnecessary death, were deliberately committed in fulfilling the Jesuits’ Council of Trent – the heart of the Counter-Reformation – in mass-murdering the “heretics” of East Germany, Prussia and Russia — the Lutheran and Orthodox peoples. The remainder were subjugated or exiled to the concentration camps of Siberia, overseen by Jesuits like the American Walter Ciszek, being under the iron heel of the Jesuits’ Roman Catholic, Communist Grand Inquisitor – the savage – Joseph Stalin.

Indeed, from 1914 to 1945, the Jesuits, pursuant to their Oath, killed nearly eighty million people through war, starvation and disease. Using their Masonic dictators, they waged relentless war on the Jews of Europe, Spanish Protestants, Catholic liberals, German Lutherans, Serbian and Russian Orthodox, Baltic Lutherans – in short – on all Protestant, Jewish and Orthodox “heretics and liberals” regardless of how many liberal Roman Catholic priests and people perished.

---

From Wlodimir Ledochowski Kulturkampf Revenge

Key to this counter reformation agenda requirement for continuing WW2 sufficiently for the USSR to advance deep into central Europe, were the polices of the Masonic U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt., and his underlings, such as General Eisenhower.

Particularly crucial were the FDR Administration policies towards proposals from factions within Germany, particularly from the predominantly Protestant east, to depose Hitler and end the war.

From Keith Halderman:

Consequences of Hate

In his post below David Beito quotes Franklin Roosevelt as saying "We have got to be tough with Germany and I mean the German people not just the Nazis. We either have to castrate the German people or you have to treat them in such a manner so they can't go on reproducing." This quotation has elicited two comments of defense from Craig J. Bolton. In the first he recalls “only two recorded incidents of opposition by the German people” and he ends the second one with the adage; “Ideas have consequences. Bad ideas have bad consequences.” I agree with this line and the notion expressed in the above Roosevelt comment was a bad idea with bad consequences for both Germans and Americans. I am now in the process of reading The New Dealers’ War: FDR and the War Within World War II by Thomas J. Fleming. This book is doing something I would have thought impossible, it is lowering my opinion of FDR even further.

While Craig Bolton may or may not be correct about there being only two overt incidents of opposition to the Nazis there certainly was a great deal of high level covert support for internal regime change including a very famous assassination attempt in East Prussia. According to Fleming Admiral Wilheim Canaris head of the German Military intelligence organization, the Abwehr, met secretly in Spain, during the summer of 1943, with the heads of American and British intelligence. They hammered out a peace plan which included a cease fire and the elimination of Hitler. Roosevelt rejected this offer refusing to negotiate with “these East German Junkers” and all other overtures from Germans yearning for the Nazis’ downfall.

In fact, when Roosevelt unexpectedly announced, against the opposition of Churchill and his own military commanders, that unconditional surrender was the only acceptable end to the war, he created a great obstacle for those Germans who wished Hitler gone and the carnage over. The policy proved to be a big unifier of the Hitler’s people. We can never know if some Allied encouragement and a different set of demands might have been enough for the success of Admiral Canaris and like minded Germans in their goal of ending the war sooner. However it is not unreasonable to say that FDR’s hatred and determination to punish may very well have cost tens of thousands of Americans their lives.

And from an email from Oliver:

In the spring of 1943, Admiral Wilhelm Canaris, head of the German Secret Service, met with George Earle, the American Naval Attache in Istanbul, Turkey. Admiral Canaris came to discuss the surrender of the German armed forces. He reported that he had joined with other German leaders in an assassination plot to remove Hitler from power. After this was accomplished, they would take over the German government, and surrender to the Allies, with only one condition:

There must be no Soviet advance into Central Europe.

Mr. Earle sent President Roosevelt a note informing him of Canaris'proposal.

He received no reply.

Earle tried again, and this time he received what has been termed a "brush-off" from President Roosevelt.

So Earle flew to Washington. Roosevelt told him that his concerns were overly anxious, that Germany would soon surrender after the planned attack commenced through Western Europe.

Earle was very disappointed, and returned to Istanbul. He advised Canaris of what he had learned, and he returned to Germany, where he and the other plotters against Hitler's life were found out and either hung or shot for their efforts to shorten the war and prevent the expansion of the Russians into Eastern Europe.4

If Roosevelt had accepted Canaris' offer: "... the war might have ended in 1943. Countless lives would in all probability have been saved, and, of greatest importance, the Allies wouldn't have supplanted one dangerous ideology with another. The Soviet hordes would have been stopped at the Polish border. The entire map of Europe would have been different."5

Earle returned to the United States. He wrote "I decided to make known some of my views and observations about the so-called allies, the Soviets, so as to wake up the American people about what was really going on. I contacted the President about it, but he reacted strongly and specifically forbade me to make my views known to the public. Then upon my requesting active duty in the Navy, I was ordered to Samoa, in the far-distant South pacific"6

In fact, Earle was warned by Roosevelt's daughter in a letter to him "... that if he carried out his outlined program of publicly criticizing and commenting on some of the Soviet moves, he could be adjudged guilty of treason."7

It is indeed unfortunate that the Roosevelts took this position on the "Soviet moves," the movement of Russian troops into the Eastern European countries as the war was ending, as evidenced by President Roosevelt's inaction in the Canaris case, and the letter of his daughter in the Earle case, because the citizens in these countries did not want the Russians to occupy their nations. This fact was made brutally apparent as millions of these patriots actually joined with the German armed forces in an attempt to keep the Russians from advancing into their respective countries.

So Roosevelt could have truly assisted these patriots in keeping their countries free of Communism by assisting the Canaris group, and Earle could have been of immense assistance in bringing these matters to the attention of the American people.

But it was not to be, and the Eastern European countries were occupied by the Russian Communists much to the chagrin of millions of patriots. Roosevelt continued his support of the Russian government as the war ended by guaranteeing their occupation of these nations by the agreements made at the wartime conferences with the major leaders of the Allied governments.

Ralph Epperson, The Unseen Hand, p.286-287

So it looks like there were two attempts to negotiate a surrender?

On the following pages more betrayals are described, like the unnecessary concessions made to Stalin by Roosevelt and Churchill at Yalta, and the betrayal of (orthodox) Russian soldiers (among them General Vlasov and his soldiers) and civilians in a forced repatriation during „Operation Keelhaul” approved by Roosevelt and Eisenhower.

I read somewhere that Admiral Canaris and General Rommel, both high-ranking victims of the Nazi regime, were both Protestants.

Best regards, Oliver

Erwin Johannes Eugen Rommel

b. November 15, 1891 – d. October 14, 1944

Rommel is considered to have been a chivalrous and humane military officer, in contrast with many other figures of Nazi Germany. His famous Afrikakorps was not accused of any war crimes. Indeed, soldiers captured during his Africa campaign were reported to have been largely treated humanely. Furthermore, orders to kill captured Jewish soldiers and civilians out of hand in all theaters of his command were defiantly ignored.

George Howard Earle III

b. December 5, 1890 - d. December 30, 1974


Wilhelm Franz Canaris

b. d. January 1, 1887 - d. April 9, 1945

Canaris was murdered by the NSDAP regime in 1945 weeks before its collapse.

Accepting the proposal would have saved millions of lives, owing to the fact that much of the war's deaths occurred afterwards (1943-1945).

Were they so concerned about deaths?

Bombing the rail-lines feeding the death camps such as Auschwitz would have saved many lives.

So would have not bombing the primarily residential city core centers, such as the mass bombings of Konigsburg and Dresden.

FDR’s apologists would say that they could not bomb the Auschwitz railways because that would ‘delay’ the war’s end- never-mind then way take the longest way to invade Italy.

U.S. General George Patton who questioned the conduct of military policy in extending the war long enough to bring the USSR deep into Central Europe, was effectively assassinated.

Erwin Johannes Eugen Rommel

b. November 15, 1891 – d. October 14, 1944

Rommel is considered to have been a chivalrous and humane military officer, in contrast with many other figures of Nazi Germany. His famous Afrikakorps was not accused of any war crimes. Indeed, soldiers captured during his Africa campaign were reported to have been largely treated humanely. Furthermore, orders to kill captured Jewish soldiers and civilians out of hand in all theaters of his command were defiantly ignored.

George Earle

Canaris

Canaris was murdered by the NSDAP regime in 1945 weeks before its collapse.

Accepting the proposal would have saved millions of lives, owing to the fact that much of the war's deaths occurred afterwards (1943-1945).

Resulting in the Oder-Neisse Line-Destruction of Prussia- Mass Expulsion of primarily Protestant Eastern Germans-Prussians

Yet ending WW2 in 1943 or 1944 would have denied an important “aim” of the "Counter Reformation" as the Oder-Neisse Line/Destruction of Prussia

Polish Cardinal Stefan Wyszinski
(b. August 3, 1901 d. May 28, 1981)
Appointed as Cardinal January 12, 1953

Accordingly, in 1965, Wyszinski said

"With the regaining of the Polish western territories [= German eastern territories], the break-up of the Prussian state and the destruction of the German Reich the counter reformation has reached its aim."
http://www.jrbooksonline.com/HTML-docs/Loeser%20booklet%202%20deutsch.htm

Wlodimir (Vladimir) Ledochowski: War Culpability Admission

Maximilian Kolbe had expressed this Oder-Neisse - counter reformation aim before 'our war' of the 'cleansing' of Poland and Europe of 'God' and Mother of War

At this period, Brother Luke speaks of Kolbe saying Mass so “full of grace” that he appeared illuminated by an unearthly radiance” or, as Brother Cyprian Grodizki puts it more prosaically, “he underwent some sort of transformation when celebrating the holy sacrifice.”

Whatever constant joy and transformations imply about Kolbe’s interior life, they did not dull his perceptions. Father Cornel, who had been elected Superior at Poznan, recalls a visit to Niepokalanow:

Father Maximilian had a map of Europe in his cell and was marking the places with little flags where he sent the monastery publications. Pausing for a moment, he said to me, “There will be a war. The boundary between Poland and Germany will be here.” And he sketched the exact location of the boundary as it is today.”

The Yalta agreement included the westward shift of Poland, mandating Poland and Germany’s new eastern borders respectively with the Curzon Line, and the Oder-Neisse Line, and authorizing the transfer of the populations from east to west.

The westward shift of Poland made Poland smaller, giving up 110, 000 square miles in the east, while gaining 44,000 square miles to the west and north, for a net loss of 66,000 square miles, though giving it a significantly more substantial coastline.

With the pre-war Polish eastern territories being more ethnically mixed, though with a Roman Catholic majority, such remained so as the majority Roman Catholic western Bylerussia and Ukraine.

With the pre-war German eastern territories being generally entirely German –with admixtures of Polish DNA – and overwhelmingly Protestant, with the exception of portions of Upper Silesia and the Warmia area within East Prussia, the expulsion of the populations and their replacement with the Polish peoples from further east, the Oder-Neisse line represented a major reconquestion of Protestant territories by Roman Catholicism.

According to Helga Jonat Hecht

http://www.crystalbay.net/germany/elbing.htm

Strangely or not, in a complex scheme of events, the Polish Catholic church under Polish Primate Cardinal August Hlond aided the Soviet Russian communists at the time of takeover of German land and expulsion of German citizens from Prussia east of the Oder-Neisse River line replacing them with forced out people from Ukraine and Belarus, etc. When the city was given to Poland after '45 any remaining German protestants had to convert to Catholicism, change their names to Polish names and take on Polish identities or be expelled.

Notably, the area of Upper Silesia, which includes Opole, which was majority Roman Catholic before the war, is where the largest numbers of ethnic Germans remain within pre WW2 eastern Germany.

The Oder Neisse line would not be the entire aim, which also included the subjugation of the more predominantly Protestant areas of east-central Germany, including the westerly portions of the pre-WW2 state of Prussia, such as Brandenburg, under the USSR client state entity of East Germany. Indeed, the 1944 Yalta Agreement between the USA, UK and USSR, would assign the USSR military an occupation of German territory extending even further west then their battle-advance.

Yalta division of Germany, Prussia erased, Austria treated as innocent

This Jesuit direction of U.S. war policy had its subordinate figures, notably General Dwight D. Eisenhower and Edmund A. Walsh, S.J. founder and head of the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service, along with its opponents within the US military, most notably US General Patton:

New Book Surfaces Claiming Gen. George Patton Assassinated - Greg Szymanski

By Greg Szymanski, JD

Dec.21, 2008

Rarely a day goes by when a new book or news article doesn’t bring to light more Jesuit intrigue in the political, social, religious and financial worlds.

The only problem is the Jesuits are never mentioned, conveniently left out so these “masters of deception” can live to kill another day.

Such is the case with the latest book written about the assassination of Gen. George S. Patton by military historian Robert Wilcox.

In his book, Wilcox claims Patton was assassinated, not killed in a European car crash, because Patton was going to blow the whistle on Allied Commander Dwight D. Eisenhower for unnecessarily prolonging the war and conspiring with the Russians and Germans, costing many American lives.

Wilcox goes on to connect high-level American officials to the Patton assassination, including “Wild Bill” Donovan, head of the Office Of Strategic Services (OSS) which was the forerunner to the CIA.

However, he doesn’t go far enough up the New World Order ladder to find out the real bosses who ordered the trigger be pulled on Patton. If Wilcox did his homework, the murder trail he was following would have led directly to the doorstep of Georgetown University Jesuit Edmund Walsh, first head of the School of Foreign Service.

Although hidden from all history books, Walsh was the power behind putting Franklin Roosevelt into power as well as handpicking Eisenhower to become Allied Commander even though many other qualified officers were passed over.

Jesuit Walsh was the kingpin never mentioned by Wilcox even though, if the truth be known, he was the power behind Donovan, Roosevelt, Eisenhower and many others orcehestrating both sides of World War II just like every other war in American history.

If Walsh, the Jesuits and the Vatican were added to the list of perpetrators in the Patton assassination the record would be complete. However, when reading the following Telegraph newspaper review of Wilcox’s book, just read between the lines and add Walsh and Jesuits while reading:

“The newly unearthed diaries of a colourful assassin for the wartime Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the forerunner of the CIA, reveal that American spy chiefs wanted Patton dead because he was threatening to expose allied collusion with the Russians that cost American lives.

“The death of General Patton in December 1945, is one of the enduring mysteries of the war era. Although he had suffered serious injuries in a car crash in Manheim, he was thought to be recovering and was on the verge of flying home.

“But after a decade-long investigation, military historian Robert Wilcox claims that OSS head General “Wild Bill” Donovan ordered a highly decorated marksman called Douglas Bazata to silence Patton, who gloried in the nickname “Old Blood and Guts”.

“His book, “Target Patton”, contains interviews with Mr Bazata, who died in 1999, and extracts from his diaries, detailing how he staged the car crash by getting a troop truck to plough into Patton’s Cadillac and then shot the general with a low-velocity projectile, which broke his neck while his fellow passengers escaped without a scratch.

“Mr Bazata also suggested that when Patton began to recover from his injuries, US officials turned a blind eye as agents of the NKVD, the forerunner of the KGB, poisoned the general.

“”Mr Wilcox told The Sunday Telegraph that when he spoke to Mr Bazata: “He was struggling with himself, all these killings he had done. He confessed to me that he had caused the accident, that he was ordered to do so by Wild Bill Donovan.

“Donovan told him: ‘We’ve got a terrible situation with this great patriot, he’s out of control and we must save him from himself and from ruining everything the allies have done.’ I believe Douglas Bazata. He’s a sterling guy.”

“Mr Bazata led an extraordinary life. He was a member of the Jedburghs, the elite unit who parachuted into France to help organize the Resistance in the run up to D-Day in 1944. He earned four purple hearts, a Distinguished Service Cross and the French Croix de Guerre three times over for his efforts.

“After the war he became a celebrated artist who enjoyed the patronage of Princess Grace of Monaco and the Duke and Duchess of Windsor.

“He was friends with Salvador Dali, who painted a portrait of Bazata as Don Quixote.

“”He ended his career as an aide to President Ronald Reagan’s Navy Secretary John Lehman, a member of the 9/11 Commission and adviser to John McCain’s presidential campaign.

Mr Wilcox also tracked down and interviewed Stephen Skubik, an officer in the Counter-Intelligence Corps of the US Army, who said he learnt that Patton was on Stalin’s death list. Skubik repeatedly alerted Donovan, who simply had him sent back to the US.

“You have two strong witnesses here,” Mr Wilcox said. “The evidence is that the Russians finished the job.”

“The scenario sounds far fetched but Mr Wilcox has assembled a compelling case that US officials had something to hide. At least five documents relating to the car accident have been removed from US archives.

“The driver of the truck was whisked away to London before he could be questioned and no autopsy was performed on Patton’s body.

“With the help of a Cadillac expert from Detroit, Mr Wilcox has proved that the car on display in the Patton museum at Fort Knox is not the one Patton was driving.

“That is a cover-up,” Mr Wilcox said.

“George Patton, a dynamic controversalist who wore pearl handled revolvers on each hip and was the subject of an Oscar winning film starring George C. Scott, commanded the US 3rd Army, which cut a swathe through France after D-Day.

“But his ambition to get to Berlin before Soviet forces was thwarted by supreme allied commander Dwight D. Eisenhower, who gave Patton’s petrol supplies to the more cautious British General Bernard Montgomery.

“Patton, who distrusted the Russians, believed Eisenhower wrongly prevented him closing the so-called Falaise Gap in the autumn of 1944, allowing hundreds of thousands of German troops to escape to fight again,. This led to the deaths of thousands of Americans during their winter counter-offensive that became known as the Battle of the Bulge.

“In order to placate Stalin, the 3rd Army was also ordered to a halt as it reached the German border and was prevented from seizing either Berlin or Prague, moves that could have prevented Soviet domination of Eastern Europe after the war.

“Mr Wilcox told The Sunday Telegraph:

“Patton was going to resign from the Army. He wanted to go to war with the Russians. The administration thought he was nuts.

“He also knew secrets of the war which would have ruined careers.

“I don’t think Dwight Eisenhower would ever have been elected president if Patton had lived to say the things he wanted to say.” Mr Wilcox added: “I think there’s enough evidence here that if I were to go to a grand jury I could probably get an indictment, but perhaps not a conviction.”

“Charles Province, President of the George S. Patton Historical Society, said he hopes the book will lead to definitive proof of the plot being uncovered. He said: “There were a lot of people who were pretty damn glad that Patton died. He was going to really open the door on a lot of things that they screwed up over there.”

Here is a short bio of Walsh and it should be noted he was present at the Nuremburg trials with his job being to cover up any Vatican connection to the orcehstration of World War II and their connection to backing the Nazi Party and handpicking Hitler for the job.

Edmund A. Walsh

(October 10, 1885 – October 31, 1956)[1] was an American Jesuit Catholic priest, professor of geopolitics and founder of the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service, which he founded in 1919–six years before the U.S. Foreign Service itself existed–and served as its first dean.

He directed the Papal Famine Relief Mission to Russia in 1922, worked on behalf of the Vatican to resolve long-standing issues between Church and State in Mexico in 1929, negotiated with the Iraqi government to establish an American College in Baghdad in 1931, and served as Consultant to the U.S. Chief of Counsel at the Nuremberg Trials.

Notably during the last task, he interrogated the German geopolitician General Karl Haushofer after World War II to determine whether or not he should stand trial at Nuremberg for war crimes, eventually finding that Gen. Haushofer ought not stand trial.

His career then stagnated for five years until in 1929 he was appointed Executive Assistant to General George Moseley, then Secretary of War. In 1933, he was then appointed chief military aide to General Douglas MacArthur and accompanied him to the Philippines.

It was through MacArthur that Eisenhower first came to the attention of the all-powerful American Jesuit Fr. Edmund A. Walsh. MacArthur was educated by the Jesuits and Walsh was his influential patron. Eisenhower quickly became an even more deeply devoted fan of Fr. Walsh and his geopolitical mind than his superior General MacArthur. At the outbreak of World War II in 1939, Eisenhower returned from the Philippines at 49 but a Lt. Colonel.

By June 1941, six months before the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbour, Col. Eisenhower was appointed to the War Department General Staff in Washington D.C. and to a role holding the temporary rank of Brigadier General. Whatever his role in the events leading up to Pearl Harbour, he soon held favour with President Franklin D. Roosevelt, another staunch supporter of Fr. Edmund A. Walsh S.J.

In December 1943, President Roosevelt announced Eisenhower, still then only officially holding the rank of Colonel would be the Supreme Allied Commander in Europe, being promoted immediately to being a four star Major General - one of the most dramatic rise in promotions in American history. The announcement sent shockwaves through the US and even the Allied forces as Eisenhower was promoted over the heads of over fifty seasoned military leaders, including his former friend and mentor Douglas MacArthur - all of whom had far greater skill and merit.

Upon his arrival in England in 1943, a controversial claim has been made that Eisenhower received a communique from senior members of the SS offering clear and specific terms of unconditional surrender of all German forces, including the assassination of Hitler, if the Americans would help halt the Soviet advance into Central Europe. Whether true or false, there is no question that Eisenhower quickly shelved the Churchill plan of a 1943 invasion while the Nazi forces were in a state of disarray and allowed the Germans a full six months to re-arm and re-equip their French forces ahead of any invasion. In 1944, Eisenhower was confirmed as a Five Star General and Chief of the Army. In spite of the massive logistical superiority of the Allied forces, the Eisenhower D-Day plan very nearly failed. Again, during the Battle of the Bulge Eisenhower inexplicably ordered the halt of the encirclement of German forces enabling up to 150,000 to escape and prolonging the war a further twelve months. No rational, military or political explanation for this order has ever been given.

The effect of Eisenhowers deliberate decisions to prolong the war cost an additional 100,000 allied personnel and effectively handed Eastern Europe to the Soviet Union. One man that did know the truth was Gen. George Smith Patton. On December 9th 1945, the day before he was due to fly back to Washington to meet with President Truman with proof that Eisenhower was a traitor who had costs the lives of thousands of American soldiers and millions of civilians, he was seriously injured in a “road accident” near Mannheim, Germany on 9 Dec 1945 (dying in hospital 21 December 1945). Miraculously the other occupants of the car in which Patton was critically injured escaped unharmed.

To counter the claims and rumour mills, Eisenhower authorised the leak of stories to damage the character of Patton including blaming Patton for the escape of the 150,000 soldiers of the German army and that Patton was mentally unstable. These false rumours still persist today. However, there can be no doubt about the direct orders of Eisenhower in Operation Keelhaul- the repatriation of over two million former Russian prisoners of war to Joseph Stalin. While the actions of Eisenhower have always been maintained as a fact of life following the Yalta Agreement between Churchill, Stalin and Roosevelt, the manner and clear fate of these poor souls was nothing short of Genocide on the same level as Adolf Hitler and the SS.

Eisenhower deliberately used the same logistical infrastructure of the Nazis used to murder millions to transport the millions of Russian prisoners of war to concentration camps until they could be handed across to the Soviets for mass execution. During this time, tens of thousands died from malnourishment, from ill treatment and sickness at the hands of Eisenhowers “special units” in charge of the operation. Many simply died in the same manner as the Jewish victims who had also been carted like sardines in the same train carriages years before. Following the end of the war Eisenhower was appointed Military Governor of the US Occupation Zone. He was instrumental in dismantling key evidence of the live human sacrifice of millions via the ovens at concentration camps.

Eisenhower also played a crucial role in eliminating as much evidence as possible concerning the direct role of the Catholic Church and the Jesuits in World War II. He was rewarded in being made a Knight of Malta by the Vatican. In 1953 Eisenhower won the Presidency of the United States in a landslide along with his young Vice President Richard Nixon. His Presidency was notable for the closeness the world came to Nuclear war. The original and official standard of the United States was changed under his presidency to “In God we Trust” a direct and deliberate heresy against the fundamental tenets of the Declaration of Independence that sought the United States to be a secular society. He died in 1969.

-------

From the school’s website:

Since 1919 the School of Public Service has devoted itself to educating the next generation of global leaders. With the unparalleled resources of Washington, D.C., the School of Foreign Service remains one of the world’s most foremost institutions for the study of international affairs. Domestically and internationally recognized academic excellence, intercultural understanding, and Jesuit ideals of service are some of the hallmarks of a School of Foreign Service education.

Founded in 1919, the School of Foreign Service was essentially a relatively early project of Wlodimir Ledochowski.

Pres. Dwight D. Eisenhower with Father Edward Bunn
at Georgetown University, Washington, D.C..
unveiling bust of Rev. Edmund A. Walsh, October 1958

Kingpin Jesuit Edmund Walsh Puppetmaster - Greg Syzmanski

Of course this counter reformation agenda required Germany to loose WW2: a part of the inner Vatican agenda that was naturally concealed.

The "Black Pope" Laughing in 1940!

"Jesuits have played many a major role in Church history.

Number one Jesuit today is the amiable Father General Wlodimir Ledochowski, who is known far and wide as the 'Black Pope"

Poland was suffering under a vicious occupation by Nazi Germany during that year, so it's an ironic timing upon this sole video of Wlodimir Ledchowski yet appearing on the internet.

As these stamps slyly suggest, Germany was rising up to rule – if not actually hump – the world, reaching up towards lucifer’s light, with an overprint exactly 30 days prior to the battle where impending victory turned to defeat with the November 19, 1942 USSR turn around at the Battle of Stalingrad, ironically located at about the standing German’s figure’s genitals.

That the deceived figuring out this betrayal, was marked by the timing of Ledochowski’s death with the battle where the war turned against Germany- Stalingrad.

The war turns on November 19, 1942 with the start of the USSR military repulse of the 3^rd Reich military.

Wlodimir Ledochowski is dead 24 days later after a number of premature obituaries, with mentions of gastro intestinal complications.

From Frank O’Collins

In 1941 aged 75, Count Wladimir Ledochowski -- Jesuit Superior General --was at the height of his supremacy, a fit and completely driven man. His army of Jesuit influentials had similarly reached great heights in all places held by Catholic Dictators as well as the United States. So why would a civil war between factions of the Jesuits break out at such a time?

One of the great historical anomalies is the behaviour of both Adolf Hitler , Fr Himmler S.J. and Fr Joseph Stalin S.J. in the Nazi Russian Invasion. Contrary to spin historians, these men had not only shown ruthless pragmatism in managing power until this point, but were actively working together on a number of military and scientific fronts until the invasion.

A frequent excuse given is that fiercly Catholic Hitler had become “drunk” with power and decided to invade Russia because he hated the Russians. But Hitler was a mere soldier, compared to Fr. Himmler S.J. the new Grand Inquisitor of the Roman Catholic Church and his massive army of assassins and torturers.

Instead, it is much more certain that Jesuit Superior General Ledochowski instructed Himmler to push for the assault on the understanding this would complete a clean sweep of Catholic National Socialism over Catholic National Communism. Similarly, it is clear that Count Ledochowski said something in reverse to Fr Stalin S.J. – that this was the plan that would ultimately destroy Germany as Stalin’s behavior against his own country and people was nothing other than treacherous.

When Hitler invaded in June 1941, Fr Stalin -- against every other example of ruthless judgment to protect his own power -- seemingly invited for his troops to be slaughtered and defeated by refusing his generals to fully engage, then having the generals executed and then repeating the bizarre process almost up to Moscow.

However, by the bleak Russian winter of December 1941, the jaws of the Jesuit Soviet Machine clamped down shut on the legs of the German Army. From this point on, the fate of the Nazi dream and power were sealed. For such a loyal German Jesuit as Fr Himmler S.J. such deliberate trickery by Ledochowski would have been devastating and unforgivable. The Jesuits had shifted their power away from Germany, France and Italy to America -- for the first time in the order's history.

On December 13, 1942 (aged 76) Count Wladimir Ledochowski died suddenly --almost certainly murdered by the very best assassins of Fr. Himmler for his treachery in dooming the German-Swiss –French “Illuminati” Jesuits.

Succumbing to gastro-intestinal problems just 24 days after WW2’s turn towards Germany’s defeat, Ledochowski was so assassinated through poisoning, logically by 3^rd Reich supporters.

According to his premature (reportedly erroneously reported) New York Times obituary of December 10, 1942:

Dr. Nicholas Murray Butler, who met Father Ledochowski in 1930, wrote later that "everyone in Rome I was told that Father Ledochowski would rank as one of the two or three greatest heads of the Jesuit Order," an estimate which would group him with such men as Ignatius Loyola, [April 19, 1541 to July 31, 1556] the first [Jesuit] general, Francisco Borgia, [July 2, 1565 to October 1, 1572] the third, and [Claudius] Aquaviva, [Feb 19, 1581 to Jan 31, 1615] the fifth.

And according to Malachi Martin:

It was during the twenty-seven year Generalate of Father Wlodzimierz Ledochowski (1915-1942) that the traditional character of the Society received the firmest stamp and clearest definition since the Generalate of Claudio Acquaviva in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. One might even say that Ledochowski insisted on fidelity to the structure of Jesuit obedience, was an almost merciless disciplinarian,and maintained a stream of instructions flowing out to the whole Society about every detail of Jesuit life and Ignatian ideals. He know exactly what Jesuits should be according to the Society’s Constitutions and traditions; and under strong hands of two quite authoritarian Popes, Pius XI and Pius XII, he reestablished the close ties that had once linked papacy and Jesuit Generalate. Ledochowski, in fact, gave renewed meaning to that old Roman nickname of the Jesuit Father General, “the Black Pope. Just as Pius XII can be described as the last of the great Roman Popes, so Ledochowski can be called the last of the great Roman Generals of the Jesuits.

p 221 Malachi Martin, The Jesuits: The Society of Jesus and the Betrayal of the Roman Catholic Church

That he remains such an obscure figure, ignored usually even by the Jesuits is consistent with the unpleasantless of the reality.

Considering the chain of events required to bring that [Maximillian Kolbe’s pre-war predictions about the outcome of the next war with the westward shift of the German-Polish border] about, such a prediction is eyebrow raising, for it not only requires that Germany start and loose a war, but also that Germany would be extremely brutal, hence providing the justification for the border changes.

Did Germany simply got seduced by a madman on a soapbox, with the Holocaust of the Jewish peoples simply the result of random occurrences and not decided upon until 1942 at Wannasee?

Or was the holocaust, or perhaps more correctly the holocausts – each directed at a different group: modernists, Jewish peoples, Orthodox and Protestant Eastern Germans -- were planned decades in advance by an evil, Orthelloizing genius, involved with manipulating popular opinion through shoddy sensationalistic “journalism”, such as that taking form as the sharp increase of anti-Jewish media in Europe around 1919.

Described as one of the greatest Jesuit Order Superior Generals, a success, who issued countless instructions about many things, Ledochoswski is so measured not, say, a failure for not stopping WW2, but rather for his immense success in crafting and driving the 20^th century continuation of the vatican’s counter reformation: as in most successful at achieving the aims of the Jesuit Order vows- these aims being the spread of Roman Catholicism including via the murder of others and the theft of their properties, with the ends justifying the means.

http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2007/07/wlodimir-vladimir-ledochowskis-deranged.html

According to Richard Whitehall's page 95 cite of the book
"Rex Germanorum, Populos Sclavorum: An Inquiry into the Origin & Early History of the Serbs/Slavs of Sarmatia, Germania, & Illyria" by Ivo Vukcevich

"In World War II, it should be noted, Moslem leaders placed the blame the crusading war and genocide against the Serbs and the chaos in Bosnia squarely on the shoulders of the Austro-Polish 'Black Pope,' Wladimir Ledochowski, Superior General of the Jesuits, who, perhaps inspired by deranged visions of a divine Polish mission, appears to have supported Roman Catholic crusade against schismatics in eastern and southeastern Europe."

richard_whitehall@hotmail.com

http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2007/06/wlodimir-vladimir-ledochowski-final.html

Let IT be KNOWN! That @ Adolf Eichmann's trial in Israel in 1961, Eichmann clearly stated that both he and Reinhard Heydrich were answerable to the PopeS (White Pope-Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli and the Black Popes-Jesuit General Wvladimir Ledochowski S.J. a Polish Jesuit) for the "Final Solution decree of the Vatican Third Reich of Europe using Four Roman Catholic Dictators Hitler,Pavelic,Mussolini and Franco!

On December 7th 1941 (Pearl Harbor)the Nazi Catholic Stormtrooper SS began GAS VAN OPERATIONS in Lodz and Chelmno regions of Poland, Jews were herded into Catholic Church in Chelmno until the next morning the hundreds of GAS VANS arrived escorting the Jews from the Roman Church directly into the GAS VANS once the measured drive to the remote forests the Jews were dead via carbon monoxide!! (source: "Shoah" documentary, Claude Lanzmann)

cordially, Michael Todd Lehman

Indeed, with the entties he created, such as the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service, Ledochowski created an endowing legacy.

There seemed, indeed, during those years of Ledochowski, Pope Pius XI, and Pius XII, no real limit to what both Jesuitism and overall Roman Catholicism could achieve. Even – especially, we should say – in the afterglow of Ledochowski’s long reign and into the Generalate of his successor, Belgian Jean-Baptise Janssens, the magic power of momentum seemed to continue.

The same General Congregation, or meeting of Jesuit leaders, that elected Janssens in 1946 also formally consecrated the Society to the Immaculate Heart of Mary – a devotion that sprang up in a parallel to the central Catholic devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus. That Congregation also affirmed its adhesion to the dogma of the Assumption of the Virgin Mary, as Pope Pius XII was to define it four years later. Mary, in Catholic belief, died, but her body never underwent the corruption of the grave. Instead it was “assumed”, taken up into the transforming glory of her divine son. The womb that conceived God as man, the breast that fed him, the hands that held him, the body that labored for him should never be desecrated by the worms and the rats.

P 221 The Jesuits: The Society of Jesus and the Betrayal of the Roman Catholic Church

Indeed, something continuing, for a highly centralized cult said to be devoted to what Maximillian Kolbe appeared to describe as a ‘mother of war”, from its ‘New Rome’ in North American commonly known as Washington, D.C.

Northern Germany to Figure Out How Rome Screwed Them?

Rome's Ledochowski Counter Reformation Set Up Germany to Loose the East

http://whispersintheloggia.blogspot.com/2011/09/this-is-where-luther-was-ordained.html

ADDRESS OF POPE BENEDICT XVI MEETING WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF THE EVANGELICAL (LUTHERAN) CHURCHES OF GERMANY AUGUSTINIAN CONVENTERFURT 23 SEPTEMBER 2011

Ladies and Gentlemen,

As I begin to speak, I would like first of all to thank you for this opportunity to come together with you. I am particularly grateful to Pastor Schneider for greeting me and welcoming me into your midst with his kind words. At the same time I want to express my thanks for the particularly gracious gesture that our meeting can be held in this historic location.

As the Bishop of Rome, it is deeply moving for me to be meeting representatives of Council of the EKD here in the ancient Augustinian convent in Erfurt. This is where Luther studied theology. This is where he was ordained a priest in 1507. Against his father’s wishes, he did not continue the study of Law, but instead he studied theology and set off on the path towards priesthood in the Order of Saint Augustine. On this path, he was not simply concerned with this or that. What constantly exercised him was the question of God, the deep passion and driving force of his whole life’s journey. “How do I receive the grace of God?”: this question struck him in the heart and lay at the foundation of all his theological searching and inner struggle. For him theology was no mere academic pursuit, but the struggle for oneself, which in turn was a struggle for and with God.

“How do I receive the grace of God?” The fact that this question was the driving force of his whole life never ceases to make an impression on me. For who is actually concerned about this today – even among Christians? What does the question of God mean in our lives? In our preaching? Most people today, even Christians, set out from the presupposition that God is not fundamentally interested in our sins and virtues. He knows that we are all mere flesh. Insofar as people today believe in an afterlife and a divine judgement at all, nearly everyone presumes for all practical purposes that God is bound to be magnanimous and that ultimately he mercifully overlooks our small failings. But are they really so small, our failings? Is not the world laid waste through the corruption of the great, but also of the small, who think only of their own advantage? Is it not laid waste through the power of drugs, which thrives on the one hand on greed and avarice, and on the other hand on the craving for pleasure of those who become addicted? Is the world not threatened by the growing readiness to use violence, frequently masking itself with claims to religious motivation? Could hunger and poverty so devastate parts of the world if love for God and godly love of neighbour – of his creatures, of men and women – were more alive in us? I could go on. No, evil is no small matter. Were we truly to place God at the centre of our lives, it could not be so powerful. The question: what is God’s position towards me, where do I stand before God? – this burning question of Martin Luther must once more, doubtless in a new form, become our question too. In my view, this is the first summons we should attend to in our encounter with Martin Luther.

Another important point: God, the one God, creator of heaven and earth, is no mere philosophical hypothesis regarding the origins of the universe. This God has a face, and he has spoken to us. He became one of us in the man Jesus Christ – who is both true God and true man. Luther’s thinking, his whole spirituality, was thoroughly Christocentric: “What promotes Christ’s cause” was for Luther the decisive hermeneutical criterion for the exegesis of sacred Scripture. This presupposes, however, that Christ is at the heart of our spirituality and that love for him, living in communion with him, is what guides our life.

Now perhaps you will say: all well and good, but what has this to do with our ecumenical situation? Could this just be an attempt to talk our way past the urgent problems that are still waiting for practical progress, for concrete results? I would respond by saying that the first and most important thing for ecumenism is that we keep in view just how much we have in common, not losing sight of it amid the pressure towards secularization – everything that makes us Christian in the first place and continues to be our gift and our task. It was the error of the Reformation period that for the most part we could only see what divided us and we failed to grasp existentially what we have in common in terms of the great deposit of sacred Scripture and the early Christian creeds. The great ecumenical step forward of recent decades is that we have become aware of all this common ground and that we acknowledge it as we pray and sing together, as we make our joint commitment to the Christian ethos in our dealings with the world, as we bear common witness to the God of Jesus Christ in this world as our undying foundation.

The risk of losing this, sadly, is not unreal. I would like to make two points here. The geography of Christianity has changed dramatically in recent times, and is in the process of changing further. Faced with a new form of Christianity, which is spreading with overpowering missionary dynamism, sometimes in frightening ways, the mainstream Christian denominations often seem at a loss. This is a form of Christianity with little institutional depth, little rationality and even less dogmatic content, and with little stability. This worldwide phenomenon poses a question to us all: what is this new form of Christianity saying to us, for better and for worse? In any event, it raises afresh the question about what has enduring validity and what can or must be changed – the question of our fundamental faith choice.

The second challenge to worldwide Christianity of which I wish to speak is more profound and in our country more controversial: the secularized context of the world in which we Christians today have to live and bear witness to our faith. God is increasingly being driven out of our society, and the history of revelation that Scripture recounts to us seems locked into an ever more remote past. Are we to yield to the pressure of secularization, and become modern by watering down the faith? Naturally faith today has to be thought out afresh, and above all lived afresh, so that it is suited to the present day. Yet it is not by watering the faith down, but by living it today in its fullness that we achieve this. This is a key ecumenical task. Moreover, we should help one another to develop a deeper and more lively faith. It is not strategy that saves us and saves Christianity, but faith – thought out and lived afresh; through such faith, Christ enters this world of ours, and with him, the living God. As the martyrs of the Nazi era brought us together and prompted the first great ecumenical opening, so today, faith that is lived from deep within amid a secularized world is the most powerful ecumenical force that brings us together, guiding us towards unity in the one Lord.

[Editor's Note: For purposes of context, in a 1984 interview with Communio, then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger laid out his thoughts on the nexus of Luther and church unity in even greater depth.]

Papist Hal Turner Acquitted

called for Roman Catholic revolt against government officials
outed as FBI informant
White Supremacist, Holocaust Denier, Called for Killing Jewish people

From The New York Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/17/nyregion/hal-turner-acquitted-of-threatening-officials-in-blog.html

HARTFORD — A blogger was acquitted on Friday of charges that he had threatened Connecticut officials when he urged readers to “take up arms” and suggested that government leaders “obey the Constitution or die.”

After deliberating less than three hours, a Hartford jury found the blogger, Harold Turner, of North Bergen, N.J., not guilty of felony inciting injury to people and misdemeanor threatening.

Mr. Turner, who will be returned to prison to complete a nearly three-year sentence in a separate case for threatening judges in Illinois, hugged family members after the verdict was announced.

“I am very pleased,” he said, as he was led away by correction officers.

Mr. Turner, who is known as Hal and who has also hosted politically charged webcasts and radio talk shows, represented himself and argued that no one had been hurt and that there was no evidence that his words had led to any violence. He also cited his First Amendment right to free speech.

Mr. Turner wrote a blog post in June 2009 in response to state legislation, withdrawn three months earlier, that would have given lay people of Roman Catholic churches more control over parish finances. Mr. Turner, 49, believed the legislation flew in the face of the constitutional doctrine of separation of church and state.

He suggested that Catholics “take up arms and put down this tyranny by force,” said government leaders should “obey the Constitution or die” and said he would post officials’ home addresses. He also wrote that if authorities tried to stop his cause, “I suspect we have enough bullets to put them down too.”

Two state officials testified that they had received unrelated threats before because of their jobs, but they said Mr. Turner’s comments went above and beyond those previous remarks.

During his closing argument, Mr. Turner said, “Ladies and gentlemen, this case is a fraud.”

“I said some nasty things about politicians, and they’re trying to use the power of the state to throw me in jail,” he said. “These are the kinds of things we heard about in the former Soviet Union.”

But the prosecutor, Thomas Garcia, said that Mr. Turner’s targets had testified that they were truly concerned about their safety and that Mr. Turner’s words were meant to incite violence.

The federal case for which Mr. Turner is serving a prison sentence stemmed from his online criticism of a 2009 ruling in which a federal appeals court dismissed lawsuits challenging handgun bans in Chicago and Oak Park, Ill. Mr. Turner wrote, “These judges must die.”

---
Here's text of the original blog article- am unsure if this is the entire article, as blogger has taken it down:

http://www.nj.com/hudson/index.ssf/2009/06/what_got_hal_turner_in_trouble.html#comments

COMMENTARY:

This is a direct government assault upon the Catholic Church, in absolute violation of the First Amendment to the Constitution for the United States.

It is very clear to us at the Turner Radio Network [TRN] that the state of Connecticut has become tyrannical and abusive. It is actively and aggressively attempting to directly interfere with the internal governance of a church and the free exercise of religion. It is retaliating against citizens for exercising their right to petition for redress of grievances. This is tyranny and it must be put down.

While filing a lawsuit is quaint and the "decent" way to handle things, we at TRN believe that being decent to a group of tyrannical scumbags is the wrong approach. It's too soft.

Thankfully, the Founding Fathers gave us the tools necessary to resolve tyranny: The Second Amendment.

TRN advocates Catholics in Connecticut take up arms and put down this tyranny by force. To that end, THIS WEDNESDAY NIGHT ON "THE HAL TURNER SHOW" we will be releasing the home addresses of the Senator and Assemblyman who introduced SB1098 as well as the home address of Thomas K. Jones from the OSE.

After all, if they are so proud of what they're doing, they shouldn't mind if everyone knows where they live.

It is our intent to foment direct action against these individuals personally. These beastly government officials should be made an example of as a warning to others in government: Obey the Constitution or die.

If any state attorney, police department or court thinks they're going to get uppity with us about this; I suspect we have enough bullets to put them down too.

The state pushed; it is about to get pushed back. Elected and other government officials sometimes need to be put in their place. They serve; they do not rule. They need to learn their place or be put there by force.

---

Hal Turner is not only a Roman Catholic Church supremacist, but also a White supremacist and anti Jewish people- something notably omitted by this reporting by The New York Times- though nonetheless reported by wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hal_Turner

Harold Charles "Hal" Turner (born March 15, 1962) is an American white nationalist, Holocaust denier[2] and blogger from North Bergen, New Jersey. In August 2010, he was convicted for making threats against three federal judges with the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Prior to Turner's arrest, his radio program, The Hal Turner Show, was a webcast from his home once a week.

Early life

Turner was born in Jersey City and raised in Ridgefield Park. He served for ten months in the United States Marine Corps and received an honorable discharge. Prior to working in radio, Turner worked as a driver and a salesman.[3]

Early career

Identifying himself as "Hal from North Bergen", Turner became notable in American conservative circles as a frequent caller to and supporter of WABC radio talk show hosts Bob Grant and Sean Hannity.[4] Turner parlayed this fame into a role as the northern New Jersey coordinator for Patrick J. Buchanan's 1992 presidential campaign. He went on to serve as campaign manager for Libertarian Party candidate Murray Sabrin in New Jersey in the 1990s, including a 1997 gubernatorial campaign.[5]

Turner claims he established a friendship with Sean Hannity, on whose program he was a frequent presence.[4] However, when confronted by the New Black Panther Party's Malik Zulu Shabazz in 2008 about his association with Turner (in light of Hannity's scrutiny of Barack Obama's association with Jeremiah Wright), Hannity at first denied knowing Turner, then said he had banned Turner from his radio program. Turner subsequently posted this response on his website: "I was quite disappointed when Sean Hannity at first tried to say he didn't know me. In fact, Sean does know me and we were quite friendly a few years ago."[6][7]

Turner became a talk radio host, joining fellow regular callers Frank from Queens and John from Staten Island to start the program The Right Perspective. Turner left the program in 2002, citing artistic differences. In 2002, Turner became a solo host, purchasing a time slot on shortwave radio station WBCQ, over which he broadcast for approximately four years. On WBCQ on March 22, 2004 he left the show "after harshly criticizing his supporters, listeners, and WBCQ."[8] The show lacked financial support[9] the owner of the station Allan Weiner was Jewish, and Turner had health problems[10][unreliable source?]. This led to the temporary closure of his website and show.

Activism and assault claims

In the 2000 US congress election, Turner sought, but did not receive, the Republican Party nomination for election to the United States Congress from New Jersey's 13th congressional district, losing to Theresa de Leon.[11][12] Turner has identified himself as the "Chairman of the Republican Party of Hudson County, NJ Corp," a group which has no connection to the official Hudson County Republican Party recognized by the state and national party. According to news reports, Hudson County Republican officials have stated that Turner's party is a "paper corporation with little or no membership".[13]

In response to an October 7, 2005, assault against a white student by a black student at Kingston High School, Turner, working with the white nationalist group National Vanguard, organized a rally which he called a "rally against violence".[14] The case resulted in the perpetrator being indicted as an adult with two felony counts: assault and attempted assault.[15][16] He characterized the rally both as "pro-white" and "against violence".[17] The victim's mother chose not to attend the rally.[17] In response, local residents, including political and religious leaders, organized a number of "Unity Rallies" with a tolerance theme.[18] When the rally occurred on November 19, 2005, Turner and the National Vanguard attracted approximately 50 demonstrators, compared to the 100 counter-demonstrators.[19]

On April 12, 2006, Turner had a physical altercation with Jaime Vazquez, a former Jersey City Deputy Mayor and a member of the Jersey City Council, who was the Jersey City Commissioner of Veterans Affairs at the time. The North Bergen Reporter quoted Turner as saying "(t)he illegal immigrants are breaking the law, and people like me should break the law as well by shooting them down." In response, Vazquez picketed with a sign reading "Hal Turner — shoot me! Racists and bigots like you are cowards."[20] Vazquez suffered a back injury and a fractured wrist. Turner and Vazquez later filed criminal charges against each other. On July 16, 2006 North Bergen Municipal Court Judge Joseph Romano found both men to be equally credible and thus neither criminally liable.[21]

Broadcasting and website issues

In 2002, Turner started broadcasting, but quit the show in July 2008[22] and resumed in April 2009 as Turner Radio Network. In August 2008 his website also closed down, though he retained a blog, it was shut down by his host, Google's Blogger, for violations of terms of service.[23]

Origin of China Eminent Domain Hoax

In February 2009, Turner posted an article to his blog entitled: "FEDS GRANT EMINENT DOMAIN AS COLLATERAL TO CHINA FOR U.S. DEBTS!" claiming that a secret agreement had been made to allow China to physically take U.S. land, in the event of a U.S. default.[24] The story then went viral and was posted across the internet, including most conspiracy and extremist right-wing sites and forums.[25]
Anonymous website raid

Turner claimed that in December 2006 and January 2007 individuals who identified themselves as Anonymous took Turner's website offline, costing him thousands of dollars in bandwidth bills. On January 19, 2007 Turner sued 4chan, eBaum's World, 7chan, and other websites for copyright infringement.[26] On January 22, 2007 he lost his plea for an injunction.[26] In February 2007 4chan responded to the lawsuit.[26] In April 2007, the judge asked the parties to submit information to schedule proceedings.[26] However, Turner failed to respond and mail from the court to Turner was returned as "Undeliverable".[26] The Judge dismissed the case in December of 2007.[26]
FBI Informant

Turner was a paid FBI informant for several years, supplying information about right-wing groups to federal agents.[27] The original allegations that Turner acted as an informant for the FBI surfaced in 2008 after unidentified hackers claimed on Turner's website's forums that they had read email correspondence between him and an FBI agent, apparently his handler.[28] This led to a discussion on a neo-Nazi website on January 10, 2008, in which Turner revealed he was quitting political work, was ending his radio show and that he was separating "from the 'pro-White' movement".[28] The FBI has declined to comment on the matter.[28] The Southern Poverty Law Center[29] and the Anti-Defamation League reported on the emails that "a neo-Nazi Website had posted material reportedly found by the hackers, including alleged exchanges between himself and law enforcement agents which indicated that Turner had been providing information to them."[30]

On July 28, 2009 in a Chicago courtroom, Turner's defense lawyer said that Turner worked as a paid informant for the FBI.[31] In December 2009, The Record published an investigative report on Turner's "complex" relationship with the FBI and Federal Marshalls, noting that all parties broke off contact at several points.[32]
Threats against judges and political figures

Turner has a history of making threats against various public figures.[33] In 2005, Turner publicized the names of three federal court judges who handled lawsuits involving Matt Hale, a white supremacist convicted of soliciting the murder of a federal judge.[34] Turner posted the judges' names and addresses on his Web site.[34][35]

On December 6, 2006, Turner announced on his website:

"We may have to ASSASSINATE some of the people you elect on Nov. 7! This could be your LAST ELECTION CHANCE, to save this Republic... Sorry to have to be so blunt, but the country is in mortal danger from our present government and our liberty is already near dead because of this government. If you are too stupid to turn things around with your vote, there are people out here like me who are willing to turn things around with guns, force and violence. We hope our method does not become necessary."[36]

Since the announcement was made, Turner has had difficulties finding a host for his website. He alleged that his website has been the target of denial of service attacks, and subsequently filed a pro se lawsuit.[37][38][39]

On April 4, 2008, Turner encouraged violence against Lexington, Massachusetts school superintendent Paul Ash for establishing a new curriculum supporting gays and lesbians. On his website, he stated:

"I advocate parents using FORCE AND VIOLENCE against Superintendent Paul B. Ash as a method of defending the health and safety of school children presently being endangered through his politically-correct indoctrination into deadly, disease-ridden sodomite lifestyles."[40]

He went on to provide Ash's personal information, including his address.[40] Fourteen months later, on June 2, 2009, Turner posted on his blog

"Let me be the first to say this plainly: These judges deserve to be killed. Their blood will replenish the tree of liberty. A small price to pay to assure freedom for millions."

The next day Turner posted information on how to find Chief Judge Frank Easterbrook and Judges Richard Posner and William Joseph Bauer.[41]
Arrests, trials and conviction

On June 3, 2009, Turner was arrested in New Jersey and charged with inciting injury to two politicians in Connecticut and a state ethics official.[42][43] The warrant issued was for inciting his website's readers to "take up arms" against the officials.[44] Two weeks later, Turner was re-arrested on June 24, 2009 at his New Jersey home for making threats against the judges of the United States Court of Appeals in Chicago.[45] When he was arrested, FBI officials seized 200 rounds of ammunition as well as three handguns and one shotgun. In federal case, Turner was denied bail.[46][47]

On June 30, 2009, the website for Turner's blog was shut down and replaced with a notice stating that the site has been taken down by Turner's family, directing interested parties to a blog for the Family of Hal Turner, with entries by his mother.[48]

United States v. Turner

Wikisource has original text related to this article:
Government's Sentencing Memorandum: United States of America vs Harold Turner

On July 28, 2009 for United States v. Turner in Chicago, Turner pleaded not guilty to threatening to kill three federal appellate judges there and then sought his release from custody, saying he had been an informant for the FBI.[49] The judge gave Turner 10 days "to produce concrete evidence of Turner's help to the FBI or federal marshals."[49] On August 11, Turner was denied bail again. The judge cited the fact that Turner, from his prison cell, recorded and posted on the internet a telephone conversation that included the names of his arresting FBI agents. The judge said that Turner's act "tells me something about the disposition of Mr. Turner."[50]

He pleaded not guilty, and his lawyer said the defense will use "Turner's background as an FBI informant" and argue that he was "trained by the FBI" as "an agent provocateur" to incite people."[51][52] In late October Turner was freed on $500,000 bond, and was ordered not to use a computer or any device that can access the Internet.[53] His trial started on November 30, 2009 and ended on December 4, 2009, with the defense opting not to call any witnesses.[54] After two hours of deliberation, the jury announced it was deadlocked.[55] Three days later the judge declared a mistrial, and a retrial was set for March 1, 2010.[56] This second trial, overseen by Western District of Louisiana judge Donald Walter, was moved from the Northern District of Illinois to the Eastern District of New York: since the prosecution was to call the three judges to the stand, the defense felt that Turner would not get a fair hearing if the trial was conducted in the same city where the judges worked.[57] A mistrial was declared on March 10.[58]

In August 2010, his third trial began and on August 31, after three days of testimony the jury found Turner guilty.[59][60] On 21 December 2010, he was sentenced to 33 months in prison. Upon completion of his sentence, he will be barred from participating in Internet or satellite radio programming for three years.[60][61] In his sentencing memorandum, U.S. Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald made the following comment:

"For years, Turner has engaged in a campaign of intimidation against public officials and private citizens alike. Even Turner’s arrest in this case failed to deter him. Turner continued his tactics by using intimidation against a key witness in the government’s case against him. All the while, Turner has displayed defiance and no regret for his actions. Turner remains utterly incapable of acknowledging the genuine fear experienced by his innumerable victims – that is, except when he is the victim of a perceived threat. Turner has committed a serious crime, engaged in witness intimidation, lied repeatedly under oath, and has shown no regret whatsoever." [62]

After his conviction Turner was incarcerated in the Metropolitan Detention Center, Brooklyn[63], and was moved to his current location in May 2011 at Federal Correctional Complex, Terre Haute.[64] In May, he sent letters to The Jersey Journal saying he is one of 38 people housed in Communication Management Unit in the prison Terre Haute with terrorists, like John Walker Lindh, and fears for his life once fellow prisoners find out he was a government informant.[65][66] According to the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Turner has a projected release date of October 3, 2012.[1] Since his incarceration in 2010, Turner declared bankruptcy and his wife filed for divorce.[67]

In August 2011, Turner filed an appeal for his conviction, which claims the government "failed to substantiate the charge" and asked to be released pending the appeal.[68]

Connecticut v. Turner

In July 2009 the Connecticut case was handed to a division of the state court that handles more serious matters.[69] In early February 2011, Turner appeared in a Hartford court for the Connecticut v. Turner pre-trial hearing on three counts of inciting injuries to persons.[70] The three felony counts Turner is facing each carry one to 10 years in prison.[71]

In late February 2011, the federal government reported that e-mails "show it appears Turner plans to pursue judicial and law-enforcement officials after he’s released from prison." On February 2, Turner wrote "when I get out, I’m gonna go after some ‘problems’ and take care of them in a manner that will be horrific."[72]

On March 25, 2011, Turner appeared in Hartford asking the court to be allowed to change his attorney, telling the judge, "I have no confidence in his ability to defend me."[73] The judge reluctantly allowed him to change his private attorney for a public defender citing Turner's unusually bad year.[73] On April 7th, with a public defender at his side, Turner pled not guilty and the case will go to trial.[74]

In July 2011, Turner's public defender asked for the case to be dismissed saying Turner's statements are free speech and that Connecticut courts don't have jurisdiction because his threats were made in New Jersey.[75] Prosecutor Thomas Garcia responded that Turner himself wrote that his intent behind the writing was to "foment direct action" against the lawmakers "personally."[71]

In September, Turner asked Judge Carl J. Schuman to represent himself after disagreeing with his public defender, John Stawicki, about defense strategy.[76] Judge Schuman agreed, but Stawicki will remain as stand-by counsel.[76] Meanwhile jury selection began.[77]

Hal Turner's profile is once military, continually Roman Catholic, and somewhat politically up-mobile, working for Patrick Buchanan, combined with being an FBI informant and expressively pro serial killer against Jewish and Mexican peoples.

Miesczyslaw Ledochowski Vatican Swore Venegence Against Prussia/2nd Reich

The Washington Post, January 15, 1913

“He spent two full years in prison before being liberated and sentence to exile, and he then proceeded to Rome where he lived as the honored guest, first of Pius IX and then of Leo XIII, exercising a potent influence at the Vatican. So much so, indeed, that before Bismarck would consent to a cessation of the so-called Culterkampf, he insisted that Cardinal Count Ledochowski should leave Rome and cease to be a member of the Pope’s immediate entourage.”

Miesczyslaw Ledochowski was a Vatican official representing a nexus of power higher then the Pope, who, vengeful for Prussia's Kulturkampf, was desirous of future war.

This is what the NY Times published in 1892: The New York Times On the Papacy and Cardinal Mieczyslaw Ledochowski:

It is very well understood, however, that Monaco is entirely under the control of Ledochowski, that proud, imperious, and able Pole who made Bismarck such worlds of trouble in the old Kulterkampf day and who has been able to impose his will very often upon even the present Pope. This powerful man was in a German prison when Pius IX created him a Cardinal in 1875. Next year he was released and banished, and he has since lived in Rome, devoting his great wealth and talents to building up a militant Ultramontagne party about him. His wrath at the treatment he received at the hands of Bismarck has colored all his political views. He has hated both Germany and Italy and has looked unceasingly forward to the time when French bayonets should restore the temporal power of the Vatican in the old Roman States.

If we assume that this spirited and resolute prelate will shortly be ruling the Church through its nominal head, it becomes a most anxious question how he will accept the existing political conditions of Europe which have so radically changed since 1875. The new rulers of the Germans have been at pains to show their desire to abolish the last traces of the Kulterkampf. When the pending Prussian Education bill is passed, the German Catholics will be actually stronger than they were before the May laws. During the last half year these dispatches have frequently reflected the new interest which William and his immediate entourage are displaying in the Polish question. Of course a good deal of this has arisen naturally from the contemplation of the necessity of sooner or later fighting Russia: but even more it represents the effort to allure Ledochowski into friendship with Germany by an appeal to his national sentiment. How far this has successor will be, as has been said, a most anxious question.

In any event under this new regime there would be an abrupt cessation of pastorals on Socialistic and labor problems and of poems about St. Thomas Aquinas. We should instead see the Vatican boldly embark upon the troubled waters of European diplomacy, seeking alliances and taking desperate risks upon the fortune in the next war. Full text juxtpositioned with the short report on the nephew in 1915

So, apparently, was the Pope (with his doctrine of 'papal infallibility"):

On January 18th, 1874 -- thus on the anniversary of the founding of the German Reich -- he declared at an assembly of international pilgrims that Bismarck was the serpent in the paradise of mankind. This serpent seduced Germans into wishing to be more than god himself. Such an overextension of the human self would be followed by a humiliation such as no people had ever before tasted!

Only the Eternal one knew whether or not the grain of sand on the mountains of eternal retribution had already been released.

This retribution was growing to avalanche proportions and it would rush in a few years at the clay feet of this Reich and transform it into ruins. This Reich, which, like the tower of Babel, had been erected in defiance of god, would pass away to the glory of god.

Pope Pius IX (May 13, 1792 – February 7, 1878),
born Giovanni Maria Mastai-Ferretti,
Pope, elected June 16, 1846, served 31+ years until his death in 1878

Cardinal Wiseman- the decisive battle against Protestantism would be fought on the mark of Brandenburg
http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2011/06/cardinal-wisemanthe-decisive-battle.html

Terrible & Premeditated
http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2011/09/terrible-premeditated.html

Terrible & Premeditated CENSORED

Facebook page East Prussia - East Prussian Movement (Freedom for East Prussia) LOCKED and Administrator List Hidden

https://www.facebook.com/pages/East-Prussia-Prussian-Movement-Freedom-for-East-Prussia/142612635778809

http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2011/09/terrible-premeditated.html

A revenge more terrible then commonly acknowledged.

The idea of setting up Germany to start and loose a brutal war with severe consequences eastward undeniably dovetails with the Jesuit Order's major goal of recapturing lands previously lost to “heretics” such as Lutherans, notably the post WW2 partition of East Prussia, historically the 1^st Lutheran state in 1525.

De Zayes book focuses exclusively upon the expulsion of the ethnic Germans as a terrible revenge for the crimes of the 3^rd Reich; it overlooks the broader picture of a continuing counter reformation directed by a man born into a prestigious Polish ‘Noble’ family – so-known for their devotion to the Vatican – who was only about 8 years old when his uncle Mieczyslaw was imprisoned by Otto Von Bismarck, leader of the predominantly Protestant state of Prussia that would prominently defy the Vatican with its KULTURKAMPF.

Wlodimir (Vladimir) Ledochowski's Goal Predicted by Maximillian Kolbe in 1938?

Wlodimir (Vladimir) Ledochowski: War Culpability Admission – Oder Neisse Line/Destruction of Prussia the ‘aim’ of the counter reformation

Rome's planned theft of the predominately Protestant areas of East Prussia, Pomerania, Silesia, etc to the north, came as the cap stone of an agenda of bloody religious war for the gain of the Roman Catholic Church Empire: a 20^th century continuation of the counter reformation....

Ledochowski Religious War CENSORED at now defunct East Prussia BB
http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2008/11/wlodimir-vladimir-ledochowski-cover-up.html


PREMEDITATED & CENSORED: on the annihilation of the first Protestant-Lutheran state in the world [moved from ABE blog]
http://avles-theamberpath.blogspot.com/2011/09/premeditated-censored-on-annihilation.html

Terrible & PREMEDITATED

excerpted from: http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2009/07/wlodimir-ledochowski-kulturkampf_17.html

A revenge more terrible then commonly acknowledged.

The idea of setting up Germany to start and loose a brutal war with severe consequences eastward undeniably dovetails with the Jesuit Order's major goal of recapturing lands previously lost to “heretics” such as Lutherans, notably the post WW2 partition of East Prussia, historically the 1^st Lutheran state in 1525.

De Zayes book focuses exclusively upon the expulsion of the ethnic Germans as a terrible revenge for the crimes of the 3^rd Reich; it overlooks the broader picture of a continuing counter reformation directed by a man born into a prestigious Polish ‘Noble’ family – so-known for their devotion to the Vatican – who was only about 8 years old when his uncle Mieczyslaw was imprisoned by Otto Von Bismarck, leader of the predominantly Protestant state of Prussia that would prominently defy the Vatican with its KULTURKAMPF.

Wlodimir (Vladimir) Ledochowski's Goal Predicted by Maximillian Kolbe in 1938?

Wlodimir (Vladimir) Ledochowski: War Culpability Admission – Oder Neisse Line/Destruction of Prussia the ‘aim’ of the counter reformation

Rome's planned theft of the predominately Protestant areas of East Prussia, Pomerania, Silesia, etc to the north, came as the cap stone of an agenda of bloody religious war for the gain of the Roman Catholic Church Empire: a 20^th century continuation of the counter reformation.

Crafted by the Jesuit Superior General, who was only 8 years old when Protestant Prussia imprisoned his Cardinal Uncle Mieczyslaw Ledochowski, as a most plausible childhood revenge vow.

Wlodimir Ledochowski 1872

about when Bismarck’s Prussia expelled the Jesuit Order

from united Germany

Baltimore newspaper April 17, 1915

“When the new Black Pope was yet a lad he witnessed the persecution and imprisonment of his uncle, the late Cardinal Ledochowski , who had estates in German Poland, and whom Bismarck regarded with mingled fear and hatred of the persecuted Poles in Germany”

Cardinal Mieczyslaw Ledochowski

b. October 29, 1822 – d. July 22, 1902

1871-1918 German 2^nd Reich, with Polish majority Posen/Poznan

Cardinal Miecczyslaw Ledochowski was a key figure in the Prussian-Vatican conflict.

From The Washington Post, January 15, 1913

The Washington Post on Cardinal Mieczyslaw Ledochowski

“He spent two full years in prison before being liberated and sentence to exile, and he then proceeded to Rome where he lived as the honored guest, first of Pius IX and then of Leo XIII, exercising a potent influence at the Vatican. So much so, indeed, that before Bismarck would consent to a cessation of the so-called Culterkampf, he insisted that Cardinal Count Ledochowski should leave Rome and cease to be a member of the Pope’s immediate entourage.”

Miesczyslaw Ledochowski was a Vatican official representing a nexus of power higher then the Pope, who, vengeful for Prussia's Kulturkampf, was desirous of future war.

This is what the NY Times published in 1892: The New York Times On the Papacy and Cardinal Mieczyslaw Ledochowski

It is very well understood, however, that Monaco is entirely under the control of Ledochowski, that proud, imperious, and able Pole who made Bismarck such worlds of trouble in the old Kulterkampf day and who has been able to impose his will very often upon even the present Pope. This powerful man was in a German prison when Pius IX created him a Cardinal in 1875. Next year he was released and banished, and he has since lived in Rome, devoting his great wealth and talents to building up a militant Ultramontagne party about him. His wrath at the treatment he received at the hands of Bismarck has colored all his political views. He has hated both Germany and Italy and has looked unceasingly forward to the time when French bayonets should restore the temporal power of the Vatican in the old Roman States.

If we assume that this spirited and resolute prelate will shortly be ruling the Church through its nominal head, it becomes a most anxious question how he will accept the existing political conditions of Europe which have so radically changed since 1875. The new rulers of the Germans have been at pains to show their desire to abolish the last traces of the Kulterkampf. When the pending Prussian Education bill is passed, the German Catholics will be actually stronger than they were before the May laws. During the last half year these dispatches have frequently reflected the new interest which William and his immediate entourage are displaying in the Polish question. Of course a good deal of this has arisen naturally from the contemplation of the necessity of sooner or later fighting Russia: but even more it represents the effort to allure Ledochowski into friendship with Germany by an appeal to his national sentiment. How far this has successor will be, as has been said, a most anxious question.

In any event under this new regime there would be an abrupt cessation of pastorals on Socialistic and labor problems and of poems about St. Thomas Aquinas. We should instead see the Vatican boldly embark upon the troubled waters of European diplomacy, seeking alliances and taking desperate risks upon the fortune in the next war.

So, apparently, was the Pope (with his doctrine of 'papal infallibility"):

On January 18th, 1874 -- thus on the anniversary of the founding of the German Reich -- he declared at an assembly of international pilgrims that Bismarck was the serpent in the paradise of mankind. This serpent seduced Germans into wishing to be more than god himself. Such an overextension of the human self would be followed by a humiliation such as no people had ever before tasted!

Only the Eternal one knew whether or not the grain of sand on the mountains of eternal retribution had already been released.

This retribution was growing to avalanche proportions and it would rush in a few years at the clay feet of this Reich and transform it into ruins. This Reich, which, like the tower of Babel, had been erected in defiance of god, would pass away to the glory of god.

Pope Pius IX (May 13, 1792 – February 7, 1878),

born Giovanni Maria Mastai-Ferretti,
Pope, elected June 16, 1846, served 31+ years until his death in 1878.

Wlodimir (Vladimir) Ledochowski's Goal Predicted by Maximillian Kolbe in 1938?
http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2007/06/wlodimir-vladimir-ledochowskis-goal.html

Wlodimir (Vladimir) Ledochowski: War Culpability Admission – Oder Neisse Line/Destruction of Prussia the ‘aim’ of the counter reformation
http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2007/08/wlodimir-vladimir-ledochowski-war.html

Wlodimir Ledochowski Goal Via Goals
http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2007/06/wlodimir-vladimir-ledochowskis-goal-via.html

Maximilian Kolbe- "'God' is Cleansing Poland"
http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2007/08/from-man-for-others-maximilian-kolbe.html

Wlodimir Ledochowski's Deranged Polish Religious Visions?
http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2007/07/wlodimir-vladimir-ledochowskis-deranged.html

Wlodimir Ledochowski: Mission, Motivation, Geopolitical Chessboard
http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2007/06/wlodimir-vladimir-ledochowski-mission.html

Wlodimir Ledochowski: Kulturkampf Revenge Last of the Great Roman Generals- Malachi Martin
http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2009/11/along-amber-path-7_7355.html

Wlodimir Ledochowski: Last of the Great Roman Generals- Series
http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/search/label/Great%20Roman%20General

Wlodimir Ledochowski Ignored Even By the Jesuits
http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2008/05/wlodimir-vladimir-ledochowski-usually.html

Luis Martin's Curse

24th Superior General -- 1892-1906 -- whose agricultural mercantilism embodied by the U.S. Food and Drugs Act protecting Virginia Bright Leaf cigarettes from the USDA and AMA's feared 'Tobacco Habit Cure' of Coca, rivals the death count of 26th Superior General Ledochowski Kulturkampf Revenge 2nd 30 Years War



Things turn politically in the U.S. against Coca in the months after the second time the Vatican awards Vin Mariani creator Angelo Francois Mariani a gold papal medal as a benefactor of humanity for making Coca available to the world, via the efforts of that 'knight' [amongst those showing] 'great prowess- Harvey Washington Wiley of the AMA-APhA and Chief of the Bureau of Chemistry of the United States Department of Agriculture.

http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2008/07/roman-catholic-church-cocaine.html


The Superior Order of the Jesuit Order at that time, Luis Martin, serving since 1892, becomes extra ill in 1905 with a cancerous tumor forcing the amputation of his right arm, before succumbing to lung cancer- April 18, 1906

http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2011/01/luis-martin-sj-punishment-for-drug-war.html


Harvey Washing Wiley was in Rome in April 1906 attending an international convention on chemistry

http://freedomofmedicineanddiet.blogspot.com/2011/04/wiley-in-rome-april-1906.html


Harvey Washington Wiley's 1906 U.S. Food and Drug Act was designed to protect Tobacco from Coca, empowering the USDA to ban from interstate commerce anything it deemed to be dangerous to health (with no scientific requirement), unless of course it was excluded from the U.S. Pharmacopoeia as Tobacco had been the previous year 1905.

http://freedomofmedicineanddiet.blogspot.com/2011/04/harvey-wileys-1906-us-food-drugs-act.html


U.S.D.A. - American Medical Association Racketeering Against Coca for Tobacco

http://freedomofmedicineanddiet.blogspot.com/2008/03/it-was-criminal-mercantilism-to-protect.html


The 1906 U.S. Food and Drug Act was signed into law, June 30, 1906 by Freemason U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt.

http://freedomofmedicineanddiet.blogspot.com/2011/05/freemason-t-roosevelt-approved-wiley.html



To this day, this matter of Agricultural-Pharma Mercantilism is misrepresented as some sort of well intended public health measure that went wrong- hence the concept of "Harm Reduction" gets whittled down to little more than cleaner ways of taking the perverted (concentrated ) drug forms promoted by prohibition, in order to prolong the protection of broader markets.

http://freedomofmedicineanddiet.blogspot.com/2011/09/ignore-harm-reduction-of-highlighting.html


Better Understanding Political Dynamics- Freemasonry's Subservience to Rome

http://wwwsouthcapitolstreet.blogspot.com/2011/04/freemasonry-lets-america-down-via.html

A Surreal August 2011

August 23, 2011: Mineral, Louisa County, Virginia 5.9 EARTHQUAKE shakes up Washington, D.C. area, Washington Monument Cracked, Washington Cathedral Pinnacles Crashdown.





Damage at the Washington National Cathedral following Louisa County, Virginia earthquake. Photo Credit: Washington National Cathedral, Craig Stapert, photographer http://www.petergreenberg.com/2011/08/24/east-coast-earthquake-damages-washington-dc-icons/

August 25-28, 2011: Hurricane "Irina" Sweeps U.S. East Coast

http://www.hannity.com/show/2011/08/23

Earthquake Shakes NYC-DC

An hour before taking the air, a magnitude 5.8 earthquake rattled the East Coast sending shockwaves as far as Boston and North Carolina. The quake's epicenter was in Mineral, Va., in Louisa County, about 90 miles away from DC. The Pentagon and Capitol Building in Washington, DC, were evacuated at 1:51 p.m., shortly after a powerful tremble was felt. Sean spoke with Tom Rockwell, Professor of Geology at San Diego University about the quake at the start of the show. “We experienced a rare earthquake in the Northeast which is rare, but not unprecedented. There have been strong earthquakes that have hit Boston in the past as well as North Carolina along old fault lines. The Midwest and the East have been struck by historical earthquakes and geologic studies do indicate that we have them rarely but when they do happen they can be damaging,” said Rockwell. Rockwell explained that structures built on the West Coast are built to more stringent building codes and are more likely to sustain less damage after an earthquake than those on the East coast. In fact as Sean took the air, reports from the U.S. Capitol Police stated that the Washington Monument may have been damaged with some stones coming loose.

I just happened to miss the 'quake, as I was about 2/3rds of the way through a flight from New York to Florida.

Luckily, the quake preceded the hurricane, thus so far sparing the region the greater damage of a quake occurring afterwards- with the consequential more water saturated soil, of perhaps greatest risk to tall buildings lacking continuous structural support to bedrock.