Wednesday, May 5, 2010

The Lost 'Palestinian' Jews



Forwarded by Barry Chamish:

The lost Palestinian Jews

According to amateur historian Tsvi Misinai, many Jews and Palestinians share not only DNA, but also customs and even names.

"We are of the same race and blood, and cooperation will bring great prosperity to the land," wrote Emir Faisal to Felix Frankfurter in 1917. Faisal was known for his affinity to the Zionists who had begun streaming to the Holy Land; in 1919, he signed a cooperation agreement with Chaim Weizmann, to whom he wrote that he was "mindful of the racial kinship and ancient bonds existing between the Arabs and the Jewish people."

But Faisal's proclamations of kinship with the Jews were more than lip service to a commonly held belief, says Tsvi Misinai, who knows perhaps more about the origins of the modern Palestinians than anyone. "Faisal's paternal line was Hashemite," he says, "meaning he was directly descended from Muhammad. But the mother of his maternal grandfather, King On, was descended from a family of forced Jewish converts to Islam that immigrated to the east bank of the Jordan, later returning to one of the villages west of the Jordan. Unlike today, when Faisal was growing up, his grandfather's mother's Jewish origin was known, and they made no great effort to hide it. And what was known to Faisal is known to many Palestinians today as well."

This is a story of what may be one of the best-kept secrets in history - one that could, in time, heal the terrible rift that has torn the Land of Israel asunder. After years of research, Misinai says that he can declare with certainty that nearly 90 percent of all Palestinians are descended from the Jews. "And what's more, about half of them know it," he says. Not only that, many Palestinians retain Jewish customs, including mourning rituals, lighting Shabbat or memorial candles and even wearing tefillin.

While the common wisdom among many Israelis is that the group that calls itself "Palestinian" is a motley collection of Arabs from various parts of the Middle East who immigrated to the Land of Israel following the employment opportunities provided by Jews, Misinai says that the vast majority of today's Palestinians are descended from the remnants of Jewish families who managed to avoid being deported over the past 2,000 years, or returned to their lands after they were exiled, as the Jews in the Holy Land suffered blow after blow - from the Roman destruction of the Temple to the Crusades to famine, poverty and war throughout the Middle Ages.

One thing many were unable to avoid, however, was converting to Islam - a forced conversion that never really "took," done more out of fear than conviction. Misinai has made it his mission to spread the word among Palestinians, giving them the opportunity to retrieve their lost heritage. And not just introduce them to their roots; according to Misinai, the reintegration of what he calls the "descendants of Israel" with the Jewish people is the best - perhaps the only - way to solve the seemingly endless Middle East crisis. Despite what some may be thinking,

Misinai is not a nut. In fact, he is a hi-tech entrepreneur, perhaps the first in Israel's history. While the kids from ICQ and Google were still in diapers, in the early 1980s Misinai was building Sapiens into a world-class application developer, focusing on the insurance industry. All those rule-based, object-oriented applications we use every day; it was Misinai who invented the concept, and the product, winning the Rothschild Award for industrial development in the field of software in 1992. Several years afterward, he retired from the hi-tech business to return to his first love - researching the history of the Land of Israel.

"I became interested in this area because of my father, who was a great collector of artifacts about the Land of Israel," he says, a hobby he has continued. But besides objects, Misinai collected stories - legends and folklore from the mouths of mukhtars, village elders throughout the land, attesting to the truth of his assertions. "There are large clans throughout the country, in the Hebron Hills, in Samaria and among the Negev Beduin, who know of their heritage and even have family trees that document their roots. Not only that; many of them have specifically Jewish customs, and their neighbors would call them 'the Jews,' even though they were technically as Muslim as anyone else."

Close to nine out of 10 Palestinians in the Land of Israel - Israel proper, Judea, Samaria and Gaza - have Jewish roots. In fact, he says, the percentage in Gaza is somewhat higher than 90 percent. Misinai is far from the first researcher to have stumbled upon this historical find. The first president of Israel, Yitzhak Ben-Zvi, and the first prime minister, David Ben-Gurion, wrote several books and articles on the subject.

In fact, Ben-Gurion believed so strongly in the idea that in 1956 he set up a task force headed by Moshe Dayan and Haim Levkov (the Palmah's "point man" among the Arabs of Israel, he worked with Yigal Allon to set up the Trackers' Unit, traditionally the domain of Negev Beduin), that was supposed to develop ways to "Judaize" the Beduin, teaching them something about modern Jewish life and tradition to integrate them with the Israeli people, ethnically if not religiously. The Beduin were willing enough, but the teachers who were supposed to live and work with them dropped out of the program because of the rough living conditions. In the end, Dayan convinced Ben-Gurion that the idea would upset "the Islamic world," and the program was dropped.

That's an important point, Misinai says. "I don't necessarily believe most, or even some, of the Palestinians would want to convert to Judaism, at least right now. Reintegrating them with the Jewish people does not necessarily require them to convert, and I imagine many of the rabbis would be reluctant to go ahead with such a program." Plus, he says, many Israelis of all stripes would be suspicious that the Palestinians were embracing their "Jewish identities" as a way of getting Israeli ID cards - to get National Insurance money, if not to carry out terror attacks.

IN HIS book, Brother Shall Not Lift Sword Against Brother, which discusses what he calls "the Engagement," Misinai foresees a gradual process of education and integration that could take 40 to 50 years, with immigration and natural growth among the Jews keeping the demographic balance in check. "It sounds like a long time, but we often forget that it's been 40 years since the Six Day War and the only 'progress' that we've made has been the Oslo process, which has turned out to be a tragedy for Israel and the Palestinians," Misinai says.

Besides, he says, many of the Palestinians might not have to convert anyway. "Many of the families in question know they are of Jewish origin, and they marry among themselves. Halachically there may be some questions, but I have consulted with rabbis who say they are resolvable. It would certainly be in line with historic Judaism, which in the past - during the Temple periods, for example - had more lax standards for accepting returnees.

For example, Jews who were idol worshipers during the First and Second Temple periods were not forced to convert back in order to be considered part of the people of Israel." Besides, he says, with most of the available spouses living in the land coming from Jewish backgrounds themselves, the opportunity to intermarry with someone of non-Jewish ancestry was low - far lower than the chances for such a marriage to take place in modern-day America or Russia, he says.

"Several Palestinians have gone through formal conversion, but I know of a number who have taken on Jewish practices - and who say they don't need to convert because they know they're already Jews." And the evidence for the Jewish ancestry of the Palestinians is persuasive - very persuasive, when all the information is taken into account. First, there are the names - not just place names, but family names. "Many villages here have names that are not Arabic, and very rarely appear in other Arab lands. Among such names are Kafr Yasif, Kafr Kana, Kafr Yatta, Kafr Manda, Kafr Samia, and many others," says Misinai.

Indeed, Ben-Zvi in his 1932 book The Peoples of Our Land wrote that west of the Jordan River, 277 villages and sites - nearly two-thirds! - had names that were similar to or the same as the Jewish settlements on the same sites during Second Temple times. That in itself, said Ben-Zvi in his book, is proof that the inhabitants of those villages were Jews who had remained after the destruction. "If in fact the Jewish settlements became inhabited by entirely different people, they would not have preserved the Hebrew names (which in fact, did occur in most of those settlements where the population did change, such as in the eastern part of the Jordan).

Such is not the case in western land of Israel where the old Hebrew names are preserved, which proves the continuity of settlement in this place," he wrote. It's not just place names; many Palestinians have Hebrew-derived family names as well, reflecting their origins, says Misinai. Already in the 1860s, "Colonel Condor of the Institute for Israel Research found biblical names among Palestinian fellahin [peasants]. Many of these names have no root in the Arabic lexicon. Large, distinguished families from various parts of the country carry Hebrew names or Jewish family names."

Among the surnames of some of the larger clans are the Abu Khatsiras, who control much of the fishing in Gaza; Elbaz, a family of Jews who immigrated from Morocco; Abulafia, the family with the famous Jaffa bakery which is descended from the 13th-century Spanish kabbalist Rabbi Abraham Abulafia; the Almogs of Jenin; the Dawouda (Davids) of Hebron; and even, believe it or not, 4,000 forced converts to Islam named Cohen living in Jordan.

Not only that: The Palestinian dialect of Arabic contains many terms and words not found in "standard" Arabic - the result of the integration of Hebrew and Aramaic into the Arabic they were forced to learn after the various Arab and Turkish conquests. Israel Belkind, one of the organizers of the Bilu movement, who researched the roots of the Palestinians during the 1890s, wrote that "it was already proven by Major Condor, in his research on the land of Israel, that the 'Arabs' of the Land of Israel had spoken Aramaic in the days of the Crusades, the language spoken by the Jews until the Arab conquest - meaning that these Aramaic-speaking 'Arabs' were actually Jews themselves."

In fact, Misinai says, Aramaic was still the lingua franca among some villagers not too long ago. "In 1974, the settlers who established the modern Ofra were astounded to find that the residents of the village on the ancient biblical site of Ofra - called Tybiba - were Christians who spoke Aramaic."

While many gentiles converted to Christianity in the religion's early days, they would most likely be Greek speakers; any group that spoke Aramaic is far more likely to have Jewish roots. Many Jewish customs have survived among the Palestinians as well, Misinai says. "In Islam, parents are required to have their sons circumcised by the age of 13. While in many Islamic countries the custom is to wait several years, among Palestinians many perform the ritual a week after their son is born - meaning on the eighth day," he says.

Other customs include sitting seven days for deceased loved ones instead of just three (a custom, Misinai says, that has fallen by the wayside since the first intifada), lighting memorial candles for the dead (a custom found nowhere in the Muslim world), lighting Shabbat candles and practicing levirate marriage - the practice of having a brother marry his deceased sibling's wife under certain circumstances. That's a widespread practice among the Beduin, says Misinai, and in fact "much of the legal code of the Beduin is remarkably similar to many laws in the Torah and the Mishna."

In addition, several Palestinian families own ancient hanukkiot, which they used in mid-winter - around Hanukka. YEHUDA BOORLA described in his book Be'ein Kochav (about his service as an officer in the Turkish army during World War I) interesting information about an Arab attendant from the Land of Israel who accompanied him. One section of the book describes a "moment of discovery" on the part of the attendant. Upon hearing the author speak about the Islamic custom of cutting off the breasts of Jewish women, the Arab attendant realized that his mother, who suffered from the same deformity, was in reality Jewish. Until today, elderly Palestinians in Jordan who moved there from west of the river tell of this tradition, says Misinai. "They say that this was done in cases where Muslim men married Jewish women, so that the Jewish women would not be able to breast-feed and their children would not take in the milk of their Jewish mothers. Thus the children would not be thought to be Jewish."

One of the most curious of the Jewish customs that were once widespread among the Palestinians was the putting on of tefillin - usually done by someone who was ill, especially by those suffering from headaches. The rare tefillin were wrapped in cloth (to preserve them, says Misinai). When a sick person needed "treatment," they would place the tefillin box (which houses the scroll) on the middle of the ill person's forehead and wrap the connected fabric straps around his head. With the use of a key, an assistant would tighten the strap, thereby creating pressure around the head. The heightened pressure increased the headache pain - so when the tefillin was removed, it seemed as if the victim's original pain had decreased, if not disappeared completely. "Other than among a few people, the true meaning of the tefillin was lost," says Misinai.

Food, too, is high on the agenda of these lost Jews. Many Beduin refrain from eating camel and other nonkosher animals, and around Pessah time, many Palestinians find themselves with a yen for matza. "In the region around Bethlehem, there is a high demand for matza during Pessah. When trucks delivering matza pass through, the customers crowd the trucks, taking the boxes right off the trucks even before unloading and bringing them into the store."

The same story repeats itself in Nazareth and Shfaram, where residents make special trips to Upper Nazareth to buy matza. "Possibly they do this because they like matza, but given the other testimonies about these people, it's more logical to say that, at least in origin, the demand for matza during the start of the spring has more to do with religious custom than a recurring heightened seasonal desire for dry crackers," says Misinai.

And while all the anecdotal evidence cited could be the result of historical confusion or some other factor, the one thing that cannot be falsified is the genetic record - which overwhelmingly proves the closeness of traditional Jews and Palestinians, says Misinai. "In 2001, Human Immunology magazine published a genetic study conducted by Prof. Antonio Arnez-Vilna, a Spanish researcher from the University of Complutense in Madrid, who discovered that the immune systems of the Jews and the Palestinians are extremely close to one another in a way that almost absolutely demonstrates a similar genetic identity. Following the publication of the article, the magazine instructed readers to destroy it due to the fact that the author had inserted political opinions into the article," Misinai says, adding that no allegations of falsified data were ever made.

OTHER STUDIES, including a 2002 test by Tel Aviv University researchers, determined that only two groups in the world - Ashkenazi Jews and Palestinians - were genetically susceptible to an inherited deafness syndrome. All the studies he cites in his book, says Misinai, show that "the Palestinians are genetically much closer to Ashkenazi Jews than they are to the Arabs." The findings, by the way, also should dispel once and for all the canard that Ashkenazi Jews are descended from the Central Asian Khazars, and not from the population of the Land of Israel.

If "secret Judaism" is as widespread among Palestinians as Misinai says, why are so many so opposed to Jewish settlement here? Because the issue has been "hijacked" by groups - the leadership of the Arab world, and Palestinians who have forgotten their Jewish roots. For this reason, most of the youth are not told about their origins until later on - when they have learned the art of obfuscation, balancing multiple identities to ensure their survival.

It should be noted not all Palestinians hate Israel, Misinai points out; in 1982, for example, the leaders of Bidya in Samaria offered to enlist in the IDF in the First Lebanon War to fight the PLO. "The Jewish origin of many of Bidya's clans is a well-known fact, even today," says Misinai. But still, there's no denying that many Palestinians would like to see the Jews just disappear. And there are several reasons for that, says Misinai, the "loss of memory" among many Palestinians who now see the Jews as a "competitive other," and fear of radicals and terrorists among those who would otherwise feel affinity for Jews - as they undertake terrorist acts to throw off suspicion that they are "collaborators."

In his book, Misinai painstakingly describes the origins of the Palestinians, who he says are made up chiefly of two groups: Jews who lived in the mountain regions of Judea and Samaria, who were able to maintain their Jewish identities for hundreds of years before being forced to make a choice between exile and conversion to Islam; and members of the ancient nations of Edom and Moab, who were converted to Judaism en masse at least twice.

The two groups, whom Misinai calls respectively the "descendants of Israel" and the "brethren of Israel," are the chief components of what we today call the Palestinians, with the addition of a smattering of Arabs (barely a few percent), Samaritans (who maintain their own distinct religious identity), descendants of the soldiers who served in the occupying Roman army after the destruction of the Second Temple and even some survivors of the ancient Canaanite and Philistine nations - "idol worshipers who can be found in Gaza and in the village of Jisr a-Zarka, near Haifa," says Misinai.

The collective memory of the mountain people was better than that of the "brethren of Israel," who eventually settled in the lowlands and coast from where most of the Jewish refugees originated; most of these people forgot their Jewish roots, and they comprise the bulk of refugees who fled Israel in 1948. And, Misinai says, they're the ones who are most active in terror activities. It's this group that participated most actively in the intifada, with their objective to return to the lands they abandoned in 1948 (which they themselves occupied only about 100 years before, as they settled near areas were Jews had built towns and cities to get work).

In essence, though, the brethren have now returned to their ancestral homeland east of the Jordan. Which leaves the "descendants" the major component of the Palestinian population on the west side of the Jordan. And it's these people, Misinai believes, that Israel can - and must - work with to resolve the Palestinian issue. Not by creating a Palestinian state in Judea and Samaria, but by offering the "mountain people" the opportunity to reconnect with their roots - with the Jewish people and with the modern State of Israel.

"It sounds impractical, but Zionism always was impractical. And yet it succeeded," says Misinai. But the Palestinian problem has thrown Zionism out of kilter. Nobody, despite reluctance to go through another partition, is interested in being an "occupier." But Israel's reintegration - Engagement, as Misinai puts it - of the Palestinians with the Jewish people would allow Zionism to renew its roots, and complete the task of 0building the modern Israeli nation.

"There are lots of reasons why this would work," says Misinai. "The fact that most Palestinians consider themselves Muslim is not an issue, because most of the Palestinians are not particularly religious Muslims. Until recent decades, there were few mosques relative to population outside Jerusalem. It was King Hussein, and later the Israeli Ministry of Religious Affairs, that prompted much of the mosque building in recent years. Bidya, for example, only had one mosque for 25,000 residents until recently."

In his writings, Ben-Zvi cited an interesting phenomenon that he observed. "When the Palestinian peasant swears in the name of the prophet Muhammad, the oath is not taken seriously. But if he goes to the grave of a holy person of the village or of the surrounding area and swears there, we may completely rely on his oath." THE PALESTINIANS' veneration of the Jewish prophets, their preservation of the grave sites of the Jewish patriarchs, and their embrace even of Jewish rituals (Ben-Zvi cites witnesses who recounted Palestinians and Beduin coming to dance at the grave of Rabbi Shimon Bar Yohai in Meron on Lag Ba'omer) indicates that the "Musta'abari [secret Jews] spirit" is still alive and that if offered the possibility of being not so religious Muslims or not so religious Jews, the majority would opt for the latter.

This is where the state has a major role to play, Misinai says. "Most Palestinians are loyal above all to their families, then to their clans, then to those in position of power and only at the end to their religion and people. A strong State of Israel, confident in its direction and its just cause, can successfully execute the Engagement plan."

One reason Palestinians have kept their Jewish roots secret for so long - despite the desire of many to come out of the Islamic closet - is because of their fear of the bully elements in the Palestinian and Arab leadership, the same groups that perpetuate the misery of Israeli Jews and descendants of Israel. "Many of the descendants' families are forced to prove their loyalty to the 'cause' on pain of death," says Misinai. "For example, many families name one of their children Jihad to 'prove' their credentials as loyal fighters against the Jews."

If the state were to offer them an alternative, however, Misinai says many would find the courage to break out of their old patterns and embrace their true heritage. It's not at all about conversion, he says, more about developing a cultural affinity and a single national group. But, he says, it's likely that a large number would want to convert anyway. Even if many Palestinians prefer not to join the Jewish people, the fact that many would be willing would set the tone.

For similar reasons Israeli Jews, since the days of Ben-Zvi and Ben-Gurion, have shunted aside the clear evidence of the Jewish background of the Palestinians. "After the Holocaust, the issue was set aside, as the Yishuv had more pressing matters, besides the obvious issues of language and lifestyle that separated Jews and Palestinians, not to mention the suffering inflicted by the various uprisings and pogroms conducted against the Yishuv. And the arrival of Jews from Eastern countries who had just been booted out of their homes by Muslims, whom they didn't trust, only exacerbated the divisions."

But now, 60 years later, with the seemingly intractable issue of two nations laying the same ancestral claim to the same piece of land, it is time to revisit the past to build the future. In the end, Misinai says, the reintegration of the Palestinians with the Jewish people is the best - and only - solution. "We've been down the path of partition, defensive war and what the world calls occupation. Nothing has worked. The world is getting very tired of our bickering, and is pushing to implement a solution - any solution. So far, the only solutions are the ones that have failed, but here is some new, fresh thinking, that many Jews and Palestinians would accept. And if we accept it, so will the nations of the world."

Misinai's Engagement would unite the "two kingdoms of Israel" described by the prophet Ezekiel. "The Jews who went into exile held onto their culture, beliefs and religion, while those that remained behind held as long as they could to the Land of Israel. Both loves - love of Torah and love of land - come from the same wellsprings. It's time to repair the historic damage done by our enemies, the Romans, and reunite our people."

Sunday, May 2, 2010

New Haven, CT Virgo Church Cluster?

Upon a recent visit to Yale University, on the southern side of the truncated Route 34 Freeway, to obtain access to a certain rare book, I noted this.

It’s a cluster of three Roman Catholic Church structures. The buildings are, from left to right, the St Martin De Porres Academy, Sacred Heart Church and Sacred Heart School.

Note the relative positioning of these three structure’s three crosses.



Apparently, the concept of a Virgo zodiac via Roman Catholic Church architecture not only manifests within a single structure – as with Washington, D.C.’s St Vincent DePaul Roman Catholic Church at the northeast corner of South Capitol and M Streets – but as well with clusters of such buildings.










Monday, April 26, 2010

Steering Poland and Russia to War

About the April 10, 2010 Sacrifice of Katyn II






There’s the story heard by most via “mainstream” news reporting such as the NY Times, CNN, FOX, etc., that it was unintentional, an accident.

And then there is the alternative story that it was a set up, a planned murder of Poland’s government with the plane brought down deliberately.

According to the “mainstream” story of an accident:
- The pilot did not speak Russian, even though they were flying into Russia
- The pilot was intimidated by the Polish President into attempting to land when unsafe, who reportedly did the same thing to another pilot had an incident in Georgia…

And according to the alternative story was a planned murder of Poland’s government:

- the plane was empty of people except the crew

According to a video tape of the crash site there were no bodies, except perhaps a crew, and there are gunshots; days later that video’s creator is murdered.

There’s a mainstream media report that people in Poland, such as this MP, believe that the culprit is Russia.

Internet motivation speculation generally focuses upon the matters of the IMF and the swine flu vaccine, which the killed Polish officials included ---

Also questioned is the practice of placing all of one’s eggs in one basket, was this placing of such a proportion of a government in one plane customary?

And of course whose hand this would transfer the power-

Barry Chamish wrote about this, and presented the example of the 1986 plane crash that killed Samuel Machel, the PM of Mozamibique, shortly after alienating his Russian contacts, and facilitated by a decoy radio beacon to confuse the plane’s operator.

LINK- Avles Beluskes- The Amber Path: Polish Plane Crash Conspiracy- Barry Chamish
But why?

If it were simply about the IMF and pharmaceutical issues regarding the opposition to the swine flu virus, why the selection of the timing with Katyn?

The unmistakable irony of this timing, with these Polish officials on their way to: as a 2nd Katyn, the murder of Polish military captives by the U.S.S.R., which the anniversary of was the ceremony they where flying to.

That is only going to infinitely inflame passions in Poland against Russia.

From an email from Barry Chamish:
http://kavkazcenter.com/eng/content/2010/04/26/11937.shtml

KATYN 2. Polish opposition party demands international investigation into plane crash

Publication time: 26 April 2010, 15:05
[]

According to a report from Warsaw of the Austrian journalist Jane Burgermeister who is engaged in investigation of the murder of the Polish elite on April 10, 2010 by the international terrorist organization оf FSB Russia,
the failure of the Polish and Russian government to address compelling new evidence suggesting that the plane crash killing President Lech Kaczynski and top military and civilians leaders was engineered is generating growing criticism in Poland, and has forced Prime Minister Donald Tusk onto the defensive.
Tusk said Sunday that he would issue a report on the official investigation into the crash on Wednesday.

Poland's chief prosecutor Andrzej Seremet said earlier this week that Polish prosecutors would postpone revealing the contents of the black boxes.

Compelling new facts and evidence that the plane crash two weeks ago in Smolensk was engineered include the revelation that a device warning the pilot of obstacles was turned off.

Also, it was revealed that agents belonging to the Polish secret service raided the flats and houses of victims three hours after the crash, removing computers and documents.
Opposition MPs in Poland on Friday demanded that an international commission be set up to examine the scientific evidence into the causes of plane crash.
Furthermore, a Polish general called for Defense Minister Bogdan Klich to resign after evidence emerged that Bogdan was not seeking to conduct a proper investigation.
An aviation official scouring the crash site in Russia for crucial scientific evidence was told by Bogdan he did not require an interpreter, and was expected to pay the costs of his investigation out of his own pocket.

Forums and message board of Polish newspapers such as "Gazeta Wyborcza", "Rzeczpospolita" and "Dziennik" indicate that the majority of Polish people, in the meantime, reject the official account of the plane crash due to pilot error.

Access to scientific evidence and expert information on the plane crash has been limited.
The Russian prime minister Vladimir Putin, who took charge of the investigation shortly after the crash in Smolensk, is the only person in Russia allowed to comment, but has so far made no statement.
Similarly, the exclusive right to release information on the crash in Poland is reserved to Tusk.
Authorities have so far failed to provide credible answers to the many unanswered questions that have emerged.

Authorities as well as the controlled mainstream media were quick to blame the crash on pilot error and fog.

In addition, the rumor that Kaczynski had pressured the pilot to land and so caused the crash spread within hours in the mainstream media and was repeated without criticism even in some blogs belonging to the alternative media.

But so many new facts and evidence have emerged contradicting government accounts that officials have been forced to retract statements.
Doubts are also growing about the DNA analysis performed by labs in Russia to identify the victims, following a number of contradictory statements made by authorities.

Even the official account of the time point at which the crash occurred has been called into question.

According to the official version, the Presidential plane crashed in Smolensk military airport at 8.56 am CET or 10.56 Moscow Times.

But a journalist from "Polsat News" reported the crash to his station 10 minute earlier.

Evidence that the crash occurred earlier also comes from a report that the transmission of power from an electricity pylon close to the crash scene, and which was seen to be damaged in photos, was interrupted at 8:41.

The Presidential plane was scheduled to arrive at 8:25 at Smolensk military airport after a flight lasting 62 minutes from Warsaw's Fredrik Chopin Airport.

But investigations do not appear to have even determined the precise time the plane left Warsaw. The Presidential plane is believed to have been delayed by 20 minutes as was another jet carrying 13 journalists, who did not travel with the President as usual.
The failure of the authorities to accurately report basic facts such as the time of the crash and the time the Polish plane left Warsaw is fuelling public unease over the crash which killed key figures including the central bank governor, the top general and the national security chief, and much of the opposition party.

It is not clear how these people were allowed to travel on the same plane given security protocols, or if many were on the plane becuse a journalist at the crash scene reported the marked absence of bodies.
Even the conservative "Polskaweb" website has concluded on the basis of the available facts and evidence that it is highly likely the plane crash killing the Polish elite was engineered", reports from Warsaw the Austrian journalist Jane Burgermeister.
Analytical Deparment
KAvkaz Center
===

Jaroslaw Kaczynski ready to complete mission of his brother

Just as Shimon Peres expressed he was ready to complete the mission of Yitzhak Rabin. The primary bad guy (Putin's man) is Tusk.
Publication time: 26 April 2010, 20:58

Despite facing long odds against a victory, Poland's former prime minister declared Monday his candidacy for president in a special election to replace his twin brother, who was considered to be killed by the Russian FSB in a plane crash earlier this month.

The official, Jaroslaw Kaczynski, said he would carry on his brother's work and stand in his place as the candidate for the conservative Law and Justice Party in the June 20 election, according to a statement on the party's Web site. The early election was called after his brother Lech and 95 other people, including dozens of top politicians and generals, were killed in a plane crash in western Russia on April 10.

"The tragically interrupted life of the president of the Republic of Poland, the death of the patriotic Polish elite, mean one thing for us: We must complete their mission," Mr. Kaczynski said in the statement. "We owe it to them and we owe it to our fatherland. While immersed in pain and mourning, bound by the eternal memory of our loss, we are obliged to carry out their will."

Mr. Kaczynski's entry into the race, predicted by members of his party even before the state funeral for his brother and the first lady, Maria Kaczynska, on April 18, sets up an emotional campaign that will be bound up in Poland's worst tragedy since World War II. But opinion surveys show that Mr. Kaczynski will have a difficult time defeating Bronislaw Komorowski, the speaker of the lower house of Parliament and acting president, from the rival Civic Platform party.

It was the latest chapter in the unusual saga of the twin brothers, who in 2006 and 2007 served as president and prime minister at the same time. Their efforts to uncover former Communists and suspected collaborators in government and the news media, and oust them from important positions, led to a deep polarization of politics in Poland. While they were staunch allies of the United States, skepticism toward the European Union often put them at odds with European allies.

Most analysts had predicted that Lech Kaczynski would lose to Mr. Komorowski in the presidential election in the fall. The deadly accident upended all expectations, moving the election forward to June and placing pressure inside the party on Jaroslaw Kaczynski to carry on in his brother's place.

While the crash claimed the lives of politicians from several parties, it was Law and Justice that suffered the most, as lawmakers and top members of the president's staff traveled with him to a ceremony commemorating the massacre of more than 20,000 Polish officers in Katyn forest by Stalin's secret police during World War II.

"Poland is our common, great commitment," Mr. Kaczynski said in the statement, adding that he had the support of the family in making the decision. "It necessitates, among other things, overcoming personal suffering and undertaking the task in spite of personal tragedy."

The deaths of so many prominent Poles prompted an outpouring of public grief that threw into question how voters would react when asked to replace Mr. Kaczynski. It vaulted Mr. Komorowski into the role of acting president, but at a moment when politicking and campaigning were deemed in poor taste.

Yet the Civic Platform government, led by Prime Minister Donald Tusk, hopes that a win for Mr. Komorowski would allow the party to push forward its agenda. Mr. Tusk presided over a Polish economy that continued to grow as the rest of the European Union sank into recession in the wake of the financial crisis.

"I would very much like for this campaign to be based not on emotions, especially bad, negative emotions, but to become a debate on the future of Poland," said Joanna Kluzik-Rostkowska, a member of Parliament from Law and Justice who was named Monday as Mr. Kaczynski's campaign manager.

Source: Agencies

Kavkaz Center
But how is this in Russia’s interest? Why further alienate Poland? Its current border with Poland is the furthest west in centuries, as set with the end of WW2.

A Russian massacre of Poles may wet the appetites of some within Russia, much as killings by Afghan insurgents -– what the U.S. celebrated 30 years earlier when the occupier was not the U.S. but rather the U.S.S.R. -- as some conceptualization of payback for the demise of the U.S.S.R. Have they been sold on a secret plan to push the borders even further west, with Lemko to the Ukraine and perhaps Lusatia to Poland?

Regardless of Putin’s involvement or innocence, if the crash was the result of forces within Russia doing another Samuel Machel as a 2nd Katyn, that definitely points the proverbial finger at a higher up directing of all of this as part of a larger agenda. Whether or not that represents the entire political pyramid or rather simply a portion of using it as part of an even larger agenda remains more mysterious and obscure.

Is Russia to be the next Germany- that is the next great power to be set up to loose?

A Katyn II would also led to a natural response, perhaps roughly the scenario already consciously envisioned, as marked by Russia’s war exercises last summer of an uprising of the Polish peoples within western Belarus.

LINK- Russian War Preparation Exercises

That area was part of the interwar – between WW1 and WW2 – Polish 2nd Republic.

- representing the easternmost thrust of Roman Catholic Europe, marking the border with the territories of the Russian Orthodox Church. This religious border, which roughly matched the pre-WW2 border between the U.S.S.R. and 2nd Republic Poland, to this day remains about the same, even as the state borders moved west.

Recall the 1979 book The Third World: August 1985


This version of WW3 culminates in an exchange of nuclear bomb attacks via missile, between the western powers and the U.S.S.R., destroying Birmingham, England, and Minsk, the latter being the Belorussian capital city.

Minsk flag


Minsk Coat of Arms

With Minsk as the location of most of Belorussian intelligentsia, this destruction results in that country’s dissolution by splitting into two, with the eastern part going to Russia, and the western rejoining Poland.

Today’s western Belarus is still significantly Roman Catholic.

This is even though the area had been the home of many Polish people who were evicted by the U.S.S.R. for re-settlement in the historically protestant areas of eastern Germany that were re-assigned to Poland with the Oder-Neisse line at the time Poland had the taking of her eastern territories by the U.S.S.R. confirmed. Of course the area was not entirely Polish, with a Polish majority primarily along the northeastern ‘peninsula’ including the city of Vilno (Wilno), a Belorussian majority elsewhere, with of course many families of mixed DNA – Polish, Belorussian, etc. – who may speak either or both languages, and who could conceivably claim either nationality based upon preference and or the political situation.

Given the realities of mixed DNA and possibilities, it is notable that an uprising of Polish oriented people is what is on the minds of the Russian military and their leaders some 7 decades later.

The current Belarus government has done its share to stir things up; from wikipedia:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_minority_in_Belarus
Polish minority in Belarus numbers officially about 400,000 (the 1989 Soviet Census and 1999 Belarus Census showed similar numbers, [4]estimates by some non-governmental sources are higher.[1][2]). The aspect of Roman Catholic Belarusians and descendants of the Belarusian nobility identifying themselves as Polish is less and less common as the Roman Catholic Church in Belarus undergoes the process of self-depolonization.[citation needed]
After the Russian minority, Poles certainly form the second largest minority group in Belarus.[5] The majority of Poles live in the Western regions of Belarus (including 294,000 in Hrodna voblast).
The largest Polish organization in Belarus is the Union of Poles in Belarus (Związek Polaków na Białorusi), with over 20,000 members.[2]
As Poland supports the pro-democracy anti-government opposition in Belarus, Polish-Belarusian relations are poor, and representatives of the Polish minority in Belarus often complain about various repressions.[2][6][7] [8]
In 2005, the Lukashenko regime launched a campaign against the Polish ethnic minority. The Belarusian authorities claimed that their pro-Western Polish neighbours are trying to destabilise the regime, and that the Polish minority is a fifth column. In May and June of that year a Polish diplomat was expelled, a Polish-language newspaper was closed and the democratically-elected leadership of a local Polish organisation, the Union of Poles in Belarus (UPB), had their own nominees replaced by those sympathetic to Lukashenko.[9]
The introduction of the Karta Polaka in 2007 enabled many thousands of inhabitants of Belarus to get it by formally declaring their Polish identity to Polish officials. The introduction caused protests from Belarusian officials.
Could the end-game goal be the split of Belarus between Poland and Russia for reversing the post WW2 Curzon line rejoining today’s western Belarus as eastern Poland, restoring the border of the 2nd Republic.

Could this be Brzezinski’s ultimate wet dream?

To image that requires imagining a series of events of war, a pastime of those a century earlier regarding the idea of Poland’s re-birth with WW1’s Germany defeating Russia, before herself being beaten by the powers to the west.

From the wiki biography of General Pilsudski-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%B3zef_Pi%C5%82sudski
At a meeting in Paris in 1914, Piłsudski presciently declared that in the impending war, for Poland to regain independence, Russia must be beaten by the Central Powers (the Austro-Hungarian and German Empires), and the latter powers must in their turn be beaten by France, Britain and the United States.[47][48] By contrast, Roman Dmowski, Piłsudski's rival, believed that the best way to achieve a unified and independent Poland was to support the Triple Entente against the Central Powers.[51]
I also recall reading this in a soft-cover edition of the Maximilian Kolbe book I have highlighted within Continuing Counter Reformation since this post in June 2007, though which I am unable to locate within the hardcover edition that I purchased via the internet in August 2007.

LINK- Wlodimir Ledochowski Great Roman General #6
LINK- Wlodimir Ledochowski’s Orthellian Diplomacy

Such would be a multi-part, plan, or a plan within a plan, much like a Russian doll, with parts sold, and other parts hidden: much as Ledochowski would sell Pope Pius X and Black Pope (Jesuit General) Franz-Wernz on the idea of Germany defeating Russia, though perhaps keep concealed the subsequent stage[s] of Germany then being defeated, and so on, before both Pius X and Franz-Wernz would mysteriously die on the same night of August 19-20, 1914.

So is perhaps something as a plan to split Belarus between Poland and Russia, or perhaps even something more?

Who knows?

Friday, April 23, 2010

The U.S. "Tea Party" & Decentralization

Where do they stand upon membership disclosure for public officials,
and upon the foreign political influence
via Georgetown University and the foreign entity running it,

the Roman Catholic Church’s Jesuit Order?
Any discussion upon political dynamics has got to ask about secretive societies.

Think about joining a political movement.

Then finding its flaws, and seeking to correct them, only to be rebuffed by those at its top (even if most people below them agree with you).

Such is the standard Hegelian Dialectic of sets of two opposing ideas/agenda designed and guided to achieve a predetermined result- which are utterly dependent upon each opposing side’s flaws - displaying the dynamics of being centrally directed.

To me, the best example of this, asides from the cigarette market protection of the ‘drug’ war ‘laws’, was with WW2, notably the policies of the ‘Allied’ powers, particularly the Franklin Delano Roosevelt U.S. government, in prolonging the war sufficiently for the military forces of the U.S.S.R. under the Joseph Stalin government, deep into central Europe- remember the story of U.S. General Patton -- and that of the U.S.S.R.-Japan Non Aggression Pact of 1941 remaining inviolate until 1945, hence denying Nazi Germany the advantage of giving the U.S.S.R. a two front war, written about here.

LINK- FDR Masonic Tool
LINK- FDR Masonic Fool
LINK- Explaining People Like FDR, Bush, Clinton

We know that FDR was a Mason, and so was Churchill.

Eisenhower apparently belonged to a Roman Catholic Military Order.

In ascertaining why officials will act contrary to their nation’s best interests, one has to look at the various memberships in various ‘orders’ – particularly when these orders are the beneficiaries of such actions.

Bringing the U.S.S.R. deep into central Europe, in the context of WW2 with its brutal Third Reich incarnation of Germany treatment of the eastern Europe it occupied, murdering so many, starting with the educated ‘liberal’ (re: insufficiently loyal) roman Catholics) in Poland, and the Jewish peoples throughout, was critical for the larger agenda of the 2nd 30 years war of the continuing counter reformation, for murdering all of these people by a Germany set up to loose its mainly protestant majority eastern areas of Pomerania, Silesia, and East Prussia- the latter the world’s 1st Lutheran state declared in the year 1525, to be cleansed and resettled taking it back for the greater roman empire

LINK- Wlodimir Ledochowski Plausible Childhood Revenge Vow
LINK- Wlodimir Ledochowski Mission, Motivation, Geopolitical Realities
LINK- Wlodimir Ledochowski Kulturkampf Revenge

Just where does the ‘Tea Party’ stand on secretive societies- do they support say public disclosure of all government officials fraternal order membership?

Speech of John F. Kennedy – secret societies are repugnant

Mr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen:

I appreciate very much your generous invitation to be here tonight.

You bear heavy responsibilities these days and an article I read some time ago reminded me of how particularly heavily the burdens of present day events bear upon your profession.

You may remember that in 1851 the New York Herald Tribune under the sponsorship and publishing of Horace Greeley, employed as its London correspondent an obscure journalist by the name of Karl Marx.

We are told that foreign correspondent Marx, stone broke, and with a family ill and undernourished, constantly appealed to Greeley and managing editor Charles Dana for an increase in his munificent salary of $5 per installment, a salary which he and Engels ungratefully labeled as the "lousiest petty bourgeois cheating."

But when all his financial appeals were refused, Marx looked around for other means of livelihood and fame, eventually terminating his relationship with the Tribune and devoting his talents full time to the cause that would bequeath the world the seeds of Leninism, Stalinism, revolution and the cold war.

If only this capitalistic New York newspaper had treated him more kindly; if only Marx had remained a foreign correspondent, history might have been different. And I hope all publishers will bear this lesson in mind the next time they receive a poverty-stricken appeal for a small increase in the expense account from an obscure newspaper man.

I have selected as the title of my remarks tonight "The President and the Press." Some may suggest that this would be more naturally worded "The President Versus the Press." But those are not my sentiments tonight.

It is true, however, that when a well-known diplomat from another country demanded recently that our State Department repudiate certain newspaper attacks on his colleague it was unnecessary for us to reply that this Administration was not responsible for the press, for the press had already made it clear that it was not responsible for this Administration.

Nevertheless, my purpose here tonight is not to deliver the usual assault on the so-called one party press. On the contrary, in recent months I have rarely heard any complaints about political bias in the press except from a few Republicans. Nor is it my purpose tonight to discuss or defend the televising of Presidential press conferences. I think it is highly beneficial to have some 20,000,000 Americans regularly sit in on these conferences to observe, if I may say so, the incisive, the intelligent and the courteous qualities displayed by your Washington correspondents.

Nor, finally, are these remarks intended to examine the proper degree of privacy which the press should allow to any President and his family.

If in the last few months your White House reporters and photographers have been attending church services with regularity, that has surely done them no harm.

On the other hand, I realize that your staff and wire service photographers may be complaining that they do not enjoy the same green privileges at the local golf courses that they once did.

It is true that my predecessor did not object as I do to pictures of one's golfing skill in action. But neither on the other hand did he ever bean a Secret Service man.

My topic tonight is a more sober one of concern to publishers as well as editors.

I want to talk about our common responsibilities in the face of a common danger. The events of recent weeks may have helped to illuminate that challenge for some; but the dimensions of its threat have loomed large on the horizon for many years. Whatever our hopes may be for the future--for reducing this threat or living with it--there is no escaping either the gravity or the totality of its challenge to our survival and to our security--a challenge that confronts us in unaccustomed ways in every sphere of human activity.

This deadly challenge imposes upon our society two requirements of direct concern both to the press and to the President--two requirements that may seem almost contradictory in tone, but which must be reconciled and fulfilled if we are to meet this national peril. I refer, first, to the need for a far greater public information; and, second, to the need for far greater official secrecy.

I

The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.

But I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to reexamine his own standards, and to recognize the nature of our country's peril. In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort based largely on self-discipline, to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In time of "clear and present danger," the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public's need for national security.

Today no war has been declared--and however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger. And yet no war has been declared, no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no missiles have been fired.

If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of "clear and present danger," then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent.

It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions--by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.

Nevertheless, every democracy recognizes the necessary restraints of national security--and the question remains whether those restraints need to be more strictly observed if we are to oppose this kind of attack as well as outright invasion.

For the facts of the matter are that this nation's foes have openly boasted of acquiring through our newspapers information they would otherwise hire agents to acquire through theft, bribery or espionage; that details of this nation's covert preparations to counter the enemy's covert operations have been available to every newspaper reader, friend and foe alike; that the size, the strength, the location and the nature of our forces and weapons, and our plans and strategy for their use, have all been pinpointed in the press and other news media to a degree sufficient to satisfy any foreign power; and that, in at least in one case, the publication of details concerning a secret mechanism whereby satellites were followed required its alteration at the expense of considerable time and money.

The newspapers which printed these stories were loyal, patriotic, responsible and well-meaning. Had we been engaged in open warfare, they undoubtedly would not have published such items. But in the absence of open warfare, they recognized only the tests of journalism and not the tests of national security. And my question tonight is whether additional tests should not now be adopted.

The question is for you alone to answer. No public official should answer it for you. No governmental plan should impose its restraints against your will. But I would be failing in my duty to the nation, in considering all of the responsibilities that we now bear and all of the means at hand to meet those responsibilities, if I did not commend this problem to your attention, and urge its thoughtful consideration.

On many earlier occasions, I have said--and your newspapers have constantly said--that these are times that appeal to every citizen's sense of sacrifice and self-discipline. They call out to every citizen to weigh his rights and comforts against his obligations to the common good. I cannot now believe that those citizens who serve in the newspaper business consider themselves exempt from that appeal.

I have no intention of establishing a new Office of War Information to govern the flow of news. I am not suggesting any new forms of censorship or any new types of security classifications. I have no easy answer to the dilemma that I have posed, and would not seek to impose it if I had one. But I am asking the members of the newspaper profession and the industry in this country to reexamine their own responsibilities, to consider the degree and the nature of the present danger, and to heed the duty of self-restraint which that danger imposes upon us all.

Every newspaper now asks itself, with respect to every story: "Is it news?" All I suggest is that you add the question: "Is it in the interest of the national security?" And I hope that every group in America--unions and businessmen and public officials at every level-- will ask the same question of their endeavors, and subject their actions to the same exacting tests.

And should the press of America consider and recommend the voluntary assumption of specific new steps or machinery, I can assure you that we will cooperate whole-heartedly with those recommendations.

Perhaps there will be no recommendations. Perhaps there is no answer to the dilemma faced by a free and open society in a cold and secret war. In times of peace, any discussion of this subject, and any action that results, are both painful and without precedent. But this is a time of peace and peril which knows no precedent in history.

II

It is the unprecedented nature of this challenge that also gives rise to your second obligation--an obligation which I share. And that is our obligation to inform and alert the American people--to make certain that they possess all the facts that they need, and understand them as well--the perils, the prospects, the purposes of our program and the choices that we face.

No President should fear public scrutiny of his program. For from that scrutiny comes understanding; and from that understanding comes support or opposition. And both are necessary. I am not asking your newspapers to support the Administration, but I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. For I have complete confidence in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed.

I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers--I welcome it. This Administration intends to be candid about its errors; for as a wise man once said: "An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it." We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors; and we expect you to point them out when we miss them.

Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed--and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. And that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment-- the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution- -not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, not to simply "give the public what it wants"--but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold, educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.

This means greater coverage and analysis of international news--for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security--and we intend to do it.

III

It was early in the Seventeenth Century that Francis Bacon remarked on three recent inventions already transforming the world: the compass, gunpowder and the printing press. Now the links between the nations first forged by the compass have made us all citizens of the world, the hopes and threats of one becoming the hopes and threats of us all. In that one world's efforts to live together, the evolution of gunpowder to its ultimate limit has warned mankind of the terrible consequences of failure.

And so it is to the printing press--to the recorder of man's deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news--that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent.


And any such discussion has got to logically ask about the centralization of political influence over the U.S. government by Jesuit Georgetown University.


Where does the Tea Party stand on this?

Are they even aware of the Jesuit Order influence through the government and media?


Are they even aware of such blatant counter reformation crimes through such political figures as the Georgetown School of Foreign Service product U.S. President William Clinton, such as the massacre of the Branch Davidians, a sect whose leader was reportedly writing a major work about the Bible’s Book of Revelations Book of Seals, and ‘Operation Storm’ driving some 300,000 Serbian peoples from their homes in order to create a more purely Roman Catholic Croatia?




LINK- Operation Storm ethnic cleansing OK for Roman Catholicism
LINK- U.S. Clinton Administration supported ethnic cleansing Operation Storm

As with “Constitutionalists” that fail to oppose the criminal mercantilism drug war, and ‘peace’ activists fixated upon Israeli housing projects who ignore such things as the 1995 Operation Storm, its all about the ancient regime's continuing counter reformation.

Tupper Saussy on the 1st Tea Party

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Tupper Saussy on the 1st ‘Tea Party’

During the night of December 16, 1773, a gang of Indians climbed aboard certain ships in Boston Harbor, ripped open three hundred forty two of the East India Company’s tea chests and threw overboard their contents, valued at $90,000. Well, they looked like Indians, and witnesses thought they were Indians, but the big open secret was that they were Freemasons in disguise. Perhaps the most succinct statement on the subject appears in respected Masonic historian Arthur Edward White’s New Encyclopedia of Freemasonry: “The Boston Tea Party was entirely Masonic, carried out by members of the St. John’s Ledge during an adjourned meeting.”

Parliament reacted to the Boston Tea Party in a way calculated to increase dozens of rolling boulders into a devastating landslide. Without seriously inquiring into who was responsible, and wholly disregarding the offer of more than a hundred Boston merchants to make restitution, Parliament rushed in to law a mass of unreasonably punitive legislation – closing the port of Boston to trade, forbidding town meetings without consent of the governor, denying the Massachusetts’s council, providing for the quartering of British and Hessian troops in the colony, and ordering that any officer or soldier of the Crown accused of an act of violence in the performance of his duty should be sent to another colony or to England for what would surely be a sweetheart trial.
This is something to think about with the 2009-2010 ‘Tea Party’.

It exists in the name of respecting the Constitution.

And it names itself after an event, crafted by masons, and named for an agricultural commodity.

Okay.

Yet what does it say about the criminal mercantilism drug war?

One must ask this, because within the U.S. entities which claim to support the constitution, actually support its subversion when induced to accept some sort of ends justify the means mentality- supposedly okaying this for things that are just soooooooooooo bad….

Thinking About the Tea Party

What does it say about the such things as police raids as this barging into people’s homes placing their lives in danger for the sake of a false ‘morality’ of arresting, prosecuting, fining and/or imprisoning consumer choice (hence debasing the police and the courts), especially when promoting drug abuse in two main ways:

- profitizing un-labeled, adulterated concentrated drugs,
banning Vin Mariani perverting cocaine use to the concentrated forms of the drug;

- doing that for the sake of protecting cigarettes and pharmaceuticals

It is all about: CRIMINAL MERCANTILISM.

Where's even a mention of the sociopathic hypocrisy of jurisdictions, particularly that with its routine “the ends justify the means” testilying for such things as suppressing Cannabis, and its concentration of industries in adulterated, misbranded cigarettes- the Commonwealth of Virginia..

Why might that be?

Particularly when the term ‘tea party’ clearly conveys a higher then likely awareness of the general concept of an agricultural commodity.





The crusade against coca – via demonizing the alkaloid cocaine regardless of concentration – came through the U.S.D.A., just after experimenting with coca and other medicinal agricultural commodities in Washington, D.C. to ascertain their potential for commercial production within the U.S., and just after Angelo Francois Mariani was awarded a gold Papal medal by the Vatican as a 'benefactor of humanity' for rendering Vin Mariani to the world.



Vin Mariani 1907 label “our processing completely eliminates it [cocaine]…”


Bad advice IMHO not required by the 1906 U.S. Pure Food and Drug Act that fed the popular misconception then being promoted by the likes of William Randolf Hearst that cocaine was intrinsically dangerous regardless of the dosage.

The U.S.'s last bottle of Vin Mariani?

Sales of cigarettes of Virginia Bright Leaf, which initially jumped in the 1880s with the development of automated mass rolling machines, have three subsequent successive up-turns in use in 1907, 1915 and 1936, respectively following the 1906 Pure Foods and Drugs Act, the 1914 Harrison Narcotics Act, and the 1930s prohibitions of Cannabis (Marijuana, or "Marihuana")


LINK: 1904-2004 USDA

And particularly given the political origins of the criminal mercantilism established in the early 1900s.

LINK- It was criminal mercantilism to Protect Cigarettes

LINK- U.S.D.A. origins of criminal mercantilism against coca

Just what is the ‘Tea Party’ position on criminal mercantilism (the ‘drug war’) suppression of coca, opium and cannabis to protect adulterated/misbranded cigarettes?

LINK- 'Knights' of the New Dark Age'

LINK- Wiley and Criminal Mercantilism Cigarette-Pharmaceutical Alliance

LINK- Anti Christ cocaine prohibition

LINK- USDA’s Harvey Washington Wiley a ‘Knight’ amongst those showing “great prowless" snubs Mariani”

Harvey Washington Wiley

Wiley, was described as a ‘knight’ amongst those "have displayed great prowess on former occasions".





Wiley, was tremendously puffed by Hearst, often with the writer Samuel Adams Hopkins.



Hearst, who was a member of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta (SMOM), was later influential in demonizing Cannabis – "Marihuana" – used for market protection and to increase the police state.



Marlboro- where flipping the lid is flipping the capstone

The favored product, exempt from even basic labeling requirements for the ingredients which may include 100s of additives designed for instance to increase the burn rate, hence increasing consumption and sales (house fires and other health detriments).

LINK- Criminal Virginia's Lust For Extra Profits & Contempt for Health

LINK- Reagan - Bush Cover Up of Cigarette Additives - Disclosure a Felony

LINK- Adulterated, Misbranded Cigarettes - Virginia Dope

I see nothing in this site:

http://www.teapartypatriots.org/

Nor have I found anything in this site:

http://countyroots.com/policynotparty/


Using the edit-find command I would find neither the word 'drug' nor 'war' anywhere within.

So 'core principles' of 'fiscal responsibility', 'limited government' and 'free markets' somehow sanctions the drug war, and apparently the wasteful murderous wars overseas- all breeding their problems to fight continuously?

That the same drug 'laws' pervail in all of the nations of the world protecting cigarettes, stands as a mute testimony to the reality of a veiled shadow government behind the scenes directing the visible 'leaders' as their puppets, and thus a central point for the introduction of so many bad things.

So may the widespread organizing of the 'Tea Party' movement with its intrinsic and apparently unchallenged contradictions.


LINK- The Jesuit Flag


http://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/2009/04/what-does-the-tea-party-movement-have-to-say-about-taxing-and-spending-on-the-death-penalty-the-drug.html





Thursday, April 15, 2010

Masonic FDR Memorial Planned

At the southern tip of NY City's East River former 'Welfare' Island


http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/26/a-campaign-to-build-a-long-delayed-fdr-memorial/#comment-656027

FDR was a terrible president and a tyrant in the making. He imprisoned Japanese-Americans in camps by executive order, he attempted to pack the Supreme Court with extra judges when they ruled against him, his New Deal destroyed the traditional limits of federal power and prolonged the Great Depression, and he violated a longstanding norm by running for President a third time. The memorial should not be a celebration.

— Chris

In addition to what Chris had to say, I would add that Roosevelt did nothing about the Holocaust until pressured by then Secretary of the Treasury Morganthau. He also did nothing to end the discrimination against blacks in the army and ignored Jesse Owens’ accomplishments at the 1936 Berlin Olympics. Not to mention that Roosevelt should have refused American participation in an Olympics taking place in Hitler’s hell.
— Rarin’ Aaron

In addition to what is said in #2 and #17, FDR was crucial in extending WW2 by 2 more years in order to bring the USSR deep into central europe to realize what was the goal of this counter reformation war:

http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2008/11/wlodimir-ledochowskis-masonic-fool-fdr.html

http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2008/11/wlodimir-ledochowski-masonic-tool-fdr.html

I say dig his body out of the ground and throw it into a trash dump!

— Douglas A. Willinger