The Counter Reformation of the Vatican's Jesuit Order did not end back in the 1600s - or more accurately, the Roman Catholic Inquisition did not end during the 1800s -------------------------------------------------------------
open their eyes, in order to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan to God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins and an inheritance among those who are sanctified by faith in Me. Acts 26: 18 NKJV
Showing posts with label Hidden 30 Years War. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hidden 30 Years War. Show all posts
In the book, de Zayas claims that approximately two million
Germans died during the post period of 1944-1949, although most recent research
on the subject has put the number at around half a million.
In fact, the most recent research has been conducted by de
Zayas and published 2012 in his "50 Theses on the Expulsion of the
Germans" ISBN
978-3-9812110-4-7
There, on pp. 55-58 de Zayas convincingly explains that none
of the "recent research" is professional or methodologically reliable
and that therefore one must continue to rely on the demographic studies of the
Statistisches Bundesamt and those of Dr. Fritz Peter Habel and Gerhard
Reichling.
Although, according to a study at the German Federal
Archives of 1974,at least half a
million were murdered directly, succumbing to beatings, dying of rape, shooting
etc., a million and a half died as a direct consequence of the expulsions,
since these were brutal and disorderly and Germany was in a state of total
collapse upon their arrival -- so that a humanitarian catastrophe ensued, as
abundantly reported in United States and British official memoranda and
studies.
Moreover, nearly two million East Germans were carted off to
slave labor in the Soviet Union and some 40% of them perished on the way to the
Urals and Siberia, during their hard years of slave labor, or during their
repatriation.
Attempting to reduce the number of German dead from 2.2
million to half a million is as obnoxious as attempting to reduce the number of
Holocaust dead from six million to one million as some revisionists do.
Dr. Raymond Lohne, Columbia College Chicago 70.89.220.194
(talk) 15:53, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
Dr. Nicholas Murray Butler, who met Father Ledochowski in 1930, wrote later that
"everyone in Rome I was told that Father Ledochowski would rank as one of the
two or three greatest heads of the Jesuit Order," an estimate which would group
him with such men as Ignatius Loyola, the first [Jesuit] general, Francisco
Borgia, the third, and [Claudius] Aquaviva, the fifth. http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2011/05/wlodimir-ledochowskis-various-nytimes.html
It was during the
twenty-seven year Generalate of Father Wlodzimierz Ledochowski (1915-1942) that
the traditional character of the Society received the firmest stamp and clearest
definition since the Generalate of Claudio Acquaviva in the sixteenth and
seventeenth centuries. One might even say that Ledochowski insisted on fidelity
to the structure of Jesuit obedience, was an almost merciless disciplinarian,
and maintained a stream of instructions flowing out to the whole Society about
every detail of Jesuit life and Ignatian ideals. He know exactly what Jesuits
should be according to the Society’s Constitutions and traditions; and under
strong hands of two quite authoritarian Popes, Pius XI and Pius XII, he
reestablished the close ties that had once linked papacy and Jesuit Generalate.
Ledochowski, in fact, gave renewed meaning to that old Roman nickname of the
Jesuit Father General, “the Black Pope. Just as Pius XII can be described as the
last of the great Roman Popes, so Ledochowski can be called the last of the
great Roman Generals of the Jesuits.
There seemed, indeed, during those
years of Ledochowski, Pius XI, and Pius XII, no real limit to what both
Jesuitism and overall Roman Catholicism could achieve. Even – especially, we
should say – in the afterglow of Ledochowski’s long reign and into the
Generalate of his successor, Belgian Jean-Baptise Janssens, the magic power of
the momentum seemed to continue. http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2007/09/wlodimr-vladimir-ledochowski-last-of.html
AT THE END of World War II, between twelve and fourteen million people, ethnic Germans, were forcibly expelled from Eastern Europe, or, if they had already fled, were prevented from going back to their homes. Many of them were simply bundled on to cattle trucks of the sort previously used to take Europe’s Jews to their fate in the gas chambers of Auschwitz and Treblinka, and sent westward to Germany without food, water, or adequate winter clothing. Others were detained in appalling conditions in concentration camps for weeks, suffering from disease, starvation, and maltreatment, before they were brutally pushed out to the west. Long lines trudged towards Germany, with the weak succumbing to hypothermia and malnutrition. Altogether probably half a million and perhaps as many as a million perished in what was the largest action of what later came to be known as “ethnic cleansing” in history.
This massive act of expulsion and forced migration is still largely unknown outside the countries most closely affected by it. The story appears in standard histories of Germany and Europe in the twentieth century as little more than a footnote. Calling it to public attention questions the widespread popular understanding of World War II as a wholly good fight by the Allies against the evil of Nazism and German aggression. Unfortunately, history is seldom as simple as that. Until recently, few historians troubled to investigate the expulsions in any depth, and what writing there was on the topic was bedeviled by one-sided narratives of German suffering or Polish or Czech self-justification. But since the fall of Communism and the opening of the archives in these countries, serious and reasonably objective historical research by a new generation of younger historians less affected than their predecessors by national or ethnic prejudice has begun to appear. R. M. Douglas’s Orderly and Humane: The Expulsion of the Germans after the Second World War draws on this recent work and incorporates archival research in Germany, Poland, and the Czech Republic as well as the files of the International Committee of the Red Cross, the UN Relief and Rehabilitation Administration, and the records of the British and American governments. It is a major achievement: for the first time it puts the whole subject onto a scholarly footing.
The expulsions, as Douglas points out, were no mere act of mass revenge carried out by peoples of Eastern Europe who had suffered under the Nazi jackboot. On the contrary, they were ordered by the Allies, and planned long before the war came to an end. The mistreatment of ethnic minorities before and during World War I in the Habsburg and Ottoman empires had led not just to a determination in the international community to guarantee their rights, but more importantly to a decision to cut through the problem by creating unitary national states. As the Tsarist Empire, itself no mean oppressor of minorities such as the Poles, fell apart, the Western Allies found meaning in the continuing conflict by declaring one of its objectives to be the realization of the democratic principle of “national self-determination.” ...
At the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, however, the seemingly simple and obvious idea that every nation should have the democratic right to elect its own government foundered on the intractable realities of centuries-old patterns of ethnic and religious diversity in East-Central Europe, and ran up against the requirements of security and viability for the new states created out of the wreckage of the old. Almost every one of them contained substantial national minorities. Naturally the peacemakers did their best to incorporate guarantees of minority rights into the settlement, but these proved impossible to enforce.
A case in point was the German-speaking minority in Czechoslovakia—three million people who made up nearly a quarter of the new Republic’s total population. The historic borders of the Kingdom of Bohemia included these people, and without them the new state would have lacked vital industries and defensible borders. Czech nationalism, already very passionate before 1914, was too strong a force to admit the German-speaking minority to equal rights, though liberal Czech politicians did their best to limit discrimination. And when Eduard Beneš took over as president in 1935, a new, harder note of Czech nationalism was heard, sparking a new radicalism among the German minority, who soon flocked to support the Sudeten German Party of Konrad Henlein. By 1937 this had become a Nazi front, dedicated to subverting the integrity of the Republic and opening it to German invasion and occupation.
During the wars, Beneš pushed aside the Sudeten German Social Democrats, led by Wenzel Jaksch, whose advocacy of a multinational postwar state was effectively suppressed. Jaksch is something of a hero to Douglas, though it has to be said that the amount of support he commanded among Sudeten Germans by 1939 had shrunk to an almost irreducible minimum, and it is doubtful whether his policy would have commanded much support among them even later on, after the war. Beneš convinced the Western Allies that the continued presence of a large German minority in Czechoslovakia would saddle the state with a million or more “young, incorrigible Nazis” who would be a major potential source of destabilization. “National minorities,” he declared in 1942, “are always—and in Central Europe especially—a real thorn in the side of individual nations. This is especially true if they are German minorities.” He won further sympathy for this point after the German destruction of the town of Lidice and the murder of its inhabitants as a reprisal for the assassination of Reinhard Heydrich in 1942. By the middle of that year, the British government had accepted the principle of the transfer of German-speaking minorities out of Eastern Europe, a principle strongly supported by the Labour Party that came to power in 1945.
Hitler’s exploitation of the grievances of national minorities also extended to Poland, which before 1918 had been divided between Russia, Germany, and Austria. The interwar Polish state included a Ukrainian population amounting to 14 percent of the whole, along with 2.3 percent German-speakers, who suffered increasing discrimination by the Polish nationalist regime. These had also been used by Hitler as a “fifth column” of subversives whose oppression, cynically exaggerated by Nazi propaganda, provided the excuse for invasion in 1939. All this made the presence of recalcitrant national minorities seem a permanent threat to the peace and integrity of national states in the retrospective vision of Allied planners for the postwar European order.
Hitler also planned to create an ethnically homogenous Germany by expelling the Jews, and then, during the war, to extend it a thousand kilometers to the East, exterminating millions of Jews and allowing between 30 and 45 million Slavs to perish through hunger and disease according to the infamous “General Plan for the East,” which became official Nazi policy in 1942. As part of Nazi policy even before the invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941, hundreds of thousands of Poles were thrown out of their farms and businesses without compensation to make way for a potential half-million or more ethnic Germans brought “home to the Reich” from Eastern Europe and the Baltic States under the Nazi-Soviet Pact of August 1939, along with a quarter of a million more from Hungary and Romania.
Increasingly exposed to attacks by Polish or Communist partisans, the settlers began to flee westwards in large numbers as Soviet forces advanced towards the end of the war, following ethnic Germans who had fled the Black Sea region, the Ukraine, Romania, and Yugoslavia in 1943-44 to escape the retribution of the Red Army. Germans in the occupied Czech lands, conquered by the Americans only at the very end of the war, did not have time to flee, and most of them in any case did not see the necessity. As Douglas notes, they entirely failed to understand that their occupation of confiscated property and their privileged status under Nazi occupation where non-Germans were discriminated against, expropriated, starved, and terrorized “had traumatized and radicalized the societies of which they were a part.”
The chaos and violence that had accompanied previous twentieth-century forced population transfers, notably between Greece and Turkey in the early 1920s, should have sent a warning signal to the Allied politicians who now set about organizing the removal of ethnic Germans from East-Central Europe. But it did not. Douglas describes in detail how policy was made on the hoof and constantly revised as negotiations about Europe’s postwar boundaries evolved. Warnings of the suffering that the transfers would entail were brushed aside by politicians anxious not to seem soft on the Germans, or alternatively dismissed by them as unduly pessimistic. Only a few commentators, such as George Orwell, warned that an “enormous crime” was about to be committed, “equivalent to transplanting the entire population of Australia.” Nobody listened.
Very late in the day, towards the end of 1944, it became clear that Stalin would hang on to the territory in Eastern Poland he had annexed in 1939 under the terms of the Nazi-Soviet Pact, and that there was no alternative to compensating the postwar Polish state with the territories to the west, in Silesia and up to the rivers Oder and Neisse, that had been part of Prussia and later Germany for years, decades or even centuries. The Red Army was in occupation and Stalin held all the trump cards. All the Allies could do at the Potsdam Conference in July 1945 was to ratify a fait accompli.
Already, millions of ethnic Germans had fled the onrushing Red Army, whose soldiers raped, looted, and killed German civilians as they went. The situation was made more desperate still by Stalin’s own expulsion of Poles from the areas annexed by the Soviet Union, which now became overwhelmingly Ukrainian in ethnic composition. Forced out to the west, the Poles had nowhere to go except, in the view of the new Polish authorities, to areas inhabited by the remaining ethnic Germans. Neither the Czech government-in-exile nor the Polish authorities backed by Stalin had made any coherent plans for the expulsions. But in the late spring and summer of 1945 they both sent in troops, police, and militia to initiate a process that, in Douglas’s view, has been misunderstood as a series of spontaneous acts of revenge by local inhabitants but in reality was centrally planned and directed.
True, there was a brief wave of popular violence against Germans after SS units had continued fighting to the very end of the war, and in a few instances afterwards—but even this was in many cases instigated by police or militia, as in the case of Brno, where at least 300 ethnic Germans were killed at Kaunitz College in May and June 1945, Germans were publicly tortured to death on a sports field, and 28,000 were rounded up and taken on a “death march” to the Austrian border, where they were dumped in a series of makeshift camps without proper supplies or sanitation. Shocked witnesses compared such events to the atrocities of the Nazis, and a few politicians urged restraint, but no concrete action was taken to control the violence.
Even though Brno, as Douglas notes, was exceptional in the extremism of its violence, politicians such as Ludvík Svoboda, Minister of Defense in the Czech government and later the country’s president, called for “the complete expulsion from Czechoslovakia of all Germans, even those so-called anti-Fascists, to safeguard us from the formation of a new fifth column.” With encouragement of this kind, local authorities acted on their own initiative, sometimes helped by the Red Army or the Czechoslovak armed forces. Germans had to wear a white square on their chest, labeled “N”for Nemec (German), echoing the yellow badge and star or “J” that Jews had been forced to wear by the Nazis, but the process of identifying them was frequently arbitrary and involved the offloading of many local rivalries and resentments.
Whole towns and villages with a mainly or wholly German population were emptied and their inhabitants forced out of the country. In Poland, where the German occupation had been far harsher, such reprisals were, perhaps surprisingly, far less common, and Polish troops even protected German women from the Red Army as it swept through the country, its troops indiscriminately raping any women they found, especially if they were German. Far more violent was the expulsion of ethnic Germans from Yugoslavia and Romania, though endemic corruption in the latter country meant that it was possible to bribe officials to allow a casual Romanian passer-by to take one’s place on the transport to Germany.
In many cases, the expellees were not pushed out directly but spent a period of some weeks or months in internment camps, where the authorities had begun to place them already well before the end of the war. Some of these were improvised, while others had already been used as camps by the Nazis. These included the concentration camps at Majdanek and Theresienstadt, and indeed Auschwitz, where a gap of less than two weeks separated liberation by the Red Army from the influx of the first ethnic German inmates. There was soon a vast network of these detention centers: ninety-six in Yugoslavia alone, for example. Around a quarter of a million ethnic Germans were imprisoned in camps in Czechoslovakia. Often the inmates were used on forced labor schemes to make good the devastation caused by the war. Conditions in the camps were atrocious, with poor supplies and hygiene, sadistic beatings, torture, disease, malnutrition and murder. In the camp at Łambinowice, in Poland, some 6,500 inmates had died by the time it was closed in 1946, many of them arbitrarily shot on the orders of the commandant.
Camp administrations were massively corrupt, with commandants selling the labor of the inmates to nearby businesses or taking bribes in return for safe-conduct to the border. Often, camp commandants and guards explicitly tried to replicate the conditions of the German camps in which they themselves had been held. Not even in the German camps, however, had sexual exploitation and sexual violence, rape, and the sadistic sexual abuse of female inmates been committed on the scale that Douglas documents for Czech and Polish camps. British and other Allied journalists and officials who tried to publicize this dire situation had no impact on politicians anxious not to be seen to be soft on the Germans. Czech and Polish crowds demonstrated publicly in support of detention. Only a handful of the camp commandants and guards were ever brought to justice.
In no country was there any serious resistance to any of this on the part of the Germans, most of whom were old people, women, and children, the vast majority of the men having been killed or taken prisoner in the war. By midsummer, more than 5,000 Germans were arriving every day in Berlin from Czechoslovakia on trains filled with the dead and dying, the sick and starving. More than half a million arrived in July alone. More came by road, thrown out of their homes and robbed of their possessions under blows, curses, and the threat of death. These expulsions and the accompanying chaos and violence caused widespread shock and disgust among Western observers in Berlin, and helped to persuade the Allies at the Potsdam Conference to sanction further expulsions only on the condition that they were “orderly and humane.”
On November 20, 1945, it was agreed that the Soviet zone of occupation of Germany would take 2,750,000 Germans from Poland and Czechoslovakia, the American zone 2,250,000 from Czechoslovakia and Hungary, the British zone 1,500,000 from Poland, and the French one 150,000 Sudeten Germans, and that the expulsions would be done gradually, in stages, to be completed in July, 1946. This agreement undermined the position of State Department officials who wanted the American government to condemn the expulsions. In 1945-46 Washington still gave priority to punishing the Germans for the crimes of Nazism. Still, the agreement promised to mark a transition from the “wild expulsions” of 1944-45 to a phase where they would be carried out in a more centralized, more controlled, and therefore more rational manner.
Yet the “organized expulsions” of 1946-47, as Douglas notes, “defied the efforts of the countries involved to impost any kind of order on the process.” Deporting millions of people in the space of a few months and with minimal resources devoted to the operation was a recipe for chaos. The Allied Combined Repatriation Executive achieved a great deal despite these hindrances, laying down rules and regulations to ensure safe passage, stop the spread of epidemic disease, and arrange proper reception facilities. But the expelling countries were in a rush to rid themselves of unwanted minorities before the Allies called a halt to the deportations, so these conditions were frequently disregarded. The expulsions degenerated into a shambles, with huge numbers of sick, malnourished, and debilitated elderly expellees arriving poorly clad and without food or supplies, and trains disgorging corpses or people so ill they had to be taken straight to hospital, to the disgust of many of the receiving Allied officials.
Often the deportees’ baggage had been impounded or stolen at the point of embarkation. Corruption was rife, with confiscated equipment being sold to the next trainload of deportees, and bribes to Polish officials getting deportees transported in better conditions, granted exemption from luggage restrictions, or moved to a place at the head of the queue. “Antifascists” were deported along with the supposedly dangerous majority, and Zionist groups took the opportunity to supply money and fake documents in order to get Jews classified as Germans and removed from Poland to Germany on their way to Palestine. Fit young males were frequently kept behind for labor service. But these were a small minority, and the sheer scale of the deportations overwhelmed the receiving authorities, not least as Hungary, though treated as a former enemy state, jumped on the expulsionist bandwagon, too.
By 1947, American officials were complaining about the chaos and warning that it was time to stop regarding “occupied Germany as a waste-paper basket with a limitless capacity for the unwanted waste of the world.” Germany had its own massive problems of reconstruction, with towns and cities devastated by Allied bombing during the war, inadequate supplies of food and fuel, rampant inflation under the influence of a flourishing black market, and widespread malnutrition and high rates of disease and mortality amongst the German population, especially during the hard winter of 1946-47. Millions of expellees were severely exacerbating these problems and diverting scarce resources from their solution at a time when the Western Allies were beginning to worry about the appeal of Communism to the beleaguered Germans and starting to think that it was more important to rebuild Germany’s economy and society rather than to continue to punish its people for the crimes of Nazism.
Many Allied officials were outraged at the terrible conditions the deportees had to endure in the camps and on the transit trains. And with the rapid deepening of anti-Communist sentiments in the United States as the Cold War took hold on policy and opinion and East-Central Europe fell under Stalinist dictatorships imposed by the Soviet Union, the expellees came to be defined, as the head of the US Displaced Persons Commission declared, not as potential “fifth columnists” but as “oppressed victims of a Godless dictatorship.”
The expulsions left a gaping hole in the societies from which so many millions had been so hurriedly removed. Farmland was left abandoned, houses unoccupied, and there were even (as the London Times correspondent reported on a tour of the Sudetenland in the summer of 1947) “whole villages without an inhabitant.” In one Czech district, twenty-two villages out of a total of twenty-nine were allowed to fall derelict, and in many areas farmland was converted to forest. The deserted areas descended into looting, banditry, violence, and crime. The Czech and Polish governments lost control of the redistribution of confiscated German properties, and government ministers often took over German villas for their own private occupation. Often the same people became rich, as the Economist magazine noted in July 1946, “by looting the property first of murdered Jews and then of expelled Germans.” Red Army troops looted and plundered as well, and gunfights were reported between units squabbling over abandoned German property. As settlers gradually came in, the inducements they were offered by their governments proved insufficient, and the evacuated areas became bywords for agricultural poverty and industrial decay.
Astonishingly, however, the millions of ethnic German expellees, far from becoming a disruptive element in postwar West German society, integrated seamlessly into it within a few years. Of course the vast majority were angry and resentful and desperate to return to their former homes, and the pressure-group they founded, the Bund der Heimatvertriebenen und Entrechteten (literally the League of People Driven from their Homes and Deprived of their Rights) soon began to exert an influence in West German politics. But West German Chancellor Konrad Adenauer cleverly took the wind from its sails by raising a new tax, the so-called Lastenausgleich, to compensate the expellees for their losses, setting up a special ministry to deal with them, and giving them eligibility for social insurance.
In foreign policy Adenauer vociferously demanded the return of the territories annexed by Germany’s eastern neighbors and insisted on the expellees’ right of return. He realized that these demands were unrealistic, but he persisted with them because he knew they won him the expellees’ political support. Massive propaganda underlining their sufferings helped create a feeling of sympathy among West Germans and aided integration. Above all, however, the so-called “economic miracle” in West Germany gave them, in little more than a decade, a much better material life than they had ever enjoyed before. Initially housed in camps, including former Nazi concentration camps, they were given help by the churches (whose role is underestimated by Douglas) and by the state, and benefited from the massive program of homebuilding. By the early 1960s their unemployment rate had fallen to little more than the average in West Germany as a whole.
Yet the expulsions left a legacy of bitterness and resentment that endures to the present day. Douglas rightly dismisses claims that they were carried out humanely, or that they were justified because the expellees were themselves guilty of atrocities against the occupied populations of Eastern Europe under Nazism, or that they were inevitable consequences of mass popular hatred against Germans triggered by the brutality of Nazi rule. On the contrary, they were the product of political machinations and government policies that could have been prevented or reversed. Carefully avoiding the use of the voluminous and self-evidently biased materials produced by expellee organizations and indeed by the Adenauer government, he uses Polish, Czech, and Allied sources to drive home his argument with conviction. “Expulsions,” he concludes, ‘”are not practicable unless they are carried out quickly; and if they are carried out quickly, they cannot be carried out humanely.”
Recent proposals for the creation of “ethnically homogeneous” populations in Bosnia, Serbia, and Croatia for example are recipes, says Douglas, for a repeat of the disaster that befell Central Europe at the end of World War II. And though he does not say so, a lesson of this book is surely that the principle of national self-determination proclaimed at Versailles in 1919 led to untold suffering in Europe during the following thirty years—suffering that underlines the need for all states and societies to be tolerant of ethnic, religious and other minorities rather than trying to expel, convert or suppress them. This important, powerful, and moving book should be on the desk of every international policymaker as well as every historian of twentieth-century Europe. Characterized by assured scholarship, cool objectivity, and convincing detail, it is also a passionate plea for tolerance and fairness in a multicultural world.
Richard Evans is Regius Professor of History and President of Wolfson College at Cambridge University and author of The Third Reich at War, published by the Penguin Press in 2009.
Prolonging the War For the Oder-Neisse Line Destruction of Prussia
Managed for the Counter Reformation
It is the end of 1942.
The U.S.S.R. military forces have turned the war's tide, with the start of their counter-offensive November 19, 1942, driving out the Third Reich invasion forces that entered the U.S.S.R. since June, 1941- tremendously brutalizing the local populations and landscape. Such was in contrast to the 1915-1918 occupation by the Second Reich, causing many Jewish peoples to disbelieve the stories of Third Reich atrocities and hence staying to be slaughtered.
Jesuit Superior General Wlodimir Ledochowski is dead, reportedly due to gastrointestinal complications, December 13, 1942- circumstances suggestive of him being poisoned by those displeased upon figuring out that he had set up Deutschland not for victory, but rather defeat.
Wlodimir Ledochowski had been the Jesuit Superior General since February 11, 1915, succeeding a German, Franz Wernz, who died the same night with Pope Pius X- circumstances suggestive of a pair of political assassinations of those who had agreed to an agenda of war, though not to that portion of the agenda they had been told about- with their being a hidden agenda they may not have supported: a timeline suggestive of something started with their approval, in a need of being steered for the sake of a further secreted agenda.
Were the statistically unlikely – one day apart -- deaths of Ledochowski's predecessor Franz Wern (August 19), and Pope Pius X (August 20) marks of an intra Vatican coup representing similar but different agendas?
Franz Wern, 25th Jesuit Superior General,
German
died August 19, 1914
Giuseppe MelchiorreSarto (Pope Pius X),
Italian, part Polish,
died August 20, 1914
Wlodimir Ledochowski, 26th Jesuit Superior General,
Polish father, Swiss mother
February 11, 1915
died December 13, 1942
GiacomodellaChiesa (Pope Benedict XV)
September 3, 1914 - January 22, 1922
Franz Wernz born died August 19, 1914.
Pope Pius X dies early morning August 20, 1914.
War broke out July 28, 1914- exactly one month its spark: the assassination of the Habsburg Archduke and his monastically (*without right of heir ship for their offspring, as she was deemed insufficiently noble) married wife Sophie in the city of Sarajevo, on June 28, 1914 by Serbian terrorists, during a royal visit to this province annexed by Austria Hungary in 1878. Serbia had opposed Austria Hungary’s annexation of Bosnia-Herzgovina, ethnically Serbo-Croatian, with three main religious faiths: Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and Muslim, and effectively on the fault line between Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Europe, occurring in the wake of the 1054 Great Schism, where Western and Eastern Catholicism split.
30 Years and 10 months later, the NSDAP 3rd Reich has been conquered, with the populations of the predominantly Protestant Lutheran areas of eastern Germany now re-defined as western Polish 're-covered territories' - referring to such lands as Silesia being part of the original Poland founded in 966, becoming Germanised sufficiently by the 1330s to be lost to Piast Poland, though afterwards being essentially German with many of part Polish ancestry, even if they did not realize it - under the end of WW2 agreements to shift Poland's borders west: an action with significant retreat regarding Protestant and Roman Catholic European demographics.
The sequence of events needed to bring about this drastic western shift of Poland required both the design of the war to maximize destruction and thus a desire for revenge, and prolonging the war sufficiently to bring the military forces of the USSR deep into Central Europe: an agenda requiring control over the war's opposing sides- guided by strategicians working for hidden agendas.
The one who doubts that World War II was “managed” by an unseen hand, must deal with the following facts that have baffled historians for years. The blunders or failures by those in power, always benefiting the purpose of the Vatican's Jesuits, are not by accident. A friend and graduate from Princeton has written the following for you, dear truth-seeker.
“In books on Europe during World War II you can find many maps. But the one that would tell you the most about what happened, and in my judgment why it happened, exists in no book I have seen. That is a religious map of Europe before and after World Wars I & II. Now in viewing such a map, for all you hear about the holocaust of millions of Jews, you would immediately see a greater religious consequence of the wars: The complete suppression of the Orthodox peoples under the Inquisition of the Atheistic ideology of Communism along with that bulwark of Lutheran Protestantism — Prussia and East Germany.
Many decisions against peace and victory were made on both sides. The religious results indicated in such a map were predetermined, evidenced by the course of the war. ....
Churchill talked about “the soft underbelly” of Europe but instead directed the Allies up what amounts to “a porcupine ridge” in Italy. A rapid invasion could have been made through Montenegro and Serbia, which, being the only active guerilla war in Europe, was already holding down fifteen to twenty German Divisions, and was without the general uprising, which would have occurred immediately upon an Allied assault. This, however, would have brought the war to a close in early 1944, and would have put Eastern Europe in the hands of the West, neither of which was intended. Instead, Italy was invaded in about the hardest and most ignorant way. If victory had been the object, the Generals would have gone for the capital, Rome, landing amphibiously on any number of close shore points and driving straight to the city, taking the enemies’ natural base and mopping him up from there. Circling Sicily to take its capital, then letting the German army escape by boat unimpeded to the main peninsula [as Meade allowed Lee to escape from Gettysburg unimpeded] was only the beginning of the follies – ‘the blunders’ – tragic to so many allied soldiers and their families (including Shriner Freemason Bob Dole). For much of the next year, the Allies fought against stiff resistance up the spine of the mountains, an excuse being made that they lacked boats to make the strategically obvious landing near Rome. But that such was just an excuse is made plain by the way in which the one major amphibious landing in Italy at Anzio was conducted. They landed, and waited on the beach for forty-eight hours for the Germans, caught by surprise, to arrive. Reconnaissance jeeps went out, reaching the outskirts of Rome and the invasion force could have followed; but instead, the force stayed put so they could have several months of World War I style trench warfare which resulted in the deliberate sacrifice of all but six of Darby’s seven hundred U.S. Rangers, betrayed by their High Command.
The policies of Roosevelt and Churchill [Churchill, like Hitler, also advocated the 19th Century Jesuit doctrine of an “International Jewish Conspiracy”] – who throughout the war maintained an active personal correspondence with Mussolini (the man who restored the Temporal Power to the Jesuits’ “infallible” Pope) – were carried out to perfection, and the taking of Rome with its Vatican, the second capital of the Axis, was delayed until June 5, 1944, one day before ‘D-Day’. So rather than the Roman Catholic hierarchy being embarrassed for its support of the Axis, its shame was quickly driven off the front pages by the Normandy Invasion, the Allies having ‘failed’ to timely capture Rome.
July 1944 to April 1945
The Division of Europe, placing Lutheran Protestant Prussia and East Germany under the Inquisition of Atheistic Communism.
At least three major ‘blunders’ had to take place to keep the American-English Allies from taking Berlin and Eastern Germany. First, there was the failure to destroy the critical core of the German army in the West by the basic maneuver of an encircling action, the closing of ‘the Falaise Pocket’ in France allowing two hundred thousand Germans to escape while ensuring the blood-bath called ‘The Battle of the Bulge’. Secondly, there was the complete intelligence ‘breakdown’ on the side of the Allies that ‘failed’ to recognize that the beefed up and returned German Army was about to attempt the breakthrough known as ‘the Battle of the Bulge’. Thirdly, there was the prevention of General Patton’s Army from blitzkrieging into Berlin and East Germany (where the German people were ready to welcome Americans and surrender to them, as this was the hope of the German Army in the East, fighting fiercely against Stalin’s Red Army.) This deliberate forbidding of Patton to take Berlin (which would have resulted in surrender) combined with the all-out suicide assault by the Soviet Armies to take the Nazi capital (raping, pillaging and plundering all along the way), resulted in the slaughter of 600,000 more Russian soldiers than a sensibly conducted campaign would have killed, according to recent estimates by Russian intelligence sources.” {} 61[Emphasis added]
All these “failures” and “blunders,” causing all this heartbreak and unnecessary death, were deliberately committed in fulfilling the Jesuits’ Council of Trent – the heart of the Counter-Reformation – in mass-murdering the “heretics” of East Germany, Prussia and Russia — the Lutheran and Orthodox peoples. The remainder were subjugated or exiled to the concentration camps of Siberia, overseen by Jesuits like the American Walter Ciszek, being under the iron heel of the Jesuits’ Roman Catholic, Communist Grand Inquisitor – the savage – Joseph Stalin.
Indeed, from 1914 to 1945, the Jesuits, pursuant to their Oath, killed nearly eighty million people through war, starvation and disease. Using their Masonic dictators, they waged relentless war on the Jews of Europe, Spanish Protestants, Catholic liberals, German Lutherans, Serbian and Russian Orthodox, Baltic Lutherans – in short – on all Protestant, Jewish and Orthodox “heretics and liberals” regardless of how many liberal Roman Catholic priests and people perished.
Key to this counter reformation agenda requirement for continuing WW2 sufficiently for the USSR to advance deep into central Europe, were the polices of the Masonic U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt., and his underlings, such as General Eisenhower.
Particularly crucial were the FDR Administration policies towards proposals from factions within Germany, particularly from the predominantly Protestant east, to depose Hitler and end the war.
From Keith Halderman:
Consequences of Hate
In his post below David Beito quotes Franklin Roosevelt as saying "We have got to be tough with Germany and I mean the German people not just the Nazis. We either have to castrate the German people or you have to treat them in such a manner so they can't go on reproducing." This quotation has elicited two comments of defense from Craig J. Bolton. In the first he recalls “only two recorded incidents of opposition by the German people” and he ends the second one with the adage; “Ideas have consequences. Bad ideas have bad consequences.” I agree with this line and the notion expressed in the above Roosevelt comment was a bad idea with bad consequences for both Germans and Americans. I am now in the process of reading The New Dealers’ War: FDR and the War Within World War II by Thomas J. Fleming. This book is doing something I would have thought impossible, it is lowering my opinion of FDR even further.
While Craig Bolton may or may not be correct about there being only two overt incidents of opposition to the Nazis there certainly was a great deal of high level covert support for internal regime change including a very famous assassination attempt in East Prussia. According to Fleming Admiral Wilheim Canaris head of the German Military intelligence organization, the Abwehr, met secretly in Spain, during the summer of 1943, with the heads of American and British intelligence. They hammered out a peace plan which included a cease fire and the elimination of Hitler. Roosevelt rejected this offer refusing to negotiate with “these East German Junkers” and all other overtures from Germans yearning for the Nazis’ downfall.
In fact, when Roosevelt unexpectedly announced, against the opposition of Churchill and his own military commanders, that unconditional surrender was the only acceptable end to the war, he created a great obstacle for those Germans who wished Hitler gone and the carnage over. The policy proved to be a big unifier of the Hitler’s people. We can never know if some Allied encouragement and a different set of demands might have been enough for the success of Admiral Canaris and like minded Germans in their goal of ending the war sooner. However it is not unreasonable to say that FDR’s hatred and determination to punish may very well have cost tens of thousands of Americans their lives.
And from an email from Oliver:
In the spring of 1943, Admiral Wilhelm Canaris, head of the German Secret Service, met with George Earle, the American Naval Attache in Istanbul, Turkey. Admiral Canaris came to discuss the surrender of the German armed forces. He reported that he had joined with other German leaders in an assassination plot to remove Hitler from power. After this was accomplished, they would take over the German government, and surrender to the Allies, with only one condition:
There must be no Soviet advance into Central Europe.
Mr. Earle sent President Roosevelt a note informing him of Canaris'proposal.
He received no reply.
Earle tried again, and this time he received what has been termed a "brush-off" from President Roosevelt.
So Earle flew to Washington. Roosevelt told him that his concerns were overly anxious, that Germany would soon surrender after the planned attack commenced through Western Europe.
Earle was very disappointed, and returned to Istanbul. He advised Canaris of what he had learned, and he returned to Germany, where he and the other plotters against Hitler's life were found out and either hung or shot for their efforts to shorten the war and prevent the expansion of the Russians into Eastern Europe.4
If Roosevelt had accepted Canaris' offer: "... the war might have ended in 1943. Countless lives would in all probability have been saved, and, of greatest importance, the Allies wouldn't have supplanted one dangerous ideology with another. The Soviet hordes would have been stopped at the Polish border. The entire map of Europe would have been different."5
Earle returned to the United States. He wrote "I decided to make known some of my views and observations about the so-called allies, the Soviets, so as to wake up the American people about what was really going on. I contacted the President about it, but he reacted strongly and specifically forbade me to make my views known to the public. Then upon my requesting active duty in the Navy, I was ordered to Samoa, in the far-distant South pacific"6
In fact, Earle was warned by Roosevelt's daughter in a letter to him "... that if he carried out his outlined program of publicly criticizing and commenting on some of the Soviet moves, he could be adjudged guilty of treason."7
It is indeed unfortunate that the Roosevelts took this position on the "Soviet moves," the movement of Russian troops into the Eastern European countries as the war was ending, as evidenced by President Roosevelt's inaction in the Canaris case, and the letter of his daughter in the Earle case, because the citizens in these countries did not want the Russians to occupy their nations. This fact was made brutally apparent as millions of these patriots actually joined with the German armed forces in an attempt to keep the Russians from advancing into their respective countries.
So Roosevelt could have truly assisted these patriots in keeping their countries free of Communism by assisting the Canaris group, and Earle could have been of immense assistance in bringing these matters to the attention of the American people.
But it was not to be, and the Eastern European countries were occupied by the Russian Communists much to the chagrin of millions of patriots. Roosevelt continued his support of the Russian government as the war ended by guaranteeing their occupation of these nations by the agreements made at the wartime conferences with the major leaders of the Allied governments.
Ralph Epperson, The Unseen Hand, p.286-287
So it looks like there were two attempts to negotiate a surrender?
On the following pages more betrayals are described, like the unnecessary concessions made to Stalin by Roosevelt and Churchill at Yalta, and the betrayal of (orthodox) Russian soldiers (among them General Vlasov and his soldiers) and civilians in a forced repatriation during „Operation Keelhaul” approved by Roosevelt and Eisenhower.
I read somewhere that Admiral Canaris and General Rommel, both high-ranking victims of the Nazi regime, were both Protestants.
Best regards, Oliver
Erwin Johannes Eugen Rommel
b. November 15, 1891 – d. October 14, 1944
Rommel is considered to have been a chivalrous and humane military officer, in contrast with many other figures of Nazi Germany. His famous Afrikakorps was not accused of any war crimes. Indeed, soldiers captured during his Africa campaign were reported to have been largely treated humanely. Furthermore, orders to kill captured Jewish soldiers and civilians out of hand in all theaters of his command were defiantly ignored.
George Howard Earle III
b. December 5, 1890 - d. December 30, 1974
Wilhelm Franz Canaris
b. d. January 1, 1887 - d. April 9, 1945
Canaris was murdered by the NSDAP regime in 1945 weeks before its collapse.
Accepting the proposal would have saved millions of lives, owing to the fact that much of the war's deaths occurred afterwards (1943-1945).
Were they so concerned about deaths?
Bombing the rail-lines feeding the death camps such as Auschwitz would have saved many lives.
So would have not bombing the primarily residential city core centers, such as the mass bombings of Konigsburg and Dresden.
FDR’s apologists would say that they could not bomb the Auschwitz railways because that would ‘delay’ the war’s end- never-mind then way take the longest way to invade Italy.
U.S. General George Patton who questioned the conduct of military policy in extending the war long enough to bring the USSR deep into Central Europe, was effectively assassinated.
Erwin Johannes Eugen Rommel
b. November 15, 1891 – d. October 14, 1944
Rommel is considered to have been a chivalrous and humane military officer, in contrast with many other figures of Nazi Germany.His famous Afrikakorps was not accused of any war crimes.Indeed, soldiers captured during his Africa campaign were reported to have been largely treated humanely.Furthermore, orders to kill captured Jewish soldiers and civilians out of hand in all theaters of his command were defiantly ignored.
George Earle
Canaris
Canaris was murdered by the NSDAP regime in 1945 weeks before its collapse.
Accepting the proposal would have saved millions of lives, owing to the fact that much of the war's deaths occurred afterwards (1943-1945).
Resulting in the Oder-Neisse Line-Destruction of Prussia- Mass Expulsion of primarily Protestant Eastern Germans-Prussians
Yet ending WW2 in 1943 or 1944 would have denied an important “aim” of the "Counter Reformation" as the Oder-Neisse Line/Destruction of Prussia
Polish Cardinal Stefan Wyszinski (b. August 3, 1901 d. May 28, 1981) Appointed as Cardinal January 12, 1953
Maximilian Kolbe had expressed this Oder-Neisse - counter reformation aim before 'our war' of the 'cleansing' of Poland and Europe of 'God' and Mother of War
At this period, Brother Luke speaks of Kolbe saying Mass so “full of grace” that he appeared illuminated by an unearthly radiance” or, as Brother Cyprian Grodizki puts it more prosaically, “he underwent some sort of transformation when celebrating the holy sacrifice.”
Whatever constant joy and transformations imply about Kolbe’s interior life, they did not dull his perceptions. Father Cornel, who had been elected Superior at Poznan, recalls a visit to Niepokalanow:
Father Maximilian had a map of Europe in his cell and was marking the places with little flags where he sent the monastery publications. Pausing for a moment, he said to me, “There will be a war. The boundary between Poland and Germany will be here.” And he sketched the exact location of the boundary as it is today.”
The Yalta agreement included the westward shift of Poland, mandating Poland and Germany’s new eastern borders respectively with the Curzon Line, and the Oder-Neisse Line, and authorizing the transfer of the populations from east to west.
The westward shift of Poland made Poland smaller, giving up 110, 000 square miles in the east, while gaining 44,000 square miles to the west and north, for a net loss of 66,000 square miles, though giving it a significantly more substantial coastline.
With the pre-war Polish eastern territories being more ethnically mixed, though with a Roman Catholic majority, such remained so as the majority Roman Catholic western Bylerussia and Ukraine.
With the pre-war German eastern territories being generally entirely German –with admixtures of Polish DNA – and overwhelmingly Protestant, with the exception of portions of Upper Silesia and the Warmia area within East Prussia, the expulsion of the populations and their replacement with the Polish peoples from further east, the Oder-Neisse line represented a major reconquestion of Protestant territories by Roman Catholicism.
Strangely or not, in a complex scheme of events, the Polish Catholic church under Polish Primate Cardinal August Hlond aided the Soviet Russian communists at the time of takeover of German land and expulsion of German citizens from Prussia east of the Oder-Neisse River line replacing them with forced out people from Ukraine and Belarus, etc. When the city was given to Poland after '45 any remaining German protestants had to convert to Catholicism, change their names to Polish names and take on Polish identities or be expelled.
Notably, the area of Upper Silesia, which includes Opole, which was majority Roman Catholic before the war, is where the largest numbers of ethnic Germans remain within pre WW2 eastern Germany.
The Oder Neisse line would not be the entire aim, which also included the subjugation of the more predominantly Protestant areas of east-central Germany, including the westerly portions of the pre-WW2 state of Prussia, such as Brandenburg, under the USSR client state entity of East Germany.Indeed, the 1944 Yalta Agreement between the USA, UK and USSR, would assign the USSR military an occupation of German territory extending even further west then their battle-advance.
Yalta division of Germany, Prussia erased, Austria treated as innocent
This Jesuit direction of U.S. war policy had its subordinate figures, notably General Dwight D. Eisenhower and Edmund A. Walsh, S.J. founder and head of the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service, along with its opponents within the US military, most notably US General Patton:
Rarely a day goes by when a new book or news article doesn’t bring to light more Jesuit intrigue in the political, social, religious and financial worlds.
The only problem is the Jesuits are never mentioned, conveniently left out so these “masters of deception” can live to kill another day.
Such is the case with the latest book written about the assassination of Gen. George S. Patton by military historian Robert Wilcox.
In his book, Wilcox claims Patton was assassinated, not killed in a European car crash, because Patton was going to blow the whistleon Allied Commander Dwight D. Eisenhower for unnecessarily prolonging the war and conspiring with the Russians and Germans, costing many American lives.
Wilcox goes on to connect high-level American officials to the Patton assassination, including “Wild Bill” Donovan, head of the Office Of Strategic Services (OSS) which was the forerunner to the CIA.
However, he doesn’t go far enough up the New World Order ladder to find out the real bosses who ordered the trigger be pulled on Patton. If Wilcox did his homework, the murder trail he was following would have led directly to the doorstep of GeorgetownUniversity Jesuit Edmund Walsh, first head of the School of Foreign Service.
Although hidden from all history books, Walsh was the power behind putting Franklin Roosevelt into power as well as handpicking Eisenhower to become Allied Commander even though many other qualified officers were passed over.
Jesuit Walsh was the kingpin never mentioned by Wilcox even though, if the truth be known, he was the power behind Donovan, Roosevelt, Eisenhower and many others orcehestrating both sides of World War II just like every other war in American history.
If Walsh, the Jesuits and the Vatican were added to the list of perpetrators in the Patton assassination the record would be complete. However, when reading the following Telegraph newspaper review of Wilcox’s book, just read between the lines and add Walsh and Jesuits while reading:
“The newly unearthed diaries of a colourful assassin for the wartime Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the forerunner of the CIA, reveal that American spy chiefs wanted Patton dead because he was threatening to expose allied collusion with the Russians that cost American lives.
“The death of General Patton in December 1945, is one of the enduring mysteries of the war era. Although he had suffered serious injuries in a car crash in Manheim, he was thought to be recovering and was on the verge of flying home.
“But after a decade-long investigation, military historian Robert Wilcox claims that OSS head General “Wild Bill” Donovan ordered a highly decorated marksman called Douglas Bazata to silence Patton, who gloried in the nickname “Old Blood and Guts”.
“His book, “Target Patton”, contains interviews with Mr Bazata, who died in 1999, and extracts from his diaries, detailing how he staged the car crash by getting a troop truck to plough into Patton’s Cadillac and then shot the general with a low-velocity projectile, which broke his neck while his fellow passengers escaped without a scratch.
“Mr Bazata also suggested that when Patton began to recover from his injuries, US officials turned a blind eye as agents of the NKVD, the forerunner of the KGB, poisoned the general.
“”Mr Wilcox told The Sunday Telegraph that when he spoke to Mr Bazata: “He was struggling with himself, all these killings he had done. He confessed to me that he had caused the accident, that he was ordered to do so by Wild Bill Donovan.
“Donovan told him: ‘We’ve got a terrible situation with this great patriot, he’s out of control and we must save him from himself and from ruining everything the allies have done.’ I believe Douglas Bazata. He’s a sterling guy.”
“Mr Bazata led an extraordinary life. He was a member of the Jedburghs, the elite unit who parachuted into France to help organize the Resistance in the run up to D-Day in 1944. He earned four purple hearts, a Distinguished Service Cross and the French Croix de Guerre three times over for his efforts.
“After the war he became a celebrated artist who enjoyed the patronage of Princess Grace of Monaco and the Duke and Duchess of Windsor.
“He was friends with Salvador Dali, who painted a portrait of Bazata as Don Quixote.
“”He ended his career as an aide to President Ronald Reagan’s Navy Secretary John Lehman, a member of the 9/11 Commission and adviser to John McCain’s presidential campaign.
Mr Wilcox also tracked down and interviewed Stephen Skubik, an officer in the Counter-Intelligence Corps of the US Army, who said he learnt that Patton was on Stalin’s death list. Skubik repeatedly alerted Donovan, who simply had him sent back to the US.
“You have two strong witnesses here,” Mr Wilcox said. “The evidence is that the Russians finished the job.”
“The scenario sounds far fetched but Mr Wilcox has assembled a compelling case that US officials had something to hide. At least five documents relating to the car accident have been removed from US archives.
“The driver of the truck was whisked away to London before he could be questioned and no autopsy was performed on Patton’s body.
“With the help of a Cadillac expert from Detroit, Mr Wilcox has proved that the car on display in the Patton museum at FortKnox is not the one Patton was driving.
“That is a cover-up,” Mr Wilcox said.
“George Patton, a dynamic controversalist who wore pearl handled revolvers on each hip and was the subject of an Oscar winning film starring George C. Scott, commanded the US 3rd Army, which cut a swathe through France after D-Day.
“But his ambition to get to Berlin before Soviet forces was thwarted by supreme allied commander Dwight D. Eisenhower, who gave Patton’s petrol supplies to the more cautious British General Bernard Montgomery.
“Patton, who distrusted the Russians, believed Eisenhower wrongly prevented him closing the so-called Falaise Gap in the autumn of 1944, allowing hundreds of thousands of German troops to escape to fight again,. This led to the deaths of thousands of Americans during their winter counter-offensive that became known as the Battle of the Bulge.
“In order to placate Stalin, the 3rd Army was also ordered to a halt as it reached the German border and was prevented from seizing either Berlin or Prague, moves that could have prevented Soviet domination of Eastern Europe after the war.
“Mr Wilcox told The Sunday Telegraph:
“Patton was going to resign from the Army. He wanted to go to war with the Russians. The administration thought he was nuts.
“He also knew secrets of the war which would have ruined careers.
“I don’t think Dwight Eisenhower would ever have been elected president if Patton had lived to say the things he wanted to say.” Mr Wilcox added: “I think there’s enough evidence here that if I were to go to a grand jury I could probably get an indictment, but perhaps not a conviction.”
“CharlesProvince, President of the George S. Patton Historical Society, said he hopes the book will lead to definitive proof of the plot being uncovered. He said: “There were a lot of people who were pretty damn glad that Patton died. He was going to really open the door on a lot of things that they screwed up over there.”
Here is a short bio of Walsh and it should be noted he was present at the Nuremburg trials with his job being to cover up any Vatican connection to the orcehstration of World War II and their connection to backing the Nazi Party and handpicking Hitler for the job.
He directed the Papal Famine Relief Mission to Russia in 1922, worked on behalf of the Vatican to resolve long-standing issues between Church and State in Mexico in 1929, negotiated with the Iraqi government to establish an American College in Baghdad in 1931, and served as Consultant to the U.S. Chief of Counsel at the Nuremberg Trials.
Notably during the last task, he interrogated the German geopolitician General Karl Haushofer after World War II to determine whether or not he should stand trial at Nuremberg for war crimes, eventually finding that Gen. Haushofer ought not stand trial.
His career then stagnated for five years until in 1929 he was appointed Executive Assistant to General George Moseley, then Secretary of War. In 1933, he was then appointed chief military aide to General Douglas MacArthur and accompanied him to the Philippines.
It was through MacArthur that Eisenhower first came to the attention of the all-powerful American Jesuit Fr. Edmund A. Walsh. MacArthur was educated by the Jesuits and Walsh was his influential patron. Eisenhower quickly became an even more deeply devoted fan of Fr. Walsh and his geopolitical mind than his superior General MacArthur. At the outbreak of World War II in 1939, Eisenhower returned from the Philippines at 49 but a Lt. Colonel.
By June 1941, six months before the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbour, Col. Eisenhower was appointed to the War Department General Staff in WashingtonD.C. and to a role holding the temporary rank of Brigadier General. Whatever his role in the events leading up to PearlHarbour, he soon held favour with President Franklin D. Roosevelt, another staunch supporter of Fr. Edmund A. Walsh S.J.
In December 1943, President Roosevelt announced Eisenhower, still then only officially holding the rank of Colonel would be the Supreme Allied Commander in Europe, being promoted immediately to being a four star Major General - one of the most dramatic rise in promotions in American history. The announcement sent shockwaves through the US and even the Allied forces as Eisenhower was promoted over the heads of over fifty seasoned military leaders, including his former friend and mentor Douglas MacArthur - all of whom had far greater skill and merit.
Upon his arrival in England in 1943, a controversial claim has been made that Eisenhower received a communique from senior members of the SS offering clear and specific terms of unconditional surrender of all German forces, including the assassination of Hitler, if the Americans would help halt the Soviet advance into Central Europe. Whether true or false, there is no question that Eisenhower quickly shelved the Churchill plan of a 1943 invasion while the Nazi forces were in a state of disarray and allowed the Germans a full six months to re-arm and re-equip their French forces ahead of any invasion. In 1944, Eisenhower was confirmed as a Five Star General and Chief of the Army. In spite of the massive logistical superiority of the Allied forces, the Eisenhower D-Day plan very nearly failed. Again, during the Battle of the Bulge Eisenhower inexplicably ordered the halt of the encirclement of German forces enabling up to 150,000 to escape and prolonging the war a further twelve months. No rational, military or political explanation for this order has ever been given.
The effect of Eisenhowers deliberate decisions to prolong the war cost an additional 100,000 allied personnel and effectively handed Eastern Europe to the Soviet Union. One man that did know the truth was Gen. George Smith Patton. On December 9th 1945, the day before he was due to fly back to Washington to meet with President Truman with proof that Eisenhower was a traitor who had costs the lives of thousands of American soldiers and millions of civilians, he was seriously injured in a “road accident” near Mannheim, Germany on 9 Dec 1945 (dying in hospital 21 December 1945). Miraculously the other occupants of the car in which Patton was critically injured escaped unharmed.
To counter the claims and rumour mills, Eisenhower authorised the leak of stories to damage the character of Patton including blaming Patton for the escape of the 150,000 soldiers of the German army and that Patton was mentally unstable. These false rumours still persist today. However, there can be no doubt about the direct orders of Eisenhower in Operation Keelhaul- the repatriation of over two million former Russian prisoners of war to Joseph Stalin. While the actions of Eisenhower have always been maintained as a fact of life following the Yalta Agreement between Churchill, Stalin and Roosevelt, the manner and clear fate of these poor souls was nothing short of Genocide on the same level as Adolf Hitler and the SS.
Eisenhower deliberately used the same logistical infrastructure of the Nazis used to murder millions to transport the millions of Russian prisoners of war to concentration camps until they could be handed across to the Soviets for mass execution. During this time, tens of thousands died from malnourishment, from ill treatment and sickness at the hands of Eisenhowers “special units” in charge of the operation. Many simply died in the same manner as the Jewish victims who had also been carted like sardines in the same train carriages years before. Following the end of the war Eisenhower was appointed Military Governor of the US Occupation Zone. He was instrumental in dismantling key evidence of the live human sacrifice of millions via the ovens at concentration camps.
Eisenhower also played a crucial role in eliminating as much evidence as possible concerning the direct role of the Catholic Church and the Jesuits in World War II. He was rewarded in being made a Knight of Malta by the Vatican. In 1953 Eisenhower won the Presidency of the United States in a landslide along with his young Vice President Richard Nixon. His Presidency was notable for the closeness the world came to Nuclear war. The original and official standard of the United States was changed under his presidency to “In God we Trust” a direct and deliberate heresy against the fundamental tenets of the Declaration of Independence that sought the United States to be a secular society. He died in 1969.
-------
From the school’s website:
Since 1919 the School of Public Service has devoted itself to educating the next generation of global leaders.With the unparalleled resources of Washington, D.C., the School of Foreign Service remains one of the world’s most foremost institutions for the study of international affairs.Domestically and internationally recognized academic excellence, intercultural understanding, and Jesuit ideals of service are some of the hallmarks of a School of Foreign Service education.
Founded in 1919, the School of Foreign Service was essentially a relatively early project of Wlodimir Ledochowski.
Pres. Dwight D. Eisenhower with Father Edward Bunn at Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.. unveiling bust of Rev. Edmund A. Walsh, October 1958
"Jesuits have played many a major role in Church history.
Number one Jesuit today is the amiable Father General Wlodimir Ledochowski, who is known far and wide as the 'Black Pope"
Poland was suffering under a vicious occupation by Nazi Germany during that year, so it's an ironic timing upon this sole video of Wlodimir Ledchowski yet appearing on the internet.
As these stamps slyly suggest, Germany was rising up to rule – if not actually hump – the world, reaching up towards lucifer’s light, with an overprint exactly 30 days prior to the battle where impending victory turned to defeatwith the November 19, 1942 USSR turn around at the Battle of Stalingrad, ironically located at about the standing German’s figure’s genitals.
That the deceived figuring out this betrayal, was marked by the timing of Ledochowski’s death with the battle where the war turned against Germany- Stalingrad.
The war turns on November 19, 1942 with the start of the USSR military repulse of the 3rd Reich military.
Wlodimir Ledochowski is dead 24 days later after a number of premature obituaries, with mentions of gastro intestinal complications.
From Frank O’Collins
In 1941 aged 75, Count Wladimir Ledochowski -- Jesuit Superior General --was at the height of his supremacy, a fit and completely driven man. His army of Jesuit influentials had similarly reached great heights in all places held by Catholic Dictators as well as the United States. So why would a civil war between factions of the Jesuits break out at such a time?
One of the great historical anomalies is the behaviour of both Adolf Hitler , Fr Himmler S.J. and Fr Joseph Stalin S.J. in the Nazi Russian Invasion. Contrary to spin historians, these men had not only shown ruthless pragmatism in managing power until this point, but were actively working together on a number of military and scientific fronts until the invasion.
A frequent excuse given is that fiercly Catholic Hitler had become “drunk” with power and decided to invade Russia because he hated the Russians. But Hitler was a mere soldier, compared to Fr. Himmler S.J. the new Grand Inquisitor of the Roman Catholic Church and his massive army of assassins and torturers.
Instead, it is much more certain that Jesuit Superior General Ledochowski instructed Himmler to push for the assault on the understanding this would complete a clean sweep of Catholic National Socialism over Catholic National Communism. Similarly, it is clear that Count Ledochowski said something in reverse to Fr Stalin S.J. – that this was the plan that would ultimately destroy Germany as Stalin’s behavior against his own country and people was nothing other than treacherous.
When Hitler invaded in June 1941, Fr Stalin -- against every other example of ruthless judgment to protect his own power -- seemingly invited for his troops to be slaughtered and defeated by refusing his generals to fully engage, then having the generals executed and then repeating the bizarre process almost up to Moscow.
However, by the bleak Russian winter of December 1941, the jaws of the Jesuit Soviet Machine clamped down shut on the legs of the German Army. From this point on, the fate of the Nazi dream and power were sealed. For such a loyal German Jesuit as Fr Himmler S.J. such deliberate trickery by Ledochowski would have been devastating and unforgivable. The Jesuits had shifted their power away from Germany, France and Italy to America -- for the first time in the order's history.
On December 13, 1942 (aged 76) Count Wladimir Ledochowski died suddenly --almost certainly murdered by the very best assassins of Fr. Himmler for his treachery in dooming the German-Swiss –French “Illuminati” Jesuits.
Succumbing to gastro-intestinal problems just 24 days after WW2’s turn towards Germany’s defeat, Ledochowski was so assassinated through poisoning, logically by 3rd Reich supporters.
Dr. Nicholas Murray Butler, who met Father Ledochowski in 1930, wrote later that "everyone in Rome I was told that Father Ledochowski would rank as one of the two or three greatest heads of the Jesuit Order," an estimate which would group him with such men as Ignatius Loyola, [April 19, 1541 to July 31, 1556] the first [Jesuit] general, Francisco Borgia, [July 2, 1565 to October 1, 1572] the third, and [Claudius] Aquaviva, [Feb 19, 1581 to Jan 31, 1615] the fifth.
And according to Malachi Martin:
It was during the twenty-seven year Generalate of Father Wlodzimierz Ledochowski (1915-1942) that the traditional character of the Society received the firmest stamp and clearest definition since the Generalate of Claudio Acquaviva in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. One might even say that Ledochowski insisted on fidelity to the structure of Jesuit obedience, was an almost merciless disciplinarian,and maintained a stream of instructions flowing out to the whole Society about every detail of Jesuit life and Ignatian ideals. He know exactly what Jesuits should be according to the Society’s Constitutions and traditions; and under strong hands of two quite authoritarian Popes, Pius XI and Pius XII, he reestablished the close ties that had once linked papacy and Jesuit Generalate. Ledochowski, in fact, gave renewed meaning to that old Roman nickname of the Jesuit Father General, “the Black Pope.Just as Pius XII can be described as the last of the great Roman Popes, so Ledochowski can be called the last of the great Roman Generals of the Jesuits.
That he remains such an obscure figure, ignored usually even by the Jesuits is consistent with the unpleasantless of the reality.
Considering the chain of events required to bring that [Maximillian Kolbe’s pre-war predictions about the outcome of the next war with the westward shift of the German-Polish border] about, such a prediction is eyebrow raising, for it not only requires that Germany start and loose a war, but also that Germany would be extremely brutal, hence providing the justification for the border changes.
Did Germany simply got seduced by a madman on a soapbox, with the Holocaust of the Jewish peoples simply the result of random occurrences and not decided upon until 1942 at Wannasee?
Or was the holocaust, or perhaps more correctly the holocausts – each directed at a different group: modernists, Jewish peoples, Orthodox and Protestant Eastern Germans -- were planned decades in advance by an evil, Orthelloizing genius, involved with manipulating popular opinion through shoddy sensationalistic “journalism”, such as that taking form as the sharp increase of anti-Jewish media in Europe around 1919.
Described as one of the greatest Jesuit Order Superior Generals, a success, who issued countless instructions about many things, Ledochoswski is so measured not, say, a failure for not stopping WW2, but rather for his immense success in crafting and driving the 20th century continuation of the vatican’s counter reformation: as in most successful at achieving the aims of the Jesuit Order vows- these aims being the spread of Roman Catholicism including via the murder of others and the theft of their properties, with the ends justifying the means.
"In World War II, it should be noted, Moslem leaders placed the blame the crusading war and genocide against the Serbs and the chaos in Bosnia squarely on the shoulders of the Austro-Polish 'Black Pope,' Wladimir Ledochowski, Superior General of the Jesuits, who, perhaps inspired by deranged visions of a divine Polish mission, appears to have supported Roman Catholic crusade against schismatics in eastern and southeastern Europe."
Let IT be KNOWN! That @ Adolf Eichmann's trial in Israel in 1961, Eichmann clearly stated that both he and Reinhard Heydrich were answerable to the PopeS (White Pope-Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli and the Black Popes-Jesuit General Wvladimir Ledochowski S.J. a Polish Jesuit) for the "Final Solution decree of the Vatican Third Reich of Europe using Four Roman Catholic Dictators Hitler,Pavelic,Mussolini and Franco!
On December 7th 1941 (Pearl Harbor)the Nazi Catholic Stormtrooper SS began GAS VAN OPERATIONS in Lodz and Chelmno regions of Poland, Jews were herded into Catholic Church in Chelmno until the next morning the hundreds of GAS VANS arrived escorting the Jews from the Roman Church directly into the GAS VANS once the measured drive to the remote forests the Jews were dead via carbon monoxide!! (source: "Shoah" documentary, Claude Lanzmann)
cordially, Michael Todd Lehman
Indeed, with the entties he created, such as the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service, Ledochowski created an endowing legacy.
There seemed, indeed, during those years of Ledochowski, Pope Pius XI, and Pius XII, no real limit to what both Jesuitism and overall Roman Catholicism could achieve. Even – especially, we should say – in the afterglow of Ledochowski’s long reign and into the Generalate of his successor, Belgian Jean-BaptiseJanssens, the magic power of momentum seemed to continue.
The same General Congregation, or meeting of Jesuit leaders, that elected Janssens in 1946 also formally consecrated the Society to the Immaculate Heart of Mary – a devotion that sprang up in a parallel to the central Catholic devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus. That Congregation also affirmed its adhesion to the dogma of the Assumption of the Virgin Mary, as Pope Pius XII was to define it four years later. Mary, in Catholic belief, died, but her body never underwent the corruption of the grave. Instead it was “assumed”, taken up into the transforming glory of her divine son. The womb that conceived God as man, the breast that fed him, the hands that held him, the body that labored for him should never be desecrated by the worms and the rats.
P 221 The Jesuits: The Society of Jesus and the Betrayal of the Roman Catholic Church
Indeed, something continuing, for a highly centralized cult said to be devoted to what Maximillian Kolbe appeared to describe as a ‘mother of war”, from its ‘New Rome’ in North American commonly known as Washington, D.C.
born October 7, 1866 -- 26th Jesuit Superior General 'Black Pope' - Feb. 11, 1915 - Dec. 13, 1942: 'one of the two or three greatest heads of the Jesuit Order' ... 'an almost merciless disciplinarian,and maintained a stream of instructions flowing out to the whole Society about every detail of Jesuit life and Ignatian ideals'...' Ledochowski can be called the last of the great Roman Generals of the Jesuits.'
Conclusion: 3 pillars
-
Three documents. Three pillars. One structure holding all of it up.
The first pillar is the claim that multiple-corpse cremation was physically
impossibl...
Trump reason for this disaster
-
Mossab Hasan Yousef is a son of one of the founding father of Hamas. He
became agent for Mossad, and a Christian Zionist. He calls Trump the reason
for the...
The Show Must Go On
-
I happen to have a Santa union suit, and though I don't have a long, full,
curly white beard, nor do I have white hair (yet!), and my "bowl full of
jelly"...
Kata-Kata Mutiara Ulang Tahun 2019
-
Kata-Kata Mutiara Ulang Tahun 2019 - Datangnya waktu perayaan ulang tahun
seseorang adalah suatu hal yang paling membahagiakan, di saat itulah banyak
sekal...
THE GREATEST LIE ON EARTH!
-
NASA'S SHOOTING PHALLUS / OBELISKS AT GOD'S THRONE… STILL TRYING TO REACH
IT SINCE BABYLON… HOLLYWOOD IS IT'S GREATEST HELP! TOTAL MIND CONTROL!
ED HEND...
Blog Hiatus
-
*Can anyone tell me how to download an entire blog and save it?*
Now is the time to copy and paste or save any articles you want. I have to
figure out how ...
Charles Spurgeon and the downgrade controversy
-
My friends this is the birth of modern evangelical movement with its
rejection of Biblical inerrancy, unbiblical practices, false doctrine,
loose living...
Meryl Streep: Martyr or Moron?
-
At the 74th Golden Globes, actress Meryl Streep received the Cecil B.
DeMille Award for lifetime achievement. She accepted the award with a
powerful speech...
"Disguised themselves as rebels".
-
>
Above imag
Saturday, August 30, 2014
PUTIN - PAVELIC - STEPINAC: three men - one star?
http://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.it/2014/08/putin-pavelic-st...
The American Fundament
-
Our Founders' "whig interpretation of history" answers every true American
Patriot's question.
Hannity's faction's ancient "logo" was openly affixed to th...
