Showing posts with label Eric Jon Phelps' Jesuitical Racism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Eric Jon Phelps' Jesuitical Racism. Show all posts

Sunday, July 21, 2013

Continuing Race Distraction


- about the race distraction from economic manipulation- like cocaine histories that focus upon the fears of Blacks without mentioning the USDA-AMA-APhA Tobacco Protectionism
- would we have ever heard of this case if it had not involved a Hispanic with a German name?
- and not a mention why Zimmermann had a gun rather than mace- if so Trayvon Martin would still be alive and not seriously injured

From  http://galatiansfour.blogspot.com/

Zimmerman Aquitted: The NWO's Use of Race

It is scary how much focus there has been on this case. When I looked at the case myself, I thought Zimmerman had a good case for self-defense taking race out of it. Did he err in continuing to follow Trayvon? Perhaps it would have been better to wait for the cops, but just walking after someone is not a crime.


When I saw a bloody picture of the back of Zimmerman's head, that one just seemed to be pictured on so called "conservative" websites, it seemed to be a clear cut case of self defense to me. Perhaps some of my readers will disagree with me but that is what I thought. If someone is banging your head against the cement, at that point you are just trying to stay alive. This week, I've had to bite my tongue a lot as I have noted the huge division between the "conservative" side that saw it as clear cut self defense and the liberal side, helped along with Obama's influence, who wanted Zimmerman locked up and the key thrown away. In other words, the reason this trial was made national was for another race-based show trial. 

And since this jury acquitted him, now they are talking about turning it into a federal civil-rights case.

Are you noticing that the politicians and media seem to be doing everything in their power to FAN THE FLAMES? Or am I just imagining things?

The media turned this into a black vs. white problem but how many people by the way ignored the fact that Zimmerman is part Peruvian, and even has African American ancestry? Why did race have to enter this at all?  The case should have just dealt with via the facts and well the jury would have been privy to them all.

 

Sit back and think about how they are MANIPULATING people for more hatred, more anger, more division. The NWO types want their order out of chaos, so make your own conclusion. Wickedness abounds in so many places from the black panthers who are [or can be] as racist as the KKK [by the way a Jesuit founded enterprise itself] to those who seem to desire as much hatred, resentment and anger as possible. The professional race baiters and liberals such as Al Sharpton who tell "minorities" to blame all white people are setting up just as much chaos and sin as those who are overtly racist and hate anyone for the color of their skin.

THE NWO wants division against the races, it wants to use people as pawns against each other, it is the whole DIVIDE and CONQUER FORMULA. This is what I told one commenter some time ago on this board who was falling into the NWO trap of blame on one race. [scroll down to comments at link].

The inner cities were influenced by the elite just as much as any other areas of society, and there was a reason that today's rap stars who advanced a wicked agenda 20 years ago pay open and overt homage to Satan like J-Z. We all have the prison industrial complex too, 2 million in prison and counting and now the corporations can have almost free labor from among the prisoners. 


All the racism and pseudo "race wars" via the NWO [left and right] and turning the races on each other in America is part of the Jesuit/NWO plan. Think about that when you see the latest show trial or watch the politicians and media FANNING THE FLAMES.

1 John 2:9 He that saith he is in the light, and hateth his brother, is in darkness even until now.


Monday, February 18, 2013

Dorner on Race- MSM FAILS





Expect severe distortion of the Dorner Manifesto by the MSM. You cannot simply read headlines and expect to know anything. You have to do more research than that to understand any issue. You also cannot read only the news articles of one or a few sources, especially the established or mainstream media. These routinely editorialize within so-called news accounts. They selectively choose and distort material.

A case in point is an article popping up in Google news that is here. It is written by Sharon Bernstein and it's under an NBC affiliate (4NBC Southern California). I have also already seen and read a CNN article that interspersed misleading editorial statements with quotes from the Dorner Manifesto. Bernstein's article is totally irresponsible journalism. Ms. Bernstein msinterpets Dorner as choosing victims on the basis of race and sex bias. This is completely false!! In each case where race and sex are mentioned, he focuses on their behavior and what he charges them with doing. More on that below. Her headline reads "Manifesto: Alleged Cop Revenge Shooter Named Targets, Blamed Asians, Hispanics and Lesbians."

[Yet] Dorner DOES NOT BLAME Asians, Hispanics and Lesbians per se. In each case, he blames them for specific reasons. These reasons are lousy reasons for murder, to be sure. But it is clear that he is not targeting various members of the LAPD for their race or sexual preference alone, but for their BEHAVIOR as he sees it.

I will first provide three quotes that show that he has nothing at all against the LGBT community:
"Ellen Degeneres, continue your excellent contribution to entertaining America and bringing the human factor to entertainment. You changed the perception of your gay community and how we as Americans view the LGBT community. I congratulate you on your success and opening my eyes as a young adult, and my generation to the fact that you are know different from us other than who you choose to love."
"It's time to allow gay service member's spouses to utilize the same benefits that all heterosexual dependents are eligible for. Medical, Dental, Tricare, Deers, SGLI, BX, Commissary, Milstar, MWR, etc. Flag officers, lets be honest. You can't really give a valid argument to as why gays shouldn't be eligible as every month a new state enacts laws that allow same sex marriage." "LGBT community and supporters, the same way you have the right to voice your opinion on acceptance of gay marriage, Chick Fil-A has a right to voice their beliefs as well. That's what makes America so great. Freedom of expression. Don't be assholes and boycott/degrade their business and customers who patronize the locations. They make some damn good chicken! Vandalizing (graffiti) their locations does not help any cause." 

What does he say about lesbian officers in general, as a class? Nothing. He singles out certain ones that he thinks are treating males unfairly who are under their supervision:
"Those lesbian officers in supervising positions who go to work, day in day out, with the sole intent of attempting to prove your misandrist authority (not feminism) to degrade male officers. You are a high value target." 

Dorner says that he is making certain LAPD police, characterized by race, as his targets, each because of a different reason. It is the reasons that are important to him, not the race per se.

In each case, race comes in because it is linked to a particular injustice that he perceives and dislikes. Take the case of Hispanics:
"Those Hispanic officers who victimize their own ethnicity because they are new immigrants to this country and are unaware of their civil rights. You call them wetbacks to their face and demean them in front of fellow officers of different ethnicities so that you will receive some sort of acceptance from your colleagues. I'm not impressed. Most likely, your parents or grandparents were immigrants at one time, but you have forgotten that. You are a high value target." 

Dorner sees an injustice in Hispanic police who mistreat other Hispanics in order to get ahead in the LAPD. Ms. Bernstein failed to mention that Dorner, who is black, also targets certain Black officers and certain Caucasian officers, again, not for their race per se but because of a perceived injustice. In the case of Black supervisors, he is concerned with those who demean white officers under their authority:

"Those Black officers in supervisory ranks and pay grades who stay in south bureau (even though you live in the valley or OC) for the sole intent of getting retribution toward subordinate caucasians officers for the pain and hostile work environment their elders inflicted on you as probationers (P-1's) and novice P-2’s. You are a high value target. You perpetuated the cycle of racism in the department as well. You breed a new generation of bigoted caucasian officer when you belittle them and treat them unfairly." 

In the case of white officers, he is concerned with those who are intent on victimizing minorities:
"Those Caucasian officers who join South Bureau divisions (77th,SW,SE, an Harbor) with the sole intent to victimize minorities who are uneducated, and unaware of criminal law, civil law, and civil rights. You prefer the South bureau because a use of force/deadly force is likely and the individual you use UOF on will likely not report it. You are a high value target." 
Dorner does indeed categorize his targets by race, as Ms. Bernstein's article partially reports. This is not central to his thought or action. Mistreatment of subordinates is central to his thinking, and this includes his personal case and his personal frustrations with getting the LAPD to change. Dorner's case should not be transformed by irresponsible reporting into the acts of a person motivated by racial hatreds. Neither should he be dismissed as one who is "mentally ill".

He has made himself judge, jury and executioner. That's for sure. In this respect, he echoes President Obama with his targeted killings. He even uses the same term, target. Both have their reasons for their killing. Both are wrong.

Saturday, February 2, 2013

Racist Neurotics Rule & Subvert Israel

Israel works against safety valve for Arabian assimilation into Israel- racist definitions of ALL such Arabians, and the children of mixed marriages as security threats, even before they were born- thus working to perpetuate the problem

Only idiots, fools and active traitors work to define MORE people as potential enemies- especially for those not yet born.

http://ivarfjeld.wordpress.com/2012/01/16/israel-upholds-citizenship-bar-for-palestinian-spouses/

Alas, the Ivarjeld blog supports this racist nonsense, which provides an excellent reason to withdraw foreign aid from Israel, along with its surrounding countries.

Racist-Subversive Israeli 'Judge' Asher Grunis 
needs to be barred forever from even stepping foot in Israel- so long as he carries that attitude.

My Idea of Legitimate "Zionism"

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Franklin's Narrative of the Late Massacres

Against the EJP pseudo-Protestant Jesuitical Racism

If an Indian injures me, does it follow that I may revenge that Injury on all Indians? It is well known that Indians are of different Tribes, Nations and Languages, as well as the White People. In Europe, if the French, who are White People, should injure the Dutch, are they to revenge it on the English, because they too are White People? The only Crime of these poor Wretches seems to have been, that they had a reddish brown Skin, and black Hair; and some People of that Sort, it seems, had murdered some of our Relations. If it be right to kill Men for such a Reason, then, should any Man, with a freckled Face and red Hair, kill a Wife or Child of mine, it would be right for me to revenge it, by killing all the freckled red-haired Men, Women and Children, I could afterwards any where meet with.

But it seems these People think they have a better Justification; nothing less than the Word of God. With the Scriptures in their Hands and Mouths, they can set at nought that express Command, Thou shalt do no Murder; and justify their Wickedness, by the Command given Joshua to destroy the Heathen. Horrid Perversion of Scripture and of Religion! to father the worst of Crimeson the God of Peace and Love! -- Even the Jews, to whom that particular Commission was directed, spared the Gibeonites, on Account of their Faith once given. The Faith of this Government has been frequently given to those Indians; -- but that did not avail them with People who despise Government.



http://www.historycarper.com/resources/twobf3/massacre.htm

A Narrative of the Late Massacres,
in Lancaster County, of a Number of Indians, Friends of this Province, by Persons Unknown
With Some Observations on the Same

These Indians were the Remains of a Tribe of the Six Nations, settled at Conestogoe, and thence called Conestogoe Indians. On the first Arrival of the English in Pennsylvania, Messengers from this Tribe came to welcome them, with Presents of Venison, Corn and Skins; and the whole Tribe entered into a Treaty of Friendship with the first Proprietor, WILLIAM PENN, which was to last "as long as the Sun should shine, or the Waters run in the Rivers."

This Treaty has been since frequently renewed, and the Chain brightened, as they express it, from time to time. It has never been violated, on their Part or ours, till now. As their Lands by Degrees were mostly purchased, and the Settlements of the White People began to surround them, the Proprietor assigned them Lands on the Manor of Conestogoe, which they might not part with; there they have lived many Years in Friendship with their White Neighbours, who loved them for their peaceable inoffensive Behaviour.

It has always been observed, that Indians, settled in the Neighbourhood of White People, do not increase, but diminish continually. This Tribe accordingly went on diminishing, till there remained in their Town on the Manor, but 20 Persons, viz. 7 Men, 5 Women, and 8 Children, Boys and Girls.

Of these, Shehaes was a very old Man, having assisted at the second Treaty held with them, by Mr. PENN, in 1701, and ever since continued a faithful and affectionate Friend to the English; he is said to have been an exceeding good Man, considering his Education, being naturally of a most kind benevolent Temper.

Peggy was Shehaes's Daughter; she worked for her aged Father, continuing to live with him, though married, and attended him with filial Duty and Tenderness.

John was another good old Man; his Son Harry helped to support him.

George and Will Soc were two Brothers, both young Men.

John Smith, a valuable young Man, of the Cayuga Nation, who became acquainted with Peggy, Shehaes's Daughter, some few Years since, married her, and settled in that Family. They had one Child, about three Years old.

Betty, a harmless old Woman; and her Son Peter, a likely young Lad.

Sally, whose Indian Name was Wyanjoy, a Woman much esteemed by all that knew her, for her prudent and good Behaviour in some very trying Situations of Life. She was a truly good and an amiable Woman, had no Children of her own, but a distant Relation dying, she had taken a Child of that Relation's, to bring up as her own, and performed towards it all the Duties of an affectionate Parent.

The Reader will observe, that many of their Names are English. It is common with the Indians that have an Affection for the English, to give themselves, and their Children, the Names of such English Persons as they particularly esteem.

This little Society continued the Custom they had begun, when more numerous, of addressing every new Governor, and every Descendant of the first Proprietor, welcoming him to the Province, assuring him of their Fidelity, and praying a Continuance of that Favour and Protection they had hitherto experienced. They had accordingly sent up an Address of this Kind to our present Governor, on his Arrival; but the same was scarce delivered, when the unfortunate Catastrophe happened, which we are about to relate.

On Wednesday, the 14th of December, 1763, Fifty-seven Men, from some of our Frontier Townships, who had projected the Destruction of this little Common-wealth, came, all well-mounted, and armed with Firelocks, Hangers and Hatchets, having travelled through the Country in the Night, to Conestogoe Manor. There they surrounded the small Village of Indian Huts, and just at Break of Day broke into them all at once. Only three Men, two Women, and a young Boy, were found at home, the rest being out among the neighbouring White People,some to sell the Baskets, Brooms and Bowls they manufactured, and others on other Occasions. These poor defenceless Creatures were immediately fired upon, stabbed and hatcheted to Death! The good Shehaes, among the rest, cut to Pieces in his Bed. All of them were scalped, and otherwise horribly mangled. Then their Huts were set on Fire, and most of them burnt down. When the Troop, pleased with their own Conduct and Bravery, but enraged that any of the poor Indians had escaped the Massacre, rode off, and in small Parties, by different Roads, went home.

The universal Concern of the neighbouring White People on hearing of this Event, and the Lamentations of the younger Indians, when they returned and saw the Desolation, and the butchered half-burnt Bodies of their murdered Parents, and other Relations, cannot well be expressed.

The Magistrates of Lancaster sent out to collect the remaining Indians, brought them into the Town for their better Security against any farther Attempt; and it is said condoled with them on the Misfortune that had happened, took them by the Hand, comforted and promised them Protection. -- They were all put into the Workhouse, a strong Building, as the Place of greatest Safety.

When the shocking News arrived in Town, a Proclamation was issued by the Governor, in the following Terms, viz.
"WHEREAS I have received Information, That on Wednesday, the Fourteenth Day of this Month, a Number of People, armed, and mounted on Horseback, unlawfully assembled together, and went to the Indian Town in the Conestogoe Manor, in Lancaster County, and without the least Reason or Provocation, in cool Blood, barbarously killed six of the Indians settled there, and burnt and destroyed all their Houses and Effects: And whereas so cruel and inhuman an Act, committed in the Heart of this Province on the said Indians, who have lived peaceably and inoffensively among us, during all our late Troubles, and for many Years before, and were justly considered as under the Protection of this Government and its Laws, calls loudly for the vigorous Exertion of the civil Authority, to detect the Offenders, and bring them to condign Punishment; I have therefore, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Council, thought fit to issue this Proclamation, and do hereby strictly charge and enjoin all Judges, Justices, Sheriffs, Constables, Officers Civil and Military, and all other His Majesty's liege Subjects within this Province, to make diligent Search and Enquiry after the Authors and Perpetrators of the said Crime, their Abettors and Accomplices, and to use all possible Means to apprehend and secure them in some of the publick Goals of this Province,that they may be brought to their Trials, and be proceeded against according to Law.

"And whereas a Number of other Indians, who lately lived on or near the Frontiers of this Province, being willing and desirous to preserve and continue the ancient Friendship which heretofore subsisted between them and the good People of this Province, have, at their own earnest Request, been removed from their Habitations, and brought into the County of Philadelphia, and seated, for the present, for their better Security, on the Province-Island, and in other Places in the Neighbourhood of the City of Philadelphia, where Provision is made for them at the public Expence; I do therefore hereby strictly forbid all Persons whatsoever, to molest or injure any of the said Indians, as they will answer the contrary at their Peril.
GIVEN under my Hand,and the Great Seal of the said Province, at Philadelphia, the Twenty-second Day of December, Anno Domini One Thousand Seven Hundred and Sixty-three, and in the Fourth Year of His Majesty's Reign.  
JOHN PENN."
JOSEPH SHIPPEN, jun. Secretary.
GOD Save the KING.
Notwithstanding this Proclamation, those cruel Men again assembled themselves, and hearing that the remaining fourteen Indians were in the Work-house at Lancaster, they suddenly appeared in that Town, on the 27th of December. Fifty of them, armed as before, dismounting, went directly to the Work-house, and by Violence broke open the Door, and entered with the utmost Fury in their Countenances. -- When the poor Wretches saw they had no Protection nigh, nor could possibly escape, and being without the least Weapon for Defence, they divided into their little Families, the Children clinging to the Parents; they fell on their Knees, protested their Innocence, declared their Love to the English, and that, in their whole Lives, they had never done them Injury; and in this Posture they all received the Hatchet! -- Men, Women and little Children -- were every one inhumanly murdered! -- in cold Blood!

The barbarous Men who committed the atrocious Fact, in Defiance of Government, of all Laws human and divine, and to the eternal Disgrace of their Country and Colour, then mounted their Horses, huzza'd in Triumph, as if they had gained a Victory, and rode off -- unmolested!

The Bodies of the Murdered were then brought out and exposed in the Street, till a Hole could be made in the Earth, to receive and cover them.

But the Wickedness cannot be covered, the Guilt will lie on the whole Land, till Justice is done on the Murderers. THE BLOOD OF THE INNOCENT WILL CRY TO HEAVEN FOR VENGEANCE.

It is said that Shehaes, being before told, that it was to be feared some English might come from the Frontier into the Country, and murder him and his People; he replied, "It is impossible: There are Indians, indeed, in the Woods, who would kill me and mine, if they could get at us, for my Friendship to the English; but the English will wrap me in their Matchcoat, and secure me from all Danger." How unfortunately was he mistaken!

Another Proclamation has been issued, offering a great Reward for apprehending the Murderers, in the following Terms, viz.
"WHEREAS on the Twenty-second Day of December last, I issued a Proclamation for the apprehending and bringing to Justice, a Number of Persons, who, in Violation of the Public Faith, and in Defiance of all Law, had inhumanly killed six of the Indians, who had lived in Conestogoe Manor, for the Course of many Years, peaceably and inoffensively, under the Protection of this Government, on Lands assigned to them for their Habitation; notwithstanding which, I have received Information, that on the Twenty-seventh of the same Month, a large Party of armed Men again assembled and met together in a riotous and tumultuous Manner, in the County of Lancaster, and proceeded to the Town of Lancaster, where they violently broke open the Work-house, and butchered and put to Death fourteen of the said Conestogoe Indians, Men, Women and Children, who had been taken under the immediate Care and Protection of the Magistrates of the said County, and lodged for their better Security in the said Work-house, till they should be more effectually provided for by Order of the Government. And whereas common Justice loudly demands, and the Laws of the Land (upon the Preservation of which not only the Liberty and Security of every Individual, but the Being of the Government itself depend) require that the above Offenders should be brought to condign Punishment; I have therefore, by and with the Advice of the Council, published this Proclamation, and do hereby strictly charge and command all Judges, Justices, Sheriffs, Constables, Officers Civil and Military, and all other His Majesty's faithful and liege Subjects within this Province, to make diligent Search and Enquiry after the Authors and Perpetrators of the said last mentioned Offence, their Abettors and Accomplices, and that they use all possible Means to apprehend and secure them in some of the public Goals of this Province, to be dealt with according to Law.
"And I do hereby further promise and engage, that any Person or Persons, who shall apprehend and secure, or cause to be apprehended and secured, any Three of the Ringleaders of the said Party, and prosecute them to Conviction, shall have and receive for each, the public Reward of Two Hundred Pounds; and any Accomplice, not concerned in the immediate shedding the Blood of the said Indians, who shall make Discovery of any or either of the said Ringleaders, and apprehend and prosecute them to Conviction, shall, over and above the said Reward, have all the Weight and Influence of the Government, for obtaining His Majesty's Pardon for his Offence.

GIVEN under my Hand, and the Great Seal of the said Province, at Philadelphia, the Second Day of January, in the Fourth Year of His Majesty's Reign, and in the Year of our Lord One Thousand Seven Hundred and Sixty-four.  
JOHN PENN."
By His Honour's Command,
JOSEPH SHIPPEN, jun. Secretary.
GOD Save the KING.
These Proclamations have as yet produced no Discovery; the Murderers having given out such Threatenings against those that disapprove their Proceedings, that the whole County seems to be in Terror, and no one durst speak what he knows; even the Letters from thence are unsigned, in which any Dislike is expressed of the Rioters.

There are some (I am ashamed to hear it) who would extenuate the enormous Wickedness of these Actions, by saying, "The Inhabitants of the Frontiers are exasperated with the Murder of their Relations, by the Enemy Indians, in the present War." It is possible; -- but though this might justify their going out into the Woods, to seek for those Enemies, and avenge upon them those Murders; it can never justify their turning in to the Heart of the Country, to murder their Friends.

If an Indian injures me, does it follow that I may revenge that Injury on all Indians? It is well known that Indians are of different Tribes, Nations and Languages, as well as the White People. In Europe, if the French, who are White People, should injure the Dutch, are they to revenge it on the English, because they too are White People? The only Crime of these poor Wretches seems to have been, that they had a reddish brown Skin, and black Hair; and some People of that Sort, it seems, had murdered some of our Relations. If it be right to kill Men for such a Reason, then, should any Man, with a freckled Face and red Hair, kill a Wife or Child of mine, it would be right for me to revenge it, by killing all the freckled red-haired Men, Women and Children, I could afterwards any where meet with.

But it seems these People think they have a better Justification; nothing less than the Word of God. With the Scriptures in their Hands and Mouths, they can set at nought that express Command, Thou shalt do no Murder; and justify their Wickedness, by the Command given Joshua to destroy the Heathen. Horrid Perversion of Scripture and of Religion! to father the worst of Crimeson the God of Peace and Love! -- Even the Jews, to whom that particular Commission was directed, spared the Gibeonites, on Account of their Faith once given. The Faith of this Government has been frequently given to those Indians; -- but that did not avail them with People who despise Government.

We pretend to be Christians, and, from the superior Light we enjoy, ought to exceed Heathens, Turks, Saracens, Moors, Negroes and Indians, in the Knowledge and Practice of what is right. I will endeavour to show, by a few Examples from Books and History, the Sense those People have had of such Actions.

Thursday, December 15, 2011

A Dialogue on EJP's Jesuitical Racism

Re: Brother Nick Booth / Brother Maxi's Separation Thanks to the Cultic Sectarian Racist/Dominionist Doctrine of Eric Phelps.
Hide Details

FROM:

TS

TO:

TS - troy_space@me.com

Message flagged
Thursday, December 15, 2011 10:27 PM
Dear friends

While I do not agree with everything Maxi says I absolutely defend his right to speak it & see his correspondent's epistle as the very "cop out" that he alleges to be the "reality" behind Maxi's methodology of reaching input>process>output (grammar>logic>rhetoric; knowledge>understanding>wisdom) based conclusions, as contrasted with his own process-free, output-first contentions.

Whether Maxi has all the data necessary to provide an assessment to form the method to reach the most correct is a matter that must be treated on issue by issue basis, nevertheless his scholarship & comprehension of the all-too-easily-ignored problems that manmade, flawed traditions have made manifest & made by their breathing themselves into ideological existence false idols of themselves, is a challenge that quite frankly the disputing parties that he has dealt with recently have more than met their match in.

However: I will state though that whether the overt Trinitarian aspects within the New Testament are interpolations or not, I see a clear implied divine trinity within the Bible (all translations, even leaving the disputed passages to one side).

Now I do not take sides with the orthodox Constantinian Trinitarians nor the Monotarians (or whatever other name fits the bill) & consider all endless dialectics on this matter to be detractions from the centrepiece of Christ's imparted wisdom: the Sermon on the Mount. For me it is a both/and situation, not an either/or. Expecting one to fall into one camp or the other means a false choice between what I see as Judaic/Islamic Monotarianism (not exclusively the same as Monotheism) & orthodoxist Trinitarianism. That is all that I have to add to the matter.

Back to the disputed matters in Maxi's reposted correspondence: Continued Eric Phelps apologist Nick Booth refers to an "indirect inspiration" of the KJAV. Well "indirect" means that Man's translation - including obfuscation, distortion, oversimplification & outright error - must come into play. He then takes the either/or polemical rhetorical tactic of saying that his only other choice is to throw it into the trash. Despite my issues with the KJAV which I have made thoroughly clear in the past & have no intention of going into detail once again I do use this translation myself along with others & do not deny the beauty & power of the language, but will not let that blind me to its shortcomings & also realise that its rather baroque flourishes are a double edge sword that the Geneva translation makes only to clear. Nor is the Geneva perfect, but that is why God gave us intellect, to look deeper & both further develop that intellect & our spiritual insight.

Ignorant blind "belief" which does not follow up on the call to prove all things - which admittedly requires a willingness to develop both intellect & spirit & is not for the lazy - & thinks that it is enough to believe the false traditions (including interpretations) of others is to leave oneself open to believing lies & thus being the unwitting servant/dupe of the father of all lies.

As Maxi has discussed before, the Ashkenazi(m) can be shown to not be S(h)emites even by their own Book of Genesis' Table of Nations which reveals that Ashkenaz was the son of Gomer, the son of Japheth - Shem's brother, both being Noah's sons along with Ham. Thus we see the logical fallacy promoted by Eric Phelps, who seemingly holds the unreconcilable paradoxical positions of being both a self-declared Biblical uber-literalist & a promoter of the notion that the Ashkenazi(m) are actually S(h)emites. As they are not - by the very book that they recognise as & declare to be the first book of the Law - Shemites they cannot - unlike the descendants of Jacob - declare themselves to be Israelites, nor - unlike the descendants of Judah - declare themselves to be Judaeans.

Even allowing for these terms to be more broadly applicable to the occupants of these territories in the era of either the Old Testament or the New, we have no evidence that the descendants of Ashkenaz occupied those territories at any time prior to the 20th century of our era. Yet these Japhethites are able to live within Eric Phelps' proposed Probaptical yet not be able to breed with the other inhabitants, supposedly to keep their "Jewish" (which they aren't - see above) blood "pure". This is just endless diversionary construction put out to waste the time of all concerned either giving credence to an inherently fallacious proposition or to waste one's energy disputing it.

Maxi is probably as "white" as Eric Phelps, as Eric has self-admitted American Native blood & Maxi being self-admitted "half-Hispanic/half-white" must allow for the fact that Hispanic genes have a large amount of white in them tipping the balance way past the 50/50 mark. Would Maxi be allowed into Eric's Probaptical? Would Eric be allowed to stay in Probaptical? At the end of the day I see this Probaptical as being a dialectical tactic to get others to expend their energy on this world of matter ruled over by the father of all lies. While I agree with Eric's oft-spoken contention that "he who stands on his own rights takes away from no man" (I'm paraphrasing here, the precise wording eludes me at the moment, but that is the essential gist), I can also see far more problems than solutions being the outcome of this proposed "Utopia" (to use the term coined by that Papist nemesis of William Tyndale, "Sir" Thomas More, from the book of the same name). Just do a search for "amish beard cutting attacks" to see how things would almost certainly pan out (beards or no beards) in Probaptical. This piece for example: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2060457/Latest-Amish-beard-cutting-attack-Son-attacked-father-scissors-holding-cutting-hair-beard.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

Now the most telling line is actually in the comments: "Sounds like a government Co-Intelpro operation." Hmm, well I think that we could apply that to "Probaptical" too. Note that Eric Phelps' flag - & most particularly his further intentions for it as conveyed to myself in email before our disassociation in late 2010 - betrays a deep, occultic outlook that is at odds with his rhetoric & more in line with the black magic sorcery of his ostensible high Jesuit "opponents".

Peace be with you -

TS


On 15 Dec 2011, at 18:25, Douglas Willinger wrote:

> Cultic- Racist hits the proverbial nail on its head.
>
> Such is a jesuitical seed to attempt to discredit the Protestant anti shadow government movement, designed to play right into their hands.
>
> Douglas Willinger
> Continuing Counter Reformation
>
> From: maxi aguaisol
> To: Troy ; Douglas Willinger ; Avenue of Light ; Nick Booth ; Samuel Benitez
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 12:03 PM
> Subject: Brother Nick Booth / Brother Maxi's Separation Thanks to the Cultic Sectarian Racist/Dominionist Doctrine of Eric Phelps.
>
> The following is a conversation between brother Nick Booth and myself. This must not be understood as an attack against anyone, nor against Booth, nor against Phelps, but against certain doctrines. It is not an act of revenge because "the revenge belongs to God" (Romans 12:19). It's sole purpose is to illustrate and exemplify how works the fanaticism in the anti-Jesuit movement. There is available much information that succinctly proofs that the material racism, the King James version of the Bible, and the doctrine of the trinity, are not Biblical, then ¿why there is some many people that still believe in these doctrines? Is thanks to the fear of mens, emotionalism and peer pressure that some christians fall into both spiritual/biblical and material/scientifical fallacies like these. The modern era is still in adolescence, and unless it matures, it can not defend itself from the ravages of evil. Therefore we must not destroy but promote the debates, because if the debate is denies then the Freedoms of Expressión and Concience are denied. That's why i publish this, becouse i can not kill the debate. In Christ - Brother Maxi.
>
> [For documentations about the issues discussed in this conversation please visit the following links:
>
> Regarding the King James Version of the Bible: The King James Only Resource Center, The KJV-Only Issue, The KJV-Only Debate Blog, The King James Only Movement, New Age Bible Versions Refuted, A Response to William Schnoebelen's Conversion to KJV Onlyism, Texe Marrs Demonstrates Yet Once Again That Facts and Logic Mean Nothing When A Conspiracy Is At Stake, The Westcott and Hort Resource Centre.
>
> Regarding the doctrine of Material Racism: One Blood: The Biblical Answer to Racism, Is Christianity a white man's religion?, Ph.D., Theo.D., William Lane Craig Response to the question: "Is Christianism a White Man's Religion?", What does the Bible say about ethnocentrism?.
>
> Regarding the doctrine of the Trinity: A history of the origin of the doctrine of the Trinity in the Christian church, The Trinity Defined and Refuted.]
>
>
> Nick Booth
> Nick Booth
> Dear Maxi,
> It pains me to have to say this but I think we should cease communication. This pains me bacause I have considered you a friend/brother Why do I want to not communicate? Because I consider Eric Jon Phelps a brother/ friend, he is the one I first heard the Gospel from. Therefore I will be forever grateful to him for this. I already talked to Doug, and told him that I have not interest of communication after he called Eric a "Racist". I already heard you say that "only God knows why" you haven't brought up your issues with him up til now. Frankly I think that is sort of a cop out. I remember you having no problem with the idea of ProBatical, or a nation in South America for Spanish speaking Christians? Also not until recently have you denied the Triune Godhead: of God the Father, God the Son, and the Holy Spirit.. This is different than the false counterfeit "Trinity" of the Roman Catholic Church which is of course Isis, Horus, and Set. If I can't believe the translation of the AV1611 KJV to be correct and indirectly inspired by God, I might as well throw it in the trash. Doe not God preserve what he inspired?
>
> I agree there are two spiritual races. You are either a "son of disobedience" of the Devil, or a "son of God" by believing on the name of his "only begotten Son" the Lord Jesus Christ. However I will always be identified as White, and you for instance as Hispanic. There is no escaping that fact. Why should we not want to preserve our peoples and our cultures. I never said people of different backgrounds can't worship together.
>
> I wish no animosity or hatred. I just think we should disassociate.
>
> Regards,
> Nick
>
> I already expect you to label me "antichrist" though I don't call you that.
>
> Maximiliano Aguaisol
> Maximiliano Aguaisol
> Nick i had never read this until now, i guess i don't care much about Facebook... Ok, i understand your position, that is, to follow the first men that convince you, and to not first properly "prove all things". If i does not disagreed with EJP in the past was becouse the past is not the present, in the same way that you don't do the exact things like as one o more years before. I will pray for God and i only ask to you that you only make your own and complete and impartial investigation regarding the following falacies and lies: "that God the Father is not One, but 3 persons", "that the KJV 1611 is a perfectly translated Bible", "that the Bible does not condemns the concept of material racism", "that God wants the christians dominate and rule nations", etc. Finally if you don't want communication, therefore you don't want the truth, becouse even the apostles and christians of the 1st century preached and debated to all mens. This is not a christian attitude. Although that i understand in the position in which you are and i understand you... Again, i will pray to the Father to by with you and to help you. Finally, i can not label you as an "antichrist" becouse i believe you already accepted Jesus Christ and his sacrifice. There is no biblical basis in which i would be able to call you in that way. As me, i will follow God, not mens. In Christ, Brother Maxi [Postdata: i am 1/2 "hispanic" 1/2 white]
>
>
>

Monday, December 12, 2011

Anti Biblical Plan to Establish Black Slave/Protestant/Baptist Nation in Shemitic North America

From: maxi aguaisol
To: Troy ; Avenue of Light ; Craig Oxley ; Douglas Willinger ; Eric Jon Phelps
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 10:51 PM
Subject: Anti-Biblical Plan to Establish Black Slave/Protestant/Baptist Nation in Shemitic North America

Again with this crap! Why you don't answer my mail in which i totally refuted your antibiblical racist doctrine!? After all the colaboration and fellowship... you just answer (and publish!) the first flattering and easy mail that anyone send you?! Eric, what you do, you "Do as thou wilt"! http://www.vaticanassassins.org/2011/11/biblical-plan-to-establish-a-new-black-protestant-nation-in-shemitic-north-america/

Thanks to the Virginia Company of the King James I for the trade of black slaves from Africa to North America!

And again with the LIE that the curse of Canaan was a Curse to the Blacks! It was not a curse to Ham , it was a curse to Canaan! If was a curse to Ham, then ¿why hamites like the egiptians, and others ruled over Israel? What a liar seeking for money. Of EJP, i eat the antijesuit meat, and spit very far away the false christian bones! Let that for the dogs!

"remembering the sons of Shem have never done anything for Black Africans" - EJP... O_o What? What about here in South America where be help them a lot? Or what about the christians jews and asians that preached the Gospel to Africa? Read your Bible Eric! Or even some real book of history! This is a great insult against everyone!

‎"Once they have established their independence, they then can enter into a treaty with a White nation which treaty will indicate their submission to that existing White nation in North America. This treaty of submission in exchange for pr ...otection from foreign invaders is called, in the law, a treaty of “suzerainty.” My new White Protestant/Baptist/Calvinist nation of ProBaptiCal could enter into such a treaty with your Black nation" - EJP. I am a shemite! And i do not want ProBaptiCal in America! What do EJP do about that? Betrayal! Betrayal now, betrayal in the future.

‎"Neither Blacks, nor Hispanics nor Asians have that ability if we are to learn from the history of the last 500 years." - EJP. ¿And what about the other 5000 years? O_o You liar! Before everyone, we the shemites ruled ALL! The Modern Era is not thanks to whites but thanks to GOD!

Come on, continue with the jesuit tactic, do not answer me! You know that i can and i will refute you.

Very angry... a shemite.

---

I'll add that it was Virginia that got over on the world with its unhealthy promotion of its "Bright Leaf" (cigarette grade) Tobacco (with a much larger leaf size with less nicotine and other components per leaf matter), created for extra repeated use to increase sales and profits while creating massive health problems, and since the early 1900s buttressed by that protectionist scheme upon its behalf known as the war on drugs (with the to be maligned Coca leaf feared as a Tobacco habit cure by the very prohibitionists in the USDA and the AMA-APhA), and a public health care disaster costing some 100 million lives from this cigarette-pharma market protection.

Sunday, August 21, 2011

EJP's Jesuitical Racist Subversion of Protestantism & Prussia

I encounter and uncover this- Up Front & Hidden in Plain Site

So I figure, go beyond Washington, D.C. planning, and look at foreign policy and WW2

And I figure out this- Wlodimir Leochwoski Kulturkampf Revenge

So look for plausible allies to help spread the word

And what do I find? The Subversion of the Reformation by attaching to it a heavy weight of Eric Jon Phelps Jesuitical Racism- Apartheid
Blatant Strategic Blunder- ignore Prussia, the worlds first Lutheran State murdered by the counter reformation, and prime candidate for new reformation state against the ancient regime, for the sake of needless race-baiting and a needlessly white only apartheid ‘ProBaptiCal’ in Eric Jon Phelp’s home state of Pennsylvania.




Flashback to the end of 1942.

Wlodimir Ledochowski is dead, reportedly from gastro-intestinal problems.

The tide of the war has just turned against the 3rd Reich at Stalingrad.

A group of men from Germany and elsewhere sought to stop the madness. End the war. Kill [s]hitler. Do it now (1943). Keep the USSR forces out of Central Europe, best within their pre-WW2 borders.

But FDR would say no to stopping the madness- let it go on for two more years against any semblance of common senses on the surface, just as let refused to allow the St Louis to disembark let along the US have a few hundred addition German-Jewish immigrants.

It HAD to go on- the USSR pushing the 3rd Reich forces back long enough to drive deep outside of the pre start of the war border, deep into Poland and beyond into Berlin with massive costs of human lives in military and in civilian population. It could not end at some intermediate area, within the western USSR or eastern Poland. It had to do so, rolling over the objections and ultimately the life of U.S. General George S. Patton.

It had to go on for the occult agenda- to facilitate the aim of the counter reformation along with numerous other aims to the aim of the counter reformations revenge against the state that stood up to the Vatican during Wlodimir Ledochowski’s childhood, Europe’s first protestant Lutheran state- Prussia.

Naturally in seeking to expose this, I sought and contacted the most prominent figure on the internet search of potential anti Vatican allies- aka Eric Jon Phelps.

EJP after all appeared to be the most prominent anti Vatican entity upon the internet with his web site, and his book by the name, Vatican Assassins of some 700+ pages, and 2 or 3 editions: about the Vatican’s political maneuvering-manipulations of history such as plotting wars to further its self, of which most are unaware because of the Jesuit Order’s prioritization of EDUCATION.

Hence, this book’s coverage includes that of what Phelps terms as Europe’s 2nd Great 30 Years War of Religion (1914-1945). The first was that of 1618-1648- which writers selected by The New York Times will insist was Europe’s LAST great religious war! That which people know as World War One and World War Two are but the two main parts of the latter- as a series of events designed to advance the rule of the ancient regime of the Roman Catholic Church.

On June 10, 2007 I posted my first block of articles about this focusing upon the leadership at the Jesuit Order at that time- of Wlodimir Ledochowski- 26th Superior General of the Jesuit Order.

http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2007_06_01_archive.html

http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2007/08/wlodimir-vladimir-ledochowski-war.html

Phelps replied positively to my contacting him about my blog Continuing Counter Reformation back in June 2007:

“A great site! The pre and post WWII boundaries have never been analyzed until now. I mentioned the necessity of this important analysis in Vatican Assassins. The result would evidence the benefit of the Papacy and this the Vatican being the real culprit behind the Second Thirty Years War (1914-1945).

>Has anyone else placed W Ledochowski with the Oder-Neisse line?

I don’t know of that line, but Ledochowski was of noble blood”

>and the apparently religious based expulsions (AFAIK of those Germans in Catholic majority Upper Silesia given the option while the others were not)




I hope I provided EJP with some inspiration- knowing of his interest in military strategy from portions of his Vatican Assassins:

http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2007/07/wlodimir-vladimir-ledochowski-world-war.html

So I figure, that an excellent way to demolish Rome is to expose its culpability for WW2; and that Phelps, being the author of Vatican Assassins, and by implication, having some handle upon military and by extension political strategy, would see not only that, but also the potential of this mass revelations of Rome’s crimes plausibly sparking an interest in re-addressing the culmination of WW2 status quo- particularly the Oder-Neisse line.

So there, I could see the need and the solution of a new republic as infinitely a more workable solution then attempting to turn back the clock to the pre WW2 borders, and especially practical in what was Europe’s FIRST Protestant State?

It only seems logical for Vatican Assassins with its creators already evident preferences and interests to have an interest in this blacked out history hence largely unknown and forgotten land of the protestant reformation – Europe, indeed the world’s FIRST PROTESTANT STATE.

This was of course essentially the original territory of Prussia later know as East Prussia, wiped off the map in 1945 and partitioned north-south respectively between the U.S.S.R. and Poland.

The very name of Prussia originates with the Prus- a Baltic people. Many were murdered by the Teutonic Knights German Roman Catholic military order that invaded Prussia in the 1200s. Others were eventually absorbed into the immigrant and successively landed Germans, resulting in their descendants being Germans who were partially Prus.

After 1525 Prussia grew, encompassing the lands around Berlin of Brandenburg.

During the 1700s, Prussia defeated Austria, gaining Silesia- the province that, unlike Bavaria and Poland had largely withstood the Counter Reformation, remaining Lutheran.

By the 1800s, the State of Prussia included lands bordering Holland and Belgium, and during the 1860s gained Hannover.

Maps of Prussia's Growth
http://www.rollintl.com/roll/prussia.htm


By 1871, Prussia united the various German states, excluding Austria, into the Deutsches Reich under the leadership of Otto Von Bismarck.

As readers of this blog are aware, this was the area of the Kulturkampf of Bismarck's Prussian led Deutsches Reich -- otherwise known as the 2nd Reich, with [s]hitler's being the 3rd Reich and the 1st being the "Holy Roman Empire" -- and of the Kulturkampf Revenge -- Revenge for Bismarcks' anti-Clerical Kulturkampf -- of Wlodimir Ledochowski: 26th Superior General of the Jesuit Order (the so-called "Society of Jesus") from February 11, 1915 to his death December 13, 1942.

Starting my posts about this forbidden history in June 2007, I followed with more:

http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2007/07/wlodimir-vladimir-ledochowskis-deranged.html

http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2007/07/holocaust-denial-via-new-york-times-in.html

It only seems logical for Vatican Assassins to have a strong interest in thrusting this blacked out history hence largely unknown and forgotten land of the protestant reformation – Europe, indeed the world’s FIRST PROTESTANT STATE.

This is especially so considering Eric Jon Phelps's tastes in what he loves, not only Protestant Christianity, but also the Celtic, German and Slavic peoples of northern Europe -- Phelps himself being self described as Irish and a little Pawnee Indian, and residing in the U.S.A. in Pennsylvania- a land with quite a few people of German ancestry, plus generally those Polish, Czech, European Jewish (generally part German and/or Eastern Europe)) and Black (sub-Saharan African ancestry). Indeed, within the U.S., Pennsylvania is frequently refereed to as "Dutch" Country- a mistranslation and understanding of the term "Deutsche" (German rather then Dutch).

Yet instead he embarks upon this "ProBaptiCal" apartheid state excluding Blacks, turning his back on the land of Europe's 1st Protestant (Lutheran) State of the European White peoples such as Slavs and Germans, instead ignoring Prussia, for the sake of something instead within his currently home state that would force out the Blacks- disregarding that a reincarnated Prussia would not be forcing out any ethnicity (and likely has few Blacks). Phelps could have a new republic upon Protestant Christina principles free of the planet's luciferian romish-masonic shadow government, without his embarrassing hang up regarding Black people thrust forth as an agent provacator, marked by his ridiculous obsessive use of his crackpot sloganeering of "Majority Blacks Savages".

Phelp’s racism is something like a speck of rust or cancer, appearing small before spreading, with the term appearing with greater and greater frequency, as Phelps increasing favorite term– “Majority Black Savages”. By 2007 his writings had already included more frequent use of the terms “civil blacks” and “savage blacks”- with his BS conclusion that a majority were savage- with the word ‘majority’ appearing before the words ‘savage black’.

However in latter 2008 there’s an evident shift, with Phelp’s massive highlighting of that concocted term “Majority Black Savages”. A google search shows him first using that term in August 2008, and two more times that year. Concern over this spurred an email conversation on matters of “race”, including my November 1, 2008 admonishment to EJP “how dare anyone other than God presume a majority of Blacks or any other whole people are “savages”.

Reading him defend it let me with little doubt that he was displaying a prideful arrogance unfitting a Christian, like he was projecting some early negative experiences of his, projected out upon an entire people within the U.S.A. if not the planet, along with a convenient disregard of such matters as the Jesuits creating the problems promoting ‘savagery’- Phelps was placing the blame upon the proverbial ‘low man on the totem pole’ literally sticking that pole up their a-----. Unlike a scholar, and very much like a Jesuit, Phelps was promoting a highly generalized set of thought processes against Blacks as a group saying that a MAJORITY were savages and that they thus had to be separated from others by this presumption- a quite jesuitical set of through processes seen with so many other topics when the ancient regime seeks to demonify a person, people nation, thing, or commodity.

While only highlighting that obnoxious slogan in latter 2008, Phelps has since sprinkled it quite liberally through his writings- polluting the later edition of Vatican Assassins with this claptrap – as if this was somehow a strategy to undermine Rome, instead of undermining Rome’s opposition!

Indeed, Phelps’ use of the term can not be seen as a means to hurt the Vatican. Rather its something to hurt those opposing the Vatican, both theologically and politically – including myself with pushing the envelope in exposing the Vatican’s power over the U.S. Capitol regarding the aborted Extending the Legacy South Capitol Mall, and with the grossly under-appreciated role of Wlodimr Ledochowski, which Phelps devotes strangely little attention to and knowledge of – not even knowing what the Oder-Neisse line was (the aim of the counter reformation) after writing Vatican Assassins – let alone Prussia's Reincarnation- something to think about if knowledge of the Vatican’s culpability for the World Wars became an object of mass consciousness. Hence be sure to try to pollute this consciousness – polluting the reputation (hopefully from a Vatican-Masonic ancient regime continuation perspective) of making the anti Vatican movement look stupid.

Akin to the ancient regime’s tools extended WW2 for two years in order to bring about the aims of the counter reformation, such as invading Italy by wasting time in Sicily and slowly up the boot rather then straight from the coast to Rome, EJP’s pathological attitudes towards Blacks would be like circling Sicily in boats made proverbially weaker and weaker by his constant screaming over and over ‘majority black savages’ majority black savages’.

For someone aware of military and political strategies and their importance to insist upon affixing this racial bunk upon the anti-Vatican political movement, Eric Jon Phelps is ultimately loyal to Rome.

Note the irony of what the NY Times obituary gives Wlodimir Ledochowski credit:
http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2011/05/wlodimir-ledochowskis-various-nytimes.html

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

D Willinger Message to EJP- Nov 1, 2008

Eric:

How can anyone other then God dare presume that a MAJORITY of US Blacks are savages (or any other ethnic group)?

Douglas Willinger

---

This was a message written to Eric Jon Phelps, included in an email thread on November 1, 2008, shortly after Phelps began polluting his generally excellent Vatican Assassins web site with the nonsensical statement "Majority Black Savages"

Against the Jesuitical Racism of Eric Jon Phelps

BROTHER MAXI ATTACKING YOUR POSITION ON RACISM

I DECIDED LONG TIME AGO TO BE SILENT ABOUT THIS TOPIC, ONLY GOD AND I KNOWS WHY. BUT I CAN NOT DO IT ANYMORE BECAUSE NOW I BAPTIZED MYSELF IN THE NAME OF CHRIST ONLY.

ERIC, AND IT HURTS MYSELF TO SAY THIS: YOUR POSITION REGARDING RACISM, (IS NOT NAZI, AND) IS NOT BIBLICAL.

TAMAR, RAHAB, AND BOAZ, ANCESTORS OF MY LORD, JESUS CHRIST, WERE HAMITES! EVEN YAHWEH MY FATHER USED THE PROPHET NATHAN TO REBUKE THE KING DAVID FOR KILLING THE HUSBAND OF BETHSEBA, URIAH THE HITTITE, WHO WAS A HAMITE!

SO, THE BIBLE NOT ONLY DO NOT CONDEMNS INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE BUT DEFENDS IT THE BIBLE IS ONLY RACIST IN SPIRIT AND NOT IN FLESH. BECAUSE THE REFORMERS WERE WHITES FOR ALMOST THE SAME REASON THAT THE JEW WERE THE FIRSTS CHRISTIANS.

THIS LETTER ALSO WORKS AS A DOCUMENT WHICH WILL DEMONSTRATE IF OUR BELOVED FRIEND AND TEACHER OF THE CLASS OF THE JESUIT HISTORY, IS OR IS NOT A TRUE CHRISTIAN, BECAUSE IS UNDENIABLE THAT RAHAB, TAMAR AND BOAZ WERE OF THE "RACE" OF HAM.

IF ERIC JON PHELPS AND ANY OTHER, CONTINUE TO PUT HIMSELF IN THE "ANTI-MULTICULTURALISM" SIDE OF THE RACIAL WAR'S HEGELIAN DIALECTIC EQUATION (MULTICULTURALISM ANTI-MULTICULTURALISM=RACIAL WAR FOR DESTABILIZATION OF THE WEST), THEN I, AS A TRUE CHRISTIAN, HAVE NO OTHER OPTION THAT TO SEE A PRO-JESUITICAL SPIRIT IN THAT BEHAVIOR. [emphasis ADDED]

CHRIST, THE TRUTH, IS THE ANSWER!

IN YAHWEH MY FATHER, THROUGH JESUS MY LORD.

BROTHER MAXI.


---

A State prohibition upon Jewish-Aryan marriages is Jesuit and Nazi; asides from that, I agree with this statement of Brother Maxi, and add the above emphasis.

FACEBOOK Note page- Against the Jesuitical Racism of Eric John Phelps
https://www.facebook.com/notes/douglas-willinger/against-the-jesuitical-racism-of-eric-jon-phelps/209352609123455




Sunday, August 22, 2010

Concerning the MYTH of MAJORITY Black Savages

  1. TheForeigner1983 says:
    1
    0
    Rate This

    From a statistical stand point concerning poverty and crime amongst blacks/whites are neck and neck. In the sense that the minority in both groups commit crime and are in poverty according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Which means the majority of blacks and whites don’t commit crimes and are above the poverty level. Just from a statistical stand point Eric John Phelps’s view on the majority of blacks being savages and the minority of blacks being safe blacks is proven to be erroneous. But taking Eric John Phelps’s view into account and incorporating it into the U.S. Census Bureau’s numbers concerning crime/ poverty the inevitable reality is that if the majority of blacks are savages then the majority of whites are inevitably savages as well since the minority of blacks and whites in the U.S. are in poverty and commit crimes.

    Since the view of the majority of whites are savages if the majority of blacks are savages in the U.S. is not the view Eric John Phelps is promoting it can only be reasoned that he is picking and choosing what he wants to see even if it’s the truth flipped upside down.

    Eric John Phelps is not doing anything different the than mass of alternative media promulgators/main stream media by promoting a lie as truth or refusing to take seriously alternative evidence into account differing from his view point. Alex Jones does this concerning the evil of the masonic order/ Jesuits and the spiritual side of the beast. Eric John Phelps just does this concerning race.

    Phelps’s misstep in perception proves to us all that walking in the truth and just knowing the truth are two totally different things and just knowing the truth is not sufficient alone.

    We can all agree Eric’s knowledge on this Jesuit conspiracy which controls the ultimate levels of white collar crime is extensive. His boldness in speaking on his Christian faith and wanting to create a Christian nation is admirable.
    His great zeal is ultimately misdirected and clouded.

    The reason for his misdirection is no different from the majority of us born in the Western hemisphere especially if you’re born in the matrix of the United States. We’ve all been trained by the societies we live in to be racist in some form. Eric John Phelps is no different he’s only human. He’s no less susceptible to the seeds of racial separation planted by the colonial elites before the inception of this country than any of us.

    Eric John Phelps has been mind raped by the idea of the supremacy of whiteness. Whites in the Western hemisphere are no less a victim to the institution of whiteness than blacks,asians,hispanics,indians,and anyone of any other race born in the Western hemisphere. For whites it just takes a different form in the idea of the supremacy of whiteness. Eric John Phelps’s version of the supremacy of whiteness is White -only Christian Nationalism.

    Like most whites in America Eric John Phelps has been institutionally mind raped into believing the divinity of the White race just like the Japanese and Germans during WWII. Except instead of promulgating a Communist religion he promulgates an anti-Christianity so it is easier to digest for his intended audience instead of being totally written off as a quack.

    Again, Eric John Phelps is a victim of the same cultural view he ascribes to himself. Over 500 years of institutionalized white supremacy encoded the very society white people live in. For him to witness the destruction of the very ideology that has been the premise of his societal existence as a white man in the Western hemisphere is beyond devastating. So in order for the ideology to survive he believes whites must separate in order to remember and foster the glories of whiteness.

    On the international stage the glories of whiteness is becoming a relic of the past. Spiritually and financially the white peoples and their institutions are rotting from the inside out. The whole world knows and only waits for the day the ideology of whiteness is broken and destroyed completely.

    Until the destruction of the institutional and financially supported ideology of whiteness is completely destroyed externally and internally Eric John Phelps and others like him whether white, black, asian, hispanic, etc. will constantly use scape goat tactics to diverge us into fighting over little issues of racism and other minute issues instead of focusing on the bigger pictures.

    John Phelps’s comically racist views on savage / civil blacks is not a major problem but it is extremely disappointing and it does give lots of fuel to those who want to discredit the rising era of the alternative media.

    Since he is a brother in Christ we should pray for him

  2. rjtengkano says:
    0
    0
    Rate This

    Very thourough and relentless studies you’ve done, Eric. I can tell you’ve put in years of observations and i commend your solemn dedication for us readers so we can see behind the smoke screen of government(s) what satan is deceitfully planning for our demise.

    Your proposed idea of separating races onto their respective nations and origins is not a bad idea as God did intend races to be living separately under different charters and laws so respect and tolerance can be maintained hence the love, not hate for thy neighbor can be experienced. Instead now we’re forcedfully mingled together where majority rules and minority oppressed.

    but i must say your proposed idea of separation by race and state seccession is impossible unless you take people power onto the streets, and even when your’e successful it’s still pointless.

    Why? It’s funny you mention that you strongly believe in the bible and its prophecy that an absolute power of worldwide NWO is bound to take place. It NEEDS to take place to complete the sealing process before the end of the world. And satan will make their power stretched to the ends of the world to get you wherever you are. And when the good are separated from the bad, then Jesus shall come to take His bride to heaven with Him.

    The mark of the beast must be issued… It’s the SUNDAY observance forced onto people. When presented it will be made really hard to resist even for the God’s truest people, because it’s beautifully crafted as if the humanity requires the false “sabbath” to be observed. “it’s for the sake of world peace” B.S! that’s the ultimate test of faith when we know God’s people’s identity is the SEVENTH DAY SABBATH, establishing the binding love between men and their Creator.

    Everyone should experience it during the Antichrist’s “15 minutes of fame” or 42 months before he’ll get destroyed in the end.

    The tribulations will have to take place and God’s people must go through it. The final test, the final battle, the final seal of God must determine whether or not each person is saved or perished.

    We are however asked to prepare ourselves best for the battle: Live humbly, leaving worldly desires and practice self-denial in the effort to have God-like character. Get out of the big cities.. in the case of americans: Get out of your country! Everyone should try to make your living in modest mountains living off the lands and be free of the grid, you’ll have better chance of staying under the radar longer.

    But nonetheless, our physical preparation can never match the greatness of the battle satan will present in his last powerful yet subtle ambush to the humanity!

    God bless

  3. kkeithnr says:
    3
    0
    Rate This

    I am a Christian, and a black man. I purchased Vatican Assassins when it first came out, when it and it was still in a spiral binder. I have been keeping up with his info over the years.

    However I will say that his stance on race hurts his ministry in my estimation, (especially in the eyes of black people–as well as many white people, not to mention other races) Many people will be and have been turned off to the great truths that he brings forth in relation to the Papacy do to what appears to be a latent or blatant form of racism in some of the positions that he takes on race.

    The Scriptures are clear; in Christ there is no Jew nor Gentile, nor male or female. So to take such a position as you take on race actually places you and your ministry outside of Christ. Eric.

    Do I believe the papacy, via the Jesuits primarily, are for the race mixing for there own nefarious purposes? No doubt…however they were also on the side of the racist in the south during the Civil War.

    Eric you should realize that the way that you talk, and the positions that you take on race, in the eyes of many black people, (especially those of us that grew up in the south) are no different from those whom we KNOW to be racists. The positions that you take and the words that you say in regard to race, any black person growing up in the south(and I am sure in many other places) recognize immediately as being a carbon copy of the positions taken by those by whom we’ve experienced the sting of racism and prejudice.

    In many ways it turns many people who might otherwise listen to you away because you come off as a white racists.

    Perhaps not having lived in this country as a black person, especially in the south, and having to encounter the demon of racism you do not completely understand how purely racists your position on race is in the eyes of many black people.

    Not only that. I walk away with the overall impression from reading your writings on race that you feel that black people in general are somewhat inferior to white people…. notice I did not say that is what you believe, but rather that is the impression that I walk away with personally from reading your writings.

    You have read quite a bit of history, but it seems that you have read comparatively very little black history. Black people have built and headed up some of the greatest civilizations in history. However racists white historians(not all are racists) glorified the white race and its accomplishments while in most cases not even mentioning anything of significance accomplished by the black race. Your writings even tend in this direction in some areas.

    Having been raised in south Georgia the only thing of significance that I was taught about black people is that they were slaves, the underground railroad…yada, yada, yada…never even heard of Malcom X until I went off into the Marine Corps… All of the heroes in history that we were taught about were white…period….nothing taught to establish self-worth and honor in black people…and you wonder why the inner cities are the way that they are…much of it (although not all) is the psychological effect of racism and prejudice for hundreds of years…intended and unintended consequences!

    You said in this article…” But I attack with all my might the “Majority Savage Blacks” who have ruined every major American city with their high crimes and misdemeanors. These MSBs kill at least 10 Whites a day and rape 100 White women every day in this country. Should I not be incensed about this behavior?”

    The “Majority Savage Blacks” have ruined every major American city with their high crimes and misdemeanors? Really? How can that be?

    First off white people have great majority of all the wealth and all of the power in this country. They own the companies that make the guns, that make the cigarettes, the dice and cards, they are behind the music companies that fund the rappers to spew filth to continue the psychological warfare to degrade the morals in the black community, they own the companies that produce the alcohol…should I go on?

    The CIA brings or oversees the importation of loads of drugs into this country..how many black CIA directors have there been? How many blacks own the huge media companies that broadcast filth and non-sense around the U.S. and the world? How many blacks own the huge liquor companies?

    Yes there are many blacks that engage in ignorant and even foolish behavior, but you must remember while the white race in this country was advancing they were(not all) by the force of law denying blacks educational opportunities, equal protection under the law etc. Such was the hatred and racism that it was just in the 1960′s that it was necessary to pass a civil rights law.

    How is it that a nation of people(not all whites) can claim to be so advanced and yet be so savage as for it to become necessary to pass a law to treat all human beings in a civil fashion? And this a “Christian” nation!

    I wonder if you would talk the same talk…and those who justify your position, if the shoe was on the other foot. If you lived in a nation where historically all of the leaders in business and government were black.

    What if you and your ancestors had lived in a country where historically all of the senators, congressman, judges, mayors, head of both local and federal institutions were all black. ..where the black people made laws to keep you from learning to read, keep you from voting etc….all in a plan to prevent you from ever being able to ascend to positions to be able to change your status and the status of your offspring in life.

    Hmmm..there would be no Vatican Assassins because you wouldn’t be able to read or write. And even if you learned, you being a white man, would not be able to get it published because all of the publishers are black people who have a vested interest in keeping you in your place…remember under there constitution you are not counted as a full man.

    Let’s go further….Now you look around and realize much of the massive wealth that the black people now have was passed down to their offspring from the amazing profits made off the backs of the white slaves. If only you could have benefited from the labor of your ancestors instead of the black people benefiting from it.

    Yet many of the same black people and there philosophical offspring, people who carried out an orchestrated campaign to ensure that you never attain success, now declare that you are a savage…while all along enjoying, to a great degree, the fruit of the labor of your ancestors!

    Eric…until such time as you become converted on the issue of race you are leaving the wrong impression upon the minds of the people with regard to the character of Christ. You are doing a similar work to that of Rome namely- misrepresenting the character of God.

  4. Geus says:
    0
    1
    Rate This

    Whether one can bear the words of Bro Eric or not, the truth is, that the Jesuits are race mixing the people, and Roman Catholics and Muslims are mulatto’s. Also being a mulatto is not wrong, the identity of a mulatto is important as a diplomat between the races.

    Another way to understand this is important, is if you know the work of Ken Bearchief and Kevin Annett. The way the Roman Catholics are killing out the Native Americans is, that the racially pure are the primary target victim for extirpation. Maybe you see the light, when you see how the EU Parliament in Strasbourg is build as the tower of Babel.

    But I think Black people should not think they are less as Caucasian people. The reason the White race is advanced, is because of the climate and shape of Europe, where it is full of sea and so cold in winter, that an advanced house is needed. Africa is almost round shaped, not many seas, and warm enough to survive in the winter without blankets. It looks to me, that Black people have no excuse calling themselves less intelligent, once there are found in the same climate. And be grateful we would bring you to America, because just have a look at a map of Europe, in order to understand, that ships are needed every where there, and in Africa there are no ships needed, thus bringing the black man to America was only possible by using ships from a seafaring race.

  5. lmorley says:
    1
    0
    Rate This

    The issue of separating whites from blacks are not Christian. If you can’t accept living with another human being that looks different then you are wasting your time claiming you believe in God.

    First of all the issue is prejudice and it got amplified during the colonial era to treat blacks as inferior. Each white person can stop doing that and then you would see the global difference it makes.

    If you can’t get along with Blacks then hell will be there to take care of you. Sorry to say that but that will be the only solution for those who insist.

  6. mrsbrandyc says:
    0
    0
    Rate This

    P.S Im more offeneded by the huge picture of a black lady on the page…..Really? i think they get the point that I’m black and we dont all look alike. (LOL)

  7. mrsbrandyc says:
    1
    0
    Rate This

    interesting point of views here. Vlad, I really dont even consider race at all, its usually someone on the outside looking in that always pulls the race card..whether its for separation or profiling or whatever. i have been fortunate in my workplace to not have to deal with the examples you spoke of, however, I can understand what you are saying. My coworkers are great people, but mostly i’m fielding a lot of questions about black people and what we are really like. There is a misconception that “we all stick together” and “we all know each other”. I dont think like that. Quite frankly, I dont want to move from where I am. THEY SHOULD HAVE THOUGHT ABOUT THAT BEFORE THEY BROUGHT US OVER HERE….ITS TOO LATE NOW!!!!!

  8. Vlad says:
    0
    0
    Rate This

    Mrs Brandy,

    Where and when did Eric ever say that he does not love any race other than white? Separation has nothing to do with hate, on the contrary.

    Let us look at the simple example here:

    Many of us have heard of injustices or illusions of injustices in the workplace which involves any race for whatever reason. How many times have you heard from someone whether it be in a direct conversation or by overhearing the ones next to you, complaints dealing with what might have been an unfair firing, hiring, advantage or disadvantage at a workplace? We all heard that or maybe even had an experience ourselves.

    People say “My friend was fired because he is black probably, I don’t know what else to think.”

    Or

    “I do not believe that that person deserved spot over the other one they interviewed a day before, but I think because he/she is a minority they got an advantage.”

    Now I can go on and on with examples from both sides, I believe you get my drift.

    Now what about a person being fired for a very, very good reason, whether it be an inadequate job experience, bad character, or poor work habit. No problems there right? But yet you will hear a person say that “I was fired for being a certain race, I’m telling you, this is the reason.” Here is the example of the illusory injustice.

    Let us think how we can solve this one problem, not a minor one either, as it led and will lead in the future to more uncomfortable situations for both sides and more and more hatred.

    What if lets say we are in an African country, all black country, and people get fired and hired, without anyone having thoughts of racism or hatred or bigotry, etc. You see what I am trying to say?

    Or let us take China for example, everybody is Chinese, they will fire you for a bad work attitude, you will go home and you won’t think that they fired you because you are not Chinese.

    But what if we bring Arabs, Japanese and Whites to China in millions, they will try to settle there and when one day they will face with examples I mentioned above, what would be the first thing that would come to their mind? You guessed it, “I was fired or not given a job because I am not Chinese!!!”

    That is one example of why we should be thinking of living in separate countries. I will repeat again, this idea does not stem from hatred, on the contrary, it stems from love for your brother and sister of another race.

  9. KERRY says:
    0
    0
    Rate This

    there is an old saying, if you can be offended you will be. eric is a very logical man of God who has great insight and knowledge to share. he is intitled to his opinion. lets not hear rejection when we hear what he has to say but take it weigh it with scripture. i love yeshua with all my babylonian pagan infested heart, im full of all this fleshy repulsive world i need to crucify everyday. we all need to walk where God has called us to walk. time is way too short to bicker and fight within the body of christ. i have found eric to be very balanced he is full of insight. its a touchy situation because we all carry our own wounds and hurts and pain. eric keep going keep doing what God has placed in your heart. your not for everybody because you are very black n white. pls pardon the pun. i have very good friends of colur i love them my world is a better place because of them. but i get totally what you are saying to eric. we all need to live transparent lives. eric keep strong in the word, you are the biggest breath of fresh air the church the world needs a few more courageous men like you.

  10. rationalman says:
    0
    1
    Rate This

    Talking about anywhere u see drug prohibition…..
    I can also say…..anywhere u see a high degree of Religion…you will see….a high degree of War, murder, corruption, crime, deceit, rape, disease, poverty, backwardness, Mysticism, Occultism, Religion, destruction, hopelessness hunger, starvation, plague, and most of all DEATH………

  11. rationalman says:
    0
    0
    Rate This

    Well….the people were probably acting Savage like…..because they’ve been kept down for so long….and dealing drugs was and is the only way for a lot of black people to make money….but even so…in a perfect world….all drugs would be legal…because making them illegal only makes the situation worse….the Drug War on peoples wants, desires and cravings is a perversion of Logic…people are going to use, acquire, make, produce, grow, invent…enjoy, medicate, sell, buy, trade, abuse, and what ever else a human can do with a drug…..humans are going to be using drugs….one way or another……and I say that the only way to use and handle drugs…..is by Being, Rational, Positive and Creative about it….but really people should be ‘that way’ all the time regardless if they r on drugs or not…..
    Anywhere u see drug prohibition…you are going to see people act savagely…Drug Prohibition is a Savage thing to Do….it’s illogical….irrational and counter productive……its Savage….anything that is Irrational is Savage…….

  12. mrsbrandyc says:
    0
    0
    Rate This

    Thanks for proving my point. If any thing is “knee jerk” it is this essay that you have posted in your rebuttal of my email to you. “A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another; as I have loved you, that you also love one another. “By this all will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another.” (John 13:34-35 NKJV) No where in this scripture or anywhere else in the good book does it say to love “only the neighbors that look like you” .
    After the great flood, Noah, his wife and his sons and daughters in law were not separated but simply told by God to go therefore and multiply, They did not all go to the same place but they were by no means biblically commanded to be separate.


    I could go on and on about how WRONG all of this is, but I think that you have done more than enough to prove my point. Simply sending a few free books or dvds out, claiming to like and/or “defend” a few of us “good blacks” every once in awhile does not redeem nor endorse your message. If anyone should apologize, it should be you to JESUS for defaming his name and his word-
    Romans 16: v 17-18


    Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which you have learned; and avoid them. For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple.